Am I the only one who thinks Christian bale mogs Leonardo Dicaprio

rando69

rando69

Iron
Joined
Aug 16, 2024
Posts
122
Reputation
74
I've seen many foids on tiktok and youtube glazing leo for his looks but christian bale is very underappreciated, I mean yes he has no ramus, a high gonial angle and long midface(all factors that contribute to a longer face shape overall but despite this his face doesn't look horse-ish, one of the very few people that actually look good with long midface) debatable weather or not he'd look better with a shorter mid-face but despite his few flaws he's got good features, mogger eye-area with good spacing, equal facial thirds, great hairline, decent jawline, perfect mouth to nose ratio, good nose shape and just overall good facial averageness, nothing looks off, just a classically handsome guy(chadlite in prime and very strong htn for his age.) Dicaprio on the otherhand was of course a great looking guy in his prime but his bi-temporal width being slightly too high breaks a lot of his harmony points, I mean yes its one features but it makes a lot of difference, he would have benefited if his forehead was more narrow. I'd say both are relatively same level of attractiveness but bale def mogs leo, I mean even bale aged a lot better too.


170px Ch Bale 02
Gettyimages 2716985 594x594


1725415622890
1725415715524


1725415800868
1725415852700

1725415950448
1725415974914


1725416265163
1725416270897

1725416362411
1725416374236


1725416583354
1725416601327




This picture below is them both at the age of 27
1725416744817
1725416758081


1725416901575
1725416941753




this is them now

1725417074861
1725417134761


Objectively Ieo does have a better midface, lips, lower third(still debatable), and eye coloring but has more falios compared to bale. Bale objectively has a much better eye area despite leo's coloring, leo has medium set eyes brows with a rounder eye shape while bale has much lower set eye-brows with hunter almond eyes. Bale has also got a far better nose, yes his tip is droopy but it is thin compared to leo who not only has a bulbous tip but much more alar flaring. To be fair it does suit him very well and fits within the inner corners of his eyes but not enough to mog bale's nose objectively. thirdly bale has also got a better forehead and hairline, not much to be said here but bale's forehead is more narrow and short without it looking autistic like zayn malik's forehead. like almost the perfect forehead that's not too big or small, leo on the other hand has a wider taller forehead with a widows peak, not much to be said here too, you all know which is better objectively. lastly being the face shape, this is my subjective opinion here but betweens leo's face shape(heart) and bale's face shape(oblong diamond) I would have to say that bale's face shape just looks better, it can work with much more variety of hairstyles and just has better proportions all round. Last thing to note is that bale is an inch taller if that makes a difference. Leo(5'11) Bale (6'1 in prime but now a weak 6'0 due to sustaining a back injury for the preparation of his role in American Hustle)

Both are good looking guys with very similar pheno but I feel bale has the slight edge due to him not looking too boyish or masculine at the same time, just a perfect mix of both. But what do you all think? do you agree with me or am I just coping?
 

Attachments

  • 1725415611266.png
    1725415611266.png
    576.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 1725415665962.png
    1725415665962.png
    1,014.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 1725415823137.png
    1725415823137.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 0
  • 1725415831541.png
    1725415831541.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 75865, Thebuffdon and NoLongerHuman
am i the only one who thinks the sky is blue
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iwillsuemeta, mightbecooked123, SSK_22 and 10 others
Dnr but American psycho Christian bale mogs any version/age of Leonardo
 
  • +1
Reactions: mightbecooked123, Rhom, 0V3R and 6 others
I've seen many foids on tiktok and youtube glazing leo for his looks but christian bale is very underappreciated, I mean yes he has no ramus, a high gonial angle and long midface(all factors that contribute to a longer face shape overall but despite this his face doesn't look horse-ish, one of the very few people that actually look good with long midface) debatable weather or not he'd look better with a shorter mid-face but despite his few flaws he's got good features, mogger eye-area with good spacing, equal facial thirds, great hairline, decent jawline, perfect mouth to nose ratio, good nose shape and just overall good facial averageness, nothing looks off, just a classically handsome guy(chadlite in prime and very strong htn for his age.) Dicaprio on the otherhand was of course a great looking guy in his prime but his bi-temporal width being slightly too high breaks a lot of his harmony points, I mean yes its one features but it makes a lot of difference, he would have benefited if his forehead was more narrow. I'd say both are relatively same level of attractiveness but bale def mogs leo, I mean even bale aged a lot better too.


View attachment 3146474View attachment 3146475

View attachment 3146484View attachment 3146486

View attachment 3146489View attachment 3146493
View attachment 3146500View attachment 3146503

View attachment 3146509View attachment 3146510
View attachment 3146512View attachment 3146513

View attachment 3146519View attachment 3146520




This picture below is them both at the age of 27
View attachment 3146522View attachment 3146523

View attachment 3146525View attachment 3146526



this is them now

View attachment 3146527View attachment 3146532

Objectively Ieo does have a better midface, lips, lower third(still debatable), and eye coloring but has more falios compared to bale. Bale objectively has a much better eye area despite leo's coloring, leo has medium set eyes brows with a rounder eye shape while bale has much lower set eye-brows with hunter almond eyes. Bale has also got a far better nose, yes his tip is droopy but it is thin compared to leo who not only has a bulbous tip but much more alar flaring. To be fair it does suit him very well and fits within the inner corners of his eyes but not enough to mog bale's nose objectively. thirdly bale has also got a better forehead and hairline, not much to be said here but bale's forehead is more narrow and short without it looking autistic like zayn malik's forehead. like almost the perfect forehead that's not too big or small, leo on the other hand has a wider taller forehead with a widows peak, not much to be said here too, you all know which is better objectively. lastly being the face shape, this is my subjective opinion here but betweens leo's face shape(heart) and bale's face shape(oblong diamond) I would have to say that bale's face shape just looks better, it can work with much more variety of hairstyles and just has better proportions all round. Last thing to note is that bale is an inch taller if that makes a difference. Leo(5'11) Bale (6'1 in prime but now a weak 6'0 due to sustaining a back injury for the preparation of his role in American Hustle)

Both are good looking guys with very similar pheno but I feel bale has the slight edge due to him not looking too boyish or masculine at the same time, just a perfect mix of both. But what do you all think? do you agree with me or am I just coping?
IMO best way to put it is younger Leo mogs Mid age/Older Christian mogs
 
  • +1
Reactions: rando69
Tbh it’s subjective at that point
 
  • +1
Reactions: leagso_004 and rando69
Leos face shape is unappealing for western standards. His FWHR and overall skull shape is too compact. Same as myself and I am diagnosed with a mild SFS, where there is not enough tooth show. Could be the case for him too.
Contrary to popular belief in this forum an overly wide face has very low appeal, despite being somewhat linked to sexual dimorphism. Especially if the skull is not proportionally long as well to create a harmonic balance between the two.
 
  • +1
Reactions: marigold and Mr.Proper
christians bales face way too narrow
 
Leos face shape is unappealing for western standards. His FWHR and overall skull shape is too compact. Same as myself and I am diagnosed with a mild SFS, where there is not enough tooth show. Could be the case for him too.
Contrary to popular belief in this forum an overly wide face has very low appeal, despite being somewhat linked to sexual dimorphism. Especially if the skull is not proportionally long as well to create a harmonic balance between the two.
couldn't agree more
 
christians bales face way too narrow
nah his width is fine, his length in face is slightly too high which gives that illusion but if you see him in motion his face is fairly wide
 
Helps that he Works out
 
Prime Leo mogs prime bale to mariana trench in terms of appeal. It's the only reason Titanic role went to leo even when bale auditoned for it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CsCurry
I've seen many foids on tiktok and youtube glazing leo for his looks but christian bale is very underappreciated, I mean yes he has no ramus, a high gonial angle and long midface(all factors that contribute to a longer face shape overall but despite this his face doesn't look horse-ish, one of the very few people that actually look good with long midface) debatable weather or not he'd look better with a shorter mid-face but despite his few flaws he's got good features, mogger eye-area with good spacing, equal facial thirds, great hairline, decent jawline, perfect mouth to nose ratio, good nose shape and just overall good facial averageness, nothing looks off, just a classically handsome guy(chadlite in prime and very strong htn for his age.) Dicaprio on the otherhand was of course a great looking guy in his prime but his bi-temporal width being slightly too high breaks a lot of his harmony points, I mean yes its one features but it makes a lot of difference, he would have benefited if his forehead was more narrow. I'd say both are relatively same level of attractiveness but bale def mogs leo, I mean even bale aged a lot better too.


View attachment 3146474View attachment 3146475

View attachment 3146484View attachment 3146486

View attachment 3146489View attachment 3146493
View attachment 3146500View attachment 3146503

View attachment 3146509View attachment 3146510
View attachment 3146512View attachment 3146513

View attachment 3146519View attachment 3146520




This picture below is them both at the age of 27
View attachment 3146522View attachment 3146523

View attachment 3146525View attachment 3146526



this is them now

View attachment 3146527View attachment 3146532

Objectively Ieo does have a better midface, lips, lower third(still debatable), and eye coloring but has more falios compared to bale. Bale objectively has a much better eye area despite leo's coloring, leo has medium set eyes brows with a rounder eye shape while bale has much lower set eye-brows with hunter almond eyes. Bale has also got a far better nose, yes his tip is droopy but it is thin compared to leo who not only has a bulbous tip but much more alar flaring. To be fair it does suit him very well and fits within the inner corners of his eyes but not enough to mog bale's nose objectively. thirdly bale has also got a better forehead and hairline, not much to be said here but bale's forehead is more narrow and short without it looking autistic like zayn malik's forehead. like almost the perfect forehead that's not too big or small, leo on the other hand has a wider taller forehead with a widows peak, not much to be said here too, you all know which is better objectively. lastly being the face shape, this is my subjective opinion here but betweens leo's face shape(heart) and bale's face shape(oblong diamond) I would have to say that bale's face shape just looks better, it can work with much more variety of hairstyles and just has better proportions all round. Last thing to note is that bale is an inch taller if that makes a difference. Leo(5'11) Bale (6'1 in prime but now a weak 6'0 due to sustaining a back injury for the preparation of his role in American Hustle)

Both are good looking guys with very similar pheno but I feel bale has the slight edge due to him not looking too boyish or masculine at the same time, just a perfect mix of both. But what do you all think? do you agree with me or am I just coping?
Holy yap you will never be NT
 
  • +1
Reactions: rando69
Prime Leo mogs prime bale to mariana trench in terms of appeal. It's the only reason Titanic role went to leo even when bale auditoned for it.
bale was only turned down from the role because he was British, young leo was glazed for looks because he was more popular at that time than bale
 
bale was only turned down from the role because he was British, young leo was glazed for looks because he was more popular at that time than bale
Leo was literally popular because of his prettyboy looks, bale himself admitted that he couldn't get roles because the first choice was always Leo, Bale only got AP because leo turned it down.
 
dicaprio looks like the 10% of reddit soyboys in his late years
 
Leo was literally popular because of his prettyboy looks, bale himself admitted that he couldn't get roles because the first choice was always Leo, Bale only got AP because leo turned it down.
I mean leo is american, no wonder he was offered roles first
 
For the sake of the forum’s credibility ,hopefully yes
 
  • +1
Reactions: rando69
I've seen many foids on tiktok and youtube glazing leo for his looks but christian bale is very underappreciated, I mean yes he has no ramus, a high gonial angle and long midface(all factors that contribute to a longer face shape overall but despite this his face doesn't look horse-ish, one of the very few people that actually look good with long midface) debatable weather or not he'd look better with a shorter mid-face but despite his few flaws he's got good features, mogger eye-area with good spacing, equal facial thirds, great hairline, decent jawline, perfect mouth to nose ratio, good nose shape and just overall good facial averageness, nothing looks off, just a classically handsome guy(chadlite in prime and very strong htn for his age.) Dicaprio on the otherhand was of course a great looking guy in his prime but his bi-temporal width being slightly too high breaks a lot of his harmony points, I mean yes its one features but it makes a lot of difference, he would have benefited if his forehead was more narrow. I'd say both are relatively same level of attractiveness but bale def mogs leo, I mean even bale aged a lot better too.


View attachment 3146474View attachment 3146475

View attachment 3146484View attachment 3146486

View attachment 3146489View attachment 3146493
View attachment 3146500View attachment 3146503

View attachment 3146509View attachment 3146510
View attachment 3146512View attachment 3146513

View attachment 3146519View attachment 3146520




This picture below is them both at the age of 27
View attachment 3146522View attachment 3146523

View attachment 3146525View attachment 3146526



this is them now

View attachment 3146527View attachment 3146532

Objectively Ieo does have a better midface, lips, lower third(still debatable), and eye coloring but has more falios compared to bale. Bale objectively has a much better eye area despite leo's coloring, leo has medium set eyes brows with a rounder eye shape while bale has much lower set eye-brows with hunter almond eyes. Bale has also got a far better nose, yes his tip is droopy but it is thin compared to leo who not only has a bulbous tip but much more alar flaring. To be fair it does suit him very well and fits within the inner corners of his eyes but not enough to mog bale's nose objectively. thirdly bale has also got a better forehead and hairline, not much to be said here but bale's forehead is more narrow and short without it looking autistic like zayn malik's forehead. like almost the perfect forehead that's not too big or small, leo on the other hand has a wider taller forehead with a widows peak, not much to be said here too, you all know which is better objectively. lastly being the face shape, this is my subjective opinion here but betweens leo's face shape(heart) and bale's face shape(oblong diamond) I would have to say that bale's face shape just looks better, it can work with much more variety of hairstyles and just has better proportions all round. Last thing to note is that bale is an inch taller if that makes a difference. Leo(5'11) Bale (6'1 in prime but now a weak 6'0 due to sustaining a back injury for the preparation of his role in American Hustle)

Both are good looking guys with very similar pheno but I feel bale has the slight edge due to him not looking too boyish or masculine at the same time, just a perfect mix of both. But what do you all think? do you agree with me or am I just coping?
female and male gaze, a male cant speak for what women likes and wants, you can only hope to look like you will attract 16-24 year olds
 
female and male gaze, a male cant speak for what women likes and wants, you can only hope to look like you will attract 16-24 year olds
True but both are female gazed, If you present them side by side to women they would probably have a hard time choosing it’s just that leo has more status in the industry
 
Di caprio is carried hard by eye area and upper third , otherwise his lower two third bones are above average and nothing impressive like strong HTN or top 10% . he was Chadlite in prime wtih prettyboy niche.

Once he hit 30 Di caprio descended to mid HTN and look like a bloated wide mess with very good eye area ever since.

He could be your local drunkard at the bar or an homeless guy like in the revenant movie. that's the power of the jaw for anti aging which he lacks.

However at 30 Bale was at least Chadlite, with well above average bones and a more balanced facial thirds.
He is more classical handsome and higher PSL than prime Di Caprio in my opinion. but he lacks striking feature and has wide appeal.

Bale moggs Di Caprio hard at 30+ , they had same SMV when both under < 30
 
  • +1
Reactions: rando69
Di caprio is carried hard by eye area and upper third , otherwise his lower two third bones are above average and nothing impressive like strong HTN or top 10% . he was Chadlite in prime wtih prettyboy niche.

Once he hit 30 Di caprio descended to mid HTN and look like a bloated wide mess with very good eye area ever since.

He could be your local drunkard at the bar or an homeless guy like in the revenant movie. that's the power of the jaw for anti aging which he lacks.

However at 30 Bale was at least Chadlite, with well above average bones and a more balanced facial thirds.
He is more classical handsome and higher PSL than prime Di Caprio in my opinion. but he lacks striking feature and has wide appeal.

Bale moggs Di Caprio hard at 30+ , they had same SMV when both under < 30
High iq af damn, yeah I agree with this 100%. Bale def does lack striking features but his harmony and overall well framed face make up for it.
 
I've seen many foids on tiktok and youtube glazing leo for his looks but christian bale is very underappreciated, I mean yes he has no ramus, a high gonial angle and long midface(all factors that contribute to a longer face shape overall but despite this his face doesn't look horse-ish, one of the very few people that actually look good with long midface) debatable weather or not he'd look better with a shorter mid-face but despite his few flaws he's got good features, mogger eye-area with good spacing, equal facial thirds, great hairline, decent jawline, perfect mouth to nose ratio, good nose shape and just overall good facial averageness, nothing looks off, just a classically handsome guy(chadlite in prime and very strong htn for his age.) Dicaprio on the otherhand was of course a great looking guy in his prime but his bi-temporal width being slightly too high breaks a lot of his harmony points, I mean yes its one features but it makes a lot of difference, he would have benefited if his forehead was more narrow. I'd say both are relatively same level of attractiveness but bale def mogs leo, I mean even bale aged a lot better too.


View attachment 3146474View attachment 3146475

View attachment 3146484View attachment 3146486

View attachment 3146489View attachment 3146493
View attachment 3146500View attachment 3146503

View attachment 3146509View attachment 3146510
View attachment 3146512View attachment 3146513

View attachment 3146519View attachment 3146520




This picture below is them both at the age of 27
View attachment 3146522View attachment 3146523

View attachment 3146525View attachment 3146526



this is them now

View attachment 3146527View attachment 3146532

Objectively Ieo does have a better midface, lips, lower third(still debatable), and eye coloring but has more falios compared to bale. Bale objectively has a much better eye area despite leo's coloring, leo has medium set eyes brows with a rounder eye shape while bale has much lower set eye-brows with hunter almond eyes. Bale has also got a far better nose, yes his tip is droopy but it is thin compared to leo who not only has a bulbous tip but much more alar flaring. To be fair it does suit him very well and fits within the inner corners of his eyes but not enough to mog bale's nose objectively. thirdly bale has also got a better forehead and hairline, not much to be said here but bale's forehead is more narrow and short without it looking autistic like zayn malik's forehead. like almost the perfect forehead that's not too big or small, leo on the other hand has a wider taller forehead with a widows peak, not much to be said here too, you all know which is better objectively. lastly being the face shape, this is my subjective opinion here but betweens leo's face shape(heart) and bale's face shape(oblong diamond) I would have to say that bale's face shape just looks better, it can work with much more variety of hairstyles and just has better proportions all round. Last thing to note is that bale is an inch taller if that makes a difference. Leo(5'11) Bale (6'1 in prime but now a weak 6'0 due to sustaining a back injury for the preparation of his role in American Hustle)

Both are good looking guys with very similar pheno but I feel bale has the slight edge due to him not looking too boyish or masculine at the same time, just a perfect mix of both. But what do you all think? do you agree with me or am I just coping?
Di Caprio is the most popular actor among women of all time, Bale is only popular amongst gay redpill men
 
Di Caprio is the most popular actor among women of all time, Bale is only popular amongst gay redpill men
Literally everyone who is a Patrick Bateman idolizer is blackpilled, they don’t even believe in bi-maxing or any of the cosmetic bs cope, you just have to be born tall and attractive or it’s over
 

Similar threads

Dastan
Replies
6
Views
548
CyberPsychodelic
CyberPsychodelic
iblameerfan
Replies
3
Views
319
BrutalMogger
BrutalMogger
aspiringexcel
Replies
123
Views
3K
Futura
Futura
Sloppyseconds
Replies
13
Views
557
Defeatist
Defeatist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top