
optimisticzoomer
Salutations my children
- Joined
- May 24, 2020
- Posts
- 22,385
- Reputation
- 33,569
Ok, so the fundamental idea of reproducing is to continue survival of the species. If they all stopped reproducing, obviously the species would die out. For one, I don't get why this matters to the individual. It's like, I couldn't care less if humans eased to exist once I'm dead.
But also, currently there is no threat of human beings going extinct any time soon. In fact, everyone procreating is creating a hostile environment which makes existing harder, and this overpopulation is less beneficial to the survival of the species. So, following on from my previous point, I dont get the desire to continue the survival of the species, but also: we have the conscious ability to realise that our species is not in danger of too few individuals, so this must affect our decision-making.
Then we have other species, who are not overpopulated and may not have the conscious abilities. Take, for example, lions. Why are the males so desperate to compete with each other to reproduce with the females? Is this purely for the enjoyment of sex, without thinking of the outcome being offspring? Maybe, but then what about animals that die just so they can pass on their genes? If it is for the survival of the species, why do individuals care so much that it is their genes that are passed on, rather than other, stronger and healthier individuals?
If you think about it, there is no actual benefit to the individual of passing on their genes. Once they die, they're not going to know any better. And future generations aren't going to be remembering their ancestor.
It just seems strange to me. You can't just explain it with "it's a biological urge" because I'm wondering why that is the case. I'm talking purely from a biological point of view here, and ignoring other reasons why you wouldn't want children, as that is a different topic.
Apparently there is a book trying to uncover this called "The Selfish Gene", but right now, it's still a mystery, and probably won't ever be fully understood
But also, currently there is no threat of human beings going extinct any time soon. In fact, everyone procreating is creating a hostile environment which makes existing harder, and this overpopulation is less beneficial to the survival of the species. So, following on from my previous point, I dont get the desire to continue the survival of the species, but also: we have the conscious ability to realise that our species is not in danger of too few individuals, so this must affect our decision-making.
Then we have other species, who are not overpopulated and may not have the conscious abilities. Take, for example, lions. Why are the males so desperate to compete with each other to reproduce with the females? Is this purely for the enjoyment of sex, without thinking of the outcome being offspring? Maybe, but then what about animals that die just so they can pass on their genes? If it is for the survival of the species, why do individuals care so much that it is their genes that are passed on, rather than other, stronger and healthier individuals?
If you think about it, there is no actual benefit to the individual of passing on their genes. Once they die, they're not going to know any better. And future generations aren't going to be remembering their ancestor.
It just seems strange to me. You can't just explain it with "it's a biological urge" because I'm wondering why that is the case. I'm talking purely from a biological point of view here, and ignoring other reasons why you wouldn't want children, as that is a different topic.
Apparently there is a book trying to uncover this called "The Selfish Gene", but right now, it's still a mystery, and probably won't ever be fully understood