attractiveness isnt related to evolution purposes

mathis

mathis

Kraken
Joined
Jan 1, 2024
Posts
3,556
Reputation
3,105
Its the society that determine whats attractive or not. There’s almost not a single critera that cant become attractive if the society you live in allow it.
Might be difficult for some of you do anderstand. Even for me. Were are all comformed to like certains things since birth.
For exemple, being fat as a women is a very attractive aspect in some tribes, height was a very secondary critera for centuries in asia, looking feminine is unattractive in EU or NA but attractive in asia, looking masculine, having a beard, or being muscular is concidered unattractive in asia and attractive in EU / NA. I could also talk abt skin or a vast amount of other physical aspects.
Fortunatly or unfortunatly, NA standards are spreading across the world via internet and even asia is starting to accept it.
For exemple i remember some years ago in France. Height was barely talked abt. Social medias brought it here. It wasnt a huge critera back then.
(Edit)
I’d like to add that it is actually due to evolution. My mistake sorry
Society determine what we like because of human
evolution. For a reason or another It was advantageous to be influenced by society in this area
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DePoop, Judas Froome, fezzz and 5 others
only a small percentage
 
  • +1
Reactions: Detective, sb23, truthhurts and 1 other person
Its the society that determine whats attractive or not. There’s almost not a single critera that cant become attractive if the society you live in allow it.
Might be difficult for some of you do anderstand. Even for me. Were are all comformed to like certains things since birth.
For exemple, being fat as a women is a very attractive aspect in some tribes, height was a very secondary critera for centuries in asia, looking feminine is unattractive in EU or NA but attractive in asia, looking masculine, having a beard, or being muscular is concidered unattractive in asia and attractive in EU / NA. I could also talk abt skin or a vast amount of other physical aspects.
Fortunatly or unfortunatly, NA standards are spreading across the world via internet and even asia is starting to accept it.
For exemple i remember some years ago in France. Height was barely talked abt. Social medias brought it here. It wasnt a huge critera back then.
this, usually.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts and mathis
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts and NZb6Air
Its the society that determine whats attractive or not. There’s almost not a single critera that cant become attractive if the society you live in allow it.
Might be difficult for some of you do anderstand. Even for me. Were are all comformed to like certains things since birth.
For exemple, being fat as a women is a very attractive aspect in some tribes, height was a very secondary critera for centuries in asia, looking feminine is unattractive in EU or NA but attractive in asia, looking masculine, having a beard, or being muscular is concidered unattractive in asia and attractive in EU / NA. I could also talk abt skin or a vast amount of other physical aspects.
Fortunatly or unfortunatly, NA standards are spreading across the world via internet and even asia is starting to accept it.
For exemple i remember some years ago in France. Height was barely talked abt. Social medias brought it here. It wasnt a huge critera back then.
Yeah I’ve heard recessedcels and neck beards are in style atm
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Imretarded?, Sapphiremaxxing, truthhurts and 2 others
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
Both could be @NZb6Air even thought it may seem very unlikely which i anderstand
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts and NZb6Air
Both could be @NZb6Air even thought it may seem very unlikely which i anderstand
wdym lol, judgments of attractiveness are universal, there's 5000000000 books and articles on it, it's the basis of art, plastic surgery, etc.
so if you didn't bother reading on attractiveness, the deformity being universally unpleasing is an easy & intuitive argument
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 86159 and truthhurts
tell me where on earth short men are more desirable than taller men?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Imretarded? and NZb6Air
wdym lol, judgments of attractiveness are universal, there's 5000000000 books and articles on it, it's the basis of art, plastic surgery, etc.
so if you didn't bother reading on attractiveness, the deformity being universally unpleasing is an easy & intuitive argument
No its not
Even things that you consider deformity could be considered attractive.
do you know why women who do plastic chirurgy all end up looking the same ?
 
No its not
Even things that you consider deformity could be considered attractive.
do you know why women who do plastic chirurgy all end up looking the same ?
what
 
tell me where on earth short men are more desirable than taller men?
today nowhere for obvious reasons.
Last time it was the case was east Asia i think
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Imretarded? and RICHCELDOM
No, if you take chico anywhere in the world, he will be extremely attractive, same with attractive girls

Even babies that were just born, no programming, look at handsome faces far longer
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: watah, Imretarded?, FutureSlayer and 2 others
No, if you take chico anywhere in the world, he will be extremely attractive, same with attractive girls

Even babies that were just born, no programming, look at handsome faces far longer
As i said, West standards are everywhere today. So it obv will be the same all around the world
Yes. As i said some criteras actually matter. Like facial harmony which is what kids look at.
 
No, if you take chico anywhere in the world, he will be extremely attractive, same with attractive girls

Even babies that were just born, no programming, look at handsome faces far longer
yeah if you were to take @Gengar around the world he would mog anywhere. Chico overrated ash tho.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Imretarded? and Gengar
As i said, West standards are everywhere today. So it obv will be the same all around the world
Yes. As i said some criteras actually matter. Like facial harmony which is what kids look at.
You must understand why some features are considered attractive, which you seem unable to grasp, so let me explain:

Attractivness is simply indicator of power, dominance and health in men

And youth, fertility and femininity in women

Men:

Harmony, better jaw, strong brow ridge, thick eyebrows, eyelashes, hair, etc -

Health, better jaw due to better food, strong brow ridge as a protection of eyes from attacks, thick eyebrows and eyelashes, the same, for water, heat, attack, as a beard (having a beard i believe nullified 40-50% of punch, it is like a pillow to low the damage), hair - protection from suna nd cold

Height - domination and power, you naturally listen to those that are taller than you, they are symbols of authority (parents, teachers) and also stronger usually, therefore more dangerous

If you think about women -

Round eyes, femine features - youth and femininity

Big boobs, hips and ass - fertility
 
  • +1
Reactions: IAMNOTANINCEL
yeah if you were to take @Gengar around the world he would mog anywhere. Chico overrated ash tho.
Not sure it's you, did 11 somalis come in the end? 🤣
 
The biggest cope post ever you sound like my anthropology teacher jfl :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: yue, watah and mathis
Tf does this mean
It's not you? I thought i recognized your pfp

I mean 2 days ago there was a thread where someone wanted to fight and a guy said he eill come there with his 10 somali friends
 
It's not you? I thought i recognized your pfp

I mean 2 days ago there was a thread where someone wanted to fight and a guy said he eill come there with his 10 somali friends
Oh nah not me
 
Dnrd but attractiveness and social hierarchies which are based on genes are purely evolutionary
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mathis
You must understand why some features are considered attractive, which you seem unable to grasp, so let me explain:

Attractivness is simply indicator of power, dominance and health in men

And youth, fertility and femininity in women

Men:

Harmony, better jaw, strong brow ridge, thick eyebrows, eyelashes, hair, etc -

Health, better jaw due to better food, strong brow ridge as a protection of eyes from attacks, thick eyebrows and eyelashes, the same, for water, heat, attack, as a beard (having a beard i believe nullified 40-50% of punch, it is like a pillow to low the damage), hair - protection from suna nd cold

Height - domination and power, you naturally listen to those that are taller than you, they are symbols of authority (parents, teachers) and also stronger usually, therefore more dangerous

If you think about women -

Round eyes, femine features - youth and femininity

Big boobs, hips and ass - fertility
Being manly isnt attractive everywhere buddy.
I already talked abt it but it seem hard for you to anderstand.
You overlooks the influence of socialisation and media on beauty standards too.
Beard nullifying 40-50% of a punch is a crazy lie.
A lot of male dont like curvy women, Big ass or big tits. Some cultures prefere slenderness over that too.
While it may SEEM to be attractive throught evolution, its the society that MAKE it attractive or not. Its just that society often choose physical criteras because of reasons.
Some critera are actually evolutionary based but they mostly are signs of good health. Not being manly or feminine
 
You must understand why some features are considered attractive, which you seem unable to grasp, so let me explain:

Attractivness is simply indicator of power, dominance and health in men

And youth, fertility and femininity in women

Men:

Harmony, better jaw, strong brow ridge, thick eyebrows, eyelashes, hair, etc -

Health, better jaw due to better food, strong brow ridge as a protection of eyes from attacks, thick eyebrows and eyelashes, the same, for water, heat, attack, as a beard (having a beard i believe nullified 40-50% of punch, it is like a pillow to low the damage), hair - protection from suna nd cold

Height - domination and power, you naturally listen to those that are taller than you, they are symbols of authority (parents, teachers) and also stronger usually, therefore more dangerous

If you think about women -

Round eyes, femine features - youth and femininity

Big boobs, hips and ass - fertility
Btw strong brow ridge and thick eyebrows are not attractive in asia :feelswat:
 
maybe for the body and height but face ratios always remain the same
 
Being manly isnt attractive everywhere buddy.
I already talked abt it but it seem hard for you to anderstand.
You overlooks the influence of socialisation and media on beauty standards too.
Beard nullifying 40-50% of a punch is a crazy lie.
A lot of male dont like curvy women, Big ass or big tits. Some cultures prefere slenderness over that too.
While it may SEEM to be attractive throught evolution, its the society that MAKE it attractive or not. Its just that society often choose physical criteras because of reasons.
Some critera are actually evolutionary based but they mostly are signs of good health. Not being manly or feminine
How can you call yourself blackpilled with these takes...


Beard nullify around 30% impact for the face, and it makes sense that women will like stubbles more, since usually people with beards won the fights and got the girl, this was evolutionary written as a symbol of more powerful fighter and better protector

Curvy = fat, you black right?

This is what i mean the boobs, hips, ass - hourglass figure, not some landwhale

66a54237b762877b9fb59483f09ac9df
Main qimg c17f0f6ee3fdbf22d8d7010fb95805e3
16 1 683x1024


These figures finds almost everyone attractive, regardless of race, because they signal BIOLOGICAL and REPRODUCTIVE qualities, NOT societal ones

Also, you can't argue about asians, because they evolved differently, eyes, skulls, etc... And even then, they find european features more attractive, because european features are better suited for combat and survival

So no, you are wrong about your thread, it is BIOLOGICAL and REPRODUCTIVE reasons that shape societal standards

The proof is simple:

There is massive agenda to push fat women, fat = beautiful, yet no one finds it attractive, no matter how much they try, you CANNOT overwrite genetics
 

Attachments

  • 66a54237b762877b9fb59483f09ac9df.jpg
    66a54237b762877b9fb59483f09ac9df.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 0
How can you call yourself blackpilled with these takes...


Beard nullify around 30% impact for the face, and it makes sense that women will like stubbles more, since usually people with beards won the fights and got the girl, this was evolutionary written as a symbol of more powerful fighter and better protector

Curvy = fat, you black right?

This is what i mean the boobs, hips, ass - hourglass figure, not some landwhale

View attachment 3131729View attachment 3131731View attachment 3131733

These figures finds almost everyone attractive, regardless of race, because they signal BIOLOGICAL and REPRODUCTIVE qualities, NOT societal ones

Also, you can't argue about asians, because they evolved differently, eyes, skulls, etc... And even then, they find european features more attractive, because european features are better suited for combat and survival

So no, you are wrong about your thread, it is BIOLOGICAL and REPRODUCTIVE reasons that shape societal standards

The proof is simple:

There is massive agenda to push fat women, fat = beautiful, yet no one finds it attractive, no matter how much they try, you CANNOT overwrite genetics
I never called myself blackpilled. I seek the truth. And i dont think the blackpill as being 100% believable.
Yh. 30%
If beard protect you better and give you better survival chances, why does asians dont like it? Caught at your own game
There’s a lot of white / black girls that dont like beard too.
Curvy does not mean fat. And no im white.
Yes rn this type of body is more attractive but its not always been the case
Saying that no culture like fat women is wrong.
beauty standards are highly malleable and influenced by cultural norms, media portrayals, and historical context. Idk how you can denie it honestly.
body ideals in the 1950s (e.g., Marilyn Monroe's fuller figure) differ significantly from the ultra-thin ideals of the 1990s and the rise of curvier figures in the 2010s. Social, economic, and media influences shape these changes, showing that preferences are not purely genetic or fixed
You are intelligent i can tell just by how you write and how you think. I dont anderstand why you dont get it.
 
I never called myself blackpilled. I seek the truth. And i dont think the blackpill as being 100% believable.
Yh. 30%
If beard protect you better and give you better survival chances, why does asians dont like it? Caught at your own game
There’s a lot of white / black girls that dont like beard too.
Curvy does not mean fat. And no im white.
Yes rn this type of body is more attractive but its not always been the case
Saying that no culture like fat women is wrong.
beauty standards are highly malleable and influenced by cultural norms, media portrayals, and historical context. Idk how you can denie it honestly.
body ideals in the 1950s (e.g., Marilyn Monroe's fuller figure) differ significantly from the ultra-thin ideals of the 1990s and the rise of curvier figures in the 2010s. Social, economic, and media influences shape these changes, showing that preferences are not purely genetic or fixed
You are intelligent i can tell just by how you write and how you think. I dont anderstand why you dont get it.
Man... You do not seek truth, you seek your own version of it

Asians did not have beards, probably because they consume too much soy = estrogen, that is why they do not have very masculine features, so if there are no beards in their race, if someone has a beard, he is "outcast"

But then, JBW is very strong pill, meaning that these features that symbolize combat power, browridge, beard, eyebrows, asian women find attractive, since sub5 whitecel can date stacy asian girl

Beauty standards are not really malleable
Sddefault 1

You are probably talking about this kind of body, but still - hourglass shape, just higher body fat, not FAT

Merlyn monroe was worshipped for the face, since face is the most important

You must understand, that human brain is the same as it was around 200.000 years ago, what people found attractive then, they would find also now. And vice versa...
 
Soy have barely anything to do with beard growth.
facial hair in East Asian men is considered a sign of "outcast" status because of societal norms. during the Ming Dynasty in China, beards were less common, and being clean-shaven was often associated with good grooming and discipline. Never changed till now ( beard is starting to get more acceptable due to the West propaganda tho)
in some Asian cultures, beards were historically seen as a sign of wisdom btw
They dont have masculine features due to genes
Nothing to do with soy.
White sub5 can date asians girls because of the race superiority - social ascension they gain from being with us + the skin color + west attractiveness standarts are more adapted to us. Most sub5 have bad browridge, beard and eyebrows anyway.
For the body i dont think there’s any debate. You can easly find a vid showing the difference in what males liked for each generations.
it is true that the human brain barely changed. But evolution made us in a way that we adapt to the standards of the society we live in ( VERY accommodating for a surviving purpose )
for exemple, if we lived in places where we had to go throught small tunnels ( strange and unlikely but you get it ) short guys would then be more attractive and tall wouldnt.
 
Man... You do not seek truth, you seek your own version of it

Asians did not have beards, probably because they consume too much soy = estrogen, that is why they do not have very masculine features, so if there are no beards in their race, if someone has a beard, he is "outcast"

But then, JBW is very strong pill, meaning that these features that symbolize combat power, browridge, beard, eyebrows, asian women find attractive, since sub5 whitecel can date stacy asian girl

Beauty standards are not really malleable
View attachment 3131775
You are probably talking about this kind of body, but still - hourglass shape, just higher body fat, not FAT

Merlyn monroe was worshipped for the face, since face is the most important

You must understand, that human brain is the same as it was around 200.000 years ago, what people found attractive then, they would find also now. And vice versa...
.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: mathis
Soy have barely anything to do with beard growth.
facial hair in East Asian men is considered a sign of "outcast" status because of societal norms. during the Ming Dynasty in China, beards were less common, and being clean-shaven was often associated with good grooming and discipline. Never changed till now ( beard is starting to get more acceptable due to the West propaganda tho)
in some Asian cultures, beards were historically seen as a sign of wisdom btw
They dont have masculine features due to genes
Nothing to do with soy.
White sub5 can date asians girls because of the race superiority - social ascension they gain from being with us + the skin color + west attractiveness standarts are more adapted to us. Most sub5 have bad browridge, beard and eyebrows anyway.
For the body i dont think there’s any debate. You can easly find a vid showing the difference in what males liked for each generations.
it is true that the human brain barely changed. But evolution made us in a way that we adapt to the standards of the society we live in ( VERY accommodating for a surviving purpose )
for exemple, if we lived in places where we had to go throught small tunnels ( strange and unlikely but you get it ) short guys would then be more attractive and tall wouldnt.
That is adapting to nature then, still not society

And you still seem unable to grasp the thing i'm trying to tell you:

Something is societal, BECAUSE we find it attractive/cute, not the other way around

We find big eyes and soft festures cute, because children look like them and if a girl has these features, we find her cute, that is why we find baby animals cute, they are small and have big eyes

If an eldrich creature was our child, we would find those features cute, because we are hard-wired to find babies cute, since that helps us survive

That is why anime characters have big eyes, since we find those features cute from tge babies, NOT the other way around

SOCIETY adapts to what we find NATURALLY beautiful

You can promote fat people (obese, not slightly overweight) everywhere in the world, NOONE will find them attractive, since it is against our biology

White people in asia are doing better because simply white skin, height, colored eyes and western features are simply considered more attractive to people

You can go to africa, asia to places that never had western propaganda, guess what, those people would STILL find those features attractive, because it's biology effecting society

Why are beard in asia now more attractive? Attractive people have them, whites, since in the past, people didn't have them much

And as you said, what does a beard symbolizes in asia: wisdom and fighter

Asian seen natural fighters in whites -> created new mode of having a beard, not the other way around
 
tell me where on earth short men are more desirable than taller men?
Maybe not preferred but short men will obviously see success in the philipenes
 
Omg the cope in here
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mathis
First high iq thread ive read in looksmaxxing section
 
  • +1
Reactions: mathis
Man... You do not seek truth, you seek your own version of it

Asians did not have beards, probably because they consume too much soy = estrogen, that is why they do not have very masculine features, so if there are no beards in their race, if someone has a beard, he is "outcast"
This is very wrong, its not because they consume too much soy

Its because of GENETICS, simple

You are very wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: mathis
This is very wrong, its not because they consume too much soy

Its because of GENETICS, simple

You are very wrong
Ahh, imagine this:

Humans evolved from monkeys, monkeys have a lot of fur, humans threw that away and kept a bit of body hair and beard/hair, they traded it for the ability to sweat

Then humans left africa and went all around the world, humans in europe needed massive beards and hair to survive the nature

So would the trend goes that asians (at least in northern china)/japanese would need it as well, so how come most of them cannot grow it?

Well, if you look at their diet, they eat a lot of estrogenic foods, and as we know women can't grow a beard and so if you eat a lot of estrogen, during thousands of years, you might naturally lose this ability as well

So their GENES most likely degraded BECAUSE of soy and other estrogenic food, not the other way around

So you are wrong, in the end, it is most likely their diet that degraded their genes for beard and young asians have still problem growing beard, because of poor genetics for it (as i said why) and their estrogenic diet

The lack of masculine features, height and very slow rate of aging also would accept my proposition, since consuming a lot of estrogen = more female characteristics...
 
Cope. Babies will stare at a beautiful face and are too young to be culturally indoctrinated.
 

Similar threads

BucketCrab
Replies
69
Views
10K
nordic_ascender
N
dreamcake1mo
Replies
106
Views
30K
illusivespirits
illusivespirits
thecel
Replies
74
Views
20K
King Solomon
King Solomon

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top