Israeli Arab sex offender acquitted for rape of Holocaust survivor

[Deleted member 2832]

The Nazareth District Court acquitted a man accused of raping an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor on Monday, saying that the relationship was consensual.


Adel Hiev, who had previously served prison time for sexual assault, gave a more compelling recollection of events according to the court, and evidence indicated that he was even paid NIS 300 for the intercourse.


The two reportedly conversed cordially in recorded phone calls, and in sexual banter. The court said that the woman allegedly offered to introduce the accused to her friends for sexual services.


Israel Women's Network CEO Hadas Daniely Yelin attacked the ruling as a failure of justice, saying that responsibility lies with the attacker to ensure consent, not the victim to object. She said that it was not possible that a sex offender had gone on to harm another woman, and urged the State Attorney's Office to appeal the decision.
Source

 

[Deleted member 2832]

WOah what Unapprociable behavior from no other than serial rapist
Fuck Left cucks
@Aypo129 @OGJBSLAYER @BigJimsWornOutTires @BrahminBoss @JackTheKnife @ReadBooksEveryday

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

WOah what Unapprociable behavior from no other than serial rapist
Fuck Left cucks
@Aypo129 @OGJBSLAYER @BigJimsWornOutTires @BrahminBoss @JackTheKnife @ReadBooksEveryday

This is war! Oh, wait, that's already happening.

 

[Aypo129]

Adel Hiev, who had previously served prison time for sexual assault, gave a more compelling recollection of events according to the court, and evidence indicated that he was even paid NIS 300 for the intercourse.


The two reportedly conversed cordially in recorded phone calls, and in sexual banter. The court said that the woman allegedly offered to introduce the accused to her friends for sexual services.

looks pretty solid case for me tbh

 

[Deleted member 2832]

Adel Hiev, who had previously served prison time for sexual assault, gave a more compelling recollection of events according to the court, and evidence indicated that he was even paid NIS 300 for the intercourse.


The two reportedly conversed cordially in recorded phone calls, and in sexual banter. The court said that the woman allegedly offered to introduce the accused to her friends for sexual services.

looks pretty solid case for me tbh

maybe, yet it sounds very absurdic though.
The case was already old news anyway after i've posted the thread):
43-year-old acquitted of raping an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor: "It was not proven that she said no"
According to the indictment, Adel Haiv suggested to the elderly woman to make renovations in her home and raped her - while he was under the supervision of the Israel Security Service after his release from prison for the rape of a 70-year-old • On the other hand, the judges noted that in a preliminary conversation between the two, the main issue was the sexual services that the accused offered to the complainant - "it was not proven that she objected, she did not testify coherently"

The district court in Nazareth acquitted 43-year-old Adel Hiev of raping an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor on the grounds that the prosecution did not prove that the elderly objected to his actions. The indictment filed against him by the prosecutor's office states that "Hev raped the complainant even though he was under the supervision of the Security Service following his release from prison for the rape of a 70-year-old."

In the verdict, the judges argued: "It was not proven that the accused raped the complainant without her consent, and it was not proven that the complainant said 'no' time and time again, just as it was not proven that the complainant showed passive resistance in one way or another - from which the accused could have learned that the complainant refused to comply Relationships that were coordinated between them."

According to the indictment, in July 2022 Hav met the Holocaust survivor on the street and complimented her. A conversation developed between the two. He introduced himself as a repairman and the elderly woman invited him to her home for renovation work. When they entered her home, he pushed her into the bedroom, brutally assaulted her and raped her.

She was rushed to Ziv Hospital in Safed bruised and bleeding, and as a result of the injury she needed emergency surgery. In court, it emerged that the 70-year-old woman Shahev attacked also suffered physical injuries when he raped her. He was released about six months before the present case, and was under the supervision of the Tsur unit of the Shavas. Heev served 14 years in prison for various offenses.

On the other hand, in the verdict, the judges present a different picture. From the discussion today, it emerged that in the preliminary conversation between the complainant and the defendant, the main topic was apparently the sexual services that he wanted to provide to the complainant and her friends. The handover of the complainant's phone number to the accused was not done for the purpose of coordinating work to replace a door, but for the purpose of coordinating a sexual encounter.

The judges also referred to the conversations that Heev recorded, and according to the court contradicted the testimony of the complainant. "Most of the conversations had a sexual nature and even a blatant sexual nature. The complainant fully cooperated with these conversations. At least one conversation was initiated by the complainant. In this last conversation, there is a 'cover story' between the complainant and the defendant according to which he will come 'supposedly' to fix a television in the bedroom of her home of the complainant".

"The defendant's version of this matter was not hidden," the judges continued. "He came for a sexual encounter and after prior arrangement. They sat for a few minutes in the kitchen and talked, and then the complainant led him to her bedroom. The defendant emphasized that he knew that her husband, who is in a serious nursing condition, and a foreign worker who takes care of him also live in the complainant's apartment. The conclusions from all of the above are that from the beginning both the complainant and the accused knew what he had come for, and the move to the bedroom was also planned for sexual contact."

According to the head of the panel of judges in the decision, Judge Asher Kola, who also acquitted Zadorov, "The complainant did not testify in a coherent and consistent manner, and avoided giving answers to some of the questions, both in the hearing before us and also in the police investigations. It will be noted and emphasized that the accused is certainly not 'Tallit Shkolah Klekhlet', certainly that the accused violated the provisions of the supervision order imposed on him, and he is the one who made blatant sexual proposals to the complainant. However, from here to being accused of brutal rape, the distance is long, even very long."

The public defender's office, which represented Haiv, stated: "The verdict speaks for itself. Adel was convicted of sexual offenses in the past and the natural tendency of all of us is to think that he committed the offense attributed to him in the indictment. However, a thorough reading of the evidence leads to the court's unequivocal conclusion." Q according to which the complainant did not tell the truth. Even before the sexual encounter, there were recorded conversations between Adel and the complainant, when the complainant did not know that she was being recorded. The conversations are of a sexual nature and their content is planning a sexual encounter. The complainant's version as she testified in court did not agree with objective evidence, including recordings and security cameras."

The judges also referred to the conversations that Heev recorded, and according to the court contradicted the testimony of the complainant. "Most of the conversations had a sexual nature and even a blatant sexual nature. The complainant fully cooperated with these conversations. At least one conversation was initiated by the complainant. In this last conversation, there is a 'cover story' between the complainant and the defendant according to which he will come 'supposedly' to fix a television in the bedroom of her home of the complainant".

"The defendant's version of this matter was not hidden," the judges continued. "He came for a sexual encounter and after prior arrangement. They sat for a few minutes in the kitchen and talked, and then the complainant led him to her bedroom. The defendant emphasized that he knew that her husband, who is in a serious nursing condition, and a foreign worker who takes care of him also live in the complainant's apartment. The conclusions from all of the above are that from the beginning both the complainant and the accused knew what he had come for, and the move to the bedroom was also planned for sexual contact."

According to the head of the panel of judges in the decision, Judge Asher Kola, who also acquitted Zadorov, "The complainant did not testify in a coherent and consistent manner, and avoided giving answers to some of the questions, both in the hearing before us and also in the police investigations. It will be noted and emphasized that the accused is certainly not 'Tallit Shkolah Klekhlet', certainly that the accused violated the provisions of the supervision order imposed on him, and he is the one who made blatant sexual proposals to the complainant. However, from here to being accused of brutal rape, the distance is long, even very long."

The public defender's office, which represented Haiv, stated: "The verdict speaks for itself. Adel was convicted of sexual offenses in the past and the natural tendency of all of us is to think that he committed the offense attributed to him in the indictment. However, a thorough reading of the evidence leads to the court's unequivocal conclusion." Q according to which the complainant did not tell the truth. Even before the sexual encounter, there were recorded conversations between Adel and the complainant, when the complainant did not know that she was being recorded. The conversations are of a sexual nature and their content is planning a sexual encounter. The complainant's version as she testified in court did not agree with objective evidence, including recordings and security cameras."

Original Source:

https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/local/387770/

 

[Aypo129]

maybe, yet it sounds very absurdic though.
The case was already old news anyway after i've posted the thread):
43-year-old acquitted of raping an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor: "It was not proven that she said no"
According to the indictment, Adel Haiv suggested to the elderly woman to make renovations in her home and raped her - while he was under the supervision of the Israel Security Service after his release from prison for the rape of a 70-year-old • On the other hand, the judges noted that in a preliminary conversation between the two, the main issue was the sexual services that the accused offered to the complainant - "it was not proven that she objected, she did not testify coherently"

The district court in Nazareth acquitted 43-year-old Adel Hiev of raping an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor on the grounds that the prosecution did not prove that the elderly objected to his actions. The indictment filed against him by the prosecutor's office states that "Hev raped the complainant even though he was under the supervision of the Security Service following his release from prison for the rape of a 70-year-old."

In the verdict, the judges argued: "It was not proven that the accused raped the complainant without her consent, and it was not proven that the complainant said 'no' time and time again, just as it was not proven that the complainant showed passive resistance in one way or another - from which the accused could have learned that the complainant refused to comply Relationships that were coordinated between them."

According to the indictment, in July 2022 Hav met the Holocaust survivor on the street and complimented her. A conversation developed between the two. He introduced himself as a repairman and the elderly woman invited him to her home for renovation work. When they entered her home, he pushed her into the bedroom, brutally assaulted her and raped her.

She was rushed to Ziv Hospital in Safed bruised and bleeding, and as a result of the injury she needed emergency surgery. In court, it emerged that the 70-year-old woman Shahev attacked also suffered physical injuries when he raped her. He was released about six months before the present case, and was under the supervision of the Tsur unit of the Shavas. Heev served 14 years in prison for various offenses.

On the other hand, in the verdict, the judges present a different picture. From the discussion today, it emerged that in the preliminary conversation between the complainant and the defendant, the main topic was apparently the sexual services that he wanted to provide to the complainant and her friends. The handover of the complainant's phone number to the accused was not done for the purpose of coordinating work to replace a door, but for the purpose of coordinating a sexual encounter.

The judges also referred to the conversations that Heev recorded, and according to the court contradicted the testimony of the complainant. "Most of the conversations had a sexual nature and even a blatant sexual nature. The complainant fully cooperated with these conversations. At least one conversation was initiated by the complainant. In this last conversation, there is a 'cover story' between the complainant and the defendant according to which he will come 'supposedly' to fix a television in the bedroom of her home of the complainant".

"The defendant's version of this matter was not hidden," the judges continued. "He came for a sexual encounter and after prior arrangement. They sat for a few minutes in the kitchen and talked, and then the complainant led him to her bedroom. The defendant emphasized that he knew that her husband, who is in a serious nursing condition, and a foreign worker who takes care of him also live in the complainant's apartment. The conclusions from all of the above are that from the beginning both the complainant and the accused knew what he had come for, and the move to the bedroom was also planned for sexual contact."

According to the head of the panel of judges in the decision, Judge Asher Kola, who also acquitted Zadorov, "The complainant did not testify in a coherent and consistent manner, and avoided giving answers to some of the questions, both in the hearing before us and also in the police investigations. It will be noted and emphasized that the accused is certainly not 'Tallit Shkolah Klekhlet', certainly that the accused violated the provisions of the supervision order imposed on him, and he is the one who made blatant sexual proposals to the complainant. However, from here to being accused of brutal rape, the distance is long, even very long."

The public defender's office, which represented Haiv, stated: "The verdict speaks for itself. Adel was convicted of sexual offenses in the past and the natural tendency of all of us is to think that he committed the offense attributed to him in the indictment. However, a thorough reading of the evidence leads to the court's unequivocal conclusion." Q according to which the complainant did not tell the truth. Even before the sexual encounter, there were recorded conversations between Adel and the complainant, when the complainant did not know that she was being recorded. The conversations are of a sexual nature and their content is planning a sexual encounter. The complainant's version as she testified in court did not agree with objective evidence, including recordings and security cameras."

The judges also referred to the conversations that Heev recorded, and according to the court contradicted the testimony of the complainant. "Most of the conversations had a sexual nature and even a blatant sexual nature. The complainant fully cooperated with these conversations. At least one conversation was initiated by the complainant. In this last conversation, there is a 'cover story' between the complainant and the defendant according to which he will come 'supposedly' to fix a television in the bedroom of her home of the complainant".

"The defendant's version of this matter was not hidden," the judges continued. "He came for a sexual encounter and after prior arrangement. They sat for a few minutes in the kitchen and talked, and then the complainant led him to her bedroom. The defendant emphasized that he knew that her husband, who is in a serious nursing condition, and a foreign worker who takes care of him also live in the complainant's apartment. The conclusions from all of the above are that from the beginning both the complainant and the accused knew what he had come for, and the move to the bedroom was also planned for sexual contact."

According to the head of the panel of judges in the decision, Judge Asher Kola, who also acquitted Zadorov, "The complainant did not testify in a coherent and consistent manner, and avoided giving answers to some of the questions, both in the hearing before us and also in the police investigations. It will be noted and emphasized that the accused is certainly not 'Tallit Shkolah Klekhlet', certainly that the accused violated the provisions of the supervision order imposed on him, and he is the one who made blatant sexual proposals to the complainant. However, from here to being accused of brutal rape, the distance is long, even very long."

The public defender's office, which represented Haiv, stated: "The verdict speaks for itself. Adel was convicted of sexual offenses in the past and the natural tendency of all of us is to think that he committed the offense attributed to him in the indictment. However, a thorough reading of the evidence leads to the court's unequivocal conclusion." Q according to which the complainant did not tell the truth. Even before the sexual encounter, there were recorded conversations between Adel and the complainant, when the complainant did not know that she was being recorded. The conversations are of a sexual nature and their content is planning a sexual encounter. The complainant's version as she testified in court did not agree with objective evidence, including recordings and security cameras."

Original Source:

https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/local/387770/

Very interesting

Unfortunately ...

 

[Deleted member 2832]

Very interesting

Unfortunately ...
View attachment 2492503

מתבקש.

 

[Aypo129]

מתבקש.

לא מולקולה

 

[Deleted member 2832]

לא מולקולה

Instead you can use "תעה" /תרלעה" / "תודה על הפרסום"

 

[Deleted member 2832]

Btw IT just means "thanks for posting".

Some silly forum slang on fxp.co.il (biggest site related to incelosphere in israel)

 

[Aypo129]

Btw IT just means "thanks for posting".

Some silly forum slang on fxp.co.il (biggest site related to incelosphere in israel)

Sheiit
Fellow hebrew moggers have a incelosphere?
Its over

 

[Aypo129]

Btw IT just means "thanks for posting".

Some silly forum slang on fxp.co.il (biggest site related to incelosphere in israel)

THEY HAVE FUCKING BANNED CURRIES TF
SO MANY YEARS OF ISRAEL ASS LICKING I PAID SO MUCH AND THEY TREAT ME LIKE A AVERAGE SHITSKIN!!!

 

[Deleted member 16501]

His name sounds Hebrew not Arab

 

[Deleted member 2832]

THEY HAVE FUCKING BANNED CURRIES TF
SO MANY YEARS OF ISRAEL ASS LICKING I PAID SO MUCH AND THEY TREAT ME LIKE A AVERAGE SHITSKIN!!!

Fuck erez berez
@geenk worg

His name sounds Hebrew not Arab

No difference tbh (both semitic tongues)

 

[Deleted member 16501]

Fuck erez berez
@geenk worg


No diffence tbh

Yeh but it's more bizarre that a Jewish guy Raping a holocaust survivor

 

[Deleted member 2832]

Yeh but it's more bizarre that a Jewish guy Raping a holocaust survivor

Read the rest of the thread...

@DaRealSixpence
also,
adel = not a commonly used jewish name (there's a whole other origin for this name in hebrew though),
haiv = clearly an arabic surname
What's your point?