A
appealmaxed
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2024
- Posts
- 7,800
- Reputation
- 8,982
i have bicep pump in photo
not flexing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i had just eaten tbh and eaten a 1.2kg choc cake in one sitting 2 days priorbrutal waist
15% bf tbhi had just eaten tbh and eaten a 1.2kg choc cake in one sitting 2 days prior
View attachment 3253157
ye i agree im not too low bf, id probably say 17% since my abs r basically only visible in that light, if i had stepped forward my abs would have disappeared.15% bf tbh
training evening, push pull twice a week, legs once a weekare u training frame?
i had previously fell for that meme but stoped as soon as i saw my face bloating tf up after like 3 weeks. i do omad, and that meal is before i go gym at night. i can eat what i want for the most part and still lose fat and maybe gain muscle since i try to train all to failure and im beginner so should helpare u bulking or sm?
defo not 12%. i used to be 12% this is like 17-18%You are extremely lean and everybody is nuts. 12%
u think 12%. if i had stepped one step forward i would have lost all abs due to lighting jfl. maybe 15%. i remember 12% is where i used to be when i was on the diet we spoke of (meat and fruit) im going back on it nowNah you’re lean bro, ppl saying you’re 17% have no idea what they’re talking abt. Def 12% at most
Good genes but don’t go full gymcel mode bhai
lean down then kek, u will look way better at 12%. Frame wise it is very good, long arms, wide shoulders. waist is meh but for 17-18% it is very good. Narrow wrists aswell, but it is acceptable bcz u have long arms.defo not 12%. i used to be 12% this is like 17-18%
That’s normal, abs are mostly only visible in good lighting. 80% of the population have shit ab genes myself included. 20% just have freaky abs always and anywhereu think 12%. if i had stepped one step forward i would have lost all abs due to lighting jfl. maybe 15%. i remember 12% is where i used to be when i was on the diet we spoke of (meat and fruit) im going back on it now
yup im tryna, about to go play sport for an hour now hopefully burn like 500 cals min, already went gym and consumed my 1 meal of 1500 cals for the day.lean down then kek, u will look way better at 12%. Frame wise it is very good, long arms, wide shoulders. waist is meh but for 17-18% it is very good. Narrow wrists aswell, but it is acceptable bcz u have long arms.
mos for the population will never be 10% bf tho or less which is what those people have probablyThat’s normal, abs are mostly only visible in good lighting. 80% of the population have shit ab genes myself included. 20% just have freaky abs always and anywhere
You might even get facial gains with this.yup im tryna, about to go play sport for an hour now hopefully burn like 500 cals min, already went gym and consumed my 1 meal of 1500 cals for the day.
mos for the population will never be 10% bf tho or less which is what those people have probably
I really think 12% man based on that picture. You really have minimal fat. Your abs are decent they probably just show at a really low body fat. You don’t have a huge amount of muscle. You can lose 10 more pounds and you would be single digit for sure.u think 12%. if i had stepped one step forward i would have lost all abs due to lighting jfl. maybe 15%. i remember 12% is where i used to be when i was on the diet we spoke of (meat and fruit) im going back on it now
thats why i’m doing it. my face looked drastically better when i was about 7-10lbs lighter. i may need to lose less than i think cos of slightly more muscle, but here’s still fat to lose regardless. and the carbs could be fucking meYou might even get facial gains with this.
if this is 15% im 20% lol15% bf tbh
are u training frame? and just measure it yourself for bidelt length but i dont think the shape is terrible
are u bulking or sm?
i will try maintain what muscle i got, but will try drop 7-10lbs fat cos my face looked drastically better thenI really think 12% man based on that picture. You really have minimal fat. Your abs are decent they probably just show at a really low body fat. You don’t have a huge amount of muscle. You can lose 10 more pounds and you would be single digit for sure.
i agreeif this is 15% im 20% lol
im not saying ur wrong btw
Literallyif this is 15% im 20% lol
im not saying ur wrong btw
U dont need to look like a model 24/7 tho, bulking for a couple years while u are still new to fitness might be worth it. But once you are advanced it is not worth it anymore to bulk, bcz u will only gain like 1 pound of muscle for an entire year of bulking. And at that point it is best to just maingain at 12%.@
thats why i’m doing it. my face looked drastically better when i was about 7-10lbs lighter. i may need to lose less than i think cos of slightly more muscle, but here’s still fat to lose regardless. and the carbs could be fucking me
i would think it’s more worth it later on since as a beginner gains can be made easily, in a deficit, at maintenance or surplusU dont need to look like a model 24/7 tho, bulking for a couple years while u are still new to fitness might be worth it.
Yeah probably true maybe it is better as an intermediate because the newbie gains slightly slow down on top of that after a certain amount of time it will be hard to build more muscle. So just accepting what you look like at that moment is the best approach imo instead of going on bulk/cut cycles every year for minimal results.i would think it’s more worth it later on since as a beginner gains can be made easily, in a deficit, at maintenance or surplus