95% of people would be considered sub5 in .org

[Zheng]

I was walking around ALDI in the UK whilst constantly analysing people's faces and height and holy moly recessed maxilla, jaw, short ramus and negative canthal tilt everywhere. I never knew how ugly people were in the general public. Everyone would be considered sub 5 and BP has me ND staring at people looking at their ratios and growth to the extent of not looking at fat asses in the gym but I was getting height mogged by 30% of guys and have in mind in 5'11 . Total BS that being 6ft+ is 14.5% btw.

 

[medialcanthus]

I was walking around ALDI in the UK whilst constantly analysing people's faces and height and holy moly recessed maxilla, jaw, short ramus and negative canthal tilt everywhere. I never knew how ugly people were in the general public. Everyone would be considered sub 5 and BP has me ND staring at people looking at their ratios and growth to the extent of not looking at fat asses in the gym but I was getting height mogged by 30% of guys and have in mind in 5'11 . Total BS that being 6ft+ is 14.5% btw.

around 70-80% of the population is LTN

 

[bpgonnakillme]

around 70-80% of the population is LTN

true, rating of 6.25 facially is considered top 10% face

 

[Arzenic]

around 70-80% of the population is LTN

Yeah, but genetically only about 5% are so genetically fucked that they could never be ltn/mtn.

retards just bluepilled copecells and refuse to better themselves

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Lifefuel for my high mtn ratings

 

[Foreverbrad]

If you rate as a Foid would rate, sure.

 

[Deleted member 180697]

Yeah because ALDI is for poor subhumans.

 

[medialcanthus]

Yeah, but genetically only about 5% are so genetically fucked that they could never be ltn/mtn.

retards just bluepilled copecells and refuse to better themselves

i would say like 20%
you have to include 3rd world countries with old world phenos