Ancient Latins were (overwhelmingly) "shitskin". Water.

[Deleted member 196670]

"Physical appearance

As regards to the data on the pigmentation of eyes, hair and skin, the following results were obtained from the study on ancient DNA of the 11 individuals of the Iron Age/Republican period, coming from Latium and Abruzzo, and the 27 individuals of Medieval/Early Modern period, coming from Latium.

For Iron Age/Republic period, the eye color is blue in 27% of the examined and dark in the remaining 73%. Hair color is 9% blond or dark blond and 91% dark brown or black. The skin color is intermediate for 82%, intermediate or dark for 9% and dark or very dark for the remaining 9%.

By contrast, the following results were obtained for Medieval/Early Modern period: the eye color is blue in 26% of the examined and dark in the remaining 74%. Hair color is 22% blond or dark blond, 11% red and 67% dark brown or black. The skin color is pale for 15%, intermediate for 68%, intermediate or dark for 10% and dark or very dark for the remaining 7%."

"We Wuz Kangz!"

 

[Bryce]

OP also thinks whites just waltzed into a peaceful America and slaughtered innocent natives and borders drawn for geopolitical convenience is racism btw

 

[Deleted member 196670]

OP also thinks whites just waltzed into a peaceful America and slaughtered innocent natives and borders drawn for geopolitical convenience is racism btw

Yes. Yes I do. Cause it was and is responsible for most of the problems in America today.

America (because of Britain) was founded on slaughtering the natives and using blacks as slaves. Imagine building a country for it to spit in your face.

 

[Bryce]

Yes. Yes I do. Cause it was and is responsible for most of the problems in America today.

America (because of Britain) was founded on slaughtering the natives and using blacks as slaves. Imagine building a country for it to spit in your face.

Blacks sold by the African kingdom to increase their wealth and expand. Niggers enslave niggers more than any other race, it's been like that historically, and it is like that currently. Native Americans were savage psychopaths who gang raped women and children before scalping them alive or performing days-long torture rituals on their POW's. Whites stumbled into a brown-on-brown warzone and took action after relentlessly trying to make peace with them. We fought them for 300 years, this wasn't some short conquering because whites wanted the land more. If America wasn't founded by whites, it would still be a third world hellhole made up of warring tribes and starving peoples who would inevitably get wiped out by the common cold.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

Blacks sold by the African kingdom to increase their wealth and expand. Niggers enslave niggers more than any other race, it's been like that historically, and it is like that currently. Native Americans were savage psychopaths who gang raped women and children before scalping them alive or performing days-long torture rituals on their POW's. Whites stumbled into a brown-on-brown warzone and took action after relentlessly trying to make peace with them. We fought them for 300 years, this wasn't some short conquering because whites wanted the land more. If America wasn't founded by whites, it would still be a third world hellhole made up of warring tribes and starving peoples who would inevitably get wiped out by the common cold.

not really most colonies struggled and depended on them (3 colonies failed and died of cold and starvation) the fourth one was slightly successful then they saw "ahh geez mate these lil girls are much better than our wife's Back in Europe" then they raped and shot them DNR

 

[Deleted member 233284]

this nigga cant admit white people commit mistakes @TheStonerOne

 

[Bryce]

this nigga cant admit white people commit mistakes @TheStonerOne

I certainly can, every group has bad apples. The problem with trying to coerce someone into admitting the few faults that whites committed is pointless because of the irrefutable amount of shit browns and blacks caused.

not really most colonies struggled and depended on them (3 colonies failed and died of cold and starvation) the fourth one was slightly successful then they saw "ahh geez mate these lil girls are much better than our wife's Back in Europe" then they raped and shot them DNR

Fire your history teacher.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

I certainly can, every group has bad apples. The problem with trying to coerce someone into admitting the few faults that whites committed is pointless because of the irrefutable amount of shit browns and blacks caused.

Fire your history teacher.

upgrade my history teacher


1.
Yes, the first three English colonies or settlements in North America largely failed due to factors like starvation, disease, poor planning, and conflict with Indigenous peoples.

1. Roanoke (1585 & 1587) – The “Lost Colony” vanished; likely due to starvation, lack of supplies, and strained relations with local tribes.
2. Popham Colony (1607) – Abandoned after one year due to harsh weather, leadership issues, and lack of support.
3. Jamestown (1607) – Survived long-term but nearly failed early on due to famine (the “Starving Time” in 1609–1610), disease, and poor site choice.

2.
Yes, the surviving colony — Jamestown — did receive crucial help from Native Americans, especially in the early years.

• The Powhatan Confederacy, led by Chief Powhatan, provided food, guidance on local crops, and survival strategies.
• The most famous figure is Pocahontas, who acted as an intermediary and helped ease tensions at times.
• Despite this early help, relations later deteriorated, leading to conflict and warfare.

Without Indigenous assistance, Jamestown likely would have completely failed like the earlier colonies.


3.

• European settlers carried diseases like smallpox, measles, influenza, and typhus — often without showing symptoms right away.
• Native Americans had no prior exposure (no immunity), so these diseases spread rapidly and were often deadly, wiping out up to 90% of some communities.

niggas die from pajeet stink(joke)





4.
Yes, there is historical evidence that some colonists raped or sexually assaulted Native American women — though these acts were not always officially recorded or prosecuted.

Here's what we know:​

• Sexual violence was part of the broader system of colonial domination, especially during times of conflict, slavery, and land expansion.
• During wars and raids, Indigenous women were often kidnapped, enslaved, and assaulted by colonists or soldiers.
• Colonists sometimes took Native women as concubines or wives without consent, especially in frontier areas.
• Because Native people were not granted equal legal status, crimes against them were rarely punished in colonial courts.

5.
Yes, unfortunately, there is historical evidence that Native children were also victims of abuse, including sexual violence, by colonists and later settlers.

Some key facts:​

• During colonization, Native children were often kidnapped or taken during raids and then enslaved, adopted, or placed in colonial households, where abuse — including sexual abuse — sometimes occurred.

TL;DR
am I demonizing white people no , am I demonizing the way of colonizing yes stop caring like it was this god tier natural selection when they in reality just backstabbed the people who helped them





sources

Key sources​

• Federal Indian Boarding School Initiative — The U.S. government investigation into federal Indian boarding schools. This report documents that, at 19 of the federal schools alone, more than 500 American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian children died. Education Week+2CBS News+2
• “A century of trauma at U.S. boarding schools for Native American children” (National Geographic) — An article that outlines how the boarding‑school system worked (forced removal of children, cultural and physical abuse) and its lasting impact. National Geographic
• “New language, old problem: Sex trafficking of American Indian women and children” (VAWnet) — A resource that describes the historical context of sexual violence, including trafficking or sexual exploitation of Native women and children in the U.S. VAWnet
• “Colonialism and Sexual Violence” (Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton) — A Canadian‑based overview of how sexual violence was used as a tool of colonial control and how it continues to impact Indigenous communities. Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton
• “Violence, trauma, and colonialism: A structural approach to understanding the policy landscape of Indigenous reproductive justice” — An academic piece that links historic colonial practices with ongoing violence and trauma in Indigenous communities, including children.

 

[Bryce]

upgrade my history teacher


1.
Yes, the first three English colonies or settlements in North America largely failed due to factors like starvation, disease, poor planning, and conflict with Indigenous peoples.

1. Roanoke (1585 & 1587) – The “Lost Colony” vanished; likely due to starvation, lack of supplies, and strained relations with local tribes.
2. Popham Colony (1607) – Abandoned after one year due to harsh weather, leadership issues, and lack of support.
3. Jamestown (1607) – Survived long-term but nearly failed early on due to famine (the “Starving Time” in 1609–1610), disease, and poor site choice.

2.
Yes, the surviving colony — Jamestown — did receive crucial help from Native Americans, especially in the early years.

• The Powhatan Confederacy, led by Chief Powhatan, provided food, guidance on local crops, and survival strategies.
• The most famous figure is Pocahontas, who acted as an intermediary and helped ease tensions at times.
• Despite this early help, relations later deteriorated, leading to conflict and warfare.

Without Indigenous assistance, Jamestown likely would have completely failed like the earlier colonies.


3.

• European settlers carried diseases like smallpox, measles, influenza, and typhus — often without showing symptoms right away.
• Native Americans had no prior exposure (no immunity), so these diseases spread rapidly and were often deadly, wiping out up to 90% of some communities.

niggas die from pajeet stink(joke)





4.
Yes, there is historical evidence that some colonists raped or sexually assaulted Native American women — though these acts were not always officially recorded or prosecuted.

Here's what we know:​

• Sexual violence was part of the broader system of colonial domination, especially during times of conflict, slavery, and land expansion.
• During wars and raids, Indigenous women were often kidnapped, enslaved, and assaulted by colonists or soldiers.
• Colonists sometimes took Native women as concubines or wives without consent, especially in frontier areas.
• Because Native people were not granted equal legal status, crimes against them were rarely punished in colonial courts.

5.
Yes, unfortunately, there is historical evidence that Native children were also victims of abuse, including sexual violence, by colonists and later settlers.

Some key facts:​

• During colonization, Native children were often kidnapped or taken during raids and then enslaved, adopted, or placed in colonial households, where abuse — including sexual abuse — sometimes occurred.

TL;DR
am I demonizing white people no , am I demonizing the way of colonizing yes stop caring like it was this god tier natural selection when they in reality just backstabbed the people who helped them





sources

Key sources​

• Federal Indian Boarding School Initiative — The U.S. government investigation into federal Indian boarding schools. This report documents that, at 19 of the federal schools alone, more than 500 American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian children died. Education Week+2CBS News+2
• “A century of trauma at U.S. boarding schools for Native American children” (National Geographic) — An article that outlines how the boarding‑school system worked (forced removal of children, cultural and physical abuse) and its lasting impact. National Geographic
• “New language, old problem: Sex trafficking of American Indian women and children” (VAWnet) — A resource that describes the historical context of sexual violence, including trafficking or sexual exploitation of Native women and children in the U.S. VAWnet
• “Colonialism and Sexual Violence” (Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton) — A Canadian‑based overview of how sexual violence was used as a tool of colonial control and how it continues to impact Indigenous communities. Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton
• “Violence, trauma, and colonialism: A structural approach to understanding the policy landscape of Indigenous reproductive justice” — An academic piece that links historic colonial practices with ongoing violence and trauma in Indigenous communities, including children.

Has to be ragebait

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

"Physical appearance

As regards to the data on the pigmentation of eyes, hair and skin, the following results were obtained from the study on ancient DNA of the 11 individuals of the Iron Age/Republican period, coming from Latium and Abruzzo, and the 27 individuals of Medieval/Early Modern period, coming from Latium.

For Iron Age/Republic period, the eye color is blue in 27% of the examined and dark in the remaining 73%. Hair color is 9% blond or dark blond and 91% dark brown or black. The skin color is intermediate for 82%, intermediate or dark for 9% and dark or very dark for the remaining 9%.

By contrast, the following results were obtained for Medieval/Early Modern period: the eye color is blue in 26% of the examined and dark in the remaining 74%. Hair color is 22% blond or dark blond, 11% red and 67% dark brown or black. The skin color is pale for 15%, intermediate for 68%, intermediate or dark for 10% and dark or very dark for the remaining 7%."

"We Wuz Kangz!"

Yes this is water

That’s why the Romans and Greeks saw themselves closer to Arabs than to euros

 

[Deleted member 233284]

Has to be ragebait

go ahead debunk it orrr

 

[Deleted member 233284]

Has to be ragebait

I'm waiting lol or your just going to stay silent or wait your dad to go to soyjak.party and find more claism

 

[Bryce]

I'm waiting lol or your just going to stay silent or wait your dad to go to soyjak.party and find more claism

Wait a few more minutes then. Unlike you, I'm not a lazy bluegum who relies on a robot to do the research for him.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

Wait a few more minutes then. Unlike you, I'm not a lazy bluegum who relies on a robot to do the research for him.

I'm waiting lol

 

[Bryce]

I'm waiting lol

Your issue, and the issue when arguing historical events, is oversimplification. I never claimed that whites didn't fail, refer to:

I certainly can, every group has bad apples. The problem with trying to coerce someone into admitting the few faults that whites committed is pointless because of the irrefutable amount of shit browns and blacks caused.

Anyhow, the failed colonies were a result of relentless attacks from natives and uncooperative behavior on both sides, as well as additional factors which outside of human control. You're constructing a false dichotomy by not giving the full picture. Instead of admitting that natives were literal savages who ate babies and performed atrocities on women and children (long before the Englishmen arrived, so trying to say we did it at some point in history is futile, browns and blacks have been doing this for centuries, consistently), you are persistent on saying that whites are the bad guys in the picture.

Your ethnic egocentricity will never admit the fact that browns started this all of this. Everything the robot generated for you was historically accurate in the sense that it happened, and as I said I'm not denying the fact that both sides had failures (natives far more so than Englishmen), but you have absolutely nothing else to say. I assume you live in the US, the country where we give black retards like you welfare, unlimited food stamps, and scholarships just because you look a certain way, and more, so long as you stay fatherless.

The point goes as follows: without the innovation, expertise, and cultivation of whites, you wouldn't exist. You are living on cloud-9 built and subsidized by the white man, for you. You sit in your room and bitch about your superiors all the livelong day without realizing for a split second you are nothing without them.

Browns started it, whites finished it. Simple as that, many such cases as well. The fraction of "oh look, whites failed in this one specific area (despite the fact they utterly obliterated you monkies 10:1) they must be dumb pinkies!" is the only thing you can cling to. So, you can continue to bring up random historical events without context that make whites look bad, but you'll never whitewash the fact that they won and continue to win.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

Your issue, and the issue when arguing historical events, is oversimplification. I never claimed that whites didn't fail, refer to:

Anyhow, the failed colonies were a result of relentless attacks from natives and uncooperative behavior on both sides, as well as additional factors which outside of human control. You're constructing a false dichotomy by not giving the full picture. Instead of admitting that natives were literal savages who ate babies and performed atrocities on women and children (long before the Englishmen arrived, so trying to say we did it at some point in history is futile, browns and blacks have been doing this for centuries, consistently), you are persistent on saying that whites are the bad guys in the picture.

Your ethnic egocentricity will never admit the fact that browns started this all of this. Everything the robot generated for you was historically accurate in the sense that it happened, and as I said I'm not denying the fact that both sides had failures (natives far more so than Englishmen), but you have absolutely nothing else to say. I assume you live in the US, the country where we give black retards like you welfare, unlimited food stamps, and scholarships just because you look a certain way, and more, so long as you stay fatherless.

The point goes as follows: without the innovation, expertise, and cultivation of whites, you wouldn't exist. You are living on cloud-9 built and subsidized by the white man, for you. You sit in your room and bitch about your superiors all the livelong day without realizing for a split second you are nothing without them.

Browns started it, whites finished it. Simple as that, many such cases as well. The fraction of "oh look, whites failed in this one specific area (despite the fact they utterly obliterated you monkies 10:1) they must be dumb pinkies!" is the only thing you can cling to. So, you can continue to bring up random historical events without context that make whites look bad, but you'll never whitewash the fact that they won and continue to win.

this is genuine ragebait

 

[Bryce]

this is genuine ragebait

Ah, I see. You must've been pretty upset when you plugged that into ChatGPT it didn't generate a response that fitted your needs.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

debunking this retard

1. "failed colonies were a result of relentless attacks from natives and uncooperative behavior"
   Lol, so you’re blaming defense against invasion for colonial failures? Bro, maybe if the colonists werent violent conquerors, people wouldn’t fight back. Imagine whining that the victims resisted.
2. they literally helped them out the first conflict was after the first settlement coming in

2.Saying “browns and blacks did bad things too” is just shifting blame. History’s not a contest of who was worse — it’s about recognizing the full truth.

3.“Browns started it” — really? Human conflict isn’t a starting gun that one group fired first. This oversimplifies centuries of complex history.

4.Claiming white innovation is the sole reason anyone exists ignores thousands of years of indigenous culture, knowledge, and survival before colonization.

5.Saying “whites finished it” overlooks the destruction, displacement, and suffering colonialism caused. Winning doesn’t make those actions right.


6. european killing gypsies for invading =good
natives killing Europeans for invading=bad


genuine retard

 

[Deleted member 233284]

When Europeans first showed up, Native peoples didn’t have any reason to attack—they didn’t even know what these newcomers were or what they wanted. The initial contact was often cautious, curious, or even friendly in some cases.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

your gonna randomly attack space aliens you don't even know they existed in the first place

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

 

[Bryce]

debunking this retard

1. "failed colonies were a result of relentless attacks from natives and uncooperative behavior"
   Lol, so you’re blaming defense against invasion for colonial failures? Bro, maybe if the colonists werent violent conquerors, people wouldn’t fight back. Imagine whining that the victims resisted.
2. they literally helped them out the first conflict was after the first settlement coming in

2.Saying “browns and blacks did bad things too” is just shifting blame. History’s not a contest of who was worse — it’s about recognizing the full truth.

3.“Browns started it” — really? Human conflict isn’t a starting gun that one group fired first. This oversimplifies centuries of complex history.

4.Claiming white innovation is the sole reason anyone exists ignores thousands of years of indigenous culture, knowledge, and survival before colonization.

5.Saying “whites finished it” overlooks the destruction, displacement, and suffering colonialism caused. Winning doesn’t make those actions right.


6. european killing gypsies for invading =good
natives killing Europeans for invading=bad


genuine retard

When Europeans first showed up, Native peoples didn’t have any reason to attack—they didn’t even know what these newcomers were or what they wanted. The initial contact was often cautious, curious, or even friendly in some cases.

Wow, I was right. ChatGPT really did flop on this one. I suggest trying to use your own brain, albeit it's most likely pea-sized, to concoct a half decent response instead of using a robot (invented by the white man) on your behest.

 

[Deleted member 233284]

Wow, I was right. ChatGPT really did flop on this one. I suggest trying to use your own brain, albeit it's most likely pea-sized, to concoct a half decent response instead of using a robot (invented by the white man) on your behest.

yapping≠ debunking me

 

[Deleted member 233284]

still waiting lol bro raged quit