Quick caution for all FGFR3-inhibitor users, high risk of deformity

ICL

ICL

sublime ethereal ecstasy
Joined
Nov 9, 2025
Posts
13,134
Reputation
18,506
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articl...afitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
1781008437330

You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
1781008871401

so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: iwishicouldbediff, avgsub5human, Sub5kang and 8 others
Fear-momguering, nothing would actually happen
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, 2s2f, Vireon and 1 other person
I’ve seen so many people talk about them but no results I’m kinda interested in them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, 2s2f, Vireon and 1 other person
B
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mast, 2s2f and Vireon
THANK YOU FOR MAKING TS:peepoWave:

This was needed so bad because many people here are clueless and just listen "fgfr3 inhibitors grow height = good!!" so this cleared up many concerns


read every molecule btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sub5kang, Paul.jnxy, anondude and 2 others
No i won't, my growth plates are closed and i'm not using fgfr3 inhibitors :feelshah:
The studies used are about those with open growth plates, hence your comment is 100% useless
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Mast, Vireon and childishkillah
The studies used are about those with open growth plates, hence your comment is 100% useless
Yeah i know
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon and 2s2f
This is why you should stick to the mainstream stuff like HGH and AI's

Being a guinea pig for niche theoretical pharmaceutical methods its not a good idea
 
  • +1
Reactions: anondude, Mast and Vireon
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
I'm 30 years old, i have knee pain everyday do you think my plate are still open?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Vireon, 81xa and 2s2f
THANK YOU FOR MAKING TS:peepoWave:

This was needed so bad because many people here are clueless and just listen "fgfr3 inhibitors grow height = good!!" so this cleared up many concerns


read every molecule btw
If you look at "similar threads" section you'll see how there's endless threads on this.

1781010084407


I feel like this should be pinned (if true) since this is regarded as a dangerous compound right now @Gengar’s Ghost @Hernan @Randomized @DildoFaggins thots? would it qualify?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, 2s2f and Vireon
If you look at "similar threads" section you'll see how there's endless threads on this.

View attachment 5196311

I feel like this should be pinned (if true) since this is regarded as a dangerous compound right now @Gengar’s Ghost @Hernan @Randomized @DildoFaggins thots?
Indeed it should

I support
 
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy and ICL
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, Vireon, ICL and 2 others
a fgfr3 inhibitors guide is needed, so much confusion on this. I might have to do it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy, ICL and Vireon
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
I will make a thread bout this tonight. Il tag you. I agree with a bunch of your points and will point them out then :feelshah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon and ICL
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR3 inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
True also there are not enough studies showing real growth besodes rats, side effects are too dangerous like blood pressure weaker bone osteoporosis, heart attacks for example from ky,tyra, and all the other knows fgfr3 inhibs, also i think cap ingibs go into the same category also i belive that during development u cant significanrly change you growth outcome by using anthing outside of the body
Mirin
I may be wrong only done research on ky and tyra 300 maybe there are some in wich the side effects are kinda none i dont belive it though bc u dont know how your body will react to it
Grey cell coping = me
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Vireon, ICL and Paul.jnxy
I will make a thread bout this tonight. Il tag you. I agree with a bunch of your points and will point them out then :feelshah:
looking forward to it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon, Paul.jnxy and N1kolai
True also there are not enough studies showing real growth besodes rats, side effects are too dangerous like blood pressure weaker bone osteoporosis, heart attacks for example from ky,tyra, and all the other knows fgfr3 inhibs, also i think cap ingibs go into the same category also i belive that during development u cant significanrly change you growth outcome by using anthing outside of the body
Mirin
I may be wrong only done research on ky and tyra 300 maybe there are some in wich the side effects are kinda none i dont belive it though bc u dont know how your body will react to it
Grey cell coping = me
@ICL
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL and Vireon
a fgfr3 inhibitors guide is needed, so much confusion on this. I might have to do it

True also there are not enough studies showing real growth besodes rats, side effects are too dangerous like blood pressure weaker bone osteoporosis, heart attacks for example from ky,tyra, and all the other knows fgfr3 inhibs, also i think cap ingibs go into the same category also i belive that during development u cant significanrly change you growth outcome by using anthing outside of the body
Mirin
I may be wrong only done research on ky and tyra 300 maybe there are some in wich the side effects are kinda none i dont belive it though bc u dont know how your body will react to it
Grey cell coping = me
A lot can be countered. Idk if you know that KY is not a fgfr3 inhib.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon, N1kolai and ICL
looking forward to it
If people will like it enough I will make a very in depth thread on FGFR inhibition in general.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon, mrpein and ICL
Anything to do with ,,heightmaxxing" is just retarded and dangerous anyway
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Vireon, Paul.jnxy and ICL
A lot can be countered. Idk if you know that KY is not a fgfr3 inhib.
Oh mb
I mean still i did research on it so yea sorry bhai
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon and Paul.jnxy
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Vireon and Ahmed88
Anything to do with ,,heightmaxxing" is just retarded and dangerous anyway
There's levels to this

FGFR3 underexpression likely deforms you and HGH likely gives you insulin resistance
If people will like it enough I will make a very in depth thread on FGFR inhibition in general.
Many people keep making FGFR3 threads, it's like a specific surge from today

And tag the guy above as wel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon, Ahmed88 and Paul.jnxy
There's levels to this

FGFR3 underexpression likely deforms you and HGH likely gives you insulin resistance

Many people keep making FGFR3 threads, it's like a specific surge from today

And tag the guy above as wel
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL and Vireon
good thread, there should always be pros and cons presented not just the positives (ive no idea wtf a fgfr3 inhibitor does but still)
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Paul.jnxy and Vireon
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
Tag me too please :peepoWave::peepoWave:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL, Paul.jnxy and avgsub5human
good thread, there should always be pros and cons presented not just the positives (ive no idea wtf a fgfr3 inhibitor does but still)
seriously though, people think it's some magic like fgfr3 serves a purpose otherwise it wouldnt exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: Paul.jnxy
seriously though, people think it's some magic like fgfr3 serves a purpose otherwise it wouldnt exist
No free lunch in biology boyo
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
With the people we've talked with, it's gonna be more than 70iq as certain mfs recommend up to 0.10mg/kg/day, clearly requiring insulin for this
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Paul.jnxy
I take GH+test and hope
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Paul.jnxy
For height? It’s over :forcedsmile:
Well originally I was only taking GH and realised it was mainly cope so I added test so now my main goal is a body halo lmao
I love roshidere tho w pfp :ogre:
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Paul.jnxy and ICL
With the people we've talked with, it's gonna be more than 70iq as certain mfs recommend up to 0.10mg/kg/day, clearly requiring insulin for this
Perhaps not. Reta is a safer solution. Shall I explain why?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL

Similar threads

victor801
Replies
3
Views
29
victor801
victor801
E
Replies
11
Views
52
Robertski
Robertski
uglyretardednigga
Replies
0
Views
52
uglyretardednigga
uglyretardednigga
Mathikxksss
Replies
2
Views
16
Mathikxksss
Mathikxksss
graingoopgoyim
Replies
5
Views
84
itsoverformr
itsoverformr

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Paul.jnxy
  • Sub5kang
  • DavidePollo
Back
Top