NoReedemingFeature
Luminary
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2023
- Posts
- 5,547
- Reputation
- 7,829
Think of this.
You have badly shaped, high set and unprojected orbitals. Would adding more mass on top of them be sufficient for them for a good look? No.
The zygomatic arch also needs to be long and thick dimensionally for there to be any benefit to adding mass to it. So for you have a benefit from additional mass the shape has to already exist.
Same with the chin, good luck with having a massive, narrow, short chin.
You have badly shaped, high set and unprojected orbitals. Would adding more mass on top of them be sufficient for them for a good look? No.
The zygomatic arch also needs to be long and thick dimensionally for there to be any benefit to adding mass to it. So for you have a benefit from additional mass the shape has to already exist.
Same with the chin, good luck with having a massive, narrow, short chin.
