BigJimsWornOutTires
Emerald
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
- Posts
- 31,024
- Reputation
- 39,995
You are who you are; that's your disposition you inherited from nature that you can either ratify or deplore.
Having been idle for so long, one begins seeing the truth of who we are and why we are.
You can not reason with an Atheist; thus, homosexual. Nor can you with a Christian; it's like debating eyesight with a born-blind person. For example, how can you convince the blind that sight is valid and normal? The blind was born with no view, has no idea what sight is like, and so in their mind, being blind is normal; it's the truth of life.
And if you could endow that blind person with sight for a moment, it would traumatize them. However, you can slowly introduce sight, in small doses, to where it will be acceptable in time.
Being intoxicated around people, one can find truth of who we are than if we were coherent. Because people see you as unconscious, they act themselves and not pretend to be anything other. So one should be mindful around an intoxicated or sleep-like person; it might be a trick.
But like shadows to the eyes, the brain can not conceive more than the line between the cloud and object. So to a conscious person next to an intoxicated, they will be themselves regardless of logic and awareness. But, on the other hand, the intoxicated person may be vigilant.
I watched two dogs play, cuddle, and then viciously attack one another. Same experience watching two birds, two cats, two mice, and two persons. This conflict 'thing' is nature's design; even trees and plants go at it. So is this of divinity? Or a repercussion of Genesis; Lucifer and the Almighty's quarrel?
And if so, we remove Lucifer from the beginning. Does that mean trees will not attack one another, dogs will never fight with one another, and so people will always agree with one another?
During my ten-year quest of the unknown, I enforced intoxication upon myself because I became addicted to watching people be themselves, mostly triggering puzzling feelings, though. But also, the unknown tends to be itself as well, when you're intoxicated. I caught THEM being themselves. Ugh. They're real. Call them spirits, angels, aliens, ghosts, multidimensional observers, etc. But they're real. And when you're conscious and going about your day on a schedule and running/rushing about, you're not aware of them because your mind is too busy to catch them.
Conflict, though, is rather disturbing. I see the connection with everything in this world, but I oppose the importance of such a hurtful action/event between the living. However, everybody in agreement with one another is just as illogical.
Natural instinct is to live.
Two lions who won't conflict with one another could mean both will die if a flood occurs because neither one will fight to stay alive. The same goes for two trees; if they don't battle one another, both trees may perish when a storm comes through, or a flood or a winter—fighting to stay alive is essential.
But why such a design?
Having been idle for so long, one begins seeing the truth of who we are and why we are.
You can not reason with an Atheist; thus, homosexual. Nor can you with a Christian; it's like debating eyesight with a born-blind person. For example, how can you convince the blind that sight is valid and normal? The blind was born with no view, has no idea what sight is like, and so in their mind, being blind is normal; it's the truth of life.
And if you could endow that blind person with sight for a moment, it would traumatize them. However, you can slowly introduce sight, in small doses, to where it will be acceptable in time.
Being intoxicated around people, one can find truth of who we are than if we were coherent. Because people see you as unconscious, they act themselves and not pretend to be anything other. So one should be mindful around an intoxicated or sleep-like person; it might be a trick.
But like shadows to the eyes, the brain can not conceive more than the line between the cloud and object. So to a conscious person next to an intoxicated, they will be themselves regardless of logic and awareness. But, on the other hand, the intoxicated person may be vigilant.
I watched two dogs play, cuddle, and then viciously attack one another. Same experience watching two birds, two cats, two mice, and two persons. This conflict 'thing' is nature's design; even trees and plants go at it. So is this of divinity? Or a repercussion of Genesis; Lucifer and the Almighty's quarrel?
And if so, we remove Lucifer from the beginning. Does that mean trees will not attack one another, dogs will never fight with one another, and so people will always agree with one another?
During my ten-year quest of the unknown, I enforced intoxication upon myself because I became addicted to watching people be themselves, mostly triggering puzzling feelings, though. But also, the unknown tends to be itself as well, when you're intoxicated. I caught THEM being themselves. Ugh. They're real. Call them spirits, angels, aliens, ghosts, multidimensional observers, etc. But they're real. And when you're conscious and going about your day on a schedule and running/rushing about, you're not aware of them because your mind is too busy to catch them.
Conflict, though, is rather disturbing. I see the connection with everything in this world, but I oppose the importance of such a hurtful action/event between the living. However, everybody in agreement with one another is just as illogical.
Natural instinct is to live.
Two lions who won't conflict with one another could mean both will die if a flood occurs because neither one will fight to stay alive. The same goes for two trees; if they don't battle one another, both trees may perish when a storm comes through, or a flood or a winter—fighting to stay alive is essential.
But why such a design?
