Average white guy in 50s vs average white guy today

tallnegga

tallnegga

Luminary
Joined
Oct 15, 2022
Posts
4,782
Reputation
5,560
50s white guy



4F848755 015E 4AA6 AF27 200A07D1004A



White guys today:


View attachment 92DCE3EF-3FCB-46B5-85E3-D0A879347438.webp




Is this foids fault too? Or was Alex jones right about them putting stuff in the water making frogs gay?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: niqfan625, Danish_Retard, autistic_tendencies and 2 others
nah its just moms emasculating their sons
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lean4Life, Deleted member 24554 and OldRooster
You know why
 
Looking up "heartthrobs" of any era will show that robust prettyboys always reigned supreme, it's nothing special to our times. Women always preferred softer features. Good chance that the male gaze was never seen as attractive but back then the female gaze had a lot less choosing power as men would lead more with resources + protection than looks back then. 60's-70's feels like the exception however where a bunch of boneless subhumans suddenly took advantage of the SMV boost that was finally growing out your hair. Now aesthetics have sort of reset again after the novelty has worn off.

50s to 80s looks


You can also find short boneless subhumans across all eras. Facial aesthetics were doomed the moment mankind switched from a raw diet to a more processed one.

Montreal lacrosse club


People haven't changed as much as we think they have. They've changed so little that you'll constantly have people arguing for both sides whether or not "men have fallen and become a bunch of underdeveloped weaklings" just as much as they argue "the new generation is 6'2+ average and completely jacked guys!".
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lean4Life, Deleted member 19442, Danish_Retard and 3 others
1697341969875

Average white guy in the '30s.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: klip11 and tallnegga
Looking up "heartthrobs" of any era will show that robust prettyboys always reigned supreme, it's nothing special to our times. Women always preferred softer features. Good chance that the male gaze was never seen as attractive but back then the female gaze had a lot less choosing power as men would lead more with resources + protection than looks back then. 60's-70's feels like the exception however where a bunch of boneless subhumans suddenly took advantage of the SMV boost that was finally growing out your hair. Now aesthetics have sort of reset again after the novelty has worn off.

View attachment 2491869

You can also find short boneless subhumans across all eras. Facial aesthetics were doomed the moment mankind switched from a raw diet to a more processed one.

View attachment 2491873

People haven't changed as much as we think they have. They've changed so little that you'll constantly have people arguing for both sides whether or not "men have fallen and become a bunch of underdeveloped weaklings" just as much as they argue "the new generation is 6'2+ average and completely jacked guys!".
They are taller with worse craniofacial development
 
I prefer looking like the modern white guy. I don't wanna look like a romanian construction worker
 
Yea sure thats the average white guy in 1950s
JFL
 
whites are more masc today

theyre cucking ethnic men in mass levels
 

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Replies
21
Views
395
GodDeityEyeBro
GodDeityEyeBro
T
Replies
12
Views
199
h4pacel
h4pacel
enriquecuador
Replies
2
Views
89
enriquecuador
enriquecuador
RealSurgerymax
Replies
63
Views
1K
Centurion_Hunter
Centurion_Hunter

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top