n9wiff
PSL icon
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2023
- Posts
- 16,280
- Reputation
- 29,768
115 IQ should do it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My answer fuck you bitch nigga2944
I've done mathematically in my head but since I am a computer scientist, I am just gonna represent it like this.115 IQ should do it
was just finna say u chat gpt'dreal high IQ think about sluts instead of doing math, here the chatgpt answer u zesty ahh
nigga reread your shit chatgpt didnt even give you the answer holy shit you are retardedThe sequence you provided is: 3, 7, 23, 96, 488.
To figure out the next number, let's analyze how the numbers change:
The differences are increasing: 4, 16, 73, 392.
- From 3 to 7: 7−3=47 - 3 = 47−3=4
- From 7 to 23: 23−7=1623 - 7 = 1623−7=16
- From 23 to 96: 96−23=7396 - 23 = 7396−23=73
- From 96 to 488: 488−96=392488 - 96 = 392488−96=392
Let's examine these differences:
These numbers (12, 57, 319) seem to grow rapidly. If we analyze them further, we could predict that the next difference grows substantially, though it's not immediately obvious whether this follows a recognizable pattern (e.g., geometric, exponential).
- The difference between 4 and 16 is 12.
- The difference between 16 and 73 is 57.
- The difference between 73 and 392 is 319.
We could estimate that the next difference after 392 will be very large. Let's approximate based on the pattern of growth and try predicting the next value. Would you like to proceed with an approximation, or look for a potential pattern in these differences more rigorously?
Because u think I have read it ????nigga reread your shit chatgpt didnt even give you the answer holy shit you are retarded
Nah I got itIt doesnt make sense
I told you guys I’m 130 IQ3 + 3 x 1 + 1 = 7
7 + 7 x 2 + 2 = 23
23 + 23 x 3 + 4 = 96
96 + 96 x 4 + 8 = 488
488 + 488 x 5 + 16 = 2944
so yeah, multiple posters itt got it
To find the next number in the sequence 3, 7, 23, 96, 488, we need to determine a pattern. Let's look at the differences between consecutive terms:
The differences themselves seem to be increasing, but not in a simple arithmetic progression. Let's look at the differences between the differences:
- 7 - 3 = 4
- 23 - 7 = 16
- 96 - 23 = 73
- 488 - 96 = 392
These are increasing, and we notice that the second differences also seem to be growing significantly. To make an educated guess, let's estimate the next difference after 319. If the pattern holds, we might expect an increase close to 319 itself.
- 16 - 4 = 12
- 73 - 16 = 57
- 392 - 73 = 319
Let's say the next difference is approximately 319 + (around 260 to 300) = 600 (estimate).
Now, add that difference to the last term:
Thus, the next number in the sequence is approximately 1088.
- 488 + 600 = 1088
I told you guys I’m 130 IQ
it was already solved, also it's piss@Harold O'brien
This is your calling.
if it wasn't already solved, I wouldn't even post ITT
we both know that's not truefair enough
we both know that's not true
dont you have better things to do than absolutely pathetic attempts to get under my skin? (unless the point is it's so blatant you know that will annoy me)
muh benzos muh white wine, buddywe definitely don't "both know that's not true", midwit
and i don't, dominating banks and other financial institutions, governmental agencies, insurance companies and LLCs with millions of EUR of yearly profit is like a 3rd grader homework to me at this point
muh benzos muh white wine, buddy
i.e. freshman CS student who just learned about loopsI am a computer scientist
real high IQ think about sluts instead of doing math, here the chatgpt answer u zesty ahh
not even close. kysi.e. freshman CS student who just learned about loops
not even close. kys
ok broHe destroyed you
im not that invested in that thread tbhfucking lol at this level of cope. why the assumption that "doing math" (this is not math) and caring about sluts are mutually exclusive? oh, right ... because you need a way to cope
2944
A_(n+1)=(n+1)*A_n+2^(N-1)
A_0=3