Alternative psl scale imo

B

bruhlook

Iron
Joined
Apr 25, 2025
Posts
171
Reputation
96
This is just an idea I had, so let me know if its accurate, i am going to show my scale then i will explain why I came to this conclusion

-3: This is the bottom of attractivenes, have mayor deformities that can't be fixed with surgeries, people in this wont have any chance in dating, true subhuman, people in this area dont even look human, being incels will be the last of their problems

-2: This is a very unatractive dude, but no deformed like one above, he need surgery to become average, and even with surgery he will still be mid, the diference between the -3 and this one is that this will come as creepy whatever you do while the -3 will be straight up scary. Dating here will be imposible (or at least 99% imposible)

-1: This is your typical unatractive guy, every overweight man will be here, most guys here can looksmaxx to average, but fat males could reach a lot more if they have good bones under the fat, he can date, but in most of realtionships he will be an oofy doofy

0: This is average, not atractive, but not ugly either, here looks won't be a halo, like for chads, nor a failo like sub5. People in here should looksmax, and maybe become redpilled while still understanding the importance of looks and height.

+1: He is an above average looking male, he is definetly not ugly, but have some minor flaws. Overall girls will say he is handsome, but his face is ''boring'', most of the compiments you will get is non-looks related. If you are here self improvement will help a lot as looks are not a problem, but they don't carry either, you have to put some work.

+2: He is an attractive male, he is a clearly handsome guy, he will have no problem in dating as long as he is NT and have some level of social skill, buy looks play a big part in his dating succes, this will be equivalent to hhtn-cl

+3: These are very attractive looking males, dating will not be a problem, he will even make money based on his looks, models and handsome actors will be in this category, he can get away with poor social skills, but this will be rare, according to the positive reinforcement theory, unless he ''glowed up'' when he was older, and spend hes early teens being an incel, and ascended in the ''second puberty''. He will only have problems in dating if he is very ND, and even in that case, he will get short term relationships.




-Now I will explain my rating model: This basically measures the level of attractiveness, 0 is not ugly nor handsome, his looks are invisible, so the further you move away from 0, the more looks will play a role in your dating life, for good or for bad, for example: a -2 guy, no matter what he do, the only thing will matter is that he is ugly, so his positive traits will become negative, the ''ugly guy that plays off as misterious is seen as insecure or creepy'' classic, while for chad whatever negative trait he has, will be seen as good, and bad actions will be forgiven or justified. Is such a short scale because, everything that goes beyond this will become subjective, as -3 will always be classified as subhuman, and +3 as very handsome man. This is rating model is very similar to the PSL one, but imo this is more accurate as it also includes the level of importance of looks or how much will impact your life. This said, I don't pretend to change anything, but I thing is interesting to view ratings, and I was bored.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Soter, aircraftboi and KaisenMaxxer
dnrd.
 
  • +1
Reactions: clarksonoid, lunar., realshit and 1 other person
by far my proudest DNR
 
  • +1
Reactions: clarksonoid, jules-pill, lunar. and 2 others
This is just an idea I had, so let me know if its accurate, i am going to show my scale then i will explain why I came to this conclusion

-3: This is the bottom of attractivenes, have mayor deformities that can't be fixed with surgeries, people in this wont have any chance in dating, true subhuman, people in this area dont even look human, being incels will be the last of their problems

-2: This is a very unatractive dude, but no deformed like one above, he need surgery to become average, and even with surgery he will still be mid, the diference between the -3 and this one is that this will come as creepy whatever you do while the -3 will be straight up scary. Dating here will be imposible (or at least 99% imposible)

-1: This is your typical unatractive guy, every overweight man will be here, most guys here can looksmaxx to average, but fat males could reach a lot more if they have good bones under the fat, he can date, but in most of realtionships he will be an oofy doofy

0: This is average, not atractive, but not ugly either, here looks won't be a halo, like for chads, nor a failo like sub5. People in here should looksmax, and maybe become redpilled while still understanding the importance of looks and height.

+1: He is an above average looking male, he is definetly not ugly, but have some minor flaws. Overall girls will say he is handsome, but his face is ''boring'', most of the compiments you will get is non-looks related. If you are here self improvement will help a lot as looks are not a problem, but they don't carry either, you have to put some work.

+2: He is an attractive male, he is a clearly handsome guy, he will have no problem in dating as long as he is NT and have some level of social skill, buy looks play a big part in his dating succes, this will be equivalent to hhtn-cl

+3: These are very attractive looking males, dating will not be a problem, he will even make money based on his looks, models and handsome actors will be in this category, he can get away with poor social skills, but this will be rare, according to the positive reinforcement theory, unless he ''glowed up'' when he was older, and spend hes early teens being an incel, and ascended in the ''second puberty''. He will only have problems in dating if he is very ND, and even in that case, he will get short term relationships.




-Now I will explain my rating model: This basically measures the level of attractiveness, 0 is not ugly nor handsome, his looks are invisible, so the further you move away from 0, the more looks will play a role in your dating life, for good or for bad, for example: a -2 guy, no matter what he do, the only thing will matter is that he is ugly, so his positive traits will become negative, the ''ugly guy that plays off as misterious is seen as insecure or creepy'' classic, while for chad whatever negative trait he has, will be seen as good, and bad actions will be forgiven or justified. Is such a short scale because, everything that goes beyond this will become subjective, as -3 will always be classified as subhuman, and +3 as very handsome man. This is rating model is very similar to the PSL one, but imo this is more accurate as it also includes the level of importance of looks or how much will impact your life. This said, I don't pretend to change anything, but I thing is interesting to view ratings, and I was bored.
dnr fucking grey
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Abdullahm06
dnr fucking grey
what are your arguments on why this is unaccurate nigger, if you are that experimented in blackpill you should explain, as the whole blackpill is based on data
 
This is just an idea I had, so let me know if its accurate, i am going to show my scale then i will explain why I came to this conclusion

-3: This is the bottom of attractivenes, have mayor deformities that can't be fixed with surgeries, people in this wont have any chance in dating, true subhuman, people in this area dont even look human, being incels will be the last of their problems

-2: This is a very unatractive dude, but no deformed like one above, he need surgery to become average, and even with surgery he will still be mid, the diference between the -3 and this one is that this will come as creepy whatever you do while the -3 will be straight up scary. Dating here will be imposible (or at least 99% imposible)

-1: This is your typical unatractive guy, every overweight man will be here, most guys here can looksmaxx to average, but fat males could reach a lot more if they have good bones under the fat, he can date, but in most of realtionships he will be an oofy doofy

0: This is average, not atractive, but not ugly either, here looks won't be a halo, like for chads, nor a failo like sub5. People in here should looksmax, and maybe become redpilled while still understanding the importance of looks and height.

+1: He is an above average looking male, he is definetly not ugly, but have some minor flaws. Overall girls will say he is handsome, but his face is ''boring'', most of the compiments you will get is non-looks related. If you are here self improvement will help a lot as looks are not a problem, but they don't carry either, you have to put some work.

+2: He is an attractive male, he is a clearly handsome guy, he will have no problem in dating as long as he is NT and have some level of social skill, buy looks play a big part in his dating succes, this will be equivalent to hhtn-cl

+3: These are very attractive looking males, dating will not be a problem, he will even make money based on his looks, models and handsome actors will be in this category, he can get away with poor social skills, but this will be rare, according to the positive reinforcement theory, unless he ''glowed up'' when he was older, and spend hes early teens being an incel, and ascended in the ''second puberty''. He will only have problems in dating if he is very ND, and even in that case, he will get short term relationships.




-Now I will explain my rating model: This basically measures the level of attractiveness, 0 is not ugly nor handsome, his looks are invisible, so the further you move away from 0, the more looks will play a role in your dating life, for good or for bad, for example: a -2 guy, no matter what he do, the only thing will matter is that he is ugly, so his positive traits will become negative, the ''ugly guy that plays off as misterious is seen as insecure or creepy'' classic, while for chad whatever negative trait he has, will be seen as good, and bad actions will be forgiven or justified. Is such a short scale because, everything that goes beyond this will become subjective, as -3 will always be classified as subhuman, and +3 as very handsome man. This is rating model is very similar to the PSL one, but imo this is more accurate as it also includes the level of importance of looks or how much will impact your life. This said, I don't pretend to change anything, but I thing is interesting to view ratings, and I was bored.
made me think of SD
like 0 is average and then -1 is 1SD in the bad side etc...
doesnt seem stupid but also doesn't sevres any purpose tbh
 
made me think of SD
like 0 is average and then -1 is 1SD in the bad side etc...
doesnt seem stupid but also doesn't sevres any purpose tbh
yeah I know, is just another way I would look at attractiveness scale
 
  • +1
Reactions: KaisenMaxxer
Nah I think the psl scale works fine the way it is

It represents percentile which is way it gets exponentially more difficult to go from 5 to 6 than 4 to 5

5 being where attractiveness starts to become generalized, you can still be seen as attractive below that if you fit a girl's type and she likes you as a person but 5+ you start being seen as attractive on a broader scale of types

6 you're pretty much undeniably attractive no matter the girl's type you still get a reaction even if she's a lesbian


7 you live a king


Attractiveness is complicated to measure but you can approximate it, there's no such thing as universally attractive
 
Nah I think the psl scale works fine the way it is

It represents percentile which is way it gets exponentially more difficult to go from 5 to 6 than 4 to 5

5 being where attractiveness starts to become generalized, you can still be seen as attractive below that if you fit a girl's type and she likes you as a person but 5+ you start being seen as attractive on a broader scale of types

6 you're pretty much undeniably attractive no matter the girl's type you still get a reaction even if she's a lesbian


7 you live a king


Attractiveness is complicated to measure but you can approximate it, there's no such thing as universally attractive
didn't say otherwise, as I said, I don't pretend to change anything, this is just a way to measure looks+how much of a role they play
 
  • +1
Reactions: KT-34
This is just an idea I had, so let me know if its accurate, i am going to show my scale then i will explain why I came to this conclusion

-3: This is the bottom of attractivenes, have mayor deformities that can't be fixed with surgeries, people in this wont have any chance in dating, true subhuman, people in this area dont even look human, being incels will be the last of their problems

-2: This is a very unatractive dude, but no deformed like one above, he need surgery to become average, and even with surgery he will still be mid, the diference between the -3 and this one is that this will come as creepy whatever you do while the -3 will be straight up scary. Dating here will be imposible (or at least 99% imposible)

-1: This is your typical unatractive guy, every overweight man will be here, most guys here can looksmaxx to average, but fat males could reach a lot more if they have good bones under the fat, he can date, but in most of realtionships he will be an oofy doofy

0: This is average, not atractive, but not ugly either, here looks won't be a halo, like for chads, nor a failo like sub5. People in here should looksmax, and maybe become redpilled while still understanding the importance of looks and height.

+1: He is an above average looking male, he is definetly not ugly, but have some minor flaws. Overall girls will say he is handsome, but his face is ''boring'', most of the compiments you will get is non-looks related. If you are here self improvement will help a lot as looks are not a problem, but they don't carry either, you have to put some work.

+2: He is an attractive male, he is a clearly handsome guy, he will have no problem in dating as long as he is NT and have some level of social skill, buy looks play a big part in his dating succes, this will be equivalent to hhtn-cl

+3: These are very attractive looking males, dating will not be a problem, he will even make money based on his looks, models and handsome actors will be in this category, he can get away with poor social skills, but this will be rare, according to the positive reinforcement theory, unless he ''glowed up'' when he was older, and spend hes early teens being an incel, and ascended in the ''second puberty''. He will only have problems in dating if he is very ND, and even in that case, he will get short term relationships.




-Now I will explain my rating model: This basically measures the level of attractiveness, 0 is not ugly nor handsome, his looks are invisible, so the further you move away from 0, the more looks will play a role in your dating life, for good or for bad, for example: a -2 guy, no matter what he do, the only thing will matter is that he is ugly, so his positive traits will become negative, the ''ugly guy that plays off as misterious is seen as insecure or creepy'' classic, while for chad whatever negative trait he has, will be seen as good, and bad actions will be forgiven or justified. Is such a short scale because, everything that goes beyond this will become subjective, as -3 will always be classified as subhuman, and +3 as very handsome man. This is rating model is very similar to the PSL one, but imo this is more accurate as it also includes the level of importance of looks or how much will impact your life. This said, I don't pretend to change anything, but I thing is interesting to view ratings, and I was bored.
not enough numbers so theres gonna be a big difference in looks while being the same level, but i did dnr this and just looked at the numbers
 
what are your arguments on why this is unaccurate nigger, if you are that experimented in blackpill you should explain, as the whole blackpill is based on data
this scale is stupid and low iq effort to create it, you are not getting botb lil bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hernan
not enough numbers so theres gonna be a big difference in looks while being the same level, but i did dnr this and just looked at the numbers
there aren't more numbers bc there is some part of subjectivity in looks, an ugly man will always be ugly, and handsome will be handsome, but for someone a man will be better looking than another objectively
 
I like the concept tbh, especially the division into negative and positive scores
 
  • +1
Reactions: bruhlook
there aren't more numbers bc there is some part of subjectivity in looks, an ugly man will always be ugly, and handsome will be handsome, but for someone a man will be better looking than another objectively
what are you saying jfl, thats not what i was on about.
the scale isnt large enough to differ people, in this scale an high mtn and mid htn could be in the same ranking
 
what are you saying jfl, thats not what i was on about.
the scale isnt large enough to differ people, in this scale an high mtn and mid htn could be in the same ranking
the 0 is a normie, +1 is mtn and htn and +3 is cl and chad, there is no need to ad more numbers, subjectivity plays a big part
 
the 0 is a normie, +1 is mtn and htn and +3 is cl and chad, there is no need to ad more numbers, subjectivity plays a big part
Mtn and htn is a big difference so this scale is bs
 
you can add decimals nigger is your iq room temp
nigga look at you trynna make a new shitty scale you retard
psl works just fine so idk what your doing idiot
 
  • +1
Reactions: lunar.
This is just an idea I had, so let me know if its accurate, i am going to show my scale then i will explain why I came to this conclusion

-3: This is the bottom of attractivenes, have mayor deformities that can't be fixed with surgeries, people in this wont have any chance in dating, true subhuman, people in this area dont even look human, being incels will be the last of their problems

-2: This is a very unatractive dude, but no deformed like one above, he need surgery to become average, and even with surgery he will still be mid, the diference between the -3 and this one is that this will come as creepy whatever you do while the -3 will be straight up scary. Dating here will be imposible (or at least 99% imposible)

-1: This is your typical unatractive guy, every overweight man will be here, most guys here can looksmaxx to average, but fat males could reach a lot more if they have good bones under the fat, he can date, but in most of realtionships he will be an oofy doofy

0: This is average, not atractive, but not ugly either, here looks won't be a halo, like for chads, nor a failo like sub5. People in here should looksmax, and maybe become redpilled while still understanding the importance of looks and height.

+1: He is an above average looking male, he is definetly not ugly, but have some minor flaws. Overall girls will say he is handsome, but his face is ''boring'', most of the compiments you will get is non-looks related. If you are here self improvement will help a lot as looks are not a problem, but they don't carry either, you have to put some work.

+2: He is an attractive male, he is a clearly handsome guy, he will have no problem in dating as long as he is NT and have some level of social skill, buy looks play a big part in his dating succes, this will be equivalent to hhtn-cl

+3: These are very attractive looking males, dating will not be a problem, he will even make money based on his looks, models and handsome actors will be in this category, he can get away with poor social skills, but this will be rare, according to the positive reinforcement theory, unless he ''glowed up'' when he was older, and spend hes early teens being an incel, and ascended in the ''second puberty''. He will only have problems in dating if he is very ND, and even in that case, he will get short term relationships.




-Now I will explain my rating model: This basically measures the level of attractiveness, 0 is not ugly nor handsome, his looks are invisible, so the further you move away from 0, the more looks will play a role in your dating life, for good or for bad, for example: a -2 guy, no matter what he do, the only thing will matter is that he is ugly, so his positive traits will become negative, the ''ugly guy that plays off as misterious is seen as insecure or creepy'' classic, while for chad whatever negative trait he has, will be seen as good, and bad actions will be forgiven or justified. Is such a short scale because, everything that goes beyond this will become subjective, as -3 will always be classified as subhuman, and +3 as very handsome man. This is rating model is very similar to the PSL one, but imo this is more accurate as it also includes the level of importance of looks or how much will impact your life. This said, I don't pretend to change anything, but I thing is interesting to view ratings, and I was bored.
go back to tiktok
 
  • +1
Reactions: Djimo
nigga look at you trynna make a new shitty scale you retard
psl works just fine so idk what your doing idiot
I litteraly said I am not trying to change anything, I was just bored so I did this, autistic sub5
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Djimo
I litteraly said I am not trying to change anything, I was just bored so I did this, autistic sub5
i love being retarded in my free time too, dont worry about it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bruhlook

Similar threads

asian_ascender
Replies
19
Views
274
debonss
debonss
Sixatheconqueror
Replies
4
Views
163
Tyler1
Tyler1
Kirby9784
Replies
6
Views
127
chillmap2736
chillmap2736
P
Replies
280
Views
8K
savemebimax
savemebimax
william.
Replies
13
Views
188
Snoofy
Snoofy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top