Which gender becomes more depressed if they dont have children(poll)

[lurking truecel]

I would assume women considering they have allways been the care givers of children thru out time. Meanwhile men have allways been providers and not been close to children most of the time

 

[VohnnyBoy]

i feel like as a man, since you failed at reproducing. Meanwhile women can only choose to not reproduce

 

[lurking truecel]

i feel like as a man, since you failed at reproducing. Meanwhile women can only choose to not reproduce

I mean both failed biologically then, its more about the absence of something. And both will feel miserable because its the sole purpose of life from a biological perspective. But men are more evolved to not be close to the child so it should be less pain

 

[chadhamed]

Men

 

[ltn_looksminner]

It’s not even close brah

 

[superpsycho]

men, they failed at the main objective of life

 

[Michelangelo]

I would assume women considering they have allways been the care givers of children thru out time. Meanwhile men have allways been providers and not been close to children most of the time

I think what others fail to take in consideration is that a man can hit as much as he wants and still have no babies, if both parties not consent to have one, so it doesnt exactly mean that a man without children failed to reproduce.
Women are much more selective exactly for the reason cited, and when they end up without children they can become extremely hateful towards men.
We already have the common idea of what a "old woman with hundreds of cats" is

 

[Sub5UglyMan]

Men, any woman can have a child if she wanted to.

 

[lurking truecel]

Men, any woman can have a child if she wanted to.

Any men can have children to if he wanted too, but its about if how you act when you dont have it

 

[greycel]

The answer will involve genetic influence (from evolution) + social influence

Genetic: women in nature provide no value other than birthing a child. A man would provide food/shelter + protect + invent/further humanity in all realms of development. The women who successfully procreated were those who fulfilled their only duty
This is different to men, where if they lack in 1, they can make up for in another - more splits

Social: influenced by above - fulfilling biological roles, but society also frames women as the deeper/ more empathetic gender (not actually), which reminds them if they haven’t lived up to it. Also should be noted, that they would be more motivated by what society thinks than men, as they’re evolutionarily engineered to seek validation

This is about who has more, not mentioning factors for why men also have less (e.g. social media is light hearted -makes jokes about black men who go for milk) .. that will further cement the answer

Answer: women

 

[lurking truecel]

The answer will involve genetic influence (from evolution) + social influence

Genetic: women in nature provide no value other than birthing a child. A man would provide food/shelter + protect + invent/further humanity in all realms of development. The women who successfully procreated were those who fulfilled their only duty
This is different to men, where if they lack in 1, they can make up for in another - more splits

Social: influenced by above - fulfilling biological roles, but society also frames women as the more deeper/empathetic gender (not actually), which reminds them if they haven’t lived up to it. Also should be noted, that they would be more motivated by what society thinks than men, as they’re evolutionarily engineered to seek validation

This is about who has more, not mentioning factors for why men also have less (e.g. social media is light hearted -makes jokes about black men who go for milk) .. that will further cement the answer

Answer: women

Yea and also because everyone knows its harder as a man it will allways be more accepted for the man aswell

 

[PsychoDsk]

Women obviously