"Ancap is cool until you have a quintillionare send 1 bazillion 7ft super soliders to ensalve you" debunking the muh invasion myth

psychomandible

psychomandible

Dark prince
Joined
Aug 28, 2024
Posts
13,045
Reputation
25,339
Whenever you discuss anarcho capitalism to some socialist they always bring up the idea "what if some billionaire sends his goons to enslave 1000 people" well this is the rebuttal of this myth

When they say this they always unknowingly out themselves for having no idea what anarcho capitalism actually is, they think that will not be any community and no fraternal companies or security companies that well be defending a community. They also disregard the fact that every single house hold will have guns and that the incentives of capturing and enslaving someone don't exist as it would actually be cheaper just to have normal payed workers and that they wouldn't be able to do business with anyone as they have a reputation for being morally horrible.

This can also be used in the argument that you will just get invaded, ancapistan will be
1. More militarised
2. More decentralised (harder to fight)
3. Every person is a warrior for their freedom

There would be no incentive to invade such country as the costs would out weigh the benefit as free trade would be more profitable for both sides then invasion.

Ask any questions if you have a problem

@imontheloose
@Volksstaffel
@castizo_ascender
@mentally_ill_chad
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: castizo_ascender, imontheloose, Jason Voorhees and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
People of Ancapistan pay for insurance/proptection agencies these companies provide the services for protection. If an agency canโ€™t reliably protect customers then people will pay a new agency. It isnโ€™t just singular individuals who defend, but voluntary collective defense groups
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and psychomandible
People of Ancapistan pay for insurance/proptection agencies these companies provide the services for protection. If an agency canโ€™t reliably protect customers then people will pay a new agency. It isnโ€™t just singular individuals who defend, but voluntary collective defense groups
I know but it seems like the socialist can't wrap their mind around this so I wanted to highlight another factor of defense
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted Member 0927
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
Whenever you discuss anarcho capitalism to some socialist they always bring up the idea "what if some billionaire sends his goons to enslave 1000 people" well this is the rebuttal of this myth

When they say this they always unknowingly out themselves for having no idea what anarcho capitalism actually is, they think that will not be any community and no fraternal companies or security companies that well be defending a community. They also disregard the fact that every single house hold will have guns and that the incentives of capturing and enslaving someone don't exist as it would actually be cheaper just to have normal payed workers and that they wouldn't be able to do business with anyone as they have a reputation for being morally horrible.

This can also be used in the argument that you will just get invaded, ancapistan will be
1. More militarised
2. More decentralised (harder to fight)
3. Every person is a warrior for their freedom

There would be no incentive to invade such country as the costs would out weigh the benefit as free trade would be more profitable for both sides then invasion.

Ask any questions if you have a problem

@imontheloose
@Volksstaffel
@castizo_ascender
@mentally_ill_chad
I want to ๐Ÿ‘ your post because you're a good guy, but I also don't want to rep anarcho capitalism meme ideology. What should I do?
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
I want to ๐Ÿ‘ your post because you're a good guy, but I also don't want to rep anarcho capitalism meme ideology. What should I do?
Do whatever you feel like, I don't mind if you don't like but have a good reason atleast, people can never actually debunk the ideology and just call it a meme.

I will continue making threads debunking the copes I most commonly see.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad
Do whatever you feel like, I don't mind if you don't like but have a good reason atleast, people can never actually debunk the ideology and just call it a meme.

I will continue making threads debunking the copes I most commonly see.
Ancap has no metaphysical values it's gay asf it's just about material acquisition as the highest good, I don't care about that, I want society to be beautiful, where human grandeur is united by a noble national spirit, ancaps want nothing good
 
Ancap has no metaphysical values it's gay asf it's just about material acquisition as the highest good, I don't care about that, I want society to be beautiful, where human grandeur is united by a noble national spirit, ancaps want nothing good
No what you want is to destroy my private property rights and destroy my freedom, you have literally said you found those concepts gay. All of your collectivist ideologies (even you're sacred arayn nazi shit) are all about material acquisition except instead of it being ear Ed by hard work of the individual it's stolen from the ubermensch of society.

Do you think
Private communities of white people
Wealth
Freedom of knowledge
Are all bad things ? Beacuse that's what ancap allows and gives if you are valued. It seems all collectivist are all just scared beacuse deep down they know they're losers who would get rejected by actually valuable white people in a ancap society.
 
wow anarcho capitalism seems to mog
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
No what you want is to destroy my private property rights and destroy my freedom, you have literally said you found those concepts gay. All of your collectivist ideologies (even you're sacred arayn nazi shit) are all about material acquisition except instead of it being ear Ed by hard work of the individual it's stolen from the ubermensch of society.

Do you think
Private communities of white people
Wealth
Freedom of knowledge
Are all bad things ? Beacuse that's what ancap allows and gives if you are valued. It seems all collectivist are all just scared beacuse deep down they know they're losers who would get rejected by actually valuable white people in a ancap society.
Yes because the Dutch republic was exactly as you described and guess what it was still gay as shit. I don't want wealth redistribution or anything like that I want people to actually serve their nation and race instead of being hedonistic bastards like you want to be
 
No what you want is to destroy my private property rights and destroy my freedom, you have literally said you found those concepts gay. All of your collectivist ideologies (even you're sacred arayn nazi shit) are all about material acquisition except instead of it being ear Ed by hard work of the individual it's stolen from the ubermensch of society.

Do you think
Private communities of white people
Wealth
Freedom of knowledge
Are all bad things ? Beacuse that's what ancap allows and gives if you are valued. It seems all collectivist are all just scared beacuse deep down they know they're losers who would get rejected by actually valuable white people in a ancap society.
Yes I don't think you have RIGHT to private property, and throughout most of history you didn't, if you were a hedonistic pig they will take things from you, it depended in how pious you were if you could keep your wealth, that's what the Spanish inquisition and catholic church and Geneva consistory used to do
 
Yes I don't think you have RIGHT to private property, and throughout most of history you didn't, if you were a hedonistic pig they will take things from you, it depended in how pious you were if you could keep your wealth, that's what the Spanish inquisition and catholic church and Geneva consistory used to do
So I don't have a right to my own body ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fusionxz
its freedom under god not freedom from god
And a man is meant to tell me if I am devoted to God enough? Who are you to tell me who is God and how I should interact with him
 
And a man is meant to tell me if I am devoted to God enough? Who are you to tell me who is God and how I should interact with him
People who say this just don't want to be held accountable
 
People who say this just don't want to be held accountable
No, I say this beacuse I know that I'm an actual radical and fringe person in my belief and I know that the vast majority disagree in my gods and I want my freedom to pursue the highest virtue and create my a life for which my future generations will succeed even more with. And I don't need parasitical socialist to try and steal what is rightfully going to be inherited by my blood.
 
No, I say this beacuse I know that I'm an actual radical and fringe person in my belief and I know that the vast majority disagree in my gods and I want my freedom to pursue the highest virtue and create my a life for which my future generations will succeed even more with. And I don't need parasitical socialist to try and steal what is rightfully going to be inherited by my blood.
Ttranslation: I'm gay and want freedom to protect gays like me

Anyway seriously I'm a perennialist like if you actually follow an actual religion then I'm ok but you're gonna be some pagan fag hedonist larper
The laws id enforce are more about just general asceticism and social conservatism rather than a specific sectarian thing
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top