Bad Bimax Results

[randomvanish]

I've only seen a couple of them, do you encounter bad / chimp looking bimax results? if so, why they end up like that?

 

[Deleted member 16380]

I've only seen a couple of them, do you encounter bad / chimp looking bimax results? if so, why they end up like that?

Because plastic surgery is NOT MATHEMATICS and NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. Every surgeon operates "approximately", because due to healing, imprecise measurement tools, etc. the result is never up to a millimeter. 3D modelling lies too sometimes.

 

[randomvanish]

Because plastic surgery is NOT MATHEMATICS and NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. Every surgeon operates "approximately", because due to healing, imprecise measurement tools, etc. the result is never up to a millimeter. 3D modelling lies too sometimes.

I disagree with you. of course you cannot precisely calculate but, having a disaster result is something different than that.

 

[Deleted member 16380]

I disagree with you. of course you cannot precisely calculate but, having a disaster result is something different than that.

Well, if you mean those, "disaster", sure...

But in most cases, those bimax bad results are simply either insufficient, or " a little bit" over the top, and patients are dissatisfied, which classifies those cases as failures

 

[randomvanish]

Well, if you mean those, "disaster", sure...

But in most cases, those bimax bad results are simply either insufficient, or " a little bit" over the top, and patients are dissatisfied, which classifies those cases as failures

share some of those you mentioned

 

[poopmaster22]

Yes share who is bad