At what net worth do you think someone becomes rich?

What networth is start of rich?

  • $500k-1M

  • $1M-10M

  • $10M-100M

  • $100M-500M

  • $500M-1B


Results are only viewable after voting.
Jason Voorhees

Jason Voorhees

๐•ฏ๐–๐•ฏ ๐–ˆ๐–—๐–Š๐–œ ๐•ต๐–Š๐–˜๐–™๐–Š๐–—
Joined
May 15, 2020
Posts
65,381
Reputation
184,207
Title. For someone in their early 20s what would you consider to be "rich"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna, uksucks, Chadeep and 4 others
Anything over a mil
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
i would say beginning at 200k imo
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: choppedshyt, SouthAfricancel, User28823 and 2 others
10 million
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
  • +1
Reactions: davidlaidisme67, Chadeep, User28823 and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel, Chadeep, Jatt and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel, Chadeep, Ogionth and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Ogionth
I's say 10, because that's the territory where you're starting to be able to tell the world to fuck off
 
  • +1
Reactions: davidlaidisme67, Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, davidlaidisme67 and FaceandBBC
Rich a decade ago at 20 years old was around 100K like you were considered elite within this bracket.Today
in your 20's especially with Social Media seeing 2O year old Entrepreneurs with Lambos and Mansions obviously
the Overton Window has shifted a great deal and so "Rich" today would probably be somewhere in the 200 Million
range imo
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
10k a month is really good if you live in the south. Not enough for places like Cali, NY, Washington, etc.
Indeed. In bay area many decent sized houses start at $3M
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and FaceandBBC
@isis_Bleach
 
@MANLETprettyBOY
 
  • +1
Reactions: MANLETprettyBOY
if you have 100k cash at early 20s you are rich
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: GigaStacySexual, sub5outsider, davidlaidisme67 and 3 others
Having 100k+ annual salary already puts you in the top 1% worldwide. Upper middle class american = rich worldwide
 
  • +1
Reactions: davidlaidisme67, Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
Having 100k+ annual salary already puts you in the top 1% worldwide. Upper middle class american = rich worldwide
Globally yes but outside of U.S. companies youโ€™re not going to see those kinds of salaries. I make over $100k myself and still donโ€™t feel rich. When I applied to companies in the UK like LSEG and Bloomberg even their top-end offers were nowhere near U.S. pay levels. @imontheloose

Screenshot 20250722 213414 Neo PAT
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
Globally yes but outside of U.S. companies youโ€™re not going to see those kinds of salaries. I make over $100k myself and still donโ€™t feel rich. When I applied to companies in the UK like LSEG and Bloomberg even their top-end offers were nowhere near U.S. pay levels. @imontheloose

View attachment 4000422
What offer did LSEG give you?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
Rich is being able to buy Luxury Cars off the lot no down payment etc you not doing that with 100K like people
in the replies are saying
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
What offer did LSEG give you?
ยฃ60k they stick to their grad scheme ranges The bigger pay jumps seem to haplen after a few years of experience or moving to more senior positions but even then they get dwarfed by US salaries.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
Rich is being able to buy Luxury Cars off the lot no down payment etc you not doing that with 100K like people
in the replies are saying
That is what even I'm saying.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Yliaster
100K - 10 Million is Middle to Upper Class

Rich starts at around 100 Million this is where you begin living effortlessly

Wealthy is basically set for life at this stage you exist and just inherit stuff
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
100K - 10 Million is Middle to Upper Class

Rich starts at around 100 Million this is where you begin living effortlessly

Wealthy is basically set for life
$100M feels a bit over the top. Iโ€™d say in todayโ€™s terms, being โ€œrichโ€ in your 20s would probably start somewhere around $30-40M or more still way beyond what most people will ever see, but not quite billionaire territory.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Yliaster and Chadeep
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
ยฃ60k they stick to their grad scheme ranges The bigger pay jumps seem to haplen after a few years of experience or moving to more senior positions but even then they get dwarfed by US salaries.
Yes. They know they get taken advantage of for a year or two. Pump โ€˜nโ€™ dump basically. US salaries are numerically always going to be more appealing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
ยฃ60k they stick to their grad scheme ranges The bigger pay jumps seem to haplen after a few years of experience or moving to more senior positions but even then they get dwarfed by US salaries.
@Saint Casanova
 
Yes. They know they get taken advantage of for a year or two. Pump โ€˜nโ€™ dump basically. US salaries are numerically always going to be more appealing.
A lot of UK grad schemes work like that. They bring you in at a relatively low salary, knowing you'll tolerate it for a year or two to build experience and get a big-name company on your CV. After that, many people either negotiate hard or jump ship to somewhere paying market rate
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
A lot of UK grad schemes work like that. They bring you in at a relatively low salary, knowing you'll tolerate it for a year or two to build experience and get a big-name company on your CV. After that, many people either negotiate hard or jump ship to somewhere paying market rate
Latter is much more popular. My brother did this (29).
 
10k a month is really good if you live in the south. Not enough for places like Cali, NY, Washington, etc.
alot of people move to Thailand etc after hitting 10k a month if they earn online
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, FaceandBBC and Jason Voorhees
if its not over 5m your not rich almost 10% of americans are millionaires
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
Yes. They know they get taken advantage of for a year or two. Pump โ€˜nโ€™ dump basically. US salaries are numerically always going to be more appealing.
I talked to UKcel and he told me ยฃ60k is very decent even for london posh areas unless I go to some ultra rich area like Richmond or Chelsea or something
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
your not keeping a stacy by beta buxing with 1 million dolars over 5 years.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
1 m
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
alot of people move to Thailand etc after hitting 10k a month if they earn online
This is a smart option. You'll live like a king over there making 10k usd a month.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Jason Voorhees and Jatt
I talked to UKcel and he told me ยฃ60k is very decent even for london posh areas unless I go to some ultra rich area like Richmond or Chelsea or something
Decent. Not sure about posh areas in London, but it is pretty decent, indeed. Youโ€™d live in a middle-class area.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
Decent. Not sure about posh areas in London, but it is pretty decent, indeed. Youโ€™d live in a middle-class area.
More vacation, free food and 3 days office sounds good tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
More vacation, free food and 3 days office sounds good tho
Definitely. It depends on how you like your job to be structured and your environment really.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
@Swarthy Knight @pope
 
Definitely. It depends on how you like your job to be structured and your environment really.
The taxes are also higher tho. UK is like the place you go to retire tbh.
 
The taxes are also higher tho. UK is like the place you go to retire tbh.
Cope. Colleague of mine pays 1% NI and HMRC havenโ€™t gave a flying monkey.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
Selected $10-100 mil but it's irrelevant tbh, net worth is kinda cope. How much you straight up earn that's actually spendable is what matters imo. But maybe I'm being short sighted
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
Cope. Colleague of mine pays 1% NI and HMRC havenโ€™t gave a flying monkey.
I don't understand it fully but that only happens in very niche tax code situations
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
Cope. Colleague of mine pays 1% NI and HMRC havenโ€™t gave a flying monkey.
I looked it up apparently 1% NI isn't a standard statutory rate for employees. What is happening
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose
I don't understand it fully but that only happens in very niche tax code situations
No idea how theyโ€™ve calculated it wrong. This isnโ€™t something done by humans. I pay multiples more a week than he does a month.

They would have had to somehow have gave him the tax code of a widow or something.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna, Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
I looked it up apparently 1% NI isn't a standard statutory rate for employees. What is happening
Itโ€™s around 1%. 1.85% is the available one I can imagine it being.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna, Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
No idea how theyโ€™ve calculated it wrong. This isnโ€™t something done by humans. I pay multiples more a week than he does a month.

They would have had to somehow have gave him the tax code of a widow or something.
Itโ€™s around 1%. 1.85% is the available one I can imagine it being.
Anglo cunningness
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and imontheloose

Similar threads

DeborahAnnWollFARTS
Replies
2
Views
88
stevielake
stevielake
uksucks
Replies
3
Views
107
dumb
dumb
mortis
Replies
0
Views
48
mortis
mortis
jbwhtninthailand
Replies
3
Views
45
HundredManSlayer
HundredManSlayer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top