Are upper class people in the west better looking and taller than low class?

[Jason Voorhees]

Title. I am also specifically talking about upper class people not rich. Every hood nigga can turn into drop shipping grifter and become rich but one cannot move up social classes easily. They are more rigid and historically this has been true. The upper classes have in the past had acces to better healthcare better resources and had a disposable income that they can spend towards looking their best and generally married and had kids with people who were better looking and of the same or higher social status so the rich end up with a better genetic pool.

Atleast that is how it is in countries like England from what I understand because the british have had an elitist society with clear class divisions since the middle ages. But in the modern era due to advanced in nutrition, science and healthcare i don't necessarily think the upper class is that much better looking and taller than the lower classes. Ethnics in the west are getting taller each generation too. And sometimes low class people who work blue collar jobs of har labour end up being better looking with wider frames and better facial development compared upper class people who never worked a day in their lives. The main difference that still somewhat remains seems to be phenotype imo but the upper classes regularly marry lower classes too.

 

[Deleted member 246707]

you want rep so much here it goes preston

 

[Idontknow-]

you want rep so much here it goes preston

Joined: 26 minutes ago

 

[Deleted member 244159]

This is one of the biggest myths everywhere in the world.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@Magnus Ironblood @Debetro @Corleone

 

[Popstar867]

I think genetics and attractiveness is extremely random that it’s not correlated with rich or high class . White + blue + blond doesn’t mean rich

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@Eärendil @Saint Casanova

 

[Eärendil]

they are all average

 

[Saint Casanova]

@Eärendil @Saint Casanova

It seems that they are generally taller but not really that much more GL. Look at the aristocracy in the UK. It’s a mixed bag. Some looks good whilst others look inbred

 

[loanshark]

From my own experience. My friends who don't come from genetical trashcan like me and subhuman family full of alcoholics and uneducated denenerates are all good looking and tall. Out of them I was the only one unlucky to be born among subhumans and unfortunately inherited all their genes too.

 

[.Cx]

Title. I am also specifically talking about upper class people not rich. Every hood nigga can turn into drop shipping grifter and become rich but one cannot move up social classes easily. They are more rigid and historically this has been true. The upper classes have in the past had acces to better healthcare better resources and had a disposable income that they can spend towards looking their best and generally married and had kids with people who were better looking and of the same or higher social status so the rich end up with a better genetic pool.

Atleast that is how it is in countries like England from what I understand because the british have had an elitist society with clear class divisions since the middle ages. But in the modern era due to advanced in nutrition, science and healthcare i don't necessarily think the upper class is that much better looking and taller than the lower classes. Ethnics in the west are getting taller each generation too. And sometimes low class people who work blue collar jobs of har labour end up being better looking with wider frames and better facial development compared upper class people who never worked a day in their lives. The main difference that still somewhat remains seems to be phenotype imo but the upper classes regularly marry lower classes too.

I love in a vacation town where all the multi million dollar houses are bought owned and paid off.
Alot of them are ugly as fuck and very weird lol.
Some of them have attractive kids but any of them over 28+ just look fucking odd, so no they aren't all tall and goodlooking probably because they never had or wanted to focus on those things.
Instead they focus on maintaining their inheritance or business.
They care alot more about status and respect other than looks.
I'm on east coast USA not cailifornia

 

[NatureRapist]

Obviously

 

[Andremln]

Where i live most low class dudes look much better than people coming from wealthy families, they're leaner with a much better physique and posture, low inhibmaxxed and have super sharp jawlines

on the other hand rich boys tend to have a brachy skull, are high inhib, 20% bodyfat on average and have a weird pheno because of race mixing between north europeans, meds and native american indigenous, the only thing they mog thugs is in height tbh

 

[Hunter]

Title. I am also specifically talking about upper class people not rich. Every hood nigga can turn into drop shipping grifter and become rich but one cannot move up social classes easily. They are more rigid and historically this has been true. The upper classes have in the past had acces to better healthcare better resources and had a disposable income that they can spend towards looking their best and generally married and had kids with people who were better looking and of the same or higher social status so the rich end up with a better genetic pool.

Atleast that is how it is in countries like England from what I understand because the british have had an elitist society with clear class divisions since the middle ages. But in the modern era due to advanced in nutrition, science and healthcare i don't necessarily think the upper class is that much better looking and taller than the lower classes. Ethnics in the west are getting taller each generation too. And sometimes low class people who work blue collar jobs of har labour end up being better looking with wider frames and better facial development compared upper class people who never worked a day in their lives. The main difference that still somewhat remains seems to be phenotype imo but the upper classes regularly marry lower classes too.

It could mabye affect quality of epigenetics thats all i can think of

 

[lastofus123]

I would say no actually, a lot of the rural guys mog the richer ones for some reason

 

[Deleted member 99272]

Title. I am also specifically talking about upper class people not rich. Every hood nigga can turn into drop shipping grifter and become rich but one cannot move up social classes easily. They are more rigid and historically this has been true. The upper classes have in the past had acces to better healthcare better resources and had a disposable income that they can spend towards looking their best and generally married and had kids with people who were better looking and of the same or higher social status so the rich end up with a better genetic pool.

Atleast that is how it is in countries like England from what I understand because the british have had an elitist society with clear class divisions since the middle ages. But in the modern era due to advanced in nutrition, science and healthcare i don't necessarily think the upper class is that much better looking and taller than the lower classes. Ethnics in the west are getting taller each generation too. And sometimes low class people who work blue collar jobs of har labour end up being better looking with wider frames and better facial development compared upper class people who never worked a day in their lives. The main difference that still somewhat remains seems to be phenotype imo but the upper classes regularly marry lower classes too.

its not nutrition, superior genes equal superior outcomes. better looking taller smarter people outsmarted shit genes normies staying with their own, building wealth and keeping good genes

 

[JAYCELL]

Title. I am also specifically talking about upper class people not rich. Every hood nigga can turn into drop shipping grifter and become rich but one cannot move up social classes easily. They are more rigid and historically this has been true. The upper classes have in the past had acces to better healthcare better resources and had a disposable income that they can spend towards looking their best and generally married and had kids with people who were better looking and of the same or higher social status so the rich end up with a better genetic pool.

Atleast that is how it is in countries like England from what I understand because the british have had an elitist society with clear class divisions since the middle ages. But in the modern era due to advanced in nutrition, science and healthcare i don't necessarily think the upper class is that much better looking and taller than the lower classes. Ethnics in the west are getting taller each generation too. And sometimes low class people who work blue collar jobs of har labour end up being better looking with wider frames and better facial development compared upper class people who never worked a day in their lives. The main difference that still somewhat remains seems to be phenotype imo but the upper classes regularly marry lower classes too.

yes nigga