luckycel
Iron
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Posts
- 158
- Reputation
- 177
Today, I was just watching FaceIQ rate taylor hill. Now I do think that taylor hill is severely above-average(especially her front, in terms of health indicators etc.), but what shocked me is the rating her side got:
Her side got an 8.02 on FaceIQLabs, which is basically stacylite. No one in the comments even pointed this out. I couldn't find a single person disagreeing. Genuinely, what the fuck? Her side looks pretty subhuman to me. Mtn or HMtn at best, but she literally got an 8(keep in mind that the average person on FaceIQLabs is around a 5, 8 is extremely good). We can quickly try genderswapping her by giving her short hair to prove my theory:
This guy literally looks like a sub3 subhuman incel. Even assuming that his mandible would be taller as a male his features in general are very subhuman regardless of dimo. I think this shows that you don't need any kind of good development as a female to look good. And no, this isn't just an example of "female dimorphism" making her look underdeveloped, as there are lots of females out there with good bones and development which makes them look way better imo:
This is a great example of how a developed mandible and a projected maxilla look like on a female. For some guys this might look too masculine but there still isn't a single person who would call her ugly. This shows that both looking underdeveloped and overdeveloped as a female look good to most guys and there isn't really any way you can look truly bad if all of your features are at least average. And you'll probably get a bunch of people calling you "stacy" if you have good health indicators, a mid eye area, and aren't a whale. I think that there are a lot of women that i'd consider stacies, but the avg normie or even the people on this forum tend to overrate any mid white woman that would literally be an incel if she was male.
Her side got an 8.02 on FaceIQLabs, which is basically stacylite. No one in the comments even pointed this out. I couldn't find a single person disagreeing. Genuinely, what the fuck? Her side looks pretty subhuman to me. Mtn or HMtn at best, but she literally got an 8(keep in mind that the average person on FaceIQLabs is around a 5, 8 is extremely good). We can quickly try genderswapping her by giving her short hair to prove my theory:
This guy literally looks like a sub3 subhuman incel. Even assuming that his mandible would be taller as a male his features in general are very subhuman regardless of dimo. I think this shows that you don't need any kind of good development as a female to look good. And no, this isn't just an example of "female dimorphism" making her look underdeveloped, as there are lots of females out there with good bones and development which makes them look way better imo:
This is a great example of how a developed mandible and a projected maxilla look like on a female. For some guys this might look too masculine but there still isn't a single person who would call her ugly. This shows that both looking underdeveloped and overdeveloped as a female look good to most guys and there isn't really any way you can look truly bad if all of your features are at least average. And you'll probably get a bunch of people calling you "stacy" if you have good health indicators, a mid eye area, and aren't a whale. I think that there are a lot of women that i'd consider stacies, but the avg normie or even the people on this forum tend to overrate any mid white woman that would literally be an incel if she was male.
Attachments
Last edited:
