As time goes on, I get less and less mad at pedophiles

Troo_

Troo_

Last troocel standing
Joined
Mar 23, 2024
Posts
2,400
Reputation
2,954
It’s water for why they go for young girls. Hos be trippin and hoeing around. I understand but I’d never justify it tho.

Also not the ones that go like 12 and stuff more like 16+
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: 134applesauce456, Decha, Napoleon1800 and 6 others
FBI open up
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anamnesis
FBI open up

1770593923381
 
  • JFL
Reactions: enlightful, Deleted member 288890 and Incelforeever
Pedophiles by definition are attracted to prepubescent girls (0-9) years old.

So someone attracted to girls above that age is not a pedophile by definition.

Learn what the word means you clueless fool.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Napoleon1800, Decha, Ergogenic and 4 others
it is natural to find an attractive 15-17 year old attractive

there is a cultural stigma against people who say that though and if you bought into it you are RETARDED.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alwazzab, wishicouldascend and sub5withgf
  • +1
Reactions: Anamnesis
Pedophiles by definition are attracted to prepubescent girls (0-9) years old.

So someone attracted to girls above that age is not a pedophile by definition.

Learn what the word means you clueless fool.
Just means children not prepubescent
 
it is natural to find an attractive 15-17 year old attractive

there is a cultural stigma against people who say that though and if you bought into it you are RETARDED.
True but if ur 23+ or sum it’s over because you shoulda found the one in ur teens so if were talking about nature then
 
First definition i see and etymology
No, you're wrong. Ever heard of the words ephebophile and hebephile? Look up what those mean.
 
It's absolutely normal to be attracted to virginal nubile beautiful maidens who have reached sexual maturity and are ready to reproduce. There is nothing wrong with that. It might be illegal in some regions, but it's not unnatural or weird. You know what's weird and unnatural? To be attracted to fat, ugly, post wall roasties who've been porked by god knows how many men and are saddled with another man's spawn. That's fucking unnatural and weird. Almost as weird as being attracted to a dude.

If a woman has reached sexual maturity, can get pregnant and carry said pregnancy to term, can she really be considered a "child"? Obviously not.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: enlightful and wishicouldascend
No, you're wrong. Ever heard of the words ephebophile and hebephile? Look up what those mean.
Ye but ur bringing up other words. Based on first definition you see and etymology of pedophile it means child. I dont see what this gotta do with my original point too ngl
 
That’s legal in 95% of countries
It's absolutely normal to be attracted to virginal nubile beautiful
Seems like OP is 20 IQ judging from what he said above and how he can't comprehend the most basic shit. Like this guy is so fucking stupid it hurts
 
  • +1
Reactions: widdi and mrdouchebag
Ye but ur bringing up other words
YES BECAUSE MEN WHO ARE ATTRACTED TO CERTAIN AGE GROUPS ARE DIVIDED UNDER DIFFERENT WORDS

THATS WHY IM BRINGING UP DIFFERENT WORDS YOU FUCKING RETARD :lul: HOW STUPID ARE YOU?
 
Seems like OP is 20 IQ judging from what he said above and how he can't comprehend the most basic shit. Like this guy is so fucking stupid it hurts
a man in a suit and tie is sitting in an office looking at the camera .
 
YES BECAUSE MEN WHO ARE ATTRACTED TO CERTAIN AGE GROUPS ARE DIVIDED UNDER DIFFERENT WORDS

THATS WHY IM BRINGING UP DIFFERENT WORDS YOU FUCKING RETARD :lul: HOW STUPID ARE YOU?
all are children, <18 = child. pedophilia is child attraction based on first definition you see and etymology, i still dont see ur point and how this again relates to original statement
 
YES BECAUSE MEN WHO ARE ATTRACTED TO CERTAIN AGE GROUPS ARE DIVIDED UNDER DIFFERENT WORDS

THATS WHY IM BRINGING UP DIFFERENT WORDS YOU FUCKING RETARD :lul: HOW STUPID ARE YOU?
why do you also always react so strongly
 
all are children, <18 = child. pedophilia is child attraction based on first definition you see and etymology, i still dont see ur point and how this again relates to original statement
I'll just use chatgpt for you, u fucking retard

IMG 20260209 030609
 
In almost every ethnic culture
Finding a 16-17 year old girl attractive is normal
 
Pedophiles by definition are attracted to prepubescent girls (0-9) years old.

So someone attracted to girls above that age is not a pedophile by definition.

Learn what the word means you clueless fool.
You are mostly correct.

"Paedo" means "Child" and "phile" means "loving". That is the formation of the word based on etymology.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Decha
You are mostly correct.

"Paedo" means "Child" and "phile" means "loving". That is the formation of the word based on etymology.
IMG 20260209 030915
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ergogenic
ask anybody they'd just say pedo
Does that mean it's true you fucking retard?

Appeal to masses fallacy. Absolute moron.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ergogenic
Show Ok GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anamnesis
15+

Half these girls once they hit 8th grade look adult bro, the other half look it by 16/17
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and Anamnesis
:Hmmm:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
This makes me wonder: What if someone starts puberty late? Would it still be paedophilia because they would still be a child by definition?

For example, hypothetically, if someone starts puberty at 20 years, would it be paedophilia to date them before then?
 
It’s water for why they go for young girls. Hos be trippin and hoeing around. I understand but I’d never justify it tho.

Also not the ones that go like 12 and stuff more like 16+
yall keep saying it's natural to find 15-17 year olds attractive and im not disagreeing with you on that but if we're gonna talk natural, it's not natural to be 30 and wanting to get with a 15-17 year old. you've already missed your window and should already have been starting a family. you we're unwanted at that age and became incel
 
Does that mean it's true you fucking retard?

Appeal to masses fallacy. Absolute moron.
how do you think definitions come to be

how do you even think that fallacy terms and deeming them logically sound to point out logically inconsistent arguments came to be? I'm not saying popular sovereignty always = correct, but at the same time like you can get a decent idea. also im going about with the overall and general view of things
 
This makes me wonder: What if someone starts puberty late? Would it still be paedophilia because they would still be a child by definition?
I really don't care about that nor care enough to talk about that. I'm just addressing that OP is ignorant and is taking out of his ass and is so wrong yet so confident.
 
Also not the ones that go like 12 and stuff more like 16+
They are not pedophiles

The retarded normie society calls anyone who is attracted to a woman 1 second before their 18th birthday (and sometimes even past their 18th birthday) as a pedophile, when pedophile means attraction to pre pubescent girls meaning girls under 12 years old.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
how do you think definitions come to be
What the fuck does this even mean? Clinical definitions I guess? Like whatever you fucking mean with that. Read everything I said above.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Napoleon1800
Pedophiles by definition are attracted to prepubescent girls (0-9) years old.

So someone attracted to girls above that age is not a pedophile by definition.

Learn what the word means you clueless fool.
Mainstream “Pedophilia” is the greatest psyop ever created. They’ve demonised natural healthy attraction to developed females by labelling it as a rare unnatural attraction to children
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
16+ is NOT pedophila tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishicouldascend
also i guess i can see how i used the wrong word for attraction to children but all my points still stand. it's unnatural to be 30 and liking other 15-17 year olds other than the one you should've already been growing up with and have started a family.
 

Similar threads

Rxndependant
Replies
4
Views
36
pslturi
pslturi
patrikos.psl
Replies
16
Views
127
toji.
toji.
Brava
Replies
13
Views
79
Brava
Brava
Tyler1
Replies
58
Views
286
t3000
t3000

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top