A new measuring system for attractiveness.

[NuclearGeo20]

Beauty is found in averageness/proportions/harmony, features, dimorphism, and health/age. Today I will be focusing on averageness/proportion/harmony. Why do we measure specific ratios when the harmony score will only tell you that the features you measured are either harmonious/disharmonious when compared to each other. That's only accounting for the 2 features you measure in the ratio. For a feature to be truly ideal it should be 100 percent harmonious with every other feature on the face. I have compiled about 36 facial features...

Forehead Height
Nasal Height
Philtrum Height
Upper Lip Height
Lower Lip Height
Chin Height
BiZygomatic Width
BiTemporal Width
BiGonial Width
Epicanthus to cheekbone Width
Epicanthus to medial canthus Width
Medial canthus to medial canthus Width
Outer eyeball to cheekbone Width
Eyeball Width
Inner Eyeball to Inner Eyeball Width
IPD
Nasal Width
Mouth Width
Distance from outer eyeball to outer eyeball
Distance between epicanthus to epicanthus
Forehead + Nasal
Nasal + Philtrum
Philtrum + Upper Lip
Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum
Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip
Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip
Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin

This accounts for every facial feature and adjacent combinations. So why have I only seen features compared to specific features. If a feature is ideal on a face then it should be 100 percent ideal when divided against any other feature on the face. Here's the math for it...

(36×35)/2=630 unique ratios.

So basically if I divide every last one of those 36 features against each other and create one way unique ratios, I will get 630 unique ratios. In the ideal man or woman, these ratios should all be 100 percent harmonious.

We could create an app that automatically calculates these 630 ratios after imputing the length values of the 36 features, and then the facial features that account for most of disharmony in the face are to blame for your disharmony in your face. Lets say that my IPD is causing is in most of the disharmonious ratios in my face. That would mean my IPD is more unideal then everything else on my face.

Also how do we rate all 630 ratios. What percent deviation in the ratio should be correlated with what point loss in attractiveness scoring. For example, lets say my midface ratio is 1.06 (ideal 1 supposedly in Caucasians). That's a 6 percent deviation in the ideal. Would that be an 8/10? 9/10? How do we correlate a score to the percentage deviation.

Hopefully this made somewhat of sense but I think black pill has to re evaluate the way it looks at facial harmony. Thx for reading

 

[Yuki]

dnr

 

[AustrianOak47]

 

[Loruki]

Beauty is found in averageness/proportions/harmony, features, dimorphism, and health/age. Today I will be focusing on averageness/proportion/harmony. Why do we measure specific ratios when the harmony score will only tell you that the features you measured are either harmonious/disharmonious when compared to each other. That's only accounting for the 2 features you measure in the ratio. For a feature to be truly ideal it should be 100 percent harmonious with every other feature on the face. I have compiled about 36 facial features...

Forehead Height
Nasal Height
Philtrum Height
Upper Lip Height
Lower Lip Height
Chin Height
BiZygomatic Width
BiTemporal Width
BiGonial Width
Epicanthus to cheekbone Width
Epicanthus to medial canthus Width
Medial canthus to medial canthus Width
Outer eyeball to cheekbone Width
Eyeball Width
Inner Eyeball to Inner Eyeball Width
IPD
Nasal Width
Mouth Width
Distance from outer eyeball to outer eyeball
Distance between epicanthus to epicanthus
Forehead + Nasal
Nasal + Philtrum
Philtrum + Upper Lip
Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum
Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip
Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip
Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip
Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin
Forehead + Nasal + Philtrum + Upper Lip + Lower Lip + Chin

This accounts for every facial feature and adjacent combinations. So why have I only seen features compared to specific features. If a feature is ideal on a face then it should be 100 percent ideal when divided against any other feature on the face. Here's the math for it...

(36×35)/2=630 unique ratios.

So basically if I divide every last one of those 36 features against each other and create one way unique ratios, I will get 630 unique ratios. In the ideal man or woman, these ratios should all be 100 percent harmonious.

We could create an app that automatically calculates these 630 ratios after imputing the length values of the 36 features, and then the facial features that account for most of disharmony in the face are to blame for your disharmony in your face. Lets say that my IPD is causing is in most of the disharmonious ratios in my face. That would mean my IPD is more unideal then everything else on my face.

Also how do we rate all 630 ratios. What percent deviation in the ratio should be correlated with what point loss in attractiveness scoring. For example, lets say my midface ratio is 1.06 (ideal 1 supposedly in Caucasians). That's a 6 percent deviation in the ideal. Would that be an 8/10? 9/10? How do we correlate a score to the percentage deviation.

Hopefully this made somewhat of sense but I think black pill has to re evaluate the way it looks at facial harmony. Thx for reading

keep coping boyo

 

[RXnd]

View attachment 3622848