Even animals are incels

D

Deleted member 24789

Adultmaxxing
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Posts
6,948
Reputation
7,531
"
Screenshot 20230811 001951 Gallery

How can I attract a girl bro "

" be confident
Screenshot 20230811 001807 YouTube


Screen shot 2016 03 24 at 94609 pm
"


" Ok i will try
Screenshot 20230811 001956 Gallery
"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksThinker, Deleted member 27987, Deleted member 28117 and 1 other person
can still run just be shark
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22918 and Deleted member 24789
hunter eyes
1691708540735
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 27987, iam good boy and Deleted member 24789
F1022FF7 3EB0 4BB4 9BFC 19313362A9A4

Human dating without religious or societal constraints (when females are given absolute free choice) is awfully similar to other apes.

The top male individuals have even more value than attractive females. The bottom males in terms of physical attractiveness have practically zero value except as soldiers or labor units.

A few genetically gifted male apes at the top fuck pretty much as many females as they want to. Other male apes get scraps or nothing, and even then the ugly small apes have to give gifts and food to the female apes for acceptance.

They can fight for the top spot but rarely do, because the top male is also heavily defended by the females he fucks. Female apes hate usurpers and will refuse to mate with a low attractiveness male who attacks top males.

 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and LooksThinker
Human dating without religious or societal constraints (when females are given absolute free choice) is awfully similar to other apes.
this tinder simulation graph is totally not skewed by the male-female ratio on tinder or the 5000 other algorithms they use to generate the most profit. the women there do not have a free choice but they have an algorithm-selected choice. :feelstrash: tinder is not society
 
this tinder simulation graph is totally not skewed by the male-female ratio on tinder or the 5000 other algorithms they use to generate the most profit. the women there do not have a free choice but they have an algorithm-selected choice. :feelstrash: tinder is not society
3C9DBA03 7598 4EE0 97BD A28C41FD7CFA


Okcupid used a massive data set (millions of female users) from the days before Tinder even existed and it was no different.

It was a few % of men getting thousands of messages while the vast majority of men got 0-1 per month.

Women also rated more than half of all men as literally deformed. Men rated women on a regular bell curve.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and New Technology
View attachment 2373958

Okcupid used a massive data set (millions of female users) from the days before Tinder even existed and it was no different.

It was a few % of men getting thousands of messages while the vast majority of men got 0-1 per month.

Women also rated more than half of all men as literally deformed. Men rated women on a regular bell curve.
i was not disagreeing but i am also not agreeing. although throughout ancient history almost every woman gave birth and most men did not and although many kings or men in arab countries have had multiples wives, i am not sure if humans today are actually like polygamous apes.
even with the current amount of feminism in the western countries and the arab religions still in place in the middle east, there is still mostly monogamy, at least until now. maybe humans have evolved monogamy? can this happen?
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
10
Views
131
nofap
nofap
abuserr007
Replies
2
Views
154
RICHCELDOM
RICHCELDOM
T
Replies
10
Views
224
PSLBurner
P
CookieGuy
Replies
9
Views
154
lurking truecel
lurking truecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top