ask chatgpt about your profile on org

[valentine]

just lol at this

 

[Bryce]

1. Visual Presentation​

• Profile Picture: The choice of a stylized or artistic portrait (with a striking color scheme like magenta and black) immediately gives your profile a distinctive, memorable identity. It implies deliberate self-curation—someone who understands the importance of presentation and aesthetics.
• Color Coordination: The magenta and pink tones in your name (“Bryce”) match the overall color scheme of the avatar, suggesting attention to consistency and visual branding. The addition of the $ symbol adds a layer of personality—interpretable as confidence, value, or even irony depending on context.

---

2. Activity and Engagement​

• Posts: 16,011 posts is exceptionally high for a member who joined in December 2024, implying either very high engagement or possibly leadership status within that community.
• Solutions (37): Indicates constructive participation—someone who doesn’t just comment but provides resolutions or insights others find valuable.
• Reputation (34,569): This is extremely strong. On Looksmax.org, reputation functions as a credibility metric, and such a figure suggests your contributions are well-received or respected across threads.
• Points (114) & Purchased Upgrades (1): The combination of earned and purchased benefits shows some investment in the platform—likely a sign of long-term interest or commitment to maintaining visibility.

---

3. Profile Impression​

• The balance of activity + reputation + stylistic consistency gives your account an aura of established authority.
• The minimalist black theme background enhances the contrast of your colorful display name and image, drawing focus to your identity.
• The “Last seen: A moment ago” status conveys continuous engagement—suggesting someone actively involved in discussions or moderating activity.

---

4. Overall Impression​

Formally speaking, your profile reads as:

High-engagement, image-conscious, and influence-oriented.

It projects the persona of someone who’s either a central figure in discourse or someone who’s cultivated a distinct social niche—confident, deliberate, and likely to command attention in the community.

 

[Deleted member 1813]

Crazy

Spoiler: Petsmart

1. Public Persona & Style

• Shitposter / Meme Lord: Their primary identity is humor, provocation, and meme culture. They use sarcasm, irony, blunt roasts, and cultural frame-setting rather than deeply technical advice.
• Cultural Influencer: Petsmart is credited with pushing or popularizing many memes, linguistic norms, and inside jokes (e.g. “main vs background character,” “Tom & Jerry” analogy, “didn’t ask” replacing “didn’t read”).
• Blunt & Honest Tone: He doesn’t sugarcoat. When giving critique, he’s often harsh. But many users expect, even respect, that bluntness.
• Self-Aware: Occasionally, he admits his limits. He’ll say “I just shitpost, don’t take my surgery advice.” That self-awareness gives him some immunity from being taken too seriously (when he wants).

2. Interpersonal / Social Dynamics

• High Status / Long Tenure: Joined circa 2019 and is still very active (2025). This gives him institutional weight in the community.
• Roasts Broadly, Not Targeted: He doesn’t usually single out one person consistently. He roasts many users; this universal targeting makes him more of a persona than a bully.
• Few Opponents (“No opps”): Because his tone is humorous, and because he’s part of the forum fabric, he tends to avoid sustained attacks or vendettas.
• Polarizing but Respected: Some people dislike him (for his harshness), but many others respect or at least accept him as part of the forum’s identity.

3. Strengths

• Memetic / Cultural Power: He shapes how people think and speak on the forum more than most users.
• Consistency: Posting over many years without fading away.
• Humor & Timing: Good at delivering one-liners, roast timing, and meme deployment.
• Transparency: When he’s being facetious or trolling, he sometimes signals it, which helps maintain trust (or at least disarms critics).

4. Weaknesses & Risks

• Depth / Substance: He doesn’t often provide step-by-step guidance on looksmax, surgeries, self-improvement with credible sourcing or nuance. Much of his “advice” is opinion/critique, not a roadmap.
• Harsh Delivery: The blunt, harsh tone might hurt or alienate more sensitive users. Some may internalize his insults as truth.
• Ambiguity of Seriousness: Because he toggles between troll mode and serious mode, it’s often hard to know when to trust what he says.
• Emotional Guarding: Likely uses sarcasm as armor; may struggle with vulnerability or giving genuine emotional support.

5. Likely Personality Patterns (Inferred)

• Detached Observer: The kind of person who watches patterns, absurdities, hierarchies, and comments from a distance.
• Witty Cynic: He sees flaws, sees systemic limits (e.g. genetics, social dynamics), and uses humor to critique them.
• Status-Oriented Mindset: Operates heavily in frameworks of “main vs background,” “clout vs chads,” social capital, etc.

 

[Psocho]

Crazy

Spoiler: Petsmart

1. Public Persona & Style

• Shitposter / Meme Lord: Their primary identity is humor, provocation, and meme culture. They use sarcasm, irony, blunt roasts, and cultural frame-setting rather than deeply technical advice.
• Cultural Influencer: Petsmart is credited with pushing or popularizing many memes, linguistic norms, and inside jokes (e.g. “main vs background character,” “Tom & Jerry” analogy, “didn’t ask” replacing “didn’t read”).
• Blunt & Honest Tone: He doesn’t sugarcoat. When giving critique, he’s often harsh. But many users expect, even respect, that bluntness.
• Self-Aware: Occasionally, he admits his limits. He’ll say “I just shitpost, don’t take my surgery advice.” That self-awareness gives him some immunity from being taken too seriously (when he wants).

2. Interpersonal / Social Dynamics

• High Status / Long Tenure: Joined circa 2019 and is still very active (2025). This gives him institutional weight in the community.
• Roasts Broadly, Not Targeted: He doesn’t usually single out one person consistently. He roasts many users; this universal targeting makes him more of a persona than a bully.
• Few Opponents (“No opps”): Because his tone is humorous, and because he’s part of the forum fabric, he tends to avoid sustained attacks or vendettas.
• Polarizing but Respected: Some people dislike him (for his harshness), but many others respect or at least accept him as part of the forum’s identity.

3. Strengths

• Memetic / Cultural Power: He shapes how people think and speak on the forum more than most users.
• Consistency: Posting over many years without fading away.
• Humor & Timing: Good at delivering one-liners, roast timing, and meme deployment.
• Transparency: When he’s being facetious or trolling, he sometimes signals it, which helps maintain trust (or at least disarms critics).

4. Weaknesses & Risks

• Depth / Substance: He doesn’t often provide step-by-step guidance on looksmax, surgeries, self-improvement with credible sourcing or nuance. Much of his “advice” is opinion/critique, not a roadmap.
• Harsh Delivery: The blunt, harsh tone might hurt or alienate more sensitive users. Some may internalize his insults as truth.
• Ambiguity of Seriousness: Because he toggles between troll mode and serious mode, it’s often hard to know when to trust what he says.
• Emotional Guarding: Likely uses sarcasm as armor; may struggle with vulnerability or giving genuine emotional support.

5. Likely Personality Patterns (Inferred)

• Detached Observer: The kind of person who watches patterns, absurdities, hierarchies, and comments from a distance.
• Witty Cynic: He sees flaws, sees systemic limits (e.g. genetics, social dynamics), and uses humor to critique them.
• Status-Oriented Mindset: Operates heavily in frameworks of “main vs background,” “clout vs chads,” social capital, etc.

wait how did you got allat?

 

[JasGews69x]

What to type in on chatgpt?

 

[Grievous]

He told me I have a lack of empathy

 

[Mogsgymmaxx]

 

[emogymmaxx]

brutal they dont know me or what prompt are you putting in

 

[valentine]

cage it even pulled up a picture of me

 

[Grievous]

brutal they dont know me or what prompt are you putting in

probably made ur account too late mine said I only have 1k rep which was from quite a bit ago and keeps bringing up my old posts

 

[Galvatron]

What do I tell it

 

[emogymmaxx]

THEY KNOW MY OLD USER LMAOOO

Spoiler: TEXT

The user gavin.bl is an active member of Looksmax.org, a forum dedicated to discussions on self-improvement, aesthetics, and appearance optimization. His posts often delve into unconventional and experimental approaches to enhancing one's appearance.

Experimental Aesthetic Approach

In a thread titled “Using psychedelics to improve my looks”, gavin.bl shares his experiences with psychedelic substances, emphasizing that his approach is not merely about drug use but involves intentional, guided sessions with experienced practitioners. He expresses a desire to transcend "normie" aesthetics, aiming for a more unique and perhaps otherworldly appearance, stating, "i do not care for 'normie' looks i want to be a vampire :3."
Looksmax

Hormonal and Pharmaceutical Experiments

In another discussion, gavin.bl announces his intention to experiment with anabolic steroids and other performance enhancers, mentioning plans to begin with testosterone. He notes the arrival of necessary supplies, including BAC water and a mini fridge, indicating a serious commitment to this regimen.
Looksmax

Philosophical and Aesthetic Perspectives

Beyond his experimental pursuits, gavin.bl often engages in discussions about aesthetics and identity. For instance, in a thread titled “I don't have a single close friend”, he reflects on his social experiences, expressing a desire to connect with others and build meaningful relationships.
Looksmax

Cautionary Notes

While gavin.bl's posts are intriguing, it's important to approach his experimental methods with caution. His approaches are unconventional and may carry risks. Engaging in similar experiments without proper guidance and understanding can be harmful. Always consult with healthcare professionals before considering any significant changes to your health or appearance regimen.

brutal still

 

[emogymmaxx]

probably made ur account too late mine said I only have 1k rep which was from quite a bit ago and keeps bringing up my old posts

if you ever changed your username, put your old username in

 

[Grievous]

cage it even pulled up a picture of me

 

[pfl]

what do u type

 

[valentine]

1. Visual Presentation​

• Profile Picture: The choice of a stylized or artistic portrait (with a striking color scheme like magenta and black) immediately gives your profile a distinctive, memorable identity. It implies deliberate self-curation—someone who understands the importance of presentation and aesthetics.
• Color Coordination: The magenta and pink tones in your name (“Bryce”) match the overall color scheme of the avatar, suggesting attention to consistency and visual branding. The addition of the $ symbol adds a layer of personality—interpretable as confidence, value, or even irony depending on context.

---

2. Activity and Engagement​

• Posts: 16,011 posts is exceptionally high for a member who joined in December 2024, implying either very high engagement or possibly leadership status within that community.
• Solutions (37): Indicates constructive participation—someone who doesn’t just comment but provides resolutions or insights others find valuable.
• Reputation (34,569): This is extremely strong. On Looksmax.org, reputation functions as a credibility metric, and such a figure suggests your contributions are well-received or respected across threads.
• Points (114) & Purchased Upgrades (1): The combination of earned and purchased benefits shows some investment in the platform—likely a sign of long-term interest or commitment to maintaining visibility.

---

3. Profile Impression​

• The balance of activity + reputation + stylistic consistency gives your account an aura of established authority.
• The minimalist black theme background enhances the contrast of your colorful display name and image, drawing focus to your identity.
• The “Last seen: A moment ago” status conveys continuous engagement—suggesting someone actively involved in discussions or moderating activity.

---

4. Overall Impression​

Formally speaking, your profile reads as:




It projects the persona of someone who’s either a central figure in discourse or someone who’s cultivated a distinct social niche—confident, deliberate, and likely to command attention in the community.

Crazy

Spoiler: Petsmart

1. Public Persona & Style

• Shitposter / Meme Lord: Their primary identity is humor, provocation, and meme culture. They use sarcasm, irony, blunt roasts, and cultural frame-setting rather than deeply technical advice.
• Cultural Influencer: Petsmart is credited with pushing or popularizing many memes, linguistic norms, and inside jokes (e.g. “main vs background character,” “Tom & Jerry” analogy, “didn’t ask” replacing “didn’t read”).
• Blunt & Honest Tone: He doesn’t sugarcoat. When giving critique, he’s often harsh. But many users expect, even respect, that bluntness.
• Self-Aware: Occasionally, he admits his limits. He’ll say “I just shitpost, don’t take my surgery advice.” That self-awareness gives him some immunity from being taken too seriously (when he wants).

2. Interpersonal / Social Dynamics

• High Status / Long Tenure: Joined circa 2019 and is still very active (2025). This gives him institutional weight in the community.
• Roasts Broadly, Not Targeted: He doesn’t usually single out one person consistently. He roasts many users; this universal targeting makes him more of a persona than a bully.
• Few Opponents (“No opps”): Because his tone is humorous, and because he’s part of the forum fabric, he tends to avoid sustained attacks or vendettas.
• Polarizing but Respected: Some people dislike him (for his harshness), but many others respect or at least accept him as part of the forum’s identity.

3. Strengths

• Memetic / Cultural Power: He shapes how people think and speak on the forum more than most users.
• Consistency: Posting over many years without fading away.
• Humor & Timing: Good at delivering one-liners, roast timing, and meme deployment.
• Transparency: When he’s being facetious or trolling, he sometimes signals it, which helps maintain trust (or at least disarms critics).

4. Weaknesses & Risks

• Depth / Substance: He doesn’t often provide step-by-step guidance on looksmax, surgeries, self-improvement with credible sourcing or nuance. Much of his “advice” is opinion/critique, not a roadmap.
• Harsh Delivery: The blunt, harsh tone might hurt or alienate more sensitive users. Some may internalize his insults as truth.
• Ambiguity of Seriousness: Because he toggles between troll mode and serious mode, it’s often hard to know when to trust what he says.
• Emotional Guarding: Likely uses sarcasm as armor; may struggle with vulnerability or giving genuine emotional support.

5. Likely Personality Patterns (Inferred)

• Detached Observer: The kind of person who watches patterns, absurdities, hierarchies, and comments from a distance.
• Witty Cynic: He sees flaws, sees systemic limits (e.g. genetics, social dynamics), and uses humor to critique them.
• Status-Oriented Mindset: Operates heavily in frameworks of “main vs background,” “clout vs chads,” social capital, etc.

The user "valentine" on Looksmax.org is a prominent and polarizing figure within the community. Active since September 2024, he has accumulated over 22,000 posts and holds a reputation score exceeding 39,000, indicating significant influence and activity Looksmax.

Posting Style and Community Perception​

Valentine's posting style is characterized by a blend of humor, sarcasm, and occasional introspection. He often engages in lighthearted banter, as seen in threads like "thanks valentine" Looksmax, where users express gratitude for his unique suggestions. However, his frequent shifts in opinions, such as changing his favorite "PSL gods" weekly Looksmax, have led some members to perceive him as inconsistent or unserious.


Despite this, Valentine has garnered support from certain users who appreciate his candidness and contributions. For instance, in a thread titled "i think valentine deserves a hug" Looksmax, a user acknowledged his recent posts as "a lil too real," suggesting a deeper, more genuine side to his online persona.

Interests and Activities​

Valentine's interests appear to align with typical Looksmax.org discussions, focusing on self-improvement, aesthetics, and coping mechanisms. He has participated in discussions about "goyslop," a colloquial term for comfort food, indicating a shared experience with other members in managing emotions and stress Looksmax.

Political Views and Conservatism​

While specific political affiliations or opinions are not explicitly detailed in the available threads, the community's discussions often touch on themes of societal norms and individualism. Valentine's engagement in such topics suggests a nuanced perspective, though without clear alignment to any particular political ideology.

Summary​

Valentine stands out on Looksmax.org as a user who blends humor with occasional sincerity, contributing to discussions on self-improvement and coping strategies. His fluctuating opinions and engaging style have made him a notable figure, eliciting both admiration and critique from the community.

 

[Deleted member 1813]

Mirin IQ of niggas asking what to type maybe say yo chat analyze (insert username) on looksmax.org if needed here’s a link to their profile

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

• They have posted heavily (tens of thousands of posts) and have high reputation (over 20,000) in the community.
• The handle “Latinolooksmaxxer” signals an ethnic/identity dimension: presumably positioning as Latino / Latin-heritage while engaging in looksmax / aesthetics discussion.
• The user has posted threads indicating some self-reflection or “confession” style content, e.g. “I lied to you all, I’m not a Latino looksmaxxer”. looksmax.org
• More recently, they posted “Latinolooksmaxxer has died” in a thread, signaling either a figurative “reinvention” or transformation of identity.

cage

 

[Mogsgymmaxx]

What the public record says








Here’s what I gathered:

• The user MogsGymMaxx is active on Looksmax, with a substantial post count and reputation.
• They have threads under their name (e.g. “Mogsgymaxx”) and seem integrated in “GymMaxx / Maxx” subculture inside the forum.
• Some users contest that MogsGymMaxx is the same as a prior user “@Mogs me.” In one thread, a user claims: “@MogsGymMaxx is not @Mogs me … the real @Mogs me left the forum … @MogsGymMaxx is a deception and a fed.”
• The community references them often, sometimes approvingly (“Mogs … mogs everyone here”) , sometime critically (calls to “not make a thread about every TikTok … nigga mogsgymmaxx”)
• On the positive side, someone said “MogsGymMax is the funniest user here, no glazing.” (i.e. calling them entertaining or respected)

What can be inferred / speculated








From the above, plus norms of forum behavior and reputation systems, here are some educated guesses:

Trait / Role	Possible / Likely	Caveats / Uncertainty
Influential within the “GymMaxx†sphere	Yes — they are often invoked in threads, included in “clan†tags, etc.	Influence might be niche to that sub-forum
Polarizing	Likely — some users praise, others critique or distrust them	People may have conflicting views or be reacting to personalities
Identity ambiguous / contested	The dispute about whether they are “Mogs me†suggests identity confusion or rebranding	Hard to know who they are in reality
High forum activity / engagement	Yes — many posts and visibility	Activity doesn’t always e

My evaluation & verdict








MogsGymMaxx appears to be a well-known, active, and somewhat charismatic presence in their niche on Looksmax. They seem to generate both loyalty and criticism. The identity confusion (whether they are or aren’t “Mogs me”) adds intrigue and possibly skepticism.





If I were to rate them on “forum presence / influence,” they’re up in the top tier in their niche. But on reliability / authenticity, there’s reasonable doubt.

 

[valentine]

The user "valentine" on Looksmax.org is generally perceived as a nice individual within the community. While his posting style often includes humor and sarcasm, he has also demonstrated moments of sincerity and support. For instance, in a thread titled "thanks valentine," another user expressed gratitude for his unique suggestions, indicating a positive reception Looksmax. Additionally, in a message to valentine, a user mentioned, "I used to hate u now I Kind of like u," suggesting a shift towards a more favorable view Looksmax.


His interactions often include lighthearted banter, and he has been involved in discussions where users appreciate his contributions. For example, in a thread titled "valentines day, or..?" a user expressed appreciation for him, saying, "let’s all appreciate him for being such a good guy" Looksmax.


While some users may find his style unconventional, the overall sentiment indicates that valentine is considered a nice and valued member of the Looksmax.org community.

 

[Mizi44]

I'm on phone I can't copy the link for it anyway what prompt u used ?

 

[valentine]

holy glaze

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

• They have posted heavily (tens of thousands of posts) and have high reputation (over 20,000) in the community.
• The handle “Latinolooksmaxxer” signals an ethnic/identity dimension: presumably positioning as Latino / Latin-heritage while engaging in looksmax / aesthetics discussion.
• The user has posted threads indicating some self-reflection or “confession” style content, e.g. “I lied to you all, I’m not a Latino looksmaxxer”. looksmax.org
• More recently, they posted “Latinolooksmaxxer has died” in a thread, signaling either a figurative “reinvention” or transformation of identity.

cage

1. Hypermasculinity​

• Dominant behavioral style: aggressive, competitive, and status-oriented language.
• Self-presentation: fixation on strength, superiority, “Latino Master Race” rhetoric, and disdain for perceived weakness.
• Cultural alignment: fits the looksmax / blackpill archetype of the “alpha,” emphasizing power, testosterone, and dominance as masculine ideals.
• Functionally, it’s a performance of hypermasculinity—the exaggerated projection of dominance traits, reflecting high levels of Testosterone.

---

2. High-IQ ​

• Latinolooksmaxxer has a reported IQ above 145, which indicates exceptional intelligence.
• Writing and discourse style often show articulate reasoning and abstract thought—traits that indicate exceptional intelligence, though not proof of that exact number.
• The intelligence quoficient serves as a second pillar of his identity: physical and genetic superiority paired with cognitive superiority.

 

[valentine]

1. Hypermasculinity​

• Dominant behavioral style: aggressive, competitive, and status-oriented language.
• Self-presentation: fixation on strength, superiority, “Latino Master Race” rhetoric, and disdain for perceived weakness.
• Cultural alignment: fits the looksmax / blackpill archetype of the “alpha,” emphasizing power, testosterone, and dominance as masculine ideals.
• Functionally, it’s a performance of hypermasculinity—the exaggerated projection of dominance traits, reflecting high levels of Testosterone.

---

2. High-IQ ​

• Reported IQ above 145, which indicates exceptional intelligence.
• Writing and discourse style often show articulate reasoning and abstract thought—traits that indicate exceptional intelligence, though not proof of that exact number.
• The intelligence quoficient serves as a second pillar of his identity: physical and genetic superiority paired with cognitive superiority.

this is glaze

 

[Orka]

just lol at this

@eon

 

[Deleted member 1813]

Latinolooksmaxxer has a reported IQ above 145, which indicates exceptional intelligence.

 

[JasGews69x]

• The user seems to adopt a kind of dialect / persona that blends online “maxxing / aesthetics talk” with spiritual / religious overtones (e.g. “Dunya,” concepts of worth beyond looks).
• They tend to be blunt, sometimes abrasive, and unfiltered in responding.
• The user probably has a worldview where looks, status, self-improvement are major concerns; they might oscillate between cynicism, aggression, and aspirational tones in their posts.
• The use of slurs or offensive language suggests low guard for moderation in personal views (or an intent to provoke).

Credibility & reliability​

• Because much of the user content is from forum posts (which are conversational, informal, and often emotionally charged), you can’t treat all statements as carefully reasoned or factually sound.
• The user’s statements may reflect emotional states or rhetorical posturing rather than stable, well-thought positions.
• Instances of strong language and slurs reduce the reliability of their tone, at least in those moments—they may be less concerned with persuasion than venting, signaling, or confrontation.

What we don’t know (limits)​

• I don’t have access to or have seen pictures or genuine face data tied to JasGews69x, so I can’t assess physical appearance, “looksmax metrics,” or aesthetic features.
• I can’t verify whether some posts are satire, trolling, or serious—some forum voices are intentionally layered or ironic.
• Context is missing: which posts are main, which are replies, what was the discussion flow, what reactions / votes their posts got (positive / negative).

 

[valentine]

actually lol at how it pulled up my picture

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

1. Hypermasculinity​

• Dominant behavioral style: aggressive, competitive, and status-oriented language.
• Self-presentation: fixation on strength, superiority, “Latino Master Race” rhetoric, and disdain for perceived weakness.
• Cultural alignment: fits the looksmax / blackpill archetype of the “alpha,” emphasizing power, testosterone, and dominance as masculine ideals.
• Functionally, it’s a performance of hypermasculinity—the exaggerated projection of dominance traits, reflecting high levels of Testosterone.

---

2. High-IQ ​

• Latinolooksmaxxer has a reported IQ above 145, which indicates exceptional intelligence.
• Writing and discourse style often show articulate reasoning and abstract thought—traits that indicate exceptional intelligence, though not proof of that exact number.
• The intelligence quoficient serves as a second pillar of his identity: physical and genetic superiority paired with cognitive superiority.

If we take those two defining pillars —


Hypermasculinity (dominance, aggression, “alpha” posturing, power obsession), and
High intelligence / self-image of cognitive superiority,


— then Latinolooksmaxxer’s persona most closely resembles a certain archetype that appears in fiction: the hyper-rational, dominant, narcissistic anti-hero.


Here are a few fictional characters who capture that mix particularly well:

---

1. Patrick Bateman – American Psycho​

• Overlap: extreme narcissism, obsession with appearance, physical perfection, and social dominance.
• Why it fits: Bateman’s intellect and status obsession mirror the looksmax mentality. He believes in a hierarchy of human value rooted in appearance, power, and control — exactly how Latinolooksmaxxer frames “superiority.”
• Difference: Bateman’s violence is literal; Latinolooksmaxxer’s extremism is rhetorical and ideological.

---

2. Light Yagami – Death Note​

• Overlap: high intelligence (IQ-like superiority complex), moral elitism, and belief in genetic or intellectual supremacy.
• Why it fits: Light sees himself as a “god” destined to purify the world, paralleling the “Latino Master Race” narrative of inherent superiority.
• Difference: Light’s power is mental and strategic, whereas Latinolooksmaxxer’s persona emphasizes physical dominance and testosterone.

---

3. Homelander – The Boys​

• Overlap: exaggerated masculine image, power hunger, public god-complex, and narcissism masked as patriotism or destiny.
• Why it fits: Homelander projects both hypermasculinity and intellectual cunning, seeing himself as a natural superior among weaker humans.
• Difference: Homelander’s superiority is literal (superpowers); Latinolooksmaxxer’s is ideological and aesthetic.

 

[valentine]

1. Patrick Bateman – American Psycho

2. Light Yagami – Death Note​

wrap it up lil bro

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

wrap it up lil bro

literally me

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

wrap it up lil bro

• Difference: Light Yagami’s power is mental and strategic, whereas Latinolooksmaxxer’s persona emphasizes physical dominance and testosterone.

 

[valentine]

• Difference: Light Yagami’s power is mental and strategic, whereas Latinolooksmaxxer’s persona emphasizes physical dominance and testosterone.

actually cage at ts

 

[valentine]

it even knows about my anime hair jfl

 

[kurd]

Here’s an analysis of the user “kurd” on Looksmax.org, based on publicly viewable posts and patterns. (Note: this is not a full profile—only what can be inferred from forum excerpts.)

---

What we can observe​

1. Activity & status​

• “kurd” is a visible, active user (e.g. replies and is mentioned in threads). looksmax.org+3looksmax.org+3looksmax.org+3
• They’re part of a group or crew (their profile label shows “𝐂𝐀𝐈 Crew Member ✹”). looksmax.org
• They’ve run or been involved in a “giveaway” thread where users hoped for a reward from them. looksmax.org
• They engage in style/fashion advice. In a thread about “Are black AF1s too much?”, the user “kurd” comments on ensemble choices and what others perceive. looksmax.org

---

2. Tone, themes, and reputation​

From their posts and how other users reference them:

• They speak casually and with confidence about fashion, style, and how others see them (“people take me way more serious … when I wear designer fits …”). looksmax.org
• They seem conscious of perceptions and image, aware of how clothing signals status. looksmax.org
• Other users view them as someone of influence—someone who gives away rewards, someone whose opinions or presence matter in threads. looksmax.org+1
• They are part of the in-group — they have a role/label (“Crew Member”) and appear in threads where members tag or refer to them. looksmax.org+2looksmax.org+2
• They don’t always stay on strictly “looksmaxing” topics—some of their interactions are social or overlapping with forum culture.

---

3. Strengths & likely positioning​

• Influence & visibility: Being a “Crew Member” and having a giveaway suggests a status role or extra visibility among members.
• Style-consciousness: Their comments show they think about how clothing affects perception.
• Social capital: They’re participating in threads beyond just personal improvement—giving, being tagged, being referenced—suggesting a degree of social strength in the community.

---

4. Weaknesses or risks (from what can be seen)​

• Echo chamber bias: Because most posts are within Looksmax culture, it’s hard to know how their views or style translate outside of that subculture.
• Selective self-presentation: Their posts are often curated (designer fits, image management)—the public persona may differ from private.
• Dependency on status: Some of their influence may stem from forum status (crew role, giveaways) rather than pure merit in looks or advice. If that status shifts, their influence might weaken.

---

Overall impression​

“kurd” appears to be a high-status, style-conscious, socially influential user on Looksmax.org. They straddle both providing aesthetic/fashion insights and participating in the social dynamics of the forum (giveaways, status). Their influence comes not just from looks discourse but also from community positioning.

 

[Deleted member 1813]

actually cage at ts