thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 24,232
- Reputation
- 51,256
1. Absolute Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men based on their absolute attractiveness as quantified by the PSL and decile scales.
If a man is 3/10, women won't want to have sex with him, even if all the other guys in the area are 2/10.
If a man is 8/10, women will want to have sex with him, even if all the other guys in the area are 9/10. They'll want to have sex with the 9/10 guys more than the 8/10 guy, but the 8/10 guy is a viable candidate despite him being the least attractive guy in the vicinity.
Women in countries with more attractive men have more sex, and women in countries with less attractive men have less sex.
2. Relative Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men based on how they compare to the average level of attractiveness.
A 6/10 man in a country where the average is 4/10 has the same advantage as an 8/10 man in a country where the average is 6/10.
Under the relative model, moving to places with shorter and uglier men is a viable strategy to get girls.
3. Standout Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men of the highest looks level in tandem with their rarity.
One 6/10 man in a crowd of 5/10 men is more attractive than a 7/10 man in a place where 50% of men are 7/10 and 50% are 5/10.
One 8/10 man among a million 7/10 men is more attractive than 8/10s in a place where 50% of men are 8/10 and 50% are 6/10. This shows the difference between the standout model and the relative model. In the relative model, women would be attracted to an 8/10 man the same amount in both places because the population averages of both are 7/10.
4. Top Mogger Model of Attraction
Women have their attention focused on the #1 most attractive man (top mogger) in their vicinity. Men's attractiveness to women is based on how their looks compare to the top mogger. Only a small range of looks levels lower than that of the top mogger is accepted.
For example, in a place where all men are 4/10, women would see all of them as potential mates. But, when a 7/10 Chadlite moves into town, suddenly women have all their eyes on this top mogger, and the 4/10 men are then seen as unattractive. If ten more 7/10 Chadlites move into town, women will be attracted to all of these Chadlites the same as the original top mogger, because they're all at the same looks level. If a 9/10 Chad comes by, women will then lose much of their attraction to the 7/10 Chadlites and instead be laser-focused on the 9/10 Chad.
If an 8.5 or 8.75 Chad moves into town after the 9/10 Chads, women will be attracted to him too, but less so than the 9/10 Chads. There's a small margin of looks under the top mogger that women tolerate, but any lower than that and it's over.
5. Top Percentiles Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men based on their looks percentiles, no matter how ugly and no matter how common men of their looks level are.
Let's say women want the top 20% of men.
In a population of 10 men with the following looks levels—
4.9, 4.95, 5, 5.05, 5.1, 5.15, 5.2, 5.25, 5.3, 5.35
—women will want the 5.3 guy and the 5.35 guy.
In a population of 10 men with these looks levels—
1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 10
—women will want the 5 guy and the 10 guy.
The 5.3/10 guy in the 1st example is just as attractive as the 5/10 guy in the 2nd example; they're both top 20% in hotness. The 5.35/10 guy in the 1st example is just as attractive as the 10/10 guy in the 2nd example; they're both top 10% in hotness.
My last thread is flawed because it only works with the top percentiles model.
My logic was, given that women get with a fixed number of mates, such as the top 10% of men, it doesn't matter what races they prefer. If Asian guys were more attractive and White guys were less attractive, the top 10% would remain a constant size.
Every Asian guy who enters the top 10% displaces a White guy out of the top 10%. The inceldom rate stays the same.
However, this isn't the case with other models like the absolute model.
Let's say women have a threshold of 5/10. Men above this threshold, they accept; men below, they reject. Imagine a country that's 95% White and 5% Asian. The average looks for White males is 10/10. The average looks for Asian males is 0/10. So, women accept almost 100% of Whites and reject almost 100% of Asians. 5% of the population is incel.
Now what if the averages of the looks distributions of Whites and Asians were both 5/10. Then women would accept 50% of Whites and 50% of Asians, making 50% of the population incel. Damn, big difference right?
Women are attracted to men based on their absolute attractiveness as quantified by the PSL and decile scales.
If a man is 3/10, women won't want to have sex with him, even if all the other guys in the area are 2/10.
If a man is 8/10, women will want to have sex with him, even if all the other guys in the area are 9/10. They'll want to have sex with the 9/10 guys more than the 8/10 guy, but the 8/10 guy is a viable candidate despite him being the least attractive guy in the vicinity.
Women in countries with more attractive men have more sex, and women in countries with less attractive men have less sex.
2. Relative Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men based on how they compare to the average level of attractiveness.
A 6/10 man in a country where the average is 4/10 has the same advantage as an 8/10 man in a country where the average is 6/10.
Under the relative model, moving to places with shorter and uglier men is a viable strategy to get girls.
3. Standout Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men of the highest looks level in tandem with their rarity.
One 6/10 man in a crowd of 5/10 men is more attractive than a 7/10 man in a place where 50% of men are 7/10 and 50% are 5/10.
One 8/10 man among a million 7/10 men is more attractive than 8/10s in a place where 50% of men are 8/10 and 50% are 6/10. This shows the difference between the standout model and the relative model. In the relative model, women would be attracted to an 8/10 man the same amount in both places because the population averages of both are 7/10.
4. Top Mogger Model of Attraction
Women have their attention focused on the #1 most attractive man (top mogger) in their vicinity. Men's attractiveness to women is based on how their looks compare to the top mogger. Only a small range of looks levels lower than that of the top mogger is accepted.
For example, in a place where all men are 4/10, women would see all of them as potential mates. But, when a 7/10 Chadlite moves into town, suddenly women have all their eyes on this top mogger, and the 4/10 men are then seen as unattractive. If ten more 7/10 Chadlites move into town, women will be attracted to all of these Chadlites the same as the original top mogger, because they're all at the same looks level. If a 9/10 Chad comes by, women will then lose much of their attraction to the 7/10 Chadlites and instead be laser-focused on the 9/10 Chad.
If an 8.5 or 8.75 Chad moves into town after the 9/10 Chads, women will be attracted to him too, but less so than the 9/10 Chads. There's a small margin of looks under the top mogger that women tolerate, but any lower than that and it's over.
5. Top Percentiles Model of Attraction
Women are attracted to men based on their looks percentiles, no matter how ugly and no matter how common men of their looks level are.
Let's say women want the top 20% of men.
In a population of 10 men with the following looks levels—
4.9, 4.95, 5, 5.05, 5.1, 5.15, 5.2, 5.25, 5.3, 5.35
—women will want the 5.3 guy and the 5.35 guy.
In a population of 10 men with these looks levels—
1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 10
—women will want the 5 guy and the 10 guy.
The 5.3/10 guy in the 1st example is just as attractive as the 5/10 guy in the 2nd example; they're both top 20% in hotness. The 5.35/10 guy in the 1st example is just as attractive as the 10/10 guy in the 2nd example; they're both top 10% in hotness.
My last thread is flawed because it only works with the top percentiles model.
My logic was, given that women get with a fixed number of mates, such as the top 10% of men, it doesn't matter what races they prefer. If Asian guys were more attractive and White guys were less attractive, the top 10% would remain a constant size.
Every Asian guy who enters the top 10% displaces a White guy out of the top 10%. The inceldom rate stays the same.
However, this isn't the case with other models like the absolute model.
Let's say women have a threshold of 5/10. Men above this threshold, they accept; men below, they reject. Imagine a country that's 95% White and 5% Asian. The average looks for White males is 10/10. The average looks for Asian males is 0/10. So, women accept almost 100% of Whites and reject almost 100% of Asians. 5% of the population is incel.
Now what if the averages of the looks distributions of Whites and Asians were both 5/10. Then women would accept 50% of Whites and 50% of Asians, making 50% of the population incel. Damn, big difference right?
Last edited:
