Deleted member 13332
mark renton
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2021
- Posts
- 33,456
- Reputation
- 50,520
Who is the main man in a woman's life? The one who sets her boundaries. Usually it is the father, and then the husband. And who is now setting these boundaries for her? State. Father and husband are not authorities for a modern woman.
What can be done, what cannot be done, what is right, what is wrong, what is bad, what is good - these are things that a woman should absorb from her father and husband, and not work it out with her own intellect. This is because a woman’s approach to such phenomena is purely evaluative: she likes it, she doesn’t like it.
Since a woman completely lacks logical and abstract thinking, she simply has to rely on the norm that prevails in society at the moment.
The state set a threshold for her that pumping her lips and boobs with silicone is the norm, having abortions is the norm, drinking is the norm, smoking is the norm, giving birth out of wedlock is the norm, destroying families is the norm, fucking from school is the norm. And women accepted this as the norm, and even some men, since they have an evaluative approach to this.
Why will a woman always listen to the state, and not her father or husband? Yes, because the state is stronger! According to one complaint, a woman can put her father or husband behind bars.
A normal man cannot indulge a woman in what modern society considers the norm. And if he tries to forbid her everything that is now considered the norm, then in her eyes he will be considered an enemy. Her evaluative thinking is a childish approach to life: parents forbid eating sweets to save the child's teeth - parents are bad in the eyes of the child, because they forbid what the child likes. So is a woman: the one who forbids her something that she likes is the enemy.
But, only one who does not have the power to forbid her anything will be considered an enemy. The modern man of conditional Russia is a slave. He stands one step below the woman. Where is this slave something to prohibit? He surrenders himself to the army for a year, and then he will forbid some random woman to go to nightclubs? A woman knows that a Russian man is a slave, so his opinion is not authoritative for her. The state gave the women of Russia the power to work as judges and put men in jail, purely for fun.
That is why, now between a man and a woman, between a father and a daughter, an inevitable conflict arises. A woman does not feel that she is obliged to listen to her husband, to listen to her father, when there is a stronger authority in the face of the state.
Now think about whether a woman will agree to give up sex outside of marriage, from smoking, from alcohol, from discos, from sexual provocations? Few will agree, because for many it is very pleasant, and even legal and not reprehensible.
@Toth's thot @8PSLcel
What can be done, what cannot be done, what is right, what is wrong, what is bad, what is good - these are things that a woman should absorb from her father and husband, and not work it out with her own intellect. This is because a woman’s approach to such phenomena is purely evaluative: she likes it, she doesn’t like it.
Since a woman completely lacks logical and abstract thinking, she simply has to rely on the norm that prevails in society at the moment.
The state set a threshold for her that pumping her lips and boobs with silicone is the norm, having abortions is the norm, drinking is the norm, smoking is the norm, giving birth out of wedlock is the norm, destroying families is the norm, fucking from school is the norm. And women accepted this as the norm, and even some men, since they have an evaluative approach to this.
Why will a woman always listen to the state, and not her father or husband? Yes, because the state is stronger! According to one complaint, a woman can put her father or husband behind bars.
A normal man cannot indulge a woman in what modern society considers the norm. And if he tries to forbid her everything that is now considered the norm, then in her eyes he will be considered an enemy. Her evaluative thinking is a childish approach to life: parents forbid eating sweets to save the child's teeth - parents are bad in the eyes of the child, because they forbid what the child likes. So is a woman: the one who forbids her something that she likes is the enemy.
But, only one who does not have the power to forbid her anything will be considered an enemy. The modern man of conditional Russia is a slave. He stands one step below the woman. Where is this slave something to prohibit? He surrenders himself to the army for a year, and then he will forbid some random woman to go to nightclubs? A woman knows that a Russian man is a slave, so his opinion is not authoritative for her. The state gave the women of Russia the power to work as judges and put men in jail, purely for fun.
That is why, now between a man and a woman, between a father and a daughter, an inevitable conflict arises. A woman does not feel that she is obliged to listen to her husband, to listen to her father, when there is a stronger authority in the face of the state.
Now think about whether a woman will agree to give up sex outside of marriage, from smoking, from alcohol, from discos, from sexual provocations? Few will agree, because for many it is very pleasant, and even legal and not reprehensible.
@Toth's thot @8PSLcel
