1, i, i, e^(2nπ-π/2), ?

[Harold O'brien]

1, i, i, e^(2nπ-π/2), ?

 

[Harold O'brien]

Low iq forum alert

 

[gooner888]

5

 

[Deleted member 51576]

@InnerVoid

 

[Harold O'brien]

5

wrong

 

[Samsepioler]

0

 

[the BULL]

110 iq required btw

 

[Harold O'brien]

110 iq required btw

80 iq could solve after taking complex analysis

 

[cube]

1, i, i, e^(2nπ-π/2), ?

nobody cares to solve ur sequences, u rub 2 braincells together to create a formula for n and expect somebody on an incel website to spend 15 min of their time to solve them, also why the FUCK does one of your terms have a variable. Heres a sequence that took me 1min anybody who passed 6th grade math can theoretically solve

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, ...

good luck lil nig

 

[SA7]

it's complete over if you know the answer

 

[Harold O'brien]

nobody cares to solve ur sequences, u rub 2 braincells together to create a formula for n and expect somebody on an incel website to spend 15 min of their time to solve them, also why the FUCK does one of your terms have a variable. Heres a sequence that took me 1min anybody who passed 6th grade math can theoretically solve

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, ...

good luck lil nig

so you're not intelligent enough to solve it...

also i can tell your sequence is made up, nice try bud

 

[Deleted member 65658]

Harold what's your FSIQ (don't reply to this with anti IQ propaganda)

 

[Deleted member 45760]

i am only in high school i have not taken complex analysis yet
gimme a min i will try to solve it tho

 

[Harold O'brien]

Harold what's your FSIQ (don't reply to this with anti IQ propaganda)

who the fuck are you

unfortunately anti iq propaganda accurately assesses ontological reality

 

[cube]

so you're not intelligent enough to solve it...

also i can tell your sequence is made up, nice try bud

Its actually not made up lol, actually IQ filtered. I'll give you a whole week to solve it, after I'll post the result. Its a genuine sequence thats has a very simple definition. If you cant solve it I dont think you have a right to post your shitty sequences and LARP about your high iq because you failed an intro to analysis class at your community college.

 

[Deleted member 65658]

who the fuck are you

Chad with a mysterious aura

unfortunately anti iq propaganda accurately assesses ontological reality

Unfortunately your cognition inaccurately assesses ontological reality


FSIQ???

 

[Deleted member 45760]

so I found

e^(2nπ-π/2)​

to be equal to i^i
does that mean the 5th term would be -e^-pi/2?
or have i just messed up horribly

 

[Deleted member 65658]

@Harold O'brien Does your FSIQ exist or is it an abstract meontological falsehood

 

[Harold O'brien]

Its actually not made up lol, actually IQ filtered. I'll give you a whole week to solve it, after I'll post the result. Its a genuine sequence thats has a very simple definition. If you cant solve it I dont think you have a right to post your shitty sequences and LARP about your high iq because you failed an intro to analysis class at your community college.

to me it looks like you've fucked it up, even if its intended to be a real sequence

1, 1, -1, 2, -5,

my guess: the fifth term is supposed to be -3 and not -5. this makes sense whether the sequence is alternatning primes or alternating sums of absolute values of previous terms

 

[Harold O'brien]

so I found

e^(2nπ-π/2)​

to be equal to i^i
does that mean the 5th term would be -e^-pi/2?
or have i just messed up horribly

nope

 

[Deleted member 45760]

nope

was i close?
i dont take complex analysis

 

[Harold O'brien]

was i close?
i dont take complex analysis

some of it was right

 

[cube]

to me it looks like you've fucked it up, even if its intended to be a real sequence

1, 1, -1, 2, -5,

my guess: the fifth term is supposed to be -3 and not -5. this makes sense whether the sequence is alternatning primes or alternating sums of absolute values of previous terms

No its not fucked up, I'll even give you an extra number since it seems you're having a tough time with it

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, 27 ...

 

[Harold O'brien]

No its not fucked up, I'll even give you an extra number since it seems you're having a tough time with it

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, 27 ...

Question: is the 1,1 at the beginning just arbitrary starting values and the sequence is recursively defined or is the sequence generated by an nth formula

 

[Axii]

nobody cares to solve ur sequences, u rub 2 braincells together to create a formula for n and expect somebody on an incel website to spend 15 min of their time to solve them, also why the FUCK does one of your terms have a variable. Heres a sequence that took me 1min anybody who passed 6th grade math can theoretically solve

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, ...

good luck lil nig

Im a retard but I’m guessing the next number in sequence is 6

Im probably so wrong

 

[Axii]

No its not fucked up, I'll even give you an extra number since it seems you're having a tough time with it

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, 27 ...

Where the fuck did 27 come from

 

[Harold O'brien]

It looks like 27=5^2 +2, 5=2^2 + 1, 2=1^2 + 1 etc is the pattern (term squared plus prwvious term) bur again i think yoive fucked it up a little

 

[Axii]

Where the fuck did 27 come from

Wait so if Im not completely a retard I can probably get this

if 27 isn’t the direct answer

-5, 6, 6, -6, -13…

You know what I mean?


So on right?

Im still in High School mate correct me if Im
Wrong @cube

 

[cube]

Question: is the 1,1 at the beginning just arbitrary starting values and the sequence is recursively defined or is the sequence generated by an nth formula

Correct a_1 and a_2 are defined to be 1, the nth number is found by a formula that includes n.

It looks like 27=5^2 +2, 5=2^2 + 1, 2=1^2 + 1 etc is the pattern (term squared plus prwvious term) bur again i think yoive fucked it up a little

Wrong, again I didn't fuck it up, every number in my sequence is well-placed.

Wait so if Im not completely a retard I can probably get this

if 27 isn’t the direct answer

-5, 6, 6, -6, -13…

You know what I mean?


So on right?

Im still in High School mate correct me if Im
Wrong @cube

You don't need anything beyond high school to solve, and sorry mate that isnt right

 

[Harold O'brien]

Correct a_1 and a_2 are defined to be 1, the nth number is found by a formula that includes n.



Wrong, again I didn't fuck it up, every number in my sequence is well-placed.



You don't need anything beyond high school to solve, and sorry mate that isnt right

either

a) a genuinely good sequence
b) wonky defintion

give the formula or another number

 

[Harold O'brien]

Correct a_1 and a_2 are defined to be 1, the nth number is found by a formula that includes n.



Wrong, again I didn't fuck it up, every number in my sequence is well-placed.



You don't need anything beyond high school to solve, and sorry mate that isnt right

solution?

 

[Deleted member 57464]

i dont know imaginary numbers over

 

[cube]

solution?

 

[Harold O'brien]

1, 1, -1, 2, -5, 27 ...

View attachment 2822918

that function with a_1=a_2=1 produces

1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1 ,1, 0, ..... repeated ad infinitum

jfl i knew it would be a trash sequence that you fucked up