75% of japanese women would choose a tall and average face man than short and handsome

D

Deleted member 14266

Zephir
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Posts
1,534
Reputation
4,308
""The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.

When the votes were tallied, the tall men occupied the higher position, with 75.2 percent of the women saying they’d pick the tall, non-ikemen option. “An average-looking guy is good enough for me,” said one respondent, while another added that she actually feels intimidated by handsome men.""

""On the other end of the spectrum were the 24.8 percent of women who’d select the shorter, otherwise more handsome guy. However, not all of them made that choice because of a craving for eye candy. “I’m short myself,” explained one, “and so if I’m walking next to a tall guy, it’s hard to carry on a conversation,” due to the distance between the speaker’s mouth and the listener’s ears.""


So we see here that the overwhelming majority of women surveyed choose a tall guy with a normal face than a handsome and short one, and even those who choose short and handsome still prefer a tall guy.

You niggas who say height is cope and face is all, answer that please.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 14875, Deleted member 14264, Deleted member 11604 and 6 others
"asked"

You know damn well you can't trust what comes out of womens mouths. Admitting to liking handsome men would make her look a lot more shallow than admitting to liking tall men.

Nice try but face will always be more important than height.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: the next o'pry, Deleted member 2816, LooksmaxxHopeful and 29 others
A new survey, though, carried out by Japanese Internet portal My Navi no Madoguchi, questioned female Japanese university students about their preference between two other oft-desired traits in a guy: height and handsomeness. The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.
Nope


Tall = Good looking
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16110, AlwaysHaveQuestions, SOS-Sonic and 5 others
"asked"

You know damn well you can't trust what comes out of womens mouths. Admitting to liking handsome men would make her look a lot more shallow than admitting to liking tall men.

Nice try but face will always be more important than height.
Cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 11604 and Carbon Copy
A new survey, though, carried out by Japanese Internet portal My Navi no Madoguchi, questioned female Japanese university students about their preference between two other oft-desired traits in a guy: height and handsomeness. The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.
View attachment 1264256

Tall = Good looking
1628605761248
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, Marsiere214 and Basedprincess

JAPANESE GIRLS ARE UGLY INCEL FACTORIES THAT GET GIGAFOGGED BY BWC PHENO CHINESE GIRLS

1628605783724
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 13994, Deleted member 13511, johncruz12345 and 6 others
"Plain" to women means 80th percentile.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, court monarch777, SOS-Sonic and 5 others
  • +1
Reactions: bankrolls, BigNigga69, subhuman incel and 1 other person
Good point tbh.

You still have to face mog 80% of men before this height shit even applies

Face > everything
Not sure. 6'4" Normie has more SMV than 5'8" Chadlite.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: the next o'pry, Deleted member 4946, subhuman incel and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: the next o'pry, bankrolls, Deleted member 4946 and 4 others
Good point tbh.

You still have to face mog 80% of men before this height shit even applies

Face > everything
Also, "short" means around or below her height, which is legitimately short, on average. "Tall" means at least top 10%.

When controlling for other factors and correctly comparing equal percentiles, face>height.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing and Deleted member 245
Not sure. 6'4" Normie has more SMV than 5'8" Chadlite.
Stop being low IQ and use correct percentiles.

50th percentile height (5'9) with a 99th percentile face mogs a 99th percentile height (6'3) with a 50th percentile face.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 245
Stop being low IQ and use correct percentiles.

50th percentile height (5'9) with a 99th percentile face mogs a 99th percentile height (6'3) with a 50th percentile face.
5'9" is not 50th percentile where I live (at least for young men) and Chadlite isn't 99th percentile. And I don't think you can compare both metrics this easily with each other.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14266
5'9" is not 50th percentile where I live (at least for young men) and Chadlite isn't 99th percentile. And I don't think you can compare both metrics this easily with each other.
It doesn't matter where you live, I'm using the rounded US demographic. Even if you use a different demographic (like the global average, which is even shorter), nothing changes. That's the whole point of using proportional percentiles and controlling for all other factors; it's literally the only legitimate means of comparing face directly to height.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Carbon Copy
It doesn't matter where you live, I'm using the rounded US demographic. Even if you use a different demographic (like the global average, which is even shorter), nothing changes. That's the whole point of using proportional percentiles and controlling for all other factors; it's literally the only legitimate means of comparing face directly to height.
It matters. So both people from Indonesia and the Netherlands should use the average height of US citizens? Makes no sense. And you can only use proportional percentiles if both metrics behave in the same way regarding SMV, and they don't. Height and SMV don't correlate in a linear way. After 6'4" SMV starts to fall again, while a better looking face is always better. In online dating height doesn't play as much of a role compared to a club setting. It's complicated. Maybe 5'8" was a little too harsh, but I would 100% rather be a 6'4" Normie than a 5"6 Chad. 1000%
 
It matters. So both people from Indonesia and the Netherlands should use the average height of US citizens? Makes no sense. And you can only use proportional percentiles if both metrics behave in the same way regarding SMV, and they don't. Height and SMV don't correlate in a linear way. After 6'4" SMV starts to fall again, while a better looking face is always better. In online dating height doesn't play as much of a role compared to a club setting. It's complicated. Maybe 5'8" was a little too harsh, but I would 100% rather be a 6'4" Normie than a 5"6 Chad. 1000%
You're arguing without using basic math and logic and understanding what I'm saying.

Tell me the demographic you want me to use for both height and face and define what percentile "Chadlite face" means to you. And I'm assuming by "normie," you mean dead average. I'll prove to you that nothing changes.
 
You're arguing without using basic math and logic and understanding what I'm saying.

Tell me the demographic you want me to use for both height and face and define what percentile "Chadlite face" means to you. And I'm assuming by "normie," you mean dead average. I'll prove to you that nothing changes.
I understand your reasoning but I don't think you are right. Imo at some point height is a bigger downturn than face. In the normal range face mogs height. My original comment was that 6'4" normie mogs 5'8" chadlite and I still think that holds true.
Would 5'8" @larsanova69 (chadlite imo) mog
6'4" Chet Henks?
I don't think so.
Image
 
I understand your reasoning but I don't think you are right. Imo at some point height is a bigger downturn than face. In the normal range face mogs height. My original comment was that 6'4" normie mogs 5'8" chadlite and I still think that holds true.
Would 5'8" @larsanova69 (chadlite imo) mog
6'4" Chet Henks?
I don't think so.
View attachment 1264729
Hard one tbh because 5'8 is manlet tier in netherlands
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14875, Carbon Copy and johncruz12345
Imagine not being above 6ft:feelshah:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1453
  • JFL
Reactions: johncruz12345 and Deleted member 1453
  • JFL
Reactions: court monarch777 and Deleted member 1453
""The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.

When the votes were tallied, the tall men occupied the higher position, with 75.2 percent of the women saying they’d pick the tall, non-ikemen option. “An average-looking guy is good enough for me,” said one respondent, while another added that she actually feels intimidated by handsome men.""

""On the other end of the spectrum were the 24.8 percent of women who’d select the shorter, otherwise more handsome guy. However, not all of them made that choice because of a craving for eye candy. “I’m short myself,” explained one, “and so if I’m walking next to a tall guy, it’s hard to carry on a conversation,” due to the distance between the speaker’s mouth and the listener’s ears.""


So we see here that the overwhelming majority of women surveyed choose a tall guy with a normal face than a handsome and short one, and even those who choose short and handsome still prefer a tall guy.

You niggas who say height is cope and face is all, answer that please.
I thought the men didn’t want to commit to them. The bitches really ain’t in a position to be demanding shit. Take what you can bitch and shut the fuck up
 
""The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.

When the votes were tallied, the tall men occupied the higher position, with 75.2 percent of the women saying they’d pick the tall, non-ikemen option. “An average-looking guy is good enough for me,” said one respondent, while another added that she actually feels intimidated by handsome men.""

""On the other end of the spectrum were the 24.8 percent of women who’d select the shorter, otherwise more handsome guy. However, not all of them made that choice because of a craving for eye candy. “I’m short myself,” explained one, “and so if I’m walking next to a tall guy, it’s hard to carry on a conversation,” due to the distance between the speaker’s mouth and the listener’s ears.""


So we see here that the overwhelming majority of women surveyed choose a tall guy with a normal face than a handsome and short one, and even those who choose short and handsome still prefer a tall guy.

You niggas who say height is cope and face is all, answer that please.
That is facts. A man who is good looking but short, will most likely fail with any woman.
 
""The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.

When the votes were tallied, the tall men occupied the higher position, with 75.2 percent of the women saying they’d pick the tall, non-ikemen option. “An average-looking guy is good enough for me,” said one respondent, while another added that she actually feels intimidated by handsome men.""

""On the other end of the spectrum were the 24.8 percent of women who’d select the shorter, otherwise more handsome guy. However, not all of them made that choice because of a craving for eye candy. “I’m short myself,” explained one, “and so if I’m walking next to a tall guy, it’s hard to carry on a conversation,” due to the distance between the speaker’s mouth and the listener’s ears.""


So we see here that the overwhelming majority of women surveyed choose a tall guy with a normal face than a handsome and short one, and even those who choose short and handsome still prefer a tall guy.

You niggas who say height is cope and face is all, answer that please.
They should have asked for tall and ugly instead, Height is a halo but average face isn't. so you get +1. And shortness is a failo but a handsome face isn't so you get 0.

Quick maths.
 
""The researchers asked 286 females whether they’d rather date a short “ikemen” (a Japanese slang term referring to a handsome, and usually physically fit, man), or a tall guy with otherwise average looks.

When the votes were tallied, the tall men occupied the higher position, with 75.2 percent of the women saying they’d pick the tall, non-ikemen option. “An average-looking guy is good enough for me,” said one respondent, while another added that she actually feels intimidated by handsome men.""

""On the other end of the spectrum were the 24.8 percent of women who’d select the shorter, otherwise more handsome guy. However, not all of them made that choice because of a craving for eye candy. “I’m short myself,” explained one, “and so if I’m walking next to a tall guy, it’s hard to carry on a conversation,” due to the distance between the speaker’s mouth and the listener’s ears.""


So we see here that the overwhelming majority of women surveyed choose a tall guy with a normal face than a handsome and short one, and even those who choose short and handsome still prefer a tall guy.

You niggas who say height is cope and face is all, answer that please.
Height is cope bro
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top