Biiyo03
Aesthetics Guru
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2021
- Posts
- 9,644
- Reputation
- 17,763
VS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Pitt higher appeal pheno and better averageness.
who do u think mogs bhai?Pitt higher appeal pheno and better averageness.
Eriksen high psl dark nordic chin mogger.
Close.
Appeal or psl?who do u think mogs bhai?
also vote plz
PSL, appeal its prolly pitt.Appeal or psl?
eriksen in psl imo, in strict facial aesthetics you have to put him over pitt.PSL, appeal its prolly pitt.
Imo girls (jbs the most) would think of Eriksen as a "giant Dutch guy" and wouldn't get much appeal as Pitt, who is angelic and "más tierno" (cuter in Spanish)eriksen in psl imo, in strict facial aesthetics you have to put him over pitt.
But Pitts pheno, coloring, averageness and status therefore leads him to appeal mog Eriksen imo.
Some aspie looking model vs one of the best looking movie gods of all time. The choice is clear.
That doesn't mean Pitt is better looking, Emma Stone is textbook movie star, still gets mogged to oblivion by 99% of known (and even not known) female models.Some aspie looking model vs one of the best looking movie gods of all time. The choice is clear.
I think Eriksen has nice pictures too, but the thing is that he just has that niche model appeal while Pitt has the more readily attractive moviestar appeal.
For next time, this is a strong browridge and prominent supraorbitals -I think if these guys stood next to each other Eriksen would mog
Jesus Christ why are you still bringing this up when I don’t have epicanthic foldsFor next time, this is a strong browridge and prominent supraorbitals -
View attachment 1493451
Even though I am not a fan of Eriksen's looks, I can acknowledge that. Meanwhile you live in fantasy land thinking you mog the entire forum with your epicanthic fold ridden eye area.
@Titbot fed you garbage lolFor next time, this is a strong browridge and prominent supraorbitals -
View attachment 1493451
Even though I am not a fan of Eriksen's looks, I can acknowledge that. Meanwhile you live in fantasy land thinking you mog the entire forum with your epicanthic fold ridden eye area.
Not a fan of Emma Stone's looks, plus it's about having averageness in your features (not to be confused with average features). Make a mog battle of Gandy vs Pitt, and that would make a harder choice since both look more readily attractive, PSL autism sometimes gets people thinking niche appeal makes someone better lookingThat doesn't mean Pitt is better looking, Emma Stone is textbook movie star, still gets mogged to oblivion by 99% of known (and even not known) female models.
Jesus Christ why are you still bringing this up when I don’t have epicanthic folds
Nepalese pill like @ChadeepView attachment 1493459another larp from the forum chang
FrenchlookzNepalese pill like @Chadeep
Not a fan of Eriksen's looks, but if I put myself into shoes of autists here then I think Eriksen is 7 plus PSL.I'd rather look like pitt but he's like 6.25 psl while eriksen is 6.5ish
When people who have seen me in motion confirm my huge supras, I don’t need any approval from you
I think his medial canthus is a failo ngl and his mouth isn't ideal.Not a fan of Eriksen's looks, but if I put myself into shoes of autists here then I think Eriksen is 7 plus PSL.
I didn’t even bully him, that Dalit always shifts entire threads@Biiyo03 should rename this user0213 vs volcelfatcel mog battle
Okay buddy, if you think that way good for youWhen people who have seen me in motion confirm my huge supras, I don’t need any approval from you
No man you have not seen me you’re basing it off a cropped pic angled from instagramOkay buddy, if you think that way good for you
I expressed my opinion without any coping there, I have seen some of my own relatives with that eye area and have seen them up close, so I feel that it's the upper eye fat pads that make that give one that look.
His mediapo canthus is just too extreme. Nigga looks evil because of it.I think his medial canthus is a failo ngl and his mouth isn't ideal.
Finally someone said it, actually his medial canthus could be a halo too if his lateral canthus wasn't taking a dive downwards too. That gives him the infamous 'crescent moon eye look' -I think his medial canthus is a failo ngl and his mouth isn't ideal.
His forward grown wide mouth is idealFinally someone said it, actually his medial canthus could be a halo too if his lateral canthus wasn't taking a dive downwards too. That gives him the infamous 'crescent moon eye look' -
View attachment 1493476View attachment 1493472
Not as aggressive as the above girl since he is not squinting.
And yes his mouth is weird cause it is as wide as his interpupillary distance, your mouth should be as wide as the starting of your pupils, that wide stretched mouth looks weird -
View attachment 1493478
I was coping hard.
Disagree with both the rates. Eriksen is 7 and pitt is 6.75. Eriksen is gigachad and pitt is a high tier chad. Both mog Efron who is a 6.25 to dirt.I'd rather look like pitt but he's like 6.25 psl while eriksen is 6.5ish
This is what I talk about when I say someone is 'readily attractive', Pitt has averageness in his features(not to be confused with average features), which makes him look more plaesing to the eyes than someone like Eriksen. You are having that moment where your mind can't decide whether to choose PSL autism or pure appeal.Eriksen mogs but I'd 100% rather look like pitt.
Might make a morph of eriksen with a normal lateral canthus but it still mighr look weird. I think such a deep dive is still a bit much tho. Imo ideal is like Basso'sFinally someone said it, actually his medial canthus could be a halo too if his lateral canthus wasn't taking a dive downwards too. That gives him the infamous 'crescent moon eye look' -
View attachment 1493476View attachment 1493472
Not as aggressive as the above girl since he is not squinting.
And yes his mouth is weird cause it is as wide as his interpupillary distance, your mouth should be as wide as the starting of your pupils, that wide stretched mouth looks weird -
View attachment 1493478
Pslwise Pitt isn't that high. He is extremely harmonious but his eyebrows are NCT, his bigonial too wide and his zygos too flat. He is a high tier chad but pslwise he ain't all that.Disagree with both the rates. Eriksen is 7 and pitt is 6.75. Eriksen is gigachad and pitt is a high tier chad. Both mog Efron who is a 6.25 to dirt.
Basso's postives are his nice eye shape, great eyebrows with positive tilt and nice eyelashes, kinda rare hazel-amber mixed eyes. But his 7 degree positive canthal tilt is on the feminine side, nevertheless he has alluring eyesMight make a morph of eriksen with a normal lateral canthus but it still mighr look weird. I think such a deep dive is still a bit much tho. Imo ideal is like Basso's
View attachment 1493492
Ive always liked that kind of lightly feminine eye area with a masc bone structure.Basso's postives are his nice eye shape, great eyebrows with positive tilt and nice eyelashes, kinda rare hazel-amber mixed eyes. But his 7 degree positive canthal tilt is on the feminine side, nevertheless he has alluring eyes
I am still yet to know what exactly are 'ideal masculine zygomatic bones', came across this one site claiming flat zygomatic bones are ideal in men. Agree with everything elsePslwise Pitt isn't that high. He is extremely harmonious but his eyebrows are NCT, his bigonial too wide and his zygos too flat. He is a high tier chad but pslwise he ain't all that.
Eriksen is 7 psl depending on whether or not you think his canthus is too extreme or not imo.
Just look in the mirror and you’ll seeI am still yet to know what exactly are 'ideal masculine zygomatic bones', came across this one site claiming flat zygomatic bones are ideal in men. Agree with everything else