4.5 IS AVERAGE, TRUE RATING SCALE

[iblamemandible7]

1/10 - 2/10: SUBHUMAN
3/10: TRUECEL

3.75/10: LOW LTN
4/10: LTN
4.25/10: HIGH LTN

4.5/10: AVERAGE HELFTY 18-25 YEER OLD MALE

4.75/10 LOW MTN
5/10: MTN
5.25/10: HIGH MTN

5.75/10: LOW HTN
6/10: HTN
6.25/10: HIGH HTN

6.75/10: LOW CL
7.25/10: HIGH CL

8/10: CHAD

9/10+: SLAYER

YOU CAN DISAGREE BY A FEW DESSIMALS, BUT JENERALLY THIS IS THE MOST ACURITE SCAIL

NOW THIS IS THE SCAIL THAT @Zeekie, CEREAL CHATGPT ABUSER, BELEEVES IN:

SUBHUMAN: 0-1.5
LTN: 1.5-3/10
MTN: 3-4.5/10
HTN: 4.5-5.5/10

HONESTLY, MASTER HIMSELF SHUD COME DOWN RITE NOW AND TELL @Zeekie HOW DISIPOINTED HE IS IN HIM BEFOUR CENTING HIM TO GANDY HEVIN, IMAJIN ROTTING HEAR FOR OVER A YEER AND HITTING PASTE ON SUCH RETARDED GPT SLOP WITH NO SECINT THOT. COULDINT BEE MEE, ROWBOAT BOY

 

[Zeekie]

This individual is clearly retarded.

If the data says the average man is a 4/10, then MTN is 4/10 NOT 5/10.

Regardless, your logic is pretty inconsistent, you're using %, so what exactly constitutes 5/10 being MTN? If you were to truly be using the mathematical midpoint to define average (which is still wrong) then MTN would be 5.5/10 NOT 5/10. This scale is a subjective joke based on your opinions and feelings on numbers, not based around data, which makes it flawed.

 

[Copercel]

1/10 - 2/10: SUBHUMAN
3/10: TRUECEL

3.75/10: LOW LTN
4/10: LTN
4.25/10: HIGH LTN

4.75/10 LOW MTN
5/10: MTN
5.25/10: HIGH MTN

5.75/10: LOW HTN
6/10: HTN
6.25/10: HIGH HTN

6.75/10: LOW CL
7.25/10: HIGH CL

8/10: CHAD

9/10+: SLAYER

YOU CAN DISAGREE BY A FEW POINTS, BUT JENERALLY THIS IS THE MOST ACURITE SCAIL

NOW THIS IS THE SCAIL THAT @Zeekie, CEREAL CHATGPT ABUSER, BELEEVES IN:

SUBHUMAN: 0-1.5
LTN: 1.5-3/10
MTN: 3-4.5/10
HTN: 4.5-5.5/10

HONESTLY, MASTER HIMSELF SHUD COME DOWN RITE NOW AND TELL @Zeekie HOW DISIPOINTED HE IS IN HIM BEFOUR CENTING HIM TO GANDY HEVIN, IMAJIN ROTTING HEAR FOR OVER A YEER AND HITTING PASTE ON SUCH RETARDED GPT SLOP WITH NO SECINT THOT. COULDINT BEE MEE, ROWBOAT BOY

Could you please learn English?

 

[iblamemandible7]

Could you please learn English?

Nigga wat? Wat languidge am I speeking hear?

 

[iblamemandible7]

@Iraniancel @shredded4summer @bigwilly10 @SilverStCloud

 

[Iraniancel]

@Iraniancel @shredded4summer @bigwilly10 @SilverStCloud

I can get somewhat behind this, saar!

 

[Iraniancel]

Thread music:

 

[iblamemandible7]

Thread music:

ALRIGHT!

 

[shredded4summer]

1/10 - 2/10: SUBHUMAN
3/10: TRUECEL

3.75/10: LOW LTN
4/10: LTN
4.25/10: HIGH LTN

4.75/10 LOW MTN
5/10: MTN
5.25/10: HIGH MTN

5.75/10: LOW HTN
6/10: HTN
6.25/10: HIGH HTN

6.75/10: LOW CL
7.25/10: HIGH CL

8/10: CHAD

9/10+: SLAYER

YOU CAN DISAGREE BY A FEW DESSIMALS, BUT JENERALLY THIS IS THE MOST ACURITE SCAIL

NOW THIS IS THE SCAIL THAT @Zeekie, CEREAL CHATGPT ABUSER, BELEEVES IN:

SUBHUMAN: 0-1.5
LTN: 1.5-3/10
MTN: 3-4.5/10
HTN: 4.5-5.5/10

HONESTLY, MASTER HIMSELF SHUD COME DOWN RITE NOW AND TELL @Zeekie HOW DISIPOINTED HE IS IN HIM BEFOUR CENTING HIM TO GANDY HEVIN, IMAJIN ROTTING HEAR FOR OVER A YEER AND HITTING PASTE ON SUCH RETARDED GPT SLOP WITH NO SECINT THOT. COULDINT BEE MEE, ROWBOAT BOY

its literally numbers. I could also say that anything is anything it doesnt matter. you are comparing arbitrary unmeasurable things therefore there is no true scale.

i truly love the .org scale we use (subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, cl, chad) it makes so much more sense

subhuaman is deformed, not many people are subhuman
ltn is the kinda chopped guy, no girl will like him for his face
mtn is the average looking guy with some apeal depending on other factos
htn is a good looking guy, gets called handsome and is clearly above average
cl is incredibly attractive, you are stunning
chad is one in a million, you see one once a year and they are usually famous

 

[iblamemandible7]

its literally numbers. I could also say that anything is anything it doesnt matter. you are comparing arbitrary unmeasurable things therefore there is no true scale.

i truly love the .org scale we use (subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, cl, chad) it makes so much more sense

subhuaman is deformed, not many people are subhuman
ltn is the kinda chopped guy, no girl will like him for his face
mtn is the average looking guy with some apeal depending on other factos
htn is a good looking guy, gets called handsome and is clearly above average
cl is incredibly attractive, you are stunning
chad is one in a million, you see one once a year and they are usually famous

I agree with your descripshuns of eech teer but im just saying, on a bel curve, 1.5/10 is not ltn in any multiverse

 

[bigwilly10]

This individual is clearly retarded.

If the data says the average man is a 4/10, then MTN is 4/10 NOT 5/10.

Regardless, your logic is pretty inconsistent, you're using %, so what exactly constitutes 5/10 being MTN? If you were to truly be using the mathematical midpoint to define average (which is still wrong) then MTN would be 5.5/10 NOT 5/10. This scale is a subjective joke based on your opinions and feelings on numbers, not based around data, which makes it flawed.

retard made up his own ratings scale and wants us to believe it

 

[Zeekie]

I agree with your descripshuns of eech teer but im just saying, on a bel curve, 1.5/10 is not ltn in any multiverse

BUT WOMEN DO NOT FUCKING RATE MEN ON A STANDARD BELL CURVE, THAT IS MY POINT! Since looks sadly don't work on bell curves in the real world, 5/10 is not MTN

 

[Zeekie]

retard made up his own ratings scale and wants us to believe it

Not even mine btw

A Concise Guide for Evaluating PSL Ratings and Male Beauty Characteristics

Because there has been an increasing influx of new members to the community. I have taken the initiative to create this manual in order to familiarize new members with the collective standards of beauty and the PSL scale. This guide will provide you with a comprehensive overview of what is...

looksmax.org

 

[WhyNotMe_]

BUT WOMEN DO NOT FUCKING RATE MEN ON A STANDARD BELL CURVE, THAT IS MY POINT! Since looks sadly don't work on bell curves in the real world, 5/10 is not MTN

I got rated high mtn or mid mtn what is that in normie scale?

 

[Zeekie]

I got rated high mtn or mid mtn what is that in normie scale?

That's around 4-4.5/10 in numerical values

 

[WhyNotMe_]

That's around 4-4.5/10 in numerical values

Damn brutal

 

[iblamemandible7]

I got rated high mtn or mid mtn what is that in normie scale?

5.1/10, BE CAIRFUL DONT LISSIN TOO ROWBOAT BOY HIS AI IS GONNA TELL HIM 3/10 OR SUM SHIIIII MANGG

 

[Zeekie]

I agree with your descripshuns of eech teer but im just saying, on a bel curve, 1.5/10 is not ltn in any multiverse

I mean, think about it outside of the logical frame. If we're trying to determine the average age when people die, we would analyze a ton of people and get what their age at the time of their death was, depending on the country that could be around 74, under your logic what the statistical average was means nothing and obviously people actually die at the age of 37 since that's the bell curve midpoint!!! NO NIGGA??

Statistical averages DO NOT ALWAYS CORRELATE WITH A STANDARD BELL CURVE, IT SERVES AS A REFERENCE

 

[vvd]

Hltn is avarage not mtn

 

[iblamemandible7]

Hltn is avarage not mtn

Averije is exactly between high ltn - low mtn

 

[Zeekie]

I mean, think about it outside of the logical frame. If we're trying to determine the average age when people die, we would analyze a ton of people and get what their age at the time of their death was, depending on the country that could be around 74, under your logic what the statistical average was means nothing and obviously people actually die at the age of 37 since that's the bell curve midpoint!!! NO NIGGA??

Statistical averages DO NOT ALWAYS CORRELATE WITH A STANDARD BELL CURVE, IT SERVES AS A REFERENCE

Ironically enough the way men rate women does somewhat follow a standard bell curve, so if we're rating women's attractiveness it would be accurate to say that the average women is a 5/10, but that isn't how it is for men, so the average dude actually ranks lower

 

[Zeekie]

Hltn is avarage not mtn

So the average is below average?

 

[Zeekie]

Averije is exactly between high ltn - low mtn

here's a nice introductory series on how statistics works, it also delves into standard distribution, please get some education

 

[vvd]

So the average is below average?

Im guessing you are asking this question becouse "mid" means "avarage", the worlds populations looks are descending every day due to bad habits and etc. In 300 after christ, the avarage male would be HTN

Todays avarage for men is HLTN to LMTN, may be even less due to how many people are in India JFL.

You reffered to women rating avarage men at 2/5 which is 4/10, but this is a completely unreliable opinion you shouldnt stand on, as people will say an avarage based on what THEY see. If they live in Sweden and you ask them how would they rate the avarage male they would say 5/10 or maybe even 6/10, but the avarage man there is a 8/10 in Mumbai. Standing on this isnt logical at all.

 

[Zeekie]

Im guessing you are asking this question becouse "mid" means "avarage", the worlds populations looks are descending every day due to bad habits and etc. In 300 after christ, the avarage male would be HTN

Todays avarage for men is HLTN to LMTN, may be even less due to how many people are in India JFL.

You reffered to women rating avarage men at 2/5 which is 4/10, but this is a completely unreliable opinion you shouldnt stand on, as people will say an avarage based on what THEY see. If they live in Sweden and you ask them how would they rate the avarage male they would say 5/10 or maybe even 6/10, but the avarage man there is a 8/10 in Mumbai. Standing on this isnt logical at all.

The data rating men come from several analyses of data obtained from dating apps. I don't like appealing to authority but it is the only sane way out I see from this conversation, this is obtained from the book "Dataclysm" by Christian Rudder a HAVARD UNIVERSITY GRADUATE IN MATHEMATICS. First off, neither you nor I, are smarter than a dude who studied math at Harvard and wrote a book about it.
That aside, yes, the data may be very well skewed depending on various factors, but whatever data we may have and utilize is MILES BETTER THAN WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING. My version of the scale utilizes data, yours is based entirely on an subjective opinion.

Let me summarize my point for you very blandly: If the average man is rated a 4/10, then the statistical average is 4/10, regardless of where the midpoint of the 1-10 scale lies. If the average is a 4/10, then MTN BY DEFINITION, as in MTN is meant to define the attractive of the average individual, MUST BE 4/10 TOO.

This is both logically and statistically cohesive, it may not be a flawless interpretation, but it is miles ahead from definining the scale based on subjectives and emotional responses to numbers.

 

[vvd]

The data rating men come from several analyses of data obtained from dating apps. I don't like appealing to authority but it is the only sane way out I see from this conversation, this is obtained from the book "Dataclysm" by Christian Rudder a HAVARD UNIVERSITY GRADUATE IN MATHEMATICS. First off, neither you nor I, are smarter than a dude who studied math at Harvard and wrote a book about it.
That aside, yes, the data may be very well skewed depending on various factors, but whatever data we may have and utilize is MILES BETTER THAN WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING. My version of the scale utilizes data, yours is based entirely on an subjective opinion.

Let me summarize my point for you very blandly: If the average man is rated a 4/10, then the statistical average is 4/10, regardless of where the midpoint of the 1-10 scale lies. If the average is a 4/10, then MTN BY DEFINITION, as in MTN is meant to define the attractive of the average individual, MUST BE 4/10 TOO.

This is both logically and statistically cohesive, it may not be a flawless interpretation, but it is miles ahead from definining the scale based on subjectives and emotional responses to numbers.

Can you link the source where the Looksmaxxing gods said that MTN will always be the avarage dude?

 

[Zeekie]

Can you link the source where the Looksmaxxing gods said that MTN will always be the avarage dude?

We're again getting into opinionated answer, this is no longer about statistics, you're just forcefully trying to deny my point, biased, obviously, but I'll play into it regardless.

There's no clear-cut definition for MTN, we sadly don't have a looksmaxxing dictionary as looks are relatively subjective (as proven by this whole thread), but we can use logic to determine what MTN must sort of mean.

"Mid Tier-Normie" implies that the AVERAGE (mid, midean) attractive male, yes, looks may be descending, I agree with that, but if we add that onto the equation you're just making it more complex unnecessarily for the sake of your argument, not how it is normally utilized. If mid is the average, then it should align with the population average throughout the years.

Using your own faulty methods, then when did the Looksmaxxing Gods claim that the PSL scale must be based on some arbitrary measurement of attractiveness at some given point in time? And when exactly did looks peak at 5/10 as to define it at the median? Can you provide any hard evidence or data of that, as I have done?

 

[vvd]

We're again getting into opinionated answer, this is no longer about statistics, you're just forcefully trying to deny my point, biased, obviously, but I'll play into it regardless.

There's no clear-cut definition for MTN, we sadly don't have a looksmaxxing dictionary as looks are relatively subjective (as proven by this whole thread), but we can use logic to determine what MTN must sort of mean.

"Mid Tier-Normie" implies that the AVERAGE (mid, midean) attractive male, yes, looks may be descending, I agree with that, but if we add that onto the equation you're just making it more complex unnecessarily for the sake of your argument, not how it is normally utilized. If mid is the average, then it should align with the population average throughout the years.

Using your own faulty methods, then when did the Looksmaxxing Gods claim that the PSL scale must be based on some arbitrary measurement of attractiveness at some given point in time? And when exactly did looks peak at 5/10 as to define it at the median? Can you provide any hard evidence or data of that, as I have done?

Your whole argument is based on what you want MTN to mean. You cant change everyones opinion on what avarage is. Youll have to accept that HLTN will have to be called avarage regardless of what MTN should mean by definition or what you want MTN to mean.

 

[Zeekie]

Your whole argument is based on what you want MTN to mean. You cant change everyones opinion on what avarage is. Youll have to accept that HLTN will have to be called avarage regardless of what MTN should mean by definition or what you want MTN to mean.

Absolutely not? So if I'm measuring the average lifespan of a human and I claim it is 74 in the US for example, is that opinion? NO! I just measured the average age of death of most people and got my average from there.

In this case I didn't personally do the research, but other people have thankfully already done that. And based on TONS of findings from dating cites and women's rating the average man is 4/10.

About the true definition of MTN, while yes, there's no "universal" definition of the word, if we use common sense we should land at only one conclusion. Using ChatGPT does not make anyone right, but let's ask it what "MTN" means:
"Average, mainstream person with typical interests and social status." (didn't ask directly about attractive here)

Yeah, it means average, obviously. So if we had previously established the statistical attractive average to be 4/10, and MTN LITERALLY IS MEANT TO REPRESENT AVERAGE ATTRACTIVE, then it must equate to 4/10 too.

What's so hard to understand here?

 

[vvd]

Absolutely not? So if I'm measuring the average lifespan of a human and I claim it is 74 in the US for example, is that opinion? NO! I just measured the average age of death of most people and got my average from there.

In this case I didn't personally do the research, but other people have thankfully already done that. And based on TONS of findings from dating cites and women's rating the average man is 4/10.

About the true definition of MTN, while yes, there's no "universal" definition of the word, if we use common sense we should land at only one conclusion. Using ChatGPT does not make anyone right, but let's ask it what "MTN" means:
"Average, mainstream person with typical interests and social status." (didn't ask directly about attractive here)

Yeah, it means average, obviously. So if we had previously established the statistical attractive average to be 4/10, and MTN LITERALLY IS MEANT TO REPRESENT AVERAGE ATTRACTIVE, then it must equate to 4/10 too.

What's so hard to understand here?

Even if your right this will never come to life totally

 

[Zeekie]

Even if your right this will never come to life totally

Yes, in .org colloquial language this is not how the scale works, but my point wasn't to appeal to .org, but to appeal to statistic objectiveness and to attack iblamemandible7.

 

[1nonlymogs]

how is your english so bad yet still coherent

1/10 - 2/10: SUBHUMAN
3/10: TRUECEL

3.75/10: LOW LTN
4/10: LTN
4.25/10: HIGH LTN

4.5/10: AVERAGE HELFTY 18-25 YEER OLD MALE

4.75/10 LOW MTN
5/10: MTN
5.25/10: HIGH MTN

5.75/10: LOW HTN
6/10: HTN
6.25/10: HIGH HTN

6.75/10: LOW CL
7.25/10: HIGH CL

8/10: CHAD

9/10+: SLAYER

YOU CAN DISAGREE BY A FEW DESSIMALS, BUT JENERALLY THIS IS THE MOST ACURITE SCAIL

NOW THIS IS THE SCAIL THAT @Zeekie, CEREAL CHATGPT ABUSER, BELEEVES IN:

SUBHUMAN: 0-1.5
LTN: 1.5-3/10
MTN: 3-4.5/10
HTN: 4.5-5.5/10

HONESTLY, MASTER HIMSELF SHUD COME DOWN RITE NOW AND TELL @Zeekie HOW DISIPOINTED HE IS IN HIM BEFOUR CENTING HIM TO GANDY HEVIN, IMAJIN ROTTING HEAR FOR OVER A YEER AND HITTING PASTE ON SUCH RETARDED GPT SLOP WITH NO SECINT THOT. COULDINT BEE MEE, ROWBOAT BOY

 

[ikramy]

Not a single molecule keep it up retards

 

[1nonlymogs]

how is your english so bad yet still coherent

1/10 - 2/10: SUBHUMAN
3/10: TRUECEL

3.75/10: LOW LTN
4/10: LTN
4.25/10: HIGH LTN

4.5/10: AVERAGE HELFTY 18-25 YEER OLD MALE

4.75/10 LOW MTN
5/10: MTN
5.25/10: HIGH MTN

5.75/10: LOW HTN
6/10: HTN
6.25/10: HIGH HTN

6.75/10: LOW CL
7.25/10: HIGH CL

8/10: CHAD

9/10+: SLAYER

YOU CAN DISAGREE BY A FEW DESSIMALS, BUT JENERALLY THIS IS THE MOST ACURITE SCAIL

NOW THIS IS THE SCAIL THAT @Zeekie, CEREAL CHATGPT ABUSER, BELEEVES IN:

SUBHUMAN: 0-1.5
LTN: 1.5-3/10
MTN: 3-4.5/10
HTN: 4.5-5.5/10

HONESTLY, MASTER HIMSELF SHUD COME DOWN RITE NOW AND TELL @Zeekie HOW DISIPOINTED HE IS IN HIM BEFOUR CENTING HIM TO GANDY HEVIN, IMAJIN ROTTING HEAR FOR OVER A YEER AND HITTING PASTE ON SUCH RETARDED GPT SLOP WITH NO SECINT THOT. COULDINT BEE MEE, ROWBOAT BOY

 

[iraqi]

1/10 - 2/10: SUBHUMAN
3/10: TRUECEL

3.75/10: LOW LTN
4/10: LTN
4.25/10: HIGH LTN

4.5/10: AVERAGE HELFTY 18-25 YEER OLD MALE

4.75/10 LOW MTN
5/10: MTN
5.25/10: HIGH MTN

5.75/10: LOW HTN
6/10: HTN
6.25/10: HIGH HTN

6.75/10: LOW CL
7.25/10: HIGH CL

8/10: CHAD

9/10+: SLAYER

YOU CAN DISAGREE BY A FEW DESSIMALS, BUT JENERALLY THIS IS THE MOST ACURITE SCAIL

NOW THIS IS THE SCAIL THAT @Zeekie, CEREAL CHATGPT ABUSER, BELEEVES IN:

SUBHUMAN: 0-1.5
LTN: 1.5-3/10
MTN: 3-4.5/10
HTN: 4.5-5.5/10

HONESTLY, MASTER HIMSELF SHUD COME DOWN RITE NOW AND TELL @Zeekie HOW DISIPOINTED HE IS IN HIM BEFOUR CENTING HIM TO GANDY HEVIN, IMAJIN ROTTING HEAR FOR OVER A YEER AND HITTING PASTE ON SUCH RETARDED GPT SLOP WITH NO SECINT THOT. COULDINT BEE MEE, ROWBOAT BOY

WATER NIGGA