5'2 is the worst possible height to be as a man

Dondraper75

Dondraper75

Apricot
Joined
Oct 27, 2024
Posts
4,055
Reputation
4,895
its the bottom of the barrel of manlet heights because its objectively extremely short yet not short enough to the point where people think its some sort of disability to pity you or see you as unique like heights like 4'10 or 4'11, id much rather have dwarfism like peter dinklage than be 5'2 because its less socially acceptable to mock + having dwarfism is so short to the point where its very low hanging fruit to make fun of
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: superpsycho, Napoleon1800, valentine and 2 others
its the bottom of the barrel of manlet heights because its objectively extremely short yet not short enough to the point where people think its some sort of disability to pity you or see you as unique like heights like 4'10 or 4'11, id much rather have dwarfism like peter dinklage than be 5'2 because its less socially acceptable to mock + having dwarfism is so short to the point where its very low hanging fruit to make fun of
lowkey real when i think about it, if u 4'10 u just date other dwarfs but 5'2 u are just looked at as subhuman , highiq thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dondraper75
Good thing i’m 5’1 then
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Coolcheeseburger127, Roquefort and Dondraper75
Yeah you'll have a frame of a little boy, I find girls cute from the height of 5'3'', so 5'2'' mallet is a death sentence, seen one at the gym, brutal mang
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dondraper75
Good thing im 3'2
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyMagnetant, StacyAttractant, StacyRepellent and 2 others
its the bottom of the barrel of manlet heights because its objectively extremely short yet not short enough to the point where people think its some sort of disability to pity you or see you as unique like heights like 4'10 or 4'11, id much rather have dwarfism like peter dinklage than be 5'2 because its less socially acceptable to mock + having dwarfism is so short to the point where its very low hanging fruit to make fun of
There’s nothing worse than 5’11 and no one can convince me otherwise
 
its the bottom of the barrel of manlet heights because its objectively extremely short yet not short enough to the point where people think its some sort of disability to pity you or see you as unique like heights like 4'10 or 4'11, id much rather have dwarfism like peter dinklage than be 5'2 because its less socially acceptable to mock + having dwarfism is so short to the point where its very low hanging fruit to make fun of
I wish I was 1'3" so I could enter vaginas like a mole
 
  • +1
Reactions: cornerd nerd
anything under 6 foot is death sentence
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
13
Views
1K
registerfasterusing
registerfasterusing
Dondraper75
Replies
7
Views
168
StraightHeadJames
StraightHeadJames
Jué
Replies
60
Views
834
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer
Сигма Бой
Replies
27
Views
1K
freedompanel
freedompanel
Сигма Бой
Replies
5
Views
147
Сигма Бой
Сигма Бой

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top