at least 55 percent of men will be incel by 2033

barcacel

barcacel

Iron
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Posts
74
Reputation
208
remember these old graphs

kl-png.1922473

npcs-png.1922475



I wondered what would happen if these kept increasing at the same rate, this is what I found:
we have 2 options in what could happen:

1-60 percent by 2033:
screenshot_2022-12-15_193525-jpg.687201


screenshot_2022-12-15_193637-jpg.687202
screenshot_2022-12-15_193646-jpg.687204


2-55 by 2033
screenshot_2022-12-15_194308-jpg.687207

screenshot_2022-12-15_194445-1-png.687223
screenshot_2022-12-15_194454-jpg.687209


I just believe that even chads will have to settle for fat foids because foids standards will keep increasing and chad will not be enough for average foids, why did the graph above kept increasing at the same pace after 2010 (by this time all females in the US had phones)? Women have been able to work and go to college since the mid 1900s, what the hell in the world changed to motivate women to be independent and plummet birth rates?

I imagine something similar like the mouse experiment will happen with females, just look at how the fertility rate is changing,10 years ago people said that we would be 12 billion in 2100, in 2021 it was discovered that it would be 10 billion, i just believe that we will stay at 8 billion
haven't you seen how females have changed in the last 5 years? 5 years ago, females were 10 times easier, but they are getting harder by the day, something new will be created like tinder or phones to increase hypergamy
"They will solve it by making prostitution legal" prostitution is legal in Europe and it doesn't solve anything
haven't you noticed that chad is losing his power more and more each day that passes?

even inceltv thinks it's close to 40 percent now:


it's gonna become around 40 percent in 2023:
screenshot_2022-12-15_210314-jpg.687227

screenshot_2022-12-15_210405-jpg.687228
screenshot_2022-12-15_210411-jpg.687229


why birth rates keep plummeting every year more and more even after 2012?

South Korea:
976976-png.687210


France:
464092-png.687211


US:
977333-1-png.687212


Spain:
449295-1-png.687213


England:
image-1-1-png.687215


women are rising their standards each day more and more, that is why it will become harder for even chadlites and chads to get sex in some years, are you gonna tell me that condoms were invented in 2012?

50 percent of adults in the us will be obese by 2030
"The results showed that by 2030, several states will have obesity prevalence close to 60%, while the lowest states will be approaching 40%. The researchers predicted that nationally, severe obesity will likely be the most common BMI category for women, non-Hispanic black adults, and those with annual incomes below $50,000 per year."

Young Lesbian couples seem to have become common in the past few years:

screenshot_20221202_105440-png.1978696


screenshot_20221202_105532-png.1978698

 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14392, FailedNormieManlet, Deleted member 22126 and 9 others
remember these old graphs

kl-png.1922473

npcs-png.1922475



I wondered what would happen if these kept increasing at the same rate, this is what I found:
we have 2 options in what could happen:

1-60 percent by 2033:
screenshot_2022-12-15_193525-jpg.687201


screenshot_2022-12-15_193637-jpg.687202
screenshot_2022-12-15_193646-jpg.687204


2-55 by 2033
screenshot_2022-12-15_194308-jpg.687207

screenshot_2022-12-15_194445-1-png.687223
screenshot_2022-12-15_194454-jpg.687209


I just believe that even chads will have to settle for fat foids because foids standards will keep increasing and chad will not be enough for average foids, why did the graph above kept increasing at the same pace after 2010 (by this time all females in the US had phones)? Women have been able to work and go to college since the mid 1900s, what the hell in the world changed to motivate women to be independent and plummet birth rates?

I imagine something similar like the mouse experiment will happen with females, just look at how the fertility rate is changing,10 years ago people said that we would be 12 billion in 2100, in 2021 it was discovered that it would be 10 billion, i just believe that we will stay at 8 billion
haven't you seen how females have changed in the last 5 years? 5 years ago, females were 10 times easier, but they are getting harder by the day, something new will be created like tinder or phones to increase hypergamy
"They will solve it by making prostitution legal" prostitution is legal in Europe and it doesn't solve anything
haven't you noticed that chad is losing his power more and more each day that passes?

even inceltv thinks it's close to 40 percent now:


it's gonna become around 40 percent in 2023:
screenshot_2022-12-15_210314-jpg.687227

screenshot_2022-12-15_210405-jpg.687228
screenshot_2022-12-15_210411-jpg.687229


why birth rates keep plummeting every year more and more even after 2012?

South Korea:
976976-png.687210


France:
464092-png.687211


US:
977333-1-png.687212


Spain:
449295-1-png.687213


England:
image-1-1-png.687215


women are rising their standards each day more and more, that is why it will become harder for even chadlites and chads to get sex in some years, are you gonna tell me that condoms were invented in 2012?

50 percent of adults in the us will be obese by 2030
"The results showed that by 2030, several states will have obesity prevalence close to 60%, while the lowest states will be approaching 40%. The researchers predicted that nationally, severe obesity will likely be the most common BMI category for women, non-Hispanic black adults, and those with annual incomes below $50,000 per year."

Young Lesbian couples seem to have become common in the past few years:

screenshot_20221202_105440-png.1978696


screenshot_20221202_105532-png.1978698


Time for becoming Suicide Bombers!!!๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค—๐Ÿค—๐Ÿค—๐Ÿค—๐Ÿค—
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zeruel
Over
 
  • +1
Reactions: barcacel
the Mayans were right, the world ended in 2012
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing, Deleted member 23554, zerotohero and 4 others
TL;DR
 
they will be incel in denial. vast majority will cope with money and betabuxing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27511, Deleted member 14392, Deleted member 22126 and 3 others
This thread should be stickied. Really sums up how over it is. If anyone says the situation is not as bad as it seems theyโ€™re either gaslighting or just clueless
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and barcacel
Damn bro by 2060 130% of men will be virgins
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing, Deleted member 22126, Sub0 and 3 others
Good thing Iโ€™m already starting my surgerymaxx. Iโ€™ll be out of this limbo of incel by end of 2023 elhumdualah
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Yerow
this nigga really took out ms paint because he dont know how to calculate slope :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: nigga go back to 6th grade

but youre probably right tho
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8manlet and Moggie
remember these old graphs

kl-png.1922473

npcs-png.1922475



I wondered what would happen if these kept increasing at the same rate, this is what I found:
we have 2 options in what could happen:

1-60 percent by 2033:
screenshot_2022-12-15_193525-jpg.687201


screenshot_2022-12-15_193637-jpg.687202
screenshot_2022-12-15_193646-jpg.687204


2-55 by 2033
screenshot_2022-12-15_194308-jpg.687207

screenshot_2022-12-15_194445-1-png.687223
screenshot_2022-12-15_194454-jpg.687209


I just believe that even chads will have to settle for fat foids because foids standards will keep increasing and chad will not be enough for average foids, why did the graph above kept increasing at the same pace after 2010 (by this time all females in the US had phones)? Women have been able to work and go to college since the mid 1900s, what the hell in the world changed to motivate women to be independent and plummet birth rates?

I imagine something similar like the mouse experiment will happen with females, just look at how the fertility rate is changing,10 years ago people said that we would be 12 billion in 2100, in 2021 it was discovered that it would be 10 billion, i just believe that we will stay at 8 billion
haven't you seen how females have changed in the last 5 years? 5 years ago, females were 10 times easier, but they are getting harder by the day, something new will be created like tinder or phones to increase hypergamy
"They will solve it by making prostitution legal" prostitution is legal in Europe and it doesn't solve anything
haven't you noticed that chad is losing his power more and more each day that passes?

even inceltv thinks it's close to 40 percent now:


it's gonna become around 40 percent in 2023:
screenshot_2022-12-15_210314-jpg.687227

screenshot_2022-12-15_210405-jpg.687228
screenshot_2022-12-15_210411-jpg.687229


why birth rates keep plummeting every year more and more even after 2012?

South Korea:
976976-png.687210


France:
464092-png.687211


US:
977333-1-png.687212


Spain:
449295-1-png.687213


England:
image-1-1-png.687215


women are rising their standards each day more and more, that is why it will become harder for even chadlites and chads to get sex in some years, are you gonna tell me that condoms were invented in 2012?

50 percent of adults in the us will be obese by 2030
"The results showed that by 2030, several states will have obesity prevalence close to 60%, while the lowest states will be approaching 40%. The researchers predicted that nationally, severe obesity will likely be the most common BMI category for women, non-Hispanic black adults, and those with annual incomes below $50,000 per year."

Young Lesbian couples seem to have become common in the past few years:

screenshot_20221202_105440-png.1978696


screenshot_20221202_105532-png.1978698


@TRUE_CEL contact the mods to stickie this shit
.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Over
 
  • +1
Reactions: barcacel
Look at the % of men 20-40y/o having kids in countries with extreme sexual selection pressure, i.e., Netherlands, Germany, Iceland, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, then divide that by the total number of men in that age range in those countries. Then subtract that number from 1 and you have a real % of men who women would rather not reproduce with.

I've been holding back for so long about the "Slayer" myth and how being a "Slayer" is just a PSL cope fantasy and a tactic PUA grifters now use to keep blackpillers semi-hooked. For example, playingwithfire has a new guy on his payroll who he includes in his livestreams called Looks4L. He claims to have a 395 laycount in his early 20s.

The reality is, of course there's Chads who could easily rack up 500 bodies like its nothing. But no one is actually "slaying", because finding a nice girl to LTR is so much more fulfilling, especially when you know other women are attracted to you.

The "slayer" myth is a really ingenious tactic used by modern day pua scammers and Wheat Waffles just to keep "blackpillers" deluded. Do you really think most Chads are just hooking up with 200 random Beckies off Tinder each year? No. Most Chads do very well in all walks of life and have full time jobs, other goals and aspirations, plans to find the best LTR and thinking about being successful financially before starting a family.

Chads that hook up with 200 chicks per year off Tinder aren't really Chads. There must be something weird going on if all you can be is a "slayer" but can't find a girl you really like who wants your kids and a future with you, who also isn't a bum.


Sidenote: The % will update dynamically as more men move past 40 and more move into their 20s. This is the best measure imo. Tinder tryhards who manage to get different ONS and don't have problems with girls trying to hit them up again after are either 1: Total LARPers just making up stories. Or. 2: Not actually good looking enough or might have some serious "ick" to the point where their deemed only good enough for a ONS (by 100s of chicks?) but not good enough to bring new life into the world.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22126, Moggie, barcacel and 2 others
Jfl at lesbian pill

they got the highest rates of domestic violence
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22126 and barcacel
Look at the % of men 20-40y/o having kids in countries with extreme sexual selection pressure, i.e., Netherlands, Germany, Iceland, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, then divide that by the total number of men in that age range in those countries. Then subtract that number from 1 and you have a real % of men who women would rather not reproduce with.

I've been holding back for so long about the "Slayer" myth and how being a "Slayer" is just a PSL cope fantasy and a tactic PUA grifters now use to keep blackpillers semi-hooked. For example, playingwithfire has a new guy on his payroll who he includes in his livestreams called Looks4L. He claims to have a 395 laycount in his early 20s.

The reality is, of course there's Chads who could easily rack up 500 bodies like its nothing. But no one is actually "slaying", because finding a nice girl to LTR is so much more fulfilling, especially when you know other women are attracted to you.

The "slayer" myth is a really ingenious tactic used by modern day pua scammers and Wheat Waffles just to keep "blackpillers" deluded. Do you really think most Chads are just hooking up with 200 random Beckies off Tinder each year? No. Most Chads do very well in all walks of life and have full time jobs, other goals and aspirations, plans to find the best LTR and thinking about being successful financially before starting a family.

Chads that hook up with 200 chicks per year off Tinder aren't really Chads. There must be something weird going on if all you can be is a "slayer" but can't find a girl you really like who wants your kids and a future with you, who also isn't a bum.


Sidenote: The % will update dynamically as more men move past 40 and more move into their 20s. This is the best measure imo. Tinder tryhards who manage to get different ONS and don't have problems with girls trying to hit them up again after are either 1: Total LARPers just making up stories. Or. 2: Not actually good looking enough or might have some serious "ick" to the point where their deemed only good enough for a ONS (by 100s of chicks?) but not good enough to bring new life into the world.
South Korea has the lowest fertility rate at 0.8 children per woman

 
  • +1
Reactions: barcacel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top