L
Looks234
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
- Posts
- 35,328
- Reputation
- 138,250
Yet they lost
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
1 vs 10 and Soviets are too big and crowded to invadeYet they lost
Their fault for invading the USSR1 vs 10 and Soviets are too big and crowded to invade
War was inevitable in fact it was high iq to invade soviets firstly it would be giga over for them if they waited more and Americans literally did nothing in ww2 btw they just saved west europe before soviets capturing it. @TsarTsar444 Thoughts ?Their fault for invading the USSR
Was not high iq jfl. It’s the main reason they lost.War was inevitable in fact it was high iq to invade soviets firstly it would be giga over for them if they waited more and Americans literally did nothing in ww2 btw they just saved west europe before soviets capturing it. @TsarTsar444 Thoughts ?
As i say it is inevitable. Communism and Nazism cant peacefully co exist in europe these are reverse of each other Soviets were heavily mobilizing for war and they were making plans to capture whole europe germans just acted quick and made a shock attack and it would work if it wasnt for winter and bad alliesWas not high iq jfl. It’s the main reason they lost.
Yeah you are correct, nothing more to add, the Soviets were getting stronger and stronger there was no time to lose, it was then or never, they tried their luckWar was inevitable in fact it was high iq to invade soviets firstly it would be giga over for them if they waited more and Americans literally did nothing in ww2 btw they just saved west europe before soviets capturing it. @TsarTsar444 Thoughts ?
Made by Americans in Nürnberg:
Schacht, Hjalmar 143
Seyss-Inquart, Arthur 141
Dönitz, Karl 138
Göring, Hermann 138
Papen, Franz von 134
Raeder, Erich 134
Frank, Hans 130
Fritzsche, Hans 130
Schirach, Baldur von 130
Keitel, Wilhelm 129
Ribbentrop, Joachim von 129
Speer, Albert 128
Jodl, Alfred 127
Rosenberg, Alfred 127
Neurath, Konstantin von 125
Frick, Wilhelm 124
Funk, Walther 124
Hess, Rudolf 120
Sauckel, Fritz 118
Thoughts ? @TsarTsar444 @lutte
Bronstein (Trotsky) | Jew |
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) | Jew |
Lourie (Larine) | Jew |
Ouritski | Jew |
Volodarski | Jew |
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) | Jew |
Smidovitch | Jew |
Sverdlof (Yankel) | Jew |
Nakhamkes (Steklof) | Jew |
Ulyanov (Lenin) | Russian |
Krylenko | Russian |
Lounatcharski | Russian |
you just need three digit iq and you shouldnt be coward to realize jewpillTbf, you have to have a somewhat high IQ to realize that jews are, in fact, in a lot of positions of power. Not too many people would bother looking into the claims that Hitler et al. made, unless they were actually intelligent people.
Most people would probably say: "Well, Hitler was an evil madman and was probably imagining things" and leaving it at that.
Even Churchill once agreed with Hitler actualy, in that the Spartacus revolt, aswell as the bolshevik revolution in russia, was led by jews.
For that you have to look at the leaders and then realize that they were, in fact, jewish.
Like Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Radek, Kurt Eisner, etc. (in the spartacus uprising in germany).
The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, "Les Deniers Jours des Romanofs", which gave the racial background of all the members of the Soviet government. - By the way: This does not appear in the later English translation. It also does not appear anywhere else. I have looked for quite a long time, and there's practically zero other information on the first Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party.
It was made up as follows:
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew Lourie (Larine) Jew Ouritski Jew Volodarski Jew Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew Smidovitch Jew Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian Krylenko Russian Lounatcharski Russian