Alternative explanation for why so many men are incel

D

Deleted member 1901

Fuchsia
Joined
Apr 15, 2022
Posts
12,142
Reputation
14,548
Disclaimer: I don’t think this theory is the whole explanation, but it may play a role.

Because of the craniofacial dystrophy (recession caused by lifestyle) epidemic, people don’t look like they should naturally. This is why women are so picky. Most men are simply subhuman now and women aren’t biologically designed to be attracted to such faces. Of course women are also affected by modern lifestyle and are just as recessed, but men evolved to not be picky and that’s why femcels don’t exist.

If everyone was forward grown and optimally developed, I don’t think women would simply raise the bar. I think that then it would be about personality because everyone is gl enough to be attracted to.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StalinCel, Deleted member 27729, Deleted member 8758 and 8 others
the current theory is feminism and women’s rights but this is an interesting thoery I think
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27729 and Deleted member 28904
inceldom existed in the past but wasnt as significant as nowadays. Its all bc of social media and other shit where women can get chad easily. Previously they should pick the best looking man in their local area.

Even if men werent as recessed as now, women still would've picked the best looking men bc of easiness which online dating provides
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30477, zyMOGenic, Deleted member 27729 and 3 others
inceldom existed in the past but wasnt as significant as nowadays. Its all bc of social media and other shit where women can get chad easily. Previously they should pick the best looking man in their local area.

Even if men werent as recessed as now, women still would've picked the best looking men bc of easiness which online dating provides
what you said is very true. But my theory may be part of it as well.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27729
what you said is very true. But my theory may be part of it as well.
Inb4 the people reply with "well I was raised on goyslop, am low T, and wasn't raised on breast milk and am perfectly fine"
Then I see how they look like and they look obviously recessed with no zygos and width.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27729 and Deleted member 1901
what you said is very true. But my theory may be part of it as well.
If everyone was forward grown and optimally developed, I don’t think women would simply raise the bar
If everyone was forward grown and optimally developed, women would've picked basing on pheno, soft tissue, harmony and height solely so it doesnt matter overall if men are recessed or not tbh
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 27729, saiya_online and Deleted member 1901
inceldom existed in the past but wasnt as significant as nowadays. Its all bc of social media and other shit where women can get chad easily. Previously they should pick the best looking man in their local area.

Even if men werent as recessed as now, women still would've picked the best looking men bc of easiness which online dating provides
Like here’s a similar scenario to imagine:

Let’s say 80% of the population gets obese (an unnatural looksmin from the environment like recession)

Then of course women will only want the non obese men and 80% will be incel

The men will probably want the non obese women but being men they will fuck anything

I just don’t think the human is biologically made to be attracted to recession. We are made to be attracted to normal faces
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27729 and saiya_online
Genetic degradation exists, you may have a bone mogger of a grandfather but he was raised on more nature stuff in comparison with the later recessed generations
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
Disclaimer: I don’t think this theory is the whole explanation, but it may play a role.

Because of the craniofacial dystrophy (recession caused by lifestyle) epidemic, people don’t look like they should naturally. This is why women are so picky. Most men are simply subhuman now and women aren’t biologically designed to be attracted to such faces. Of course women are also affected by modern lifestyle and are just as recessed, but men evolved to not be picky and that’s why femcels don’t exist.

If everyone was forward grown and optimally developed, I don’t think women would simply raise the bar. I think that then it would be about personality because everyone is gl enough to be attracted to.
me and @It'snotover spoke about the exact same thing yesterday jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover and Deleted member 1901
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28904
Too many joos on this forum to discuss it though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover, saiya_online and Deleted member 1901
Yes it’s over I am subhuman
1686700615442
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
This is kike jew cope
People have always looked pretty much similar to now

The 2mm wider palate of people thousands of years ago had no impact on the face, and the difference between humans then and now is way overstated
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eren
This is kike jew cope
People have always looked pretty much similar to now

The 2mm wider palate of people thousands of years ago had no impact on the face, and the difference between humans then and now is way overstated
That’s Jewish cope

people have never been so recessed

Crooked teeth didn’t even exist for hundreds of thousands of years
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17244 and optimisticzoomer
That’s Jewish cope

people have never been so recessed

Crooked teeth didn’t even exist for hundreds of thousands of years
What's cope is this idea that primitive humans were somehow better looking 🤣
Look at pictures of Neanderthals, whilst not directly related, they were also living like humans back then

Mouth breathing causes bad growth, but you probably never even see a mouth breather in every day life cos they're rare
 
What's cope is this idea that primitive humans were somehow better looking 🤣
Look at pictures of Neanderthals, whilst not directly related, they were also living like humans back then

Mouth breathing causes bad growth, but you probably never even see a mouth breather in every day life cos they're rare
I’m not saying Neanderthals were better looking. I mean they were a different species (or subspecies) and animals aren’t attracted to other species but their own.

look at sapiens before agriculture
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28904
Mouth breathing causes bad growth, but you probably never even see a mouth breather in every day life cos they're rare
My mom is a perma mouth breather they aren’t that rare where I live in my classes I see a few in each I’m not lying

I mouth breathed a third of my life which ruined me

Not only mouth breathing but soft diet and lack of breast feeding are huge concerns for facial development
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover and Deleted member 28904
I’m not saying Neanderthals were better looking. I mean they were a different species (or subspecies) and animals aren’t attracted to other species but their own.

look at sapiens before agriculture
You're probably going off cherry picked examples which u could find similar today

There's no evidence at all that people looked better before, and btw, genes and widespread traits change over time. Our mandibles are supposed to be genetically smaller than back then

And btw, this is only for ramus length
Mandibular and maxillary projection stayed the same
 
Disclaimer: I don’t think this theory is the whole explanation, but it may play a role.

Because of the craniofacial dystrophy (recession caused by lifestyle) epidemic, people don’t look like they should naturally. This is why women are so picky. Most men are simply subhuman now and women aren’t biologically designed to be attracted to such faces. Of course women are also affected by modern lifestyle and are just as recessed, but men evolved to not be picky and that’s why femcels don’t exist.

If everyone was forward grown and optimally developed, I don’t think women would simply raise the bar. I think that then it would be about personality because everyone is gl enough to be attracted to.
most women are recessed and look like shit too, they could just obviously get away with it more than men can
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eren and Deleted member 1901
Barely any men are incel, nigga.

Inceldom only a problem on .org because most users are dysgenic.
the average user has to roid just so their shoulders are as wide as their hips.
@St.TikTokcel
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 26824 and Deleted member 28904
try reading weston A price book about nutrition and physical degeneration. it explains exactly your theory and i think just like you do
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
That's what all the studies show, and btw:
Screenshot 2023 06 14 01 13 14 70 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12

Which doesn't support u at all. Current mandibles have a longer ramus and more projected chin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901
Disclaimer: I don’t think this theory is the whole explanation, but it may play a role.

Because of the craniofacial dystrophy (recession caused by lifestyle) epidemic, people don’t look like they should naturally. This is why women are so picky. Most men are simply subhuman now and women aren’t biologically designed to be attracted to such faces. Of course women are also affected by modern lifestyle and are just as recessed, but men evolved to not be picky and that’s why femcels don’t exist.

If everyone was forward grown and optimally developed, I don’t think women would simply raise the bar. I think that then it would be about personality because everyone is gl enough to be attracted to.
Somewhat agree. Attraction is about reaching a threshold, its somwhat grey but its there and not as much about relativity.

IRL, peoples contact and opportunities are limited by who they can meet in their day to day routines and social circles, those conditions are more forgiving because of lack of accessibility. When you go online, THEN it becomes more relative, especially since women have been exposed to more beautiful faces since they consume more social media and Netflix etc. Men are also somewhat jaded by the vast exposure to beautiful women (advertisements, porn, movies etc) but the difference is that the margin between ugly subhuman men vs Chads is astronomical. Ugly women arent mogged to oblivion by gorgeous women like Chad does to subhuman males.
This explaination is more for Millennials/Early Zoomers.

Women habitually online dont do the looksmatch equation for themselves and if they do, they include the most make-up'd version of themselves. They are willing to hold out TIL DEATH for chad and if they dont get chad/chadlite/HTN, they atleast have some cute cats. Settling for a subhuman IS DEATH, they're not too different than us users here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1901

Similar threads

enriquecuador
Replies
15
Views
160
KingOfCurrycels
KingOfCurrycels
D
Replies
38
Views
961
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
D
Replies
6
Views
331
1exposed
1exposed
Nodesbitch
Replies
28
Views
2K
Clav's Baseball Cup
C
accelerationist
Replies
29
Views
607
RAJ GHRANDHICK🗿
RAJ GHRANDHICK🗿

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top