Average big 5 profile of an org user

[Changmentum]

high openness = interest in esoteric ideas
low extraversion = water
low conscientiousness = we lazy and we rot
low agreeableness = water, we’re an argumentative bunch
high neuroticism = stress from concern over our looks

INTP.org

 

[MyDreamIsToBe183CM]

high openness = interest in esoteric ideas
low extraversion = water
low conscientiousness = we lazy and we rot
low agreeableness = water, we’re an argumentative bunch
high neuroticism = stress from concern over our looks

INTP.org

Shircup

 

[ImVerySorry]

high openness = interest in esoteric ideas
low extraversion = water
low conscientiousness = we lazy and we rot
low agreeableness = water, we’re an argumentative bunch
high neuroticism = stress from concern over our looks

Boiiiiii where did you get so much effort from

 

[Petsmart]

I am INTP god is good nigga

 

[Changmentum]

I am INTP god is good nigga

I’m INTP/INTJ. i come off as INTP though, when I try to troll and rep farm on this forum

 

[jaeger]

dnr a single word

 

[Petsmart]

Here’s what the top three MBTI types on Looksmax.org would likely sound like — fully in-character and exaggerated to match the site’s tone, rhetoric, and worldview.

INTJ-T – “The Blackpill Strategist”

Title: Facial Bone Structure is the Only Predictor of Female Attention – A Data-Driven Analysis

The delusion must end.

Women aren’t attracted to your personality. They’re reacting to midface projection, canthal tilt, and gonial angle. I compiled 200 Tinder profiles across six regions. The only consistent predictor of match rates was orbital recession and lower third symmetry.

Cope all you want with “self-improvement.” If your zygomas are recessed and your browridge is flat, you’re invisible to the female brain’s evolutionary heuristic.

You think she rejected you because you stuttered? No. She rejected you because your maxilla said ‘weak genes.’

Improve or rot. There is no middle path.


INTP-T – “The Theorist in Despair”

Title: I Ran Simulations on My SMV – It’s Over Mathematically

I modeled my SMV using a tiered rating scale factoring in height (5’8”), facial symmetry (56% on Golden Ratio app), voice tone, and income. I then built a probability curve against female hypergamy trends using OkCupid match data and evolutionary psych theory (Buss 1989).

Result: <1.3% chance of securing a long-term mate within desired parameters.

Tried personality maxxing — no effect. Tried social calibration — got friendzoned.

My only hope is bone remodeling surgery + maybe hair transplant. But I ran cost-benefit on that too: $30K+ for marginal gains, with diminishing returns due to age.

Starting to think this isn’t a dating problem. It’s a civilizational-level genetic lottery problem.

Just needed to put this somewhere. I’m not even sad. Just… analyzed.


ISTP-T – “The Silent Doomer Technician”

Title: You’re Either Chad or You’re Wasting Your Time

I don’t get why people argue here. Just look around.

Chad walks into a room and girls laugh at his jokes before he talks. You walk in, and they don’t even register you. You know it.

Spent 3 years lifting. Made zero difference. Only thing that worked was getting lean + fixing my jawline angle with mewing (maybe placebo).

Dating apps? Waste of time. Cold approach? Cope.

Either you look elite or you’re invisible.

Just grind aesthetics or disappear. No one cares.

Signed up for DJS next summer. If it doesn’t work, I’m out.

 

[Changmentum]

Here’s what the top three MBTI types on Looksmax.org would likely sound like — fully in-character and exaggerated to match the site’s tone, rhetoric, and worldview.

INTJ-T – “The Blackpill Strategist”

Title: Facial Bone Structure is the Only Predictor of Female Attention – A Data-Driven Analysis

The delusion must end.

Women aren’t attracted to your personality. They’re reacting to midface projection, canthal tilt, and gonial angle. I compiled 200 Tinder profiles across six regions. The only consistent predictor of match rates was orbital recession and lower third symmetry.

Cope all you want with “self-improvement.” If your zygomas are recessed and your browridge is flat, you’re invisible to the female brain’s evolutionary heuristic.

You think she rejected you because you stuttered? No. She rejected you because your maxilla said ‘weak genes.’

Improve or rot. There is no middle path.


INTP-T – “The Theorist in Despair”

Title: I Ran Simulations on My SMV – It’s Over Mathematically

I modeled my SMV using a tiered rating scale factoring in height (5’8”), facial symmetry (56% on Golden Ratio app), voice tone, and income. I then built a probability curve against female hypergamy trends using OkCupid match data and evolutionary psych theory (Buss 1989).

Result: <1.3% chance of securing a long-term mate within desired parameters.

Tried personality maxxing — no effect. Tried social calibration — got friendzoned.

My only hope is bone remodeling surgery + maybe hair transplant. But I ran cost-benefit on that too: $30K+ for marginal gains, with diminishing returns due to age.

Starting to think this isn’t a dating problem. It’s a civilizational-level genetic lottery problem.

Just needed to put this somewhere. I’m not even sad. Just… analyzed.


ISTP-T – “The Silent Doomer Technician”

Title: You’re Either Chad or You’re Wasting Your Time

I don’t get why people argue here. Just look around.

Chad walks into a room and girls laugh at his jokes before he talks. You walk in, and they don’t even register you. You know it.

Spent 3 years lifting. Made zero difference. Only thing that worked was getting lean + fixing my jawline angle with mewing (maybe placebo).

Dating apps? Waste of time. Cold approach? Cope.

Either you look elite or you’re invisible.

Just grind aesthetics or disappear. No one cares.

Signed up for DJS next summer. If it doesn’t work, I’m out.

I’ll read later, but I wonder if Clavicular is an INTJ lol.