DrOtaku
Silver
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2019
- Posts
- 733
- Reputation
- 923
Here's a problem I ran into. The only reason operations like MSE work in adults is due to a suture that is malleable throughout a humans entire lifetime on the palatine bone.
The Palatine bone structure varies greatly from the mandibular structure. A palatine bone is really two bones with a "crack" in the middle that can be changed. The suture that fuses the lower mandible rests in the chin area. They both posses a suture so they can both be widened.
The only existing method of mandibular transverse expansion lies in orthognathic surgeries such as Mandibular Symphysis Distraction Osteotomies (MSDO). I'll post some pictures of what mandibular width does for perspective
(This women has a narrow mandible, a feminine trait)
(Morphed Ernest Khalimov has an extremely wide mandible due to the space at his chin, this is the power of a widened chin through mandibular symphysis expansion)
Unfortunately most of us are not wealthy enough to afford to spend around $100,000 for the perfect jaw. To obtain this dominant look without surgery you would need an orthodontic appliance that pushes on and beneath beneath the mandibular cuspid and incisors with a significant transversal force great enough to come close to spliting the mandibular symphysis. Bones are always remodeling so force will always cause skeletal alterations no matter the age.
This sounds good in theory until the mandibular width exceeds the palatine width. You would essentially rip your jaw out of your cranium with your own bite force if too much expansion is given, Under bites and cross bites would occur as well in even less severe cases .This type of procedure would probably be best paired with MSE for a general expansion of the lower and middle thirds. Due to expanding both upper and lower palate, you would be left with a higher splanchnocranium to Neurocranium ratio which is what ultimately separates men from boys.
Below are some references to the splanchnocranium to Neurocranium ratio.
(here we can see the neurocranium is abysmal in size in reference to the splanchnocranium. ALL chads have this trait)
(here we can see a bowling ball sized neurocranium which can be considered a gay alien skull)
I do not believe modern orthodontistry is to this level of understanding with the skull to have an appliance that can be known as a Mandibular Symphysis Expander. Which could Ironically be abbreviated to MSE. Mandibular Symphysis Expander (MSE) in conjuction with Maxilliary Skeletal Expander (MSE) could cause MSEx2 which would result in a complete transverse expansion of the entire skull through appliances and cost a mere $10,000.
The only falios remaining can be fixed through soft maxing. Only exception is nose and ear cells. Both Rhinoplasty and otoplasty only cost 3,000 a piece. Hooked noses would go away after bone anchored face pulling.
(the image above is a face puller)
The majority of eye failios could most likely be fixed through this general skull expansion process when in conjunction with face pulling for more forward growth for a better Canthal tilt and under eye support.
(Face pulling with two MSE devices would ultimately change your occlusal plane as well as seen below)
Two to three orthodontic appliances would ascend this entire platform.
The Palatine bone structure varies greatly from the mandibular structure. A palatine bone is really two bones with a "crack" in the middle that can be changed. The suture that fuses the lower mandible rests in the chin area. They both posses a suture so they can both be widened.
The only existing method of mandibular transverse expansion lies in orthognathic surgeries such as Mandibular Symphysis Distraction Osteotomies (MSDO). I'll post some pictures of what mandibular width does for perspective
(This women has a narrow mandible, a feminine trait)
(Morphed Ernest Khalimov has an extremely wide mandible due to the space at his chin, this is the power of a widened chin through mandibular symphysis expansion)
Unfortunately most of us are not wealthy enough to afford to spend around $100,000 for the perfect jaw. To obtain this dominant look without surgery you would need an orthodontic appliance that pushes on and beneath beneath the mandibular cuspid and incisors with a significant transversal force great enough to come close to spliting the mandibular symphysis. Bones are always remodeling so force will always cause skeletal alterations no matter the age.
This sounds good in theory until the mandibular width exceeds the palatine width. You would essentially rip your jaw out of your cranium with your own bite force if too much expansion is given, Under bites and cross bites would occur as well in even less severe cases .This type of procedure would probably be best paired with MSE for a general expansion of the lower and middle thirds. Due to expanding both upper and lower palate, you would be left with a higher splanchnocranium to Neurocranium ratio which is what ultimately separates men from boys.
Below are some references to the splanchnocranium to Neurocranium ratio.
(here we can see the neurocranium is abysmal in size in reference to the splanchnocranium. ALL chads have this trait)
(here we can see a bowling ball sized neurocranium which can be considered a gay alien skull)
I do not believe modern orthodontistry is to this level of understanding with the skull to have an appliance that can be known as a Mandibular Symphysis Expander. Which could Ironically be abbreviated to MSE. Mandibular Symphysis Expander (MSE) in conjuction with Maxilliary Skeletal Expander (MSE) could cause MSEx2 which would result in a complete transverse expansion of the entire skull through appliances and cost a mere $10,000.
The only falios remaining can be fixed through soft maxing. Only exception is nose and ear cells. Both Rhinoplasty and otoplasty only cost 3,000 a piece. Hooked noses would go away after bone anchored face pulling.
(the image above is a face puller)
The majority of eye failios could most likely be fixed through this general skull expansion process when in conjunction with face pulling for more forward growth for a better Canthal tilt and under eye support.
(Face pulling with two MSE devices would ultimately change your occlusal plane as well as seen below)
Two to three orthodontic appliances would ascend this entire platform.
Attachments
Last edited:
