Deleted member 18465
ㅤ
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2022
- Posts
- 284
- Reputation
- 538
Think of it this way: there is a pattern in women's behavior, otherwise we wouldn't have recognized it and studied it extensively over the years.
All patterns have variations. For example:
• men are taller than women, but some men are taller or shorter than others.
• men are more aggressive than women, but some men are less aggressive or more aggressive than others.
Hypergamy, promiscuity, and unloyalty among the female population is the same thing. Unless you can prove mathematically how all women are equally hypergamous, promiscuous, and unloyal, then it is not wrong to assume some women are below average and some are above average in relation to those characteristics.
But if some women are less hypergamous, promiscuous and unloyal, who are them?
• Women who had a low number of sex partners are less likely to divorce or cheat on their husbands. (less unloyal)
• Teenage girls don't have as many options, as much money, or as much sexual experience as adult women, and for this reason their standards are lower. (less hypergamous)
• Promiscuity is influenced by genes to some extent. Monogamy was selected in citizens from generation to generation. So much so that some people are less promiscuous than others nowadays. Do you agree with this proposition? Then why would you think all women are equally promiscuous? (less promiscuous)
1. Anyone who denies this is retarded.
2. If you need sources, just ask me. I'll link them.
3. If you commented "cope" on this thread without reading it, I hope you die of HIV.
All patterns have variations. For example:
• men are taller than women, but some men are taller or shorter than others.
• men are more aggressive than women, but some men are less aggressive or more aggressive than others.
Hypergamy, promiscuity, and unloyalty among the female population is the same thing. Unless you can prove mathematically how all women are equally hypergamous, promiscuous, and unloyal, then it is not wrong to assume some women are below average and some are above average in relation to those characteristics.
But if some women are less hypergamous, promiscuous and unloyal, who are them?
• Women who had a low number of sex partners are less likely to divorce or cheat on their husbands. (less unloyal)
• Teenage girls don't have as many options, as much money, or as much sexual experience as adult women, and for this reason their standards are lower. (less hypergamous)
• Promiscuity is influenced by genes to some extent. Monogamy was selected in citizens from generation to generation. So much so that some people are less promiscuous than others nowadays. Do you agree with this proposition? Then why would you think all women are equally promiscuous? (less promiscuous)
1. Anyone who denies this is retarded.
2. If you need sources, just ask me. I'll link them.
3. If you commented "cope" on this thread without reading it, I hope you die of HIV.