You're begging the question in this statement. I could easily ask you if you can be absolutely sure that your perception of white and black is correct but since you are against questioning reality you would just ignore it.
My post illustrated how he did not understand what i was saying and he also failed to answer my very simple question. It's not "cherrypicking" to point out how he misunderstood part of my post.
No, why?
kinda guy.I understand what you are saying bro, most ssying that i agree but i witnessed this discussion and debate many times
I didnt say that I said scientist stats can only be wrong if there is bias or incorrect protocol is followed. Didnt even read my shit right calling me the dumbass that cant understand
This is why i said he cherrpy picked. He will never agree with us tbh he is so egoist.
I asked you if you can be absolutely sure that your perception of the world/what is accurate is truly accurate and for literally a THIRD TIME you failed to comprehend my insanely simple post and question. I'm not even sure what to say anymore, you arent actually capable of comprehending the idea that sensory information you recieve could be incorrect and I can't ask anything I have already asked in a simpler way.
If I asked you if you could be absolutely certain that your perception of correct/incorrect bias or correct/incorrect protocol could be wrong would you actually answer this time, or would you dodge the question?
Dudes basically saying dont trust scientist, stats and data because ur perception of what's true could be wrong. Some hippy garbage tbh, surely that means he doesnt believe any blackpill stats so it cant be real bro.
This is his excuse for being a cuckold fetihist ask him would he want to be a woman he would accept in a milisecond. This kind of guys making excuses for being losers tbh.
I don't think he is saying not trust them at all but don't trust them entirely they could be wrong in some aspects and u need to keep questioning to find the aspects where they are wrong.
Agreed
Nigga I literally answered for the 3rd time yes I could be absolutely certain that's it right. Near impossible for my perception to be wrong if I am educated like a scientist on how proof measure work. U can never be 100% certain about complex occurrences or things
Incorrect again. I only asked you if you can be absolutely certain that your senses give you correct information. From my limited perspective I of course believe in well backed truths, but the fact that I can't be absolutely certain my perception is 100% accurate means that I can question whether or not my senses are giving me absolutely accurate information.
Theres no point in me questioning tho. Like the rest of general populous I'm a low iq drone. That's for actual smart niggas to dissect, if I start doing it I will sound like Alex Jones or someone that believes 5g causes corona.
How can you be absolutely sure that what you perceive to be true is accurate? If your senses were faulty then how could you actually know this?
You can never be 100% but u can be 99% sure. Throwing other stuff in bag just distorts it, u might have dementia or aids bro. Water is vital for life, I am 100% sure that is true cus every human and animal needs it to live
True u can sound foolish but if u get it right u will be seen as a genius. Even the "smart niggas" sounds foolish at first until they get it right and everyone consider them genius.
True. Everyone does call revelourionary scientists, explorers etc nuts until they take action and prove it. But being too much of a skeptic leads people down the internet rabbit whole where they absorb hogwash from other crazy cunts. Once u leave the general thought/consensus u are an outcast in society.
ok, This is the point I am getting at. You can't actually be 100% sure that your sensory information is accurate. If you are aware that it is possible that your senses could be incorrect then you CAN question these seemingly basic facts about the nature of reality. You also can't know for sure if you can even be 99% sure, because you can't actually know how distorted your sensory information is, the same way you wouldn't be able to know if, for example, your reality is illusory/simulated.
That would seem to be the case on our planet, but I'm saying that an entire perception of reality could be flawed or illusory and you couldn't know for sure whether it is or not.
i mean doesn't technically every human do what they do, due to their own ego or perception of self importance? i could say that your responses to me are about your ego because you view yourself important enough to engage in the discussion the same as I do so idk what your point is.
Yh but I'm in no place to ask these questions or act like some intellectual revolutionary. That sorta shit is for geniuses that appear once every century. I dont want to be like Tesla, dying a virgin and marrying a pigeon.
Yes my responses about my own ego too i never disagreed with that. I say your thoughts is a coping mechanism for justifying a loner even though it can have little truth on it. You want to see yourself intellectually superior because you can be sucsesful at social life.
Cant be*
You could ask the questions if you wanted to. Maybe you're not in a position to be doing research or whatever but neither am I. The anti-intellectualism road is just a dumb one to go down because by going down it you would unnecessarily, and seemingly for no reason, decide not to question reality.
this just seems like projection and is offtopic
It is projection but it is what it is
I never disagreed with that ?
brutal
Im the opposite tbh i think it depends on people, i liked questioning things since i was a kid and ye i feel like it's not viewed good to do this in society cause even my own parents told me that i should stop questioning things so much and it's stupid.
I agree with that mate but saying race DONT exist or women ISNT inferior is just about power. This is just for a political agenda not because it is actual reality. People saing that actually would be happy if women were superior jfl. And questioning absolute things is total cope tbh i mean you can of course question but questions are for answers not more questions
I am talking about the larger idea that even your perception of reality could be incorrect and thus can be questioned, since you can't be absolutely certain it is right. Idk what exactly you mean by "race doesn't exist", obviously humans have different phenotypes but there aren't officially any subspecies of human or anything like that.
How can you be sure that something is absolute if you don't question it? lol. Also, questioning something could be part of a mental exercise you don't necessarily need to give an answer to every question. Anti intellectualism is rotting your mind bro.
I would question complex topics not obvious facts of life though. OP does not like the ladder and neither do most people, that shit is just annoying and retarded af.
How can you be sure that an obvious fact is true if you decide not to question it, and if you have already conceded that your sensory perception could hypothetically be completely incorrect?
I think it depends some people just don't really enjoy doing it, u probably like questioning things but imagine if u didn't liked doing it, maby u would just find it stupid. On top of that some time intellectualism can bring "problems" for some so that's maby why some are anti intellectualism
Its not gaslighting he agreed that sensory perception could be flawed without one's own knowledge of it, and that you can't be 100% sure your sensory perception is correct. how am i gaslighting him with a question?
true, but i would argue that those who find it stupid are probably stupid in and of themselves.
What kind of problems?
Bro u sound nuts, literally talking like my criminal cousin that's been hooked on crack for the last year or two. Believes in numerology and bs like that, saying hes gonna change the education system while being a low iq drug dealer jfl.
all of these are non-arguments
Ok, I don't disagree that currently we recognize two main genders or sexes or whatever, male and female. I agree with this. It seemed like you understood earlier what i was getting at, and it is that your basic sensory perception could be incorrect entirely, thus making it not absolute, thus making it questionable.
Don't really know but he talked about homosexuality, race and things. When questioning things you can sometimes be completely wrong trying to find the truth and it can maybe creates new problems.
The only problem I can intuitively come up with for intellectualism would be reaching a question that you can't answer. But this in and of itself isn't a problem, not necessarily, because all it would mean is that you do not currently have an answer for something. You could just try looking for the answer or theorizing about what the answer might be.
A question u cant answer = what happens after life?
I mean if your brain dies you would seemingly be incapable of perceiving any sensory information, so from the perspective of a dead person nothing at all would be happening. From the perspective of those who aren't dead, witnessing a person who is dead, that person would begin to decompose or they would bury them or whatever.
It is you tho
been achieved that's why scientific theories are adjusted and fine tuned often.Most philosophers are what you describe. 2000 years of wastefull debates for nothing.
