6'1 is literally the perfect and most ideal height for a male

[theblackestofpills]

6'1 is literally the most ideal / perfect height for a male, here is why....


Men 6'1 and up reap the benefits of being tall and are of higher social status. 6'1 is just about enough to stand out from all the worthless, mediocre humans who are 5'11 and under.

6'1 is just about enough to reap all the benefits of being tall, while retaining good proportions, and having a good lifespan.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 also have good lifespan and proportions however, lack being fully masculine and are considered mediocre heights.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 don't garner as much respect and attention from the opposite sex as men who are 6'1 and up.


Also, men who are under 5'10 actually have reduced lifespan as opposed to those in the bracket of 5'10 to 6'1.

Men who are 6'2 and up also have a reduced lifespan in exchange for higher social status, respect and female attention.


So 6'1 is literally the perfect height if we merge all of the aspects together.

6'1 is also around 85th - 90th percentile which means there is a sharp decline in occurrence at around 6'1, so it is it enough to warrant giving "tall" status.


As for 6'0, I see 6'0 as an okay / respectable height.

At the moment, I would say that 6'0 is pretty ideal, however it does seem to be dwindling in value in the passing years. It's not enough to be considered "tall", but it's still good enough for most women.

Also, modelling agencies tend to prefer their models in that 6'0 - 6'2 range and so 6'1 is like bang on the money in terms of ideal for modelling careers. It's also a good height for various different sports, apart from maybe the NBA and other sports where the taller the better.


Now obviously if someone is 6'4 and lives a long life, while also retaining good proportions, that will be better than being 6'1
However, that isn't usually the case and so being taller isn't necessarily better.


So yeah.

Men who are 6'1 and above have higher social status

Men who are 5'11 and under are seen as mediocre, or worthless.

Under 5'10 = Unhealthy, short, unattractive

5'10 - 5'11 = mediocre, valueless (in a bad way)

6'0 = okay, respectable, decent

6'1 = most ideal

6'2 and up = Ideal, at the cost of lifespan and depends on proportions.


So yeah 6'1 is the most ideal. It's tall enough to stand out, be ideal and be a man.

Heights under 6'0 are feminine.

6'0 is manly enough but losing its place with time.

 

[theblackestofpills]

In short ,6'1 is the most ideal height and that's all there is to it.

 

[StrangerDanger]

Try being 6'1 in Scandinavia you will feel average

 

[LiteralCaucasian]

Woah that's a lot of words for someone coping that they're not a 6'2 Chad such as myself

 

[theblackestofpills]

Woah that's a lot of words for someone coping that they're not a 6'2 Chad such as myself

It's why I'm not gonna bother fixing my anterior pelvic tilt. I cba to die 5 years earlier

 

[tallnegga]

ideal height for nobody to ever mention your height because you’re average af

 

[LiteralCaucasian]

It's why I'm not gonna bother fixing my anterior pelvic tilt. I cba to die 5 years earlier

Cope, I am better than you XD

 

[theblackestofpills]

Cope, I am better than you XD

Id rather stay 6'1 now.

 

[Deleted member 23558]

6’3 is ideal.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

As a 6'3 I think 6'1 is also ideal. Slight back pains and bad calf insertions are caused by being taller than 6'1. The first hunter gatherers were 6'1 as well, it's the perfectly balanced height.

 

[Deleted member 24586]

You're a fake 6'1 like me (6'1 in morning but reduce to 6ft by night)

 

[Deleted member 14815]

Proceeds to get mogged by the 6 ft 3 d1 athlete girls

 

[;-;]

I'm 190cm and i would've give 25 years of my lifespan to be 6'8+ or a chadlite face

 

[theblackestofpills]

You're a fake 6'1 like me (6'1 in morning but reduce to 6ft by night)

?

 

[Deleted member 24940]

Lifefuel for 6'1cels like myself. Should I stop wearing my lifts that take me to 6'3 to avoid being too tall?

 

[Sprinkles]

im 5 foot 5

 

[theblackestofpills]

Lifefuel for 6'1cels like myself. Should I stop wearing my lifts that take me to 6'3 to avoid being too tall?

Yes 100 percent. Even adding 1 inch of shoe lift can cause damage long term to the feet and other areas.

It's not healthy as it's an unnatural position to put your feet in.

I only wear lifts that bring me up 1.5cm max and even that's pushing it.

 

[theblackestofpills]

im 5 foot 5

Go slay Bolivians

 

[Deleted member 16194]

5’10” -5-11” is midget unless you’re robust

 

[theblackestofpills]

5’10” -5-11” is midget unless you’re robust

5'10 - 5'11 are the doable heights imo. Men have to compensate elsewhere for their feminine, genetically inferior heights.. that is sub 6 ft.

 

[Deleted member 16194]

5'10 - 5'11 are the doable heights imo. Men have to compensate elsewhere for their feminine, genetically inferior heights.. that is sub 6 ft.

It’s a size thing if you’re not robust at that height you are seen as short and beta

You can still get laid but you will never be a big man in the eyes of women

 

[St.TikTokcel]

6'1 is literally the most ideal / perfect height for a male, here is why....


Men 6'1 and up reap the benefits of being tall and are of higher social status. 6'1 is just about enough to stand out from all the worthless, mediocre humans who are 5'11 and under.

6'1 is just about enough to reap all the benefits of being tall, while retaining good proportions, and having a good lifespan.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 also have good lifespan and proportions however, lack being fully masculine and are considered mediocre heights.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 don't garner as much respect and attention from the opposite sex as men who are 6'1 and up.


Also, men who are under 5'10 actually have reduced lifespan as opposed to those in the bracket of 5'10 to 6'1.

Men who are 6'2 and up also have a reduced lifespan in exchange for higher social status, respect and female attention.


So 6'1 is literally the perfect height if we merge all of the aspects together.

6'1 is also around 85th - 90th percentile which means there is a sharp decline in occurrence at around 6'1, so it is it enough to warrant giving "tall" status.


As for 6'0, I see 6'0 as an okay / respectable height.

At the moment, I would say that 6'0 is pretty ideal, however it does seem to be dwindling in value in the passing years. It's not enough to be considered "tall", but it's still good enough for most women.

Also, modelling agencies tend to prefer their models in that 6'0 - 6'2 range and so 6'1 is like bang on the money in terms of ideal for modelling careers. It's also a good height for various different sports, apart from maybe the NBA and other sports where the taller the better.


Now obviously if someone is 6'4 and lives a long life, while also retaining good proportions, that will be better than being 6'1
However, that isn't usually the case and so being taller isn't necessarily better.


So yeah.

Men who are 6'1 and above have higher social status

Men who are 5'11 and under are seen as mediocre, or worthless.

Under 5'10 = Unhealthy, short, unattractive

5'10 - 5'11 = mediocre, valueless (in a bad way)

6'0 = okay, respectable, decent

6'1 = most ideal

6'2 and up = Ideal, at the cost of lifespan and depends on proportions.


So yeah 6'1 is the most ideal. It's tall enough to stand out, be ideal and be a man.

Heights under 6'0 are feminine.

6'0 is manly enough but losing its place with time.

Manlet cope. 6'2 is literally the average height.

 

[Deleted member 24940]

Yes 100 percent. Even adding 1 inch of shoe lift can cause damage long term to the feet and other areas.

It's not healthy as it's an unnatural position to put your feet in.

Any source on this? I doubt adding 1 inch lifts are that bad for you.

 

[theblackestofpills]

Any source on this? I doubt adding 1 inch lifts are that bad for you.

Well that would be from a very long term perspective.

I suppose it depends on the lifts itself as well. If they are very well designed and is a high quality product then an inch might be okay. I. Would opt for any higher though.

If it is a cheaper one get rid asap.

 

[Deleted member 24586]

?

You said in another thread you drop down to 6.05 in the evening? Maybe that was another guy here

 

[theblackestofpills]

Any source on this? I doubt adding 1 inch lifts are that bad for you.

It will probably provide to a lesser extent of that of high heels.

Just type down high heels long term effects and and it should be that to a much lesser extent.

Depends on the quality of the lifts as well.

 

[nitesik]

6'1 is literally the most ideal / perfect height for a male, here is why....


Men 6'1 and up reap the benefits of being tall and are of higher social status. 6'1 is just about enough to stand out from all the worthless, mediocre humans who are 5'11 and under.

6'1 is just about enough to reap all the benefits of being tall, while retaining good proportions, and having a good lifespan.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 also have good lifespan and proportions however, lack being fully masculine and are considered mediocre heights.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 don't garner as much respect and attention from the opposite sex as men who are 6'1 and up.


Also, men who are under 5'10 actually have reduced lifespan as opposed to those in the bracket of 5'10 to 6'1.

Men who are 6'2 and up also have a reduced lifespan in exchange for higher social status, respect and female attention.


So 6'1 is literally the perfect height if we merge all of the aspects together.

6'1 is also around 85th - 90th percentile which means there is a sharp decline in occurrence at around 6'1, so it is it enough to warrant giving "tall" status.


As for 6'0, I see 6'0 as an okay / respectable height.

At the moment, I would say that 6'0 is pretty ideal, however it does seem to be dwindling in value in the passing years. It's not enough to be considered "tall", but it's still good enough for most women.

Also, modelling agencies tend to prefer their models in that 6'0 - 6'2 range and so 6'1 is like bang on the money in terms of ideal for modelling careers. It's also a good height for various different sports, apart from maybe the NBA and other sports where the taller the better.


Now obviously if someone is 6'4 and lives a long life, while also retaining good proportions, that will be better than being 6'1
However, that isn't usually the case and so being taller isn't necessarily better.


So yeah.

Men who are 6'1 and above have higher social status

Men who are 5'11 and under are seen as mediocre, or worthless.

Under 5'10 = Unhealthy, short, unattractive

5'10 - 5'11 = mediocre, valueless (in a bad way)

6'0 = okay, respectable, decent

6'1 = most ideal

6'2 and up = Ideal, at the cost of lifespan and depends on proportions.


So yeah 6'1 is the most ideal. It's tall enough to stand out, be ideal and be a man.

Heights under 6'0 are feminine.

6'0 is manly enough but losing its place with time.

these bluepillers man

6'1-6'2 IS LITERALLY BELOW AVERAGE STOP THE COPE

 

[theblackestofpills]

You said in another thread you drop down to 6.05 in the evening? Maybe that was another guy here

Nah

 

[Sens]

Being talking for ages that ideal is 185-190 depending on country, after 190 cm your quality of life and longevity starts to decrease.

 

[theblackestofpills]

Being talking for ages that ideal is 185-190 depending on country, after 190 cm your quality of life and longevity starts to decrease.

And 183cm is bare minimum.

Anything less and compensation is needed.

 

[RichmondBread]

I think so too, but I don't agree that being taller is the better. 6'1 is ideal but over 6'3 is actually too tall. Just basing it off of male modeling agencies who want standard 5'11-6'3 height.

 

[RAITEIII]

6'1 is literally the most ideal / perfect height for a male, here is why....


Men 6'1 and up reap the benefits of being tall and are of higher social status. 6'1 is just about enough to stand out from all the worthless, mediocre humans who are 5'11 and under.

6'1 is just about enough to reap all the benefits of being tall, while retaining good proportions, and having a good lifespan.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 also have good lifespan and proportions however, lack being fully masculine and are considered mediocre heights.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 don't garner as much respect and attention from the opposite sex as men who are 6'1 and up.


Also, men who are under 5'10 actually have reduced lifespan as opposed to those in the bracket of 5'10 to 6'1.

Men who are 6'2 and up also have a reduced lifespan in exchange for higher social status, respect and female attention.


So 6'1 is literally the perfect height if we merge all of the aspects together.

6'1 is also around 85th - 90th percentile which means there is a sharp decline in occurrence at around 6'1, so it is it enough to warrant giving "tall" status.


As for 6'0, I see 6'0 as an okay / respectable height.

At the moment, I would say that 6'0 is pretty ideal, however it does seem to be dwindling in value in the passing years. It's not enough to be considered "tall", but it's still good enough for most women.

Also, modelling agencies tend to prefer their models in that 6'0 - 6'2 range and so 6'1 is like bang on the money in terms of ideal for modelling careers. It's also a good height for various different sports, apart from maybe the NBA and other sports where the taller the better.


Now obviously if someone is 6'4 and lives a long life, while also retaining good proportions, that will be better than being 6'1
However, that isn't usually the case and so being taller isn't necessarily better.


So yeah.

Men who are 6'1 and above have higher social status

Men who are 5'11 and under are seen as mediocre, or worthless.

Under 5'10 = Unhealthy, short, unattractive

5'10 - 5'11 = mediocre, valueless (in a bad way)

6'0 = okay, respectable, decent

6'1 = most ideal

6'2 and up = Ideal, at the cost of lifespan and depends on proportions.


So yeah 6'1 is the most ideal. It's tall enough to stand out, be ideal and be a man.

Heights under 6'0 are feminine.

6'0 is manly enough but losing its place with time.

Were young none cares that bad about lifespan shit

 

[Deleted member 22099]

Mirin' the manlet cope

 

[Zoom759]

I think ideal is around 3 inches whatever ur average is. this allows u to stand out and be tall but not too tall to the point where it might become only niche appeal. so in america yeah 6’1 is ideal but in most of north europe where it’s about an inch taller I think 6’2 is ideal and in the tall dutch countries ideal there would be around 6’3-6’4.

 

[Deleted member 21766]

 

[Deleted member 25198]

Ideal height doesn't exist, in foids minds bigger is always better, if there was a 7 ft version of you they'd fuck him before they fuck you. The only thing that exists is being tall enough or not for that particular woman's standards. It's all a numbers game. If you live in Europe being ober 180cm is great, in NA it's 183cm

 

[Splinter901]

lifespan is cope, you will look like a monster in your 40's and pretend to live 40 more years getting more and more disgusting? jfl, I'd rather be 6'5 and die at 29

 

[Deleted member 24940]

Ideal height doesn't exist, in foids minds bigger is always better, if there was a 7 ft version of you they'd fuck him before they fuck you. The only thing that exists is being tall enough or not for that particular woman's standards. It's all a numbers game. If you live in Europe being ober 180cm is great, in NA it's 183cm

This is actually probably true. Flip the scenario and think of it from a male perspective: have you ever seen a girl that was too short? (assuming she's not a legit deformed midget/dwarf but a normal human female)

Shorter girls are always more attractive because they are more submissive and easier to manhandle. There was this 4'10 girl at my job with massive ass and titties and it got me so hard thinking about lifting her up and fucking her.

 

[Deleted member 25193]

6'1 is literally the most ideal / perfect height for a male, here is why....


Men 6'1 and up reap the benefits of being tall and are of higher social status. 6'1 is just about enough to stand out from all the worthless, mediocre humans who are 5'11 and under.

6'1 is just about enough to reap all the benefits of being tall, while retaining good proportions, and having a good lifespan.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 also have good lifespan and proportions however, lack being fully masculine and are considered mediocre heights.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 don't garner as much respect and attention from the opposite sex as men who are 6'1 and up.


Also, men who are under 5'10 actually have reduced lifespan as opposed to those in the bracket of 5'10 to 6'1.

Men who are 6'2 and up also have a reduced lifespan in exchange for higher social status, respect and female attention.


So 6'1 is literally the perfect height if we merge all of the aspects together.

6'1 is also around 85th - 90th percentile which means there is a sharp decline in occurrence at around 6'1, so it is it enough to warrant giving "tall" status.


As for 6'0, I see 6'0 as an okay / respectable height.

At the moment, I would say that 6'0 is pretty ideal, however it does seem to be dwindling in value in the passing years. It's not enough to be considered "tall", but it's still good enough for most women.

Also, modelling agencies tend to prefer their models in that 6'0 - 6'2 range and so 6'1 is like bang on the money in terms of ideal for modelling careers. It's also a good height for various different sports, apart from maybe the NBA and other sports where the taller the better.


Now obviously if someone is 6'4 and lives a long life, while also retaining good proportions, that will be better than being 6'1
However, that isn't usually the case and so being taller isn't necessarily better.


So yeah.

Men who are 6'1 and above have higher social status

Men who are 5'11 and under are seen as mediocre, or worthless.

Under 5'10 = Unhealthy, short, unattractive

5'10 - 5'11 = mediocre, valueless (in a bad way)

6'0 = okay, respectable, decent

6'1 = most ideal

6'2 and up = Ideal, at the cost of lifespan and depends on proportions.


So yeah 6'1 is the most ideal. It's tall enough to stand out, be ideal and be a man.

Heights under 6'0 are feminine.

6'0 is manly enough but losing its place with time.

You ever go outside and see most couples ranging from 4 to 6 out of 10 all being sub 6ft you are a mentalcel

 

[Deleted member 25198]

This is actually probably true. Flip the scenario and think of it from a male perspective: have you ever seen a girl that was too short? (assuming she's not a legit deformed midget/dwarf but a normal human female)

Shorter girls are always more attractive because they are more submissive and easier to manhandle. There was this 4'10 girl at my job with massive ass and titties and it got me so hard thinking about lifting her up and fucking her.

No nigga you misunderstood me wtf. I'd like a woman as tall as possible too. Shorter = more subhuman for both genders

 

[Deleted member 24940]

No nigga you misunderstood me wtf. I'd like a woman as tall as possible too. Shorter = more subhuman for both genders

I understand for marriage you want a tall girl, but for sex I'm more attracted to short woman because I find them more submissive and feminine.

Although I'm not very attracted to tall girls, I would marry and have kids with only a 5'8+ woman because I want tall sons. In an ideal world of have a harem of curvy womanlets and a main bitch who's tall.

 

[Deleted member 25198]

I understand for marriage you want a tall girl, but for sex I'm more attracted to short woman because I find them more submissive and feminine.

Although I'm not very attracted to tall girls, I would marry and have kids with only a 5'8+ woman because I want tall sons. In an ideal world of have a harem of curvy womanlets and a main bitch who's tall.

Fuck them womanlets, give me a harem of thick, tall bitches to grab and manhandle. I can't be attracted to girls under 5'7 due to ptsd from seeing my mom and dad interact with each other at massive height diff. I feel weird around short goblinas

 

[WhoAmIReally]

6'1.5/187 cm mogs, perfect male model height and also gandy and hernan drago's heights.

 

[manletfuel]

6'1 is literally the most ideal / perfect height for a male, here is why....


Men 6'1 and up reap the benefits of being tall and are of higher social status. 6'1 is just about enough to stand out from all the worthless, mediocre humans who are 5'11 and under.

6'1 is just about enough to reap all the benefits of being tall, while retaining good proportions, and having a good lifespan.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 also have good lifespan and proportions however, lack being fully masculine and are considered mediocre heights.

Men who are 5'10 - 5'11 don't garner as much respect and attention from the opposite sex as men who are 6'1 and up.


Also, men who are under 5'10 actually have reduced lifespan as opposed to those in the bracket of 5'10 to 6'1.

Men who are 6'2 and up also have a reduced lifespan in exchange for higher social status, respect and female attention.


So 6'1 is literally the perfect height if we merge all of the aspects together.

6'1 is also around 85th - 90th percentile which means there is a sharp decline in occurrence at around 6'1, so it is it enough to warrant giving "tall" status.


As for 6'0, I see 6'0 as an okay / respectable height.

At the moment, I would say that 6'0 is pretty ideal, however it does seem to be dwindling in value in the passing years. It's not enough to be considered "tall", but it's still good enough for most women.

Also, modelling agencies tend to prefer their models in that 6'0 - 6'2 range and so 6'1 is like bang on the money in terms of ideal for modelling careers. It's also a good height for various different sports, apart from maybe the NBA and other sports where the taller the better.


Now obviously if someone is 6'4 and lives a long life, while also retaining good proportions, that will be better than being 6'1
However, that isn't usually the case and so being taller isn't necessarily better.


So yeah.

Men who are 6'1 and above have higher social status

Men who are 5'11 and under are seen as mediocre, or worthless.

Under 5'10 = Unhealthy, short, unattractive

5'10 - 5'11 = mediocre, valueless (in a bad way)

6'0 = okay, respectable, decent

6'1 = most ideal

6'2 and up = Ideal, at the cost of lifespan and depends on proportions.


So yeah 6'1 is the most ideal. It's tall enough to stand out, be ideal and be a man.

Heights under 6'0 are feminine.

6'0 is manly enough but losing its place with time.

eh aesthetics > lifespan