Are most guys ltns? What does htn ltn mtn even fucking mean at this point?

[Xylmaxxing]

Please keep in mind that whenever I say average throughout this post, I'm only considering guys aged between 18 to 25 years of age. It would be worthless to consider 30+ guys who are balding, fat etc.

I'm pretty sure, judging from my experiences, I would be rated ltn (smv wise) by females (I only manage to get some femcels to like me in a year jfl), but when I look around myself, I'm pretty sure I mog like 60% to 70% of young guys around me and get compliments quite frequently from other guys on my looks.

Now it begs the question, what the hell even is an mtn? Is it the guys foids perceive as average looking? OR Is it the guys who are actually 50 percentile looks wise? (In the second case they are actually ltns by female standards)

To me, the definition of any tier of looks is based on how women perceive them. To me, if you're a chadlite perceived as "above average" by women, then you're not a chadlite, you're htn. What do people even mean when they say htn is minimum for slaying? Are they talking about "above average dating material" to women or are they talking about the top 30% "above average" looking guys?

Applying my logic, an mtn won't be completely invisible to women. He would be passable as dateable, aka "average" to women.

 

[GreekGenes]

LTN MTN HTN are looksmaxxing categories which are inherently determined by the male perspective.

Women only have two categories: attractive and unattractive/invisible

Now the interesting question is, which of the categories LTN MTN HTN CL etc aligns with the threshold that women find "attractive".

And my best guess, is that HTN+ is basically where females considering you attractive begins. Less than 20% of men are HTN and above. That's the same men women are attracted to.

LTN, MTN are both slightly below and about average, technically speaking, but average PSL wise doesnt make the cut to be attractive to women.

Women are not going to see an attractive guy on tinder and swipe left. But they do swipe left on more than 80% of guys. So, we do know what MTN cannot be considered attractive to women.

 

[Xylmaxxing]

LTN MTN HTN are looksmaxxing categories which are inherently determined by the male perspective.

Women only have two categories: attractive and unattractive/invisible

Now the interesting question is, which of the categories LTN MTN HTN CL etc aligns with the threshold that women find "attractive".

And my best guess, is that HTN+ is basically where females considering you attractive begins. Less than 20% of men are HTN and above. That's the same men women are attracted to.

LTN, MTN are both slightly below and about average, technically speaking, but average PSL wise doesnt make the cut to be attractive to women.

Women are not going to see an attractive guy on tinder and swipe left. But they do swipe left on more than 80% of guys. So, we do know what MTN cannot be considered attractive to women.

So an mtn (non invisible) by women's standards is actually an htn (top 20%)?

 

[GreekGenes]

So an mtn (non invisible) by women's standards is actually an htn (top 20%)?

I don't believe a man can be mtn and visible to women.
What i am saying is that generally speaking, what we here consider an HTN is what women consider "attractive" without using the autistic HTN terminology of course.

 

[Xylmaxxing]

autistic HTN terminology of course.

Like this one? (look at description of a "7" male in the image)