![noor](/data/avatars/l/6/6880.jpg?1606578788)
noor
Banned
- Joined
- May 9, 2020
- Posts
- 225
- Reputation
- 418
"arms" includes shoulders ofc
In fact I only do side laterals and push ups. My chest is naturally huge bc of big ribcage and it portrudes so much, so I don't care about overloading it
Arms are good too so I just maintain with pushups and curls
I only overload my side delts and neck, I hammer them 3 times a week
Training back didn't add anything to my physique. I already have a big frame, and lats don't actually make you wider unless you're flexing. muh pushes your arms to the side blah blah yeah no lmao if you're relaxed and lean as a natty, your lats wont be even CLOSE to pushing your arms to your side, NOT that it's even attractive to most girls. When you spread your lats, the reason it makes you look wider is because the muscle is expanding from your scapula and ribcage and pushing your arm to the side; all that muscle returns and gathers on the back of your scapula and ribcage, and even if you have big lats, it will push out saggitally, not laterally. I've read girls comment on this particular thing over and over on reddit, they don't like when your arms aren't on ur side
I like having square shoulders and I don't want traps to detract from that, so if u have sloping shoulders forget about traps. i want my arms to be perfectly by my side, flared lats look retarded and tryhard and de-angularize u
fuck legs
To me legs and back are a waste of muscle synthesis. by only training chest, triceps, biceps, neck and side delts , I don't require much protein intake, which is ideal and makes cutting easier because I don't have to be worried about getting in more food for protein, which will inevitably result in more calories
In fact I only do side laterals and push ups. My chest is naturally huge bc of big ribcage and it portrudes so much, so I don't care about overloading it
Arms are good too so I just maintain with pushups and curls
I only overload my side delts and neck, I hammer them 3 times a week
Training back didn't add anything to my physique. I already have a big frame, and lats don't actually make you wider unless you're flexing. muh pushes your arms to the side blah blah yeah no lmao if you're relaxed and lean as a natty, your lats wont be even CLOSE to pushing your arms to your side, NOT that it's even attractive to most girls. When you spread your lats, the reason it makes you look wider is because the muscle is expanding from your scapula and ribcage and pushing your arm to the side; all that muscle returns and gathers on the back of your scapula and ribcage, and even if you have big lats, it will push out saggitally, not laterally. I've read girls comment on this particular thing over and over on reddit, they don't like when your arms aren't on ur side
I like having square shoulders and I don't want traps to detract from that, so if u have sloping shoulders forget about traps. i want my arms to be perfectly by my side, flared lats look retarded and tryhard and de-angularize u
fuck legs
To me legs and back are a waste of muscle synthesis. by only training chest, triceps, biceps, neck and side delts , I don't require much protein intake, which is ideal and makes cutting easier because I don't have to be worried about getting in more food for protein, which will inevitably result in more calories