Andreas Eriksen VS Brad Pitt

Who mogs


  • Total voters
    62
Biiyo03

Biiyo03

Aesthetics Guru
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Posts
9,644
Reputation
17,763
1642181384295
1642181455602
1642181463480
1642181470734
1642181474006
1642181477665
1642181483698



VS


1642181492015
1642181520426
1642181497641

1642181544311

1642181507314
 
  • +1
Reactions: delusionalretard, Deleted member 14160, Jason Voorhees and 2 others
@Preston @StrangerDanger @Blue @germanlooks @Frank Jack @volcelfatcel @Gargantuan @cloUder @looksmaxxer234
 
  • +1
Reactions: delusionalretard, Jason Voorhees, Blue and 2 others
Damn Pitt was so angelic
 
@ForeverRecession @USER0213 @VicMackey @delusionalretard @ArvidGustavsson @Effortless
 
  • +1
Reactions: delusionalretard and Deleted member 15081
  • +1
Reactions: delusionalretard and AscendingHero
Eriksen psl alone, then again i mog them both to death:Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3946 and AscendingHero
PSL, appeal its prolly pitt.
eriksen in psl imo, in strict facial aesthetics you have to put him over pitt.

But Pitts pheno, coloring, averageness and status therefore leads him to appeal mog Eriksen imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, Deleted member 16346 and Deleted member 3946
eriksen in psl imo, in strict facial aesthetics you have to put him over pitt.

But Pitts pheno, coloring, averageness and status therefore leads him to appeal mog Eriksen imo.
Imo girls (jbs the most) would think of Eriksen as a "giant Dutch guy" and wouldn't get much appeal as Pitt, who is angelic and "más tierno" (cuter in Spanish)
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
I think if these guys stood next to each other Eriksen would mog
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, TUSSELEIF, Jason Voorhees and 3 others
threads like this are still being made in 2022 ?
Sxv wtf
 
  • +1
Reactions: TUSSELEIF
Some aspie looking model vs one of the best looking movie gods of all time. The choice is clear.
I think Eriksen has nice pictures too, but the thing is that he just has that niche model appeal while Pitt has the more readily attractive moviestar appeal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03
Some aspie looking model vs one of the best looking movie gods of all time. The choice is clear.
I think Eriksen has nice pictures too, but the thing is that he just has that niche model appeal while Pitt has the more readily attractive moviestar appeal.
That doesn't mean Pitt is better looking, Emma Stone is textbook movie star, still gets mogged to oblivion by 99% of known (and even not known) female models.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03
Pitt is more conventionally attractive whereas Eriksen looks far more striking and has objectively better features so I'm picking the latter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, Kroker, Biiyo03 and 3 others
I think if these guys stood next to each other Eriksen would mog
For next time, this is a strong browridge and prominent supraorbitals -
2694330 1642181470734

Even though I am not a fan of Eriksen's looks, I can acknowledge that. Meanwhile you live in fantasy land thinking you mog the entire forum with your epicanthic fold ridden eye area.
 
For next time, this is a strong browridge and prominent supraorbitals -
View attachment 1493451
Even though I am not a fan of Eriksen's looks, I can acknowledge that. Meanwhile you live in fantasy land thinking you mog the entire forum with your epicanthic fold ridden eye area.
Jesus Christ why are you still bringing this up when I don’t have epicanthic folds :ROFLMAO:
 
For next time, this is a strong browridge and prominent supraorbitals -
View attachment 1493451
Even though I am not a fan of Eriksen's looks, I can acknowledge that. Meanwhile you live in fantasy land thinking you mog the entire forum with your epicanthic fold ridden eye area.
@Titbot fed you garbage lol
 
Someone morph Eriksen with Pitt's eyes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03, Deleted member 16346 and volcelfatcel
That doesn't mean Pitt is better looking, Emma Stone is textbook movie star, still gets mogged to oblivion by 99% of known (and even not known) female models.
Not a fan of Emma Stone's looks, plus it's about having averageness in your features (not to be confused with average features). Make a mog battle of Gandy vs Pitt, and that would make a harder choice since both look more readily attractive, PSL autism sometimes gets people thinking niche appeal makes someone better looking
 
  • JFL
Reactions: volcelfatcel
I'd rather look like pitt but he's like 6.25 psl while eriksen is 6.5ish
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3946
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep and volcelfatcel
@Titbot didn't put that into my mind, I told him that -
Chrome screenshot 1642182962439
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: volcelfatcel and Deleted member 16346
I'd rather look like pitt but he's like 6.25 psl while eriksen is 6.5ish
Not a fan of Eriksen's looks, but if I put myself into shoes of autists here then I think Eriksen is 7 plus PSL.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16346
@Biiyo03 should rename this user0213 vs volcelfatcel mog battle
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Biiyo03, Titbot and volcelfatcel
Not a fan of Eriksen's looks, but if I put myself into shoes of autists here then I think Eriksen is 7 plus PSL.
I think his medial canthus is a failo ngl and his mouth isn't ideal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3946, Aesthetics_III, Deleted member 15081 and 1 other person
When people who have seen me in motion confirm my huge supras, I don’t need any approval from you
Okay buddy, if you think that way good for you👍🏻
I expressed my opinion without any coping there, I have seen some of my own relatives with that eye area and have seen them up close, so I feel that it's the upper eye fat pads that make that give one that look.
 
Okay buddy, if you think that way good for you👍🏻
I expressed my opinion without any coping there, I have seen some of my own relatives with that eye area and have seen them up close, so I feel that it's the upper eye fat pads that make that give one that look.
No man you have not seen me you’re basing it off a cropped pic angled from instagram

stop the cope, your eye area isn’t even remotely close to mine @Preston and @StrangerDanger have seen me
 
  • +1
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Jason Voorhees
I think his medial canthus is a failo ngl and his mouth isn't ideal.
His mediapo canthus is just too extreme. Nigga looks evil because of it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03 and volcelfatcel
Eriksen mogs but I'd 100% rather look like pitt.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Biiyo03, Frank Jack and 3 others
I think his medial canthus is a failo ngl and his mouth isn't ideal.
Finally someone said it, actually his medial canthus could be a halo too if his lateral canthus wasn't taking a dive downwards too. That gives him the infamous 'crescent moon eye look' -
F7a174537ac33999e9d9e035d5b2d999 2
DJTnor3V4AEd7zZ 1

Not as aggressive as the above girl since he is not squinting.
And yes his mouth is weird cause it is as wide as his interpupillary distance, your mouth should be as wide as the starting of your pupils, that wide stretched mouth looks weird -
Cf1782108dee80d4570670f3504b9c9f
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, Kroker, Frank Jack and 3 others
Finally someone said it, actually his medial canthus could be a halo too if his lateral canthus wasn't taking a dive downwards too. That gives him the infamous 'crescent moon eye look' -
View attachment 1493476View attachment 1493472
Not as aggressive as the above girl since he is not squinting.
And yes his mouth is weird cause it is as wide as his interpupillary distance, your mouth should be as wide as the starting of your pupils, that wide stretched mouth looks weird -
View attachment 1493478
His forward grown wide mouth is ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03
I'd rather look like pitt but he's like 6.25 psl while eriksen is 6.5ish
Disagree with both the rates. Eriksen is 7 and pitt is 6.75. Eriksen is gigachad and pitt is a high tier chad. Both mog Efron who is a 6.25 to dirt.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Biiyo03, Deleted member 3946 and 3 others
Eriksen mogs but I'd 100% rather look like pitt.
This is what I talk about when I say someone is 'readily attractive', Pitt has averageness in his features(not to be confused with average features), which makes him look more plaesing to the eyes than someone like Eriksen. You are having that moment where your mind can't decide whether to choose PSL autism or pure appeal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Finally someone said it, actually his medial canthus could be a halo too if his lateral canthus wasn't taking a dive downwards too. That gives him the infamous 'crescent moon eye look' -
View attachment 1493476View attachment 1493472
Not as aggressive as the above girl since he is not squinting.
And yes his mouth is weird cause it is as wide as his interpupillary distance, your mouth should be as wide as the starting of your pupils, that wide stretched mouth looks weird -
View attachment 1493478
Might make a morph of eriksen with a normal lateral canthus but it still mighr look weird. I think such a deep dive is still a bit much tho. Imo ideal is like Basso's

3516c62d5f9670fcb69434efff93e0ab
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and Deleted member 15081
Disagree with both the rates. Eriksen is 7 and pitt is 6.75. Eriksen is gigachad and pitt is a high tier chad. Both mog Efron who is a 6.25 to dirt.
Pslwise Pitt isn't that high. He is extremely harmonious but his eyebrows are NCT, his bigonial too wide and his zygos too flat. He is a high tier chad but pslwise he ain't all that.

Eriksen is 7 psl depending on whether or not you think his canthus is too extreme or not imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
OP didn't use good pics for pitt tbh. These pics don't do him justice. Pitt was very good looking in his prime

Images   2021 12 22T092010699
2602527 1636131658219 2
RDT 20211222 0919374581110942541196133  01
2602526 1636131638529 1
 

Attachments

  • RDT_20211222_0919346053171202494042020__01.jpg
    RDT_20211222_0919346053171202494042020__01.jpg
    205.9 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Biiyo03 and Deleted member 16346
Might make a morph of eriksen with a normal lateral canthus but it still mighr look weird. I think such a deep dive is still a bit much tho. Imo ideal is like Basso's

View attachment 1493492
Basso's postives are his nice eye shape, great eyebrows with positive tilt and nice eyelashes, kinda rare hazel-amber mixed eyes. But his 7 degree positive canthal tilt is on the feminine side, nevertheless he has alluring eyes👍🏻
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16346
Basso's postives are his nice eye shape, great eyebrows with positive tilt and nice eyelashes, kinda rare hazel-amber mixed eyes. But his 7 degree positive canthal tilt is on the feminine side, nevertheless he has alluring eyes👍🏻
Ive always liked that kind of lightly feminine eye area with a masc bone structure.

Imo ideal is masc eyebrows with feminine eye shape
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03 and Deleted member 15081
Pslwise Pitt isn't that high. He is extremely harmonious but his eyebrows are NCT, his bigonial too wide and his zygos too flat. He is a high tier chad but pslwise he ain't all that.

Eriksen is 7 psl depending on whether or not you think his canthus is too extreme or not imo.
I am still yet to know what exactly are 'ideal masculine zygomatic bones', came across this one site claiming flat zygomatic bones are ideal in men. Agree with everything else
 
I am still yet to know what exactly are 'ideal masculine zygomatic bones', came across this one site claiming flat zygomatic bones are ideal in men. Agree with everything else
Just look in the mirror and you’ll see
 

Similar threads

bautista!
Replies
30
Views
848
Nerdmaxxing
Nerdmaxxing
FUE Mogger
Replies
7
Views
147
FUE Mogger
FUE Mogger
geneticdiff
Replies
12
Views
261
anthony111553
anthony111553
FUE Mogger
Replies
21
Views
210
leonardu
leonardu
PlayersGetPlayed
  • Poll
Replies
1
Views
135
PlayersGetPlayed
PlayersGetPlayed

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top