6'1 - 6'2" is too common
How are 6'4-6'5 not good health and longevity wise? Sounds like manlet cope tbh. There's 6'9+ NBA players in their late 80's.
Don’t you live in Egypt? Average guy is 5’8.5 there according to Wikipedia so you’re like a standard deviation above average
no australia everyone is tall here
its kinda cope but tall guys will have trouble doing sports in their 40s-50s already
thats because 6'1 is tall and 6'0 is not. its the cut off
chill out bro I’m just tryna relax
should i larp as 6'0 when im 181,5 cm
fr tho I'm almost 6'2 and I've been called tall multiple times too. I live in the USA in a university campus so average height here isn't short. These people just focus way too much on trying to find someone taller than them and once they do that is literally all they think about.
Dude no one is going to tell the difference between 6'1 and 6'0, LITERALLY no one. Unless you're a 5'11 larper.
there’s barely a difference between 6’1 and 6’0 dumb ass
Tom Brady is 43 and still in the NFL. Major cope. 99% of people have trouble with sports in their mid 30s regardless of height.
no one is going to tell the difference between literally any height that follows the other you dipshit
brady has shit tier athleticism bro. jfl. he can't run for shit
181.5 is 5’11 and half so you could just round up
You're actually retarded, such a small difference shouldn't be accounted for. 6'0 and 6'1 are basically the same, the only difference is the status and halo it provides, 6'1 is better than 6'0 but the differences are nearly non existent. Only 2 inch difference should be counted.
u must be trolling at this point
Shit-tier athleticism in comparison to 4.4 dashes 40 inch vertical NBA players. Still playing a professional sport at 43. The average 40 year old would be in the hospital after 1 tackle.
well if you are just going minus '1 everytime then I guess 6'2 is tall. lol
he is an outlier, and not in the league because of his athleticism. how often do you see oldcel giants run in the park? never because they can't. above 6'1 isn't ideal for athletic longevity IMO. bigger toll on knees etc.
Like I said, no one is going to notice the difference between 6'1 and 6'0, so there's no point at putting the cut off there. The height difference has to be clearly visible, like a 6'2 vs a 6'0.
6'1 and 5'11 is visible. It's hard to tell apart 1 inches, 2 inches you can easily tell.
so your point is that tall is dependent on the second tallest in the group or what
My point is that to say 6'0 is short and claiming 6'1 is the cutoff is ridiculous, that's foid logic. 5'11 and 6' are pratically the same yet foids prefer 6' just because of the number when the difference is so tiny.
How often do you see giants at all? Only 1% of people are 6'4+. You're obviously not going to see them often JFL.
bruh how is it foid logic when the foid logic relies just on the first number and I don't. omfg I'm done jfl
a tall guy will take bigger tolls on his knees when doing the same activites than a manlet. same for fatness. so yeah its more about weight but height means more weight in general.
Lebron is 36...
6ft = manlet never begun only rope
Wait u r 6 6? I find that very very unbelievable. I never met anyone ur height or taller. Is that ur height barefoot measured by the doctors? Or some cope u came up with
im Michael Jordan
