Insults based on Status/Money are more impactful than Insults based on Looks

[PubertyMaxxer]

Insulting a Man's Lack of Status or Money ( calling him a broke loser or misfit) is hurting his feelings more than insulting his Looks ( calling him a short subhuman)

Why? Because men attribute way more of their social worth to their Status/Money than to their Looks, in contrast to women for instance .

Also Insulting a Man's Looks, except for his overall Height/Size which is socially accepted , makes you seem like a gay prettyboy faggot that uses makeup and eyebrow pencils or a autistic gymcel in the case of insulting his body proportions/muscle insertions.

 

[UglyGod360]

Yeah you would know

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

Insulting a Man's Lack of Status or Money ( calling him a broke loser or misfit) is hurting his feelings more than insulting his Looks ( calling him a short subhuman)

Why? Because men attribute way more of their social worth to their Status/Money than to their Looks, in contrast to women for instance .

Also Insulting a Man's Looks, except for his overall Height/Size which is socially accepted , makes you seem like a gay prettyboy faggot that uses makeup and eyebrow pencils or a autistic gymcel in the case of insulting his body proportions/muscle insertions.

Being called an unedcuated loser and bum is way more impacting than being called a manlet. Even calling a man " a whiny virgin" is an attack on their status.

 

[Deleted member 13332]

bro insults

 

[GetShrekt]

maybe if you’re over 30

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

maybe if you’re over 30

It's also more socially accepted to insult men on Status/Money.

While body positivity mainly is directed to women, public consent in modern Western areas is that insults on Men's Looks is socially unacceptable too.

 

[Deleted member 17311]

Maybe face but insults on height/size/dick is worse than money/status on a man

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Maybe face but insults on height/size/dick is worse than money/status on a man

I'd argue not nowadays in Western " feminist progressive" areas.

It's also more socially accepted to insult men on Status/Money.

While body positivity mainly is directed to women, public consent in modern Western areas is that insults on Men's Looks is socially unacceptable too.

 

[Entschuldigung]

Nah

 

[Deleted member 17311]

I'd argue not nowadays in Western " feminist progressive" areas.

Nah its only women's looks that you cant attack, even in the most leftist-progressive social medias like twitter and reddit men still get shamed for their height/size/dick while if you shame women for their body/face/roastie vagina, it will likely result in downvotes and angry soys/feminists attacking you.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Nah its only women's looks that you cant attack, even in the most leftist-progressive social medias like twitter and reddit men still get shamed for their height/size/dick while if you shame women for their body/face/roastie vagina, it will likely result in downvotes and angry soys/feminists attacking you.

Yeah obviously a Mans Looks being attacked is much much more socially accepted than a Womans , both Face and HFD, however a Man's Money/Status being attacked is way more accepted and more impactful

 

[germanlooks]

Looks is more brutal because it is an actual part of you. Status and money are more neutral and can be easier fixed

 

[6ft4]

subhuman is the greatest term for insulting a man's genetic worth
It's a catch all for baldcels, ethnics, framcels, fatcels, manlets, uglies and also poorcunts or low social class

I agree with your thread tho