D
Deleted member 15302
Platinum
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
- Posts
- 1,100
- Reputation
- 1,238
almost all geniuses/masters throughout history were not even really masters in their field. off the top of my head: einstein, bill gates, world famous hackers. you can be a “master” of something by just learning about the topic for 3 - 6 months.
it’s a complete cope when normies say “good at everything but master of none”. there’s always going to be some tryhard that’s a “master” of something that spent 10,000 hours learning that skill. why spend years of your life becoming a “master” when you can spend 3 - 6 months or less on a certain skill and be better than 99% of the population? there’s always going to be some tryhard that’s better at a specific skill, what’s important is being better than most people.
very few skills are worth “mastering”, if any. you can always just pay some nerd in the field to do it for you if it’s really that difficult and steal credit. now you are considered a “master” in that field AND MIGHT AS WELL BE ONE because you got the results of one.
idk if worded this well but if ur not retarded you should understand
it’s a complete cope when normies say “good at everything but master of none”. there’s always going to be some tryhard that’s a “master” of something that spent 10,000 hours learning that skill. why spend years of your life becoming a “master” when you can spend 3 - 6 months or less on a certain skill and be better than 99% of the population? there’s always going to be some tryhard that’s better at a specific skill, what’s important is being better than most people.
very few skills are worth “mastering”, if any. you can always just pay some nerd in the field to do it for you if it’s really that difficult and steal credit. now you are considered a “master” in that field AND MIGHT AS WELL BE ONE because you got the results of one.
idk if worded this well but if ur not retarded you should understand