3; 7, 23, 96, 488, ?

n9wiff

n9wiff

PSL icon
Joined
Sep 24, 2023
Posts
16,280
Reputation
29,768
115 IQ should do it
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: NZb6Air, Deleted member 59122, DNRDniggerking and 5 others
Lookism tier 80 IQ thread.
 
2944
 
  • +1
Reactions: wsada
115 IQ should do it
I've done mathematically in my head but since I am a computer scientist, I am just gonna represent it like this.

just run this pseudo code into chatgpt.
you'll get 2944

if you wanna continue this pattern for more just change the loop value from 5 to whatever

-

run the following pseudo code algorithm

loop while z<=5
number = 3
y = 1
x = 2
z = 1
number * x + y = number
z = z + 1
x = x + 1
y = y * 2
end loop
print number
 
Last edited:
1249090900
 
Last edited:
Let's look for a pattern in the sequence: 3, 7, 23, 96, 488.

It doesn't appear to be arithmetic or geometric. Let's examine the differences between consecutive terms:










Next, let's look at the differences between these differences:








No obvious pattern is apparent yet, but the differences are increasing in a complex manner. This could be a recursive or polynomial relationship.

Let me try modeling this numerically to
predict the next term.
 
The sequence you provided is: 3, 7, 23, 96, 488.

To figure out the next number, let's analyze how the numbers change:

  • From 3 to 7: 7−3=47 - 3 = 47−3=4
  • From 7 to 23: 23−7=1623 - 7 = 1623−7=16
  • From 23 to 96: 96−23=7396 - 23 = 7396−23=73
  • From 96 to 488: 488−96=392488 - 96 = 392488−96=392
The differences are increasing: 4, 16, 73, 392.

Let's examine these differences:

  • The difference between 4 and 16 is 12.
  • The difference between 16 and 73 is 57.
  • The difference between 73 and 392 is 319.
These numbers (12, 57, 319) seem to grow rapidly. If we analyze them further, we could predict that the next difference grows substantially, though it's not immediately obvious whether this follows a recognizable pattern (e.g., geometric, exponential).

We could estimate that the next difference after 392 will be very large. Let's approximate based on the pattern of growth and try predicting the next value. Would you like to proceed with an approximation, or look for a potential pattern in these differences more rigorously?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ey88, Deleted member 87612 and Schizotypalcel
doesnt the question go like 3, 7, 23, 95, 479 in that manner :feelswat:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ihearvoices and Underdog9494
real high IQ think about sluts instead of doing math, here the chatgpt answer u zesty ahh
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ineonx, SAQUIB66, Never Get Up and 3 others
real high IQ think about sluts instead of doing math, here the chatgpt answer u zesty ahh
was just finna say u chat gpt'd
 
  • +1
Reactions: PARISIEN
The sequence you provided is: 3, 7, 23, 96, 488.

To figure out the next number, let's analyze how the numbers change:

  • From 3 to 7: 7−3=47 - 3 = 47−3=4
  • From 7 to 23: 23−7=1623 - 7 = 1623−7=16
  • From 23 to 96: 96−23=7396 - 23 = 7396−23=73
  • From 96 to 488: 488−96=392488 - 96 = 392488−96=392
The differences are increasing: 4, 16, 73, 392.

Let's examine these differences:

  • The difference between 4 and 16 is 12.
  • The difference between 16 and 73 is 57.
  • The difference between 73 and 392 is 319.
These numbers (12, 57, 319) seem to grow rapidly. If we analyze them further, we could predict that the next difference grows substantially, though it's not immediately obvious whether this follows a recognizable pattern (e.g., geometric, exponential).

We could estimate that the next difference after 392 will be very large. Let's approximate based on the pattern of growth and try predicting the next value. Would you like to proceed with an approximation, or look for a potential pattern in these differences more rigorously?
nigga reread your shit chatgpt didnt even give you the answer holy shit you are retarded
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: n9wiff and Schizotypalcel
It doesnt make sense
 
3x2+1=7
7x3+2=23
23x4+4=96
96x5+8=488
488x6+16=2944
2944x7+32

so you add +1 to x and then double the second thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: ihearvoices
3 + 3 x 1 + 1 = 7
7 + 7 x 2 + 2 = 23
23 + 23 x 3 + 4 = 96
96 + 96 x 4 + 8 = 488
488 + 488 x 5 + 16 = 2944

so yeah, multiple posters itt got it
 
  • Love it
Reactions: ey88
3 + 3 x 1 + 1 = 7
7 + 7 x 2 + 2 = 23
23 + 23 x 3 + 4 = 96
96 + 96 x 4 + 8 = 488
488 + 488 x 5 + 16 = 2944

so yeah, multiple posters itt got it
I told you guys I’m 130 IQ
 
  • +1
Reactions: n9wiff
To find the next number in the sequence 3, 7, 23, 96, 488, we need to determine a pattern. Let's look at the differences between consecutive terms:
  • 7 - 3 = 4
  • 23 - 7 = 16
  • 96 - 23 = 73
  • 488 - 96 = 392
The differences themselves seem to be increasing, but not in a simple arithmetic progression. Let's look at the differences between the differences:
  • 16 - 4 = 12
  • 73 - 16 = 57
  • 392 - 73 = 319
These are increasing, and we notice that the second differences also seem to be growing significantly. To make an educated guess, let's estimate the next difference after 319. If the pattern holds, we might expect an increase close to 319 itself.
Let's say the next difference is approximately 319 + (around 260 to 300) = 600 (estimate).
Now, add that difference to the last term:
  • 488 + 600 = 1088
Thus, the next number in the sequence is approximately 1088.

AI takeover, bro!

mean-mug.gif
 
@Harold O'brien

This is your calling.
 
fair enough
we both know that's not true

dont you have better things to do than absolutely pathetic attempts to get under my skin? (unless the point is it's so blatant you know that will annoy me)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ey88
we both know that's not true

dont you have better things to do than absolutely pathetic attempts to get under my skin? (unless the point is it's so blatant you know that will annoy me)

we definitely don't "both know that's not true", midwit

and i don't, dominating banks and other financial institutions, governmental agencies, insurance companies and LLCs with millions of EUR of yearly profit is like a 3rd grader homework to me at this point
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NZb6Air and Harold O'brien
we definitely don't "both know that's not true", midwit

and i don't, dominating banks and other financial institutions, governmental agencies, insurance companies and LLCs with millions of EUR of yearly profit is like a 3rd grader homework to me at this point
muh benzos muh white wine, buddy
 
muh benzos muh white wine, buddy


 
real high IQ think about sluts instead of doing math, here the chatgpt answer u zesty ahh

fucking lol at this level of cope. why the assumption that "doing math" (this is not math) and caring about sluts are mutually exclusive? oh, right ... because you need a way to cope :forcedsmile:
 
fucking lol at this level of cope. why the assumption that "doing math" (this is not math) and caring about sluts are mutually exclusive? oh, right ... because you need a way to cope :forcedsmile:
im not that invested in that thread tbh
 
Fuck i really am 107 iq
 
Nvm thats wrong
 

Similar threads

Gaygymmaxx
Replies
17
Views
112
Gaygymmaxx
Gaygymmaxx
๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
Replies
6
Views
90
Klasik616
Klasik616
i_love_roosters
Replies
42
Views
327
i_love_roosters
i_love_roosters
orb.tobx
Replies
35
Views
223
orb.tobx
orb.tobx
Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
1
Views
35
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top