"B-b-b Chad doesn't have to...." fallacy

VohnnyBoy

VohnnyBoy

Taleteller from Yugoslav mental wards
Joined
Jun 2, 2025
Posts
7,356
Reputation
13,223
You're not Chad, neither is 99% of males. Millionaire's son may never have to work, but you have to. Same analogy here.

Bozos always throw in "I have to do all that shit while Chad just..." argument. Yes you have to bubba. And not only for slaying, but primarily to not be seen as a repulsive weirdo or better yet potential offender lulz.

You're using extremes who live by different rules than us mortals. We don't have looks halo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel, datboijj, MiserableMan and 8 others
That only applies if you ask for consent. It's over for consentcels
 
  • +1
Reactions: VohnnyBoy
Looks are not one of a man's main assets, at least it shouldn't be
 
Looks are not one of a man's main assets, at least it shouldn't be
I'm simply saying that a very attractive male has limited advantages over his female counterpart
 
You're not Chad, neither is 99% of males. Millionaire's son may never have to work, but you have to. Same analogy here.

Bozos always throw in "I have to do all that shit while Chad just..." argument. Yes you have to bubba. And not only for slaying, but primarily to not be seen as a repulsive weirdo or better yet potential offender lulz.

You're using extremes who live by different rules than us mortals. We don't have looks halo.
But you are comparing money which is an object to an autonomous creature who has free will ( women ). My problem isn’t that Chads get to fuck all the women without problem it’s that women could give less than a fuck about you and you’ll have to bend over backwards to get with one while she’s head over heels for Chad who did jackshit
 
Been saying this since i joined. Why are you bringing "chad" to every conversacion? Do you wanna suck him :feelskek:?
 
I'm simply saying that a very attractive male has limited advantages over his female counterpart
I’d argue the opposite tbh, a man who could get with any women has more power because ultimately men are the ones who lead while women follow
 
I’d argue the opposite tbh, a man who could get with any women has more power because ultimately men are the ones who lead while women follow
Yes, if you think fucking lots of women is fundamentally important, but it shouldn't be.

Individual achievements are far more important than that bullshit
 
Yes, if you think fucking lots of women is fundamentally important, but it shouldn't be.

Individual achievements are far more important than that bullshit
Idk it’s hard to say at least for me because looks also allow you to have a lot more respect and authority as a man, I do agree with the second part though, a truly good life means you have a lot of different but good qualities like individual achievements and also looks etc etc etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quicksand
You're not Chad, neither is 99% of males. Millionaire's son may never have to work, but you have to. Same analogy here.

Bozos always throw in "I have to do all that shit while Chad just..." argument. Yes you have to bubba. And not only for slaying, but primarily to not be seen as a repulsive weirdo or better yet potential offender lulz.

You're using extremes who live by different rules than us mortals. We don't have looks halo.
Nah let them be it reduces competition
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
87
Views
4K
Apchun144
Apchun144
Vass
Replies
44
Views
2K
Vass
Vass
EvilSatanArseRapist
Replies
21
Views
814
funfafy812
funfafy812
Elegant
Replies
64
Views
5K
VerticalManiac
VerticalManiac
omnis
Replies
109
Views
10K
ltnfoidraperer
ltnfoidraperer

Users who are viewing this thread

  • JordanBarretee
  • vxfx
  • Klasik616
  • iblameocclusalcant
Back
Top