Anyone had laser eye surgery?

[Aribbaa]

Title

 

[Fear]

Laser eye surgery, assuming you mean to correct nearsightedness, is pointless unless you change your viewing habits post-surgery.

A nearsighted eyeball has permanently elongated, like a football, to accommodate persistent near-focus demands and simultaneously relieve stress on an over-strained ciliary muscle. The ciliary muscle is what performs work to enable you to focus up close.

A laser reshapes your cornea so that the anterior part of your eyeball approximates a perfectly round shape instead of that football shape.

If you continue to practice poor viewing habits -- prolonged near-distance focus without adequate rest -- accommodation by eyeball elongation will resume, and you will become nearsighted once more.

Whether or not you elect for surgery, take care of your ciliary muscle. In addition to healthier habits, proper supplementation and diet can help strengthen it.

 

[Mateusz74]

Laser eye surgery, assuming you mean to correct nearsightedness, is pointless unless you change your viewing habits post-surgery.

A nearsighted eyeball has permanently elongated, like a football, to accommodate persistent near-focus demands and simultaneously relieve stress on an over-strained ciliary muscle. The ciliary muscle is what performs work to enable you to focus up close.

A laser reshapes your cornea so that the anterior part of your eyeball approximates a perfectly round shape instead of that football shape.

If you continue to practice poor viewing habits -- prolonged near-distance focus without adequate rest -- accommodation by eyeball elongation will resume, and you will become nearsighted once more.

Whether or not you elect for surgery, take care of your ciliary muscle. In addition to healthier habits, proper supplementation and diet can help strengthen it.

Can u improve ur nearsightedness with natural methods or is it cope?

 

[cardiologist]

Waiting for Stroma

 

[Fear]

Can u improve ur nearsightedness with natural methods or is it cope?

You can in fact restore the natural shape of your eyeball by gradually changing the strength of your negative lens prescription toward a positive diopter -- in other words, by progressively weakening your prescription. For example, if your current prescription is a -4.00 in each eye, you could wear -3.75 instead for a period of time, allow your eyes to fully adjust, then wear -3.50 for another period, and so on.

Since every new prescription would theoretically require another examination by an eye doctor, you could save money on this process by skipping the optometrist visits and repeatedly forging your own prescriptions instead. This is very easy to do.

Sadly, prevailing wisdom surrounding eye health dictates that when your vision gets worse, you should get a stronger prescription. This only creates a vicious cycle.

 

[Mateusz74]

You can in fact restore the natural shape of your eyeball by gradually changing the strength of your negative lens prescription toward a positive diopter -- in other words, by progressively weakening your prescription. For example, if your current prescription is a -4.00 in each eye, you could wear -3.75 instead for a period of time, allow your eyes to fully adjust, then wear -3.50 for another period, and so on.

Since every new prescription would theoretically require another examination by an eye doctor, you could save money on this process by skipping the optometrist visits and repeatedly forging your own prescriptions instead. This is very easy to do.

Sadly, prevailing wisdom surrounding eye health dictates that when your vision gets worse, you should get a stronger prescription. This only creates a vicious cycle.

Is this ur theory ur actually tested

 

[Aribbaa]

Anyone else had it since this post

 

[middayshowers]

You can in fact restore the natural shape of your eyeball by gradually changing the strength of your negative lens prescription toward a positive diopter -- in other words, by progressively weakening your prescription. For example, if your current prescription is a -4.00 in each eye, you could wear -3.75 instead for a period of time, allow your eyes to fully adjust, then wear -3.50 for another period, and so on.

Since every new prescription would theoretically require another examination by an eye doctor, you could save money on this process by skipping the optometrist visits and repeatedly forging your own prescriptions instead. This is very easy to do.

Sadly, prevailing wisdom surrounding eye health dictates that when your vision gets worse, you should get a stronger prescription. This only creates a vicious cycle.

this theory isn’t scientifically tested, the groups behind “fixing” myopia are shit peddlers

 

[Brandon10]

You can in fact restore the natural shape of your eyeball by gradually changing the strength of your negative lens prescription toward a positive diopter -- in other words, by progressively weakening your prescription. For example, if your current prescription is a -4.00 in each eye, you could wear -3.75 instead for a period of time, allow your eyes to fully adjust, then wear -3.50 for another period, and so on.

Since every new prescription would theoretically require another examination by an eye doctor, you could save money on this process by skipping the optometrist visits and repeatedly forging your own prescriptions instead. This is very easy to do.

Sadly, prevailing wisdom surrounding eye health dictates that when your vision gets worse, you should get a stronger prescription. This only creates a vicious cycle.

Sounds like the mewing equivalent for eye surgery.

 

[EthnicelAscension]

You can in fact restore the natural shape of your eyeball by gradually changing the strength of your negative lens prescription toward a positive diopter -- in other words, by progressively weakening your prescription. For example, if your current prescription is a -4.00 in each eye, you could wear -3.75 instead for a period of time, allow your eyes to fully adjust, then wear -3.50 for another period, and so on.

Since every new prescription would theoretically require another examination by an eye doctor, you could save money on this process by skipping the optometrist visits and repeatedly forging your own prescriptions instead. This is very easy to do.

Sadly, prevailing wisdom surrounding eye health dictates that when your vision gets worse, you should get a stronger prescription. This only creates a vicious cycle.

I did this during high school and my negative diopters dropped by like one whole point in each eye, this only took a year also.

This post is legit. I can atest.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Anyone else had it since this post

This is not a lookmaxing forum, go for neweyes laser deps from normies on youtybe

 

[Fear]

this theory isn’t scientifically tested, the groups behind “fixing” myopia are shit peddlers

There's no theorizing necessary, you're just terribly underinformed. This exact process happens all the time, only in the opposite direction:

1. Over-focus on near objects, creating eyestrain
2. Eyeball changes shape to relieve eyestrain and distance vision becomes worse
3. Obtain negative prescription corrective lenses to re-enable long distance vision
4. Wear same lenses meant for distance vision when focusing near

And then the cycle repeats.

In step 4, the negative lenses have the effect of bringing all objects closer to you. So it makes your eyes work even harder than if you didn't have lenses when you wear them and look at a book, a phone screen, a monitor, etc. And then your vision becomes progressively nearsighted.

What I am saying is that you can make it progressively more farsighted, and therefore eventually correct myopia, by wearing increasingly positive negative lenses when trying to focus far. As a side benefit, this will also make focusing near much less of a strain on your eyes, if you're wearing contacts and it's too inconvenient to take them off every time you want to look up close at something.