Bangladesh to remove "secularism" from constitution

SecularIslamist

SecularIslamist

Islamist jihadi and intersectional feminist
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Posts
22,698
Reputation
42,725


It was never an aggressive form of secularism anyway. But it's about time. Further evidence south Asia and south east Asia is where Islam is alive and well. MENA cucks don't have this level of courage. We will have to conquer them one day 🇵🇰🇧🇩🇮🇩🇲🇾

@Skinnycel_ @MaghrebGator @shia.jihadist @Gengar @yeeyeeslayer
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Muttcel foid killer, shia.jihadist, Corleone and 6 others
might get hate for this but L tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloomercel


It was never an aggressive form of secularism anyway. But it's about time. Further evidence south Asia and south east Asia is where Islam is alive and well. MENA cucks don't have this level of courage. We will have to conquer them one day 🇵🇰🇧🇩🇮🇩🇲🇾

@Skinnycel_ @MaghrebGator @shia.jihadist @Gengar @yeeyeeslayer

 
might get hate for this but L tbh
How is it an L? The only one to freaking out are Hindus. And this is just fearmongering. They will have more rights under a government which prioritises religion, rather than claim to be a neutral - an impossible position. The only way to do that is to privatize religion to the home. That's how the rest of society fucks up because the home isn't enough. You need moral values to govern society as a whole.

I would happily live in a Christian theocracy.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zone7411, shia.jihadist, Deleted member 104207 and 4 others
How is it an L. The only one to freaking out are Hindus. And this is just fearmongering. They will have more rights under a government which prioritises religion, rather than claim to be a neutral - an impossible position. The only way to do that is to privatize religion to the home. That's how the rest of society fucks up because the home isn't enough. You need moral values to govern society as a whole.

I would happily live in a Christian theocracy.
its an L because the all copes aside reality is that the more secular a muslim country is the better Qol it is and more advanced, and the happier the people,

just something Ive noticed.

as in if you think about the 'best' muslim countries what comes to mind : Turkey, Singapore, UAE, Azerbaijan, Saudi/gulf (nowadays)

and when you think of the worst ones you have : Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Pakistan

it is what it is

having a secular government doesn't mean becoming an atheist, you can still be a proud muslim with a secular government its a non issue
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411, ryuken, haramzada and 1 other person
its an L because the all copes aside reality is that the more secular a muslim country is the better Qol it is and more advanced, and the happier the people,

just something Ive noticed.

as in if you think about the 'best' muslim countries what comes to mind : Turkey, Singapore, UAE, Azerbaijan, Saudi/gulf (nowadays)

and when you think of the worst ones you have : Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Pakistan

it is what it is

having a secular government doesn't mean becoming an atheist, you can still be a proud muslim with a secular government its a non issue
Damn you have swallowed western orientalist cuck thought entirely :lul:

Muh muh we are Secular sir = good

Islamist = 'muh muh bad, intolerant, backward'.

Name me a single Muslim government that have come to power? No, Iran and the fake French inspired "Islamic" Republic and the Taliban (JFL) don't count. Only the Egyptian brotherhood had like a year before they went out in a coup.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411, ryuken, Corleone and 1 other person
Idk why u celebrating this bro this is an L for Bangladesh,

Bangladesh was way better off under hasnia, its just facts, she grew your economy, Bangladesh became one of the largest exporters in the world for garments, improved ur infrastructure, alleviated poverty etc.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: pookieslove and Shahnameh
Idk why u celebrating this bro this is an L for Bangladesh,

Bangladesh was way better off under hasnia, its just facts, she grew your economy, Bangladesh became one of the largest exporters in the world for garments, improved ur infrastructure, alleviated poverty etc.
Yeah I'm not denying that. But it can't be attributed to secularism JFLLL. She was ruthless towards religious people.
 
moralitymaxxed but successminned,in 2024 if you want to politicsmaxx and modernmaxx you have to be just a bit cucked to be compatible with the rest of the world without forgetting about islam at the same time. as in,no fag laws and immorality still punishable with jailtime
 
moralitymaxxed but successminned,in 2024 if you want to politicsmaxx and modernmaxx you have to be just a bit cucked to be compatible with the rest of the world without forgetting about islam at the same time. as in,no fag laws and immorality still punishable with jailtime
Modernization isn't equivalent to westernization. It seemed you have conflated both, just like @yeeyeeslayer

Is China a western country? Because they have modernised far more than anybody else in history. Even today for a country of their size they are growing at an insane rate. They did this without letting a single filthy westerner in.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zone7411, yeeyeeslayer, Pikabro and 1 other person
modernization is equivalent to degeneracy to some extent,china does not have western values but it doesent have moral/islamic values either jfl,china is almost as degenerate as western countries its just that western countries are the MOST degenerate and most successful
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
modernization is equivalent to degeneracy to some extent,china does not have western values but it doesent have moral/islamic values either jfl,china is almost as degenerate as western countries its just that western countries are the MOST degenerate and most successful
You need to decolonise your mind nighas :feelskek:
China doesn't have western values JFLL.But you need to be specific - I don't think there are things wrong with certain "western" systems like aspects of capitalism. This has nothing to do with degeneracy. In fact it's these Western values I'm referring to that are going to be the demise of the West in itself.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Skinnycel_
You need to decolonise your mind nighas :feelskek:
China doesn't have western values JFLL.But you need to be specific - I don't think there are things wrong with certain "western" systems like aspects of capitalism. This has nothing to do with degeneracy. In fact it's these Western values I'm referring to that are going to be the demise of the West in itself.
nigga very simple example,imagine being the muslim president of a muslim country,you wouldnt even be able to shake hands with a female politician so you have to be cucked to some extent in order to politicsmaxx,no way around it.

not to mention riba(interest) is haram and its very simple to see how to be successful in the modern world you have to modernmaxx and therefore compromise textbook islam,you cant be a perfect muslim leader/muslim country without suffering HARD when it comes to economy and globalization,if morocco for example banned western whores from wearing miniskirts in the blazing marrakech sun,cucked tourists will start crying about opression and never come back again which would hurt morocco's economy.

you are the one coping bro
 
Master to remove "secularislamist" off the forum
 
  • JFL
Reactions: haramzada
Damn you have swallowed western orientalist cuck thought entirely :lul:

Muh muh we are Secular sir = good

Islamist = 'muh muh bad, intolerant, backward'.

Name me a single Muslim government that have come to power? No, Iran and the fake French inspired "Islamic" Republic and the Taliban (JFL) don't count. Only the Egyptian brotherhood had like a year before they went out in a coup.
Nigga your name is literally secularislamist what are you doing
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist and yeeyeeslayer
A secular believer in God is someone who believes that God was sufficiently intelligent to put in place all kinds of physical laws that hold the universe and sustain millions of planets, bodies and life, but that He wasn't intelligent and powerful enough to legislate a law that would befit the nature of the human being and govern society.

Allah says (Interpretation of the meaning): Should not He Who has created know? And He is the Most Kind and Courteous (to His slaves) All-Aware (of everything)
 
  • +1
Reactions: ryuken and SecularIslamist
nigga very simple example,imagine being the muslim president of a muslim country,you wouldnt even be able to shake hands with a female politician so you have to be cucked to some extent in order to politicsmaxx,no way around it.

not to mention riba(interest) is haram and its very simple to see how to be successful in the modern world you have to modernmaxx and therefore compromise textbook islam,you cant be a perfect muslim leader/muslim country without suffering HARD when it comes to economy and globalization,if morocco for example banned western whores from wearing miniskirts in the blazing marrakech sun,cucked tourists will start crying about opression and never come back again which would hurt morocco's economy.

you are the one coping bro
This dude's more fitting for the name than you brah @SecularIslamist
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist and Skinnycel_
A secular believer in God is someone who believes that God was sufficiently intelligent to put in place all kinds of physical laws that hold the universe and sustain millions of planets, bodies and life, but that He wasn't intelligent and powerful enough to legislate a law that would befit the nature of the human being and govern society.

Allah says (Interpretation of the meaning): Should not He Who has created know? And He is the Most Kind and Courteous (to His slaves) All-Aware (of everything)
Why do you care? If being secular is wrong then the oh so perfect and almighty god should've prevented it from happening. But he didn't. Never did for every other "objectively wrong" things either.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411 and haramzada
nigga very simple example,imagine being the muslim president of a muslim country,you wouldnt even be able to shake hands with a female politician so you have to be cucked to some extent in order to politicsmaxx,no way around it.
Oh no we can't develop our economy because President doesn't shake hands with women 😱 😱 😱
not to mention riba(interest) is haram and its very simple to see how to be successful in the modern world you have to modernmaxx and therefore compromise textbook islam,you cant be a perfect muslim leader/muslim country without suffering HARD when it comes to economy and globalization,if morocco for example banned western whores from wearing miniskirts in the blazing marrakech sun,cucked tourists will start crying about opression and never come back again which would hurt morocco's economy.

you are the one coping bro
Your point about Riba is a fair one. Nothing to do is degeneracy more to do with changing the global economy that doesn't rely on interest. That would involve significant change beyond just one country. The Jews are just too powerful in this regard.

But your second point isn't even worth discussing. You think everywhere Muslim country is reliant on the tourist sector. I don't know about Morocco I'm not talking about Morocco specifically. Hardly any tourist visit China. If anything Western tourist fuck up everywhere they go. That's why they should be banned from Japan.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zone7411, ryuken and Skinnycel_
This dude's more fitting for the name than you brah @SecularIslamist
you are dumb as sh*t,i never said im for secular governments in muslim countries,i would rather my country be broke and moral than rich and infidel,matter fact everything i hate most about my own country has to do with modernmaxxing and tourismaxxing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411 and SecularIslamist
its an L because the all copes aside reality is that the more secular a muslim country is the better Qol it is and more advanced, and the happier the people,

just something Ive noticed.

as in if you think about the 'best' muslim countries what comes to mind : Turkey, Singapore, UAE, Azerbaijan, Saudi/gulf (nowadays)

and when you think of the worst ones you have : Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Pakistan

it is what it is

having a secular government doesn't mean becoming an atheist, you can still be a proud muslim with a secular government its a non issue
how does the western joo dick taste?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zone7411, yeeyeeslayer, ryuken and 1 other person
you are dumb as sh*t,i never said im for secular governments in muslim countries,i would rather my country be broke and moral than rich and infidel,matter fact everything i hate most about my own country has to do with modernmaxxing and tourismaxxing
My point still stands though, ur still more secular than secularislamist. You were literally arguing for secularism just about a minute ago nigga.

@SecularIslamist get ur brethren bro, nigga started calling me names for no reason
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zone7411 and Skinnycel_
Oh no we can't develop our economy because President doesn't shake hands with women 😱 😱 😱

Your point about Riba is a fair one. Nothing to do is degeneracy more to do with changing the global economy that doesn't rely on interest. That would involve significant change beyond just one country. The Jews are just too powerful in this regard.

But your second point isn't even worth discussing. You think everywhere Muslim country is reliant on the tourist sector. I don't know about Morocco I'm not talking about Morocco specifically. Hardly any tourist visit China. If anything Western tourist fuck up everywhere they go. That's why they should be banned from Japan.
the handshake was just a very simple example of how inconvenient shit can be in politics for example.
there are a million way bigger issues but im sure you can figure them out yourself.

being a perfect muslim country with perfect muslim society while also being very successful is extremely hard bordeline impossible,also jfl,"just fuck tourism bro","just get rich otherwise bro"

im not saying every muslim country is like morocco,im saying wtf should countries that ARE like morocco do?just poormaxx?nah
 
Why do you care? If being secular is wrong then the oh so perfect and almighty god should've prevented it from happening. But he didn't. Never did for every other "objectively wrong" things either.
What you mention is against any concept of free will which is what differentiates human beings from other creatures, giving us the possibility to superseed and be better than angels who do not commit sin or be lower than heedless animals who are not aware of themselves and don't possess nor feel attached strongly to features like dignity and honor.

You are just going back to the Problem of Evil which is addressed by Allah during the creation of the Human Being (Interpretation of the meaning): ˹Remember˺ when your Lord said to the angels, “I am going to place a successive ˹human˺ authority on earth.” They asked ˹Allah˺, “Will You place in it someone who will spread corruption there and shed blood while we glorify Your praises and proclaim Your holiness?” Allah responded, “I know what you do not know.”
 
  • +1
Reactions: ryuken
My point still stands though, ur still more secular than secularislamist. You were literally arguing for secularism just about a minute ago nigga.
no i was arguing that to be successful in a cucked world you have to be cucked,never have i said that i encourage muslim countries to be cucked,kys faggot
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411
its an L because the all copes aside reality is that the more secular a muslim country is the better Qol it is and more advanced, and the happier the people,

just something Ive noticed.

as in if you think about the 'best' muslim countries what comes to mind : Turkey, Singapore, UAE, Azerbaijan, Saudi/gulf (nowadays)

and when you think of the worst ones you have : Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Pakistan

it is what it is

having a secular government doesn't mean becoming an atheist, you can still be a proud muslim with a secular government its a non issue
nigga its because the "secular" countries have oil
 
superseed
1731866296237

“I know what you do not know.”
It comes down to faith at the end. Just let live.
 
no i was arguing that to be successful in a cucked world you have to be cucked,never have i said that i encourage muslim countries to be cucked,kys faggot
Ur secular and ur going to hell bro
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: SecularIslamist and Skinnycel_
Well well well
It's true ask @PrinceLuenLeoncur

the handshake was just a very simple example of how inconvenient shit can be in politics for example.
there are a million way bigger issues but im sure you can figure them out yourself.
Just just means society needs to change in general.
being a perfect muslim country with perfect muslim society while also being very successful is extremely hard bordeline impossible,also jfl,"just fuck tourism bro","just get rich otherwise bro"

im not saying every muslim country is like morocco,im saying wtf should countries that ARE like morocco do?just poormaxx?nah
I'm not saying to tell every Western tourist to fuck off. No they should be invited and they're likely just go to the liberal areas anyway where they can even drink alcohol (under restrictions). You can accommodate people of different cultures without changing your own.

What I'm saying is they shouldn't import their cultural degeneracy here and neither should Muslim governments try to attract them in this way by trying to rebrand their entire country and make a cultural change. Saudi Arabia has done a full 180. They are the worst example. Tbh I don't mind if a tourist female dresses like this and heads to the beach.

1731866445633

No cleavage and loose clothing.
Obviously it's not appropriate for a Muslim woman. But this isn't exactly degeneracy. They just need to know their bounds. But soon in Saudi they will dress like this.
1731866784277
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411, Corleone and Skinnycel_
nigga its because the "secular" countries have oil
First, we need to start from the obvious premise that @yeeyeeslayer is not a muslim, as it is evident by his stances like this particular one or his clear support for Israel (Go ahead, say now "B-b-b i dont support them dude, trust me bro, look at this old comment)

Second, no, he is wrong, in fact his entire comment is a fallacy. The most succesful countries in the muslim world from the 1930s to very recent days 2010s were Saudi (Almost full Islamic Law until 2015), UAE (Closer to Muslim Law than secular until recently especially with Bin Zayed), Qatar (Same as the UAE but still keeping it), Oman (Similar to Qatar but with different elements)

The most secular countries were Iraq (Baathist), Lebanon (Multicultural), Syria (Baathist), Egypt (Anti Muslim Brotherhood which won the only free election ever and were couped by the secular military one year later), etc. All of those countries were on bad shape and are still on bad shape

And then you have secular hybrids who act like muslims sometimes out of pure damage control, like Jordan, Bahrain, the Lybia of Gadaffi, Algeria, etc

He speaks of Sudan, Afghanistan and Iran, coincidentally enough 3 of the most sanctioned countries in the world, and all subjected to proxy wars like Sudan nowadays via the secular UAE, Afghanistan via the secular soviets and americans, Iran via the secular american funded Iraq in the 80s, Yemen via the secular funded soviets and afterwards via the Saudis post 2015 supported by the secular Americans, etc etc etc.

His entire argument is: "Hmmmm you dislike secularism... Why don't you go live to {Select country destroyed by secular powers} then???"

Secularism has only brought defeats to the arab world.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411, ryuken, Skinnycel_ and 1 other person
First, we need to start from the obvious premise that @yeeyeeslayer is not a muslim, as it is evident by his stances like this particular one or his clear support for Israel (Go ahead, say now "B-b-b i dont support them dude, trust me bro, look at this old comment)

Second, no, he is wrong, in fact his entire comment is a fallacy. The most succesful countries in the muslim world from the 1930s to very recent days 2010s were Saudi (Almost full Islamic Law until 2015), UAE (Almost full Muslim Law until recently), Qatar (Same as the UAE but still keeping it), Oman.

The most secular countries were Iraq (Baathist), Lebanon (Multicultural), Syria (Baathist), Egypt (Anti Muslim Brotherhood which won the only free election ever and were couped by the secular military one year later), etc. All of those countries were on bad shape and are still on bad shape

And then you have secular hybrids who act like muslims sometimes, like Jordan, Bahrain, the Lybia of Gadaffi, Algeria, etc

He speaks of Sudan, Afghanistan and Iran, coincidentally enough 3 of the most sanctioned countries in the world, and all subjected to proxy wars like Sudan nowadays via the secular UAE, Afghanistan via the secular soviets and americans, Iran via the secular american funded Iraq in the 80s, Yemen via the secular funded soviets and afterwards via the Saudis post 2015 supported by the secular Americans, etc etc etc.

His entire argument is: "Hmmmm you dislike secularism... Why don't you go live to {Select country destroyed by secular powers} then???"

Secularism has only brought defeats to the arab world.
Giphy 7
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zone7411, ryuken, MrShimano and 1 other person
It's true ask @PrinceLuenLeoncur


Just just means society needs to change in general.

I'm not saying to tell every Western tourist to fuck off. No they should be invited and they're likely just go to the liberal areas anyway where they can even drink alcohol (under restrictions). You can accommodate people of different cultures without changing your own.

What I'm saying is they shouldn't import their cultural degeneracy here and neither should Muslim governments try to attract them in this way by trying to rebrand their entire country and make a cultural change. Saudi Arabia has done a full 180. They are the worst example. Tbh I don't mind if a tourist female dresses like this and heads to the beach.

View attachment 3301226
No cleavage and loose clothing.
Obviously it's not appropriate for a Muslim woman. But this isn't exactly degeneracy. They just need to know their bounds. But soon in Saudi they will dress like this.
View attachment 3301249
yeah thats exactly what im saying aswell but truth is,you cant give tourists rules that they dont have in their country without having them go "fuck no why do i have to do all that?imma just go somewhere else then".

you have to choose between perfect morality or tourism which for some is a very big part of the economy,thats all i was saying.
tbh if i was the moroccan king i would kill all degeneracy and immigration but i wouldnt be oblivious to the damage it would do to the economy and considering how in the past 10-15 years the avarage moroccan has been living way better every year i would also know i would be hated like hell
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SecularIslamist
yeah thats exactly what im saying aswell but truth is,you cant give tourists rules that they dont have in their country without having them go "fuck no why do i have to do all that?imma just go somewhere else then".
This will affect an extremely tiny minority. But the net saving to your society will be worth it. If someone is saying I'm not visiting Morocco because I can't dress like a slut let them. Most women know Muslim countries are more conservative even in the cities.

Anyway the shari'ah doesn't apply to non-Muslims. Facilities and services not ordinarily available to them should be.
you have to choose between perfect morality or tourism which for some is a very big part of the economy,thats all i was saying.
tbh if i was the moroccan king i would kill all degeneracy and immigration but i wouldnt be oblivious to the damage it would do to the economy and considering how in the past 10-15 years the avarage moroccan has been living way better every year i would also know i would be hated like hell
Then idk what we are arguing about... You seem to want to acknowledge some level of cuckoldry is necessary in a globalised world. I understand where you're coming from but bowing down to secularism to achieve it isn't necessary and will slowly and incrementally turn every liberal tourist city into the same thing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skinnycel_
First, we need to start from the obvious premise that @yeeyeeslayer is not a muslim, as it is evident by his stances like this particular one or his clear support for Israel (Go ahead, say now "B-b-b i dont support them dude, trust me bro, look at this old comment)

Second, no, he is wrong, in fact his entire comment is a fallacy. The most succesful countries in the muslim world from the 1930s to very recent days 2010s were Saudi (Almost full Islamic Law until 2015), UAE (Closer to Muslim Law than secular until recently especially with Bin Zayed), Qatar (Same as the UAE but still keeping it), Oman (Similar to Qatar but with different elements)

The most secular countries were Iraq (Baathist), Lebanon (Multicultural), Syria (Baathist), Egypt (Anti Muslim Brotherhood which won the only free election ever and were couped by the secular military one year later), etc. All of those countries were on bad shape and are still on bad shape

And then you have secular hybrids who act like muslims sometimes out of pure damage control, like Jordan, Bahrain, the Lybia of Gadaffi, Algeria, etc

He speaks of Sudan, Afghanistan and Iran, coincidentally enough 3 of the most sanctioned countries in the world, and all subjected to proxy wars like Sudan nowadays via the secular UAE, Afghanistan via the secular soviets and americans, Iran via the secular american funded Iraq in the 80s, Yemen via the secular funded soviets and afterwards via the Saudis post 2015 supported by the secular Americans, etc etc etc.

His entire argument is: "Hmmmm you dislike secularism... Why don't you go live to {Select country destroyed by secular powers} then???"

Secularism has only brought defeats to the arab world.
those countries you named are oilmaxxed,before oil they were nothing unless im wrong and you can feel free to correct me cause im no expert on the middle east
 
  • +1
Reactions: yeeyeeslayer and MaghrebGator
This is W for them, imagine falling into gynocentric hell like the west with secularism
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Modernization isn't equivalent to westernization. It seemed you have conflated both, just like @yeeyeeslayer

Is China a western country? Because they have modernised far more than anybody else in history. Even today for a country of their size they are growing at an insane rate. They did this without letting a single filthy westerner in.
Why are you worshipping chinks, bro jfl.

Have you seen how China treats its Muslim minority?
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: SecularIslamist
This will affect an extremely tiny minority. But the net saving to your society will be worth it. If someone is saying I'm not visiting Morocco because I can't dress like a slut let them. Most women know Muslim countries are more conservative even in the cities.

Anyway the shari'ah doesn't apply to non-Muslims. Facilities and services not ordinarily available to them should be.

Then idk what we are arguing about... You seem to want to acknowledge some level of cuckoldry is necessary in a globalised world. I understand where you're coming from but bowing down to secularism to achieve it isn't necessary and will slowly and incrementally turn every liberal tourist city into the same thing.
yeah thats all im arguing,some cuckery is necessary in this cuck world but i absolutely do not encourage it in any way,in fact im against it,if i could i would ban tourists ngl
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Why are you worshipping chinks, bro jfl.

Have you seen how China treats its Muslim minority?
I'm not worshiping them. But I will give credit where credit is due. They have managed to develop their economy and modernize their infrastructure without relying or giving In to West's cultural social and economic hegemony.

They have the death grip over some of these upcoming technologies. Recently overtoook he US when it comes to peer-reviewed research. They went from 3% into early 2000s to 40 + now overtaking the US. You won't ever hear in Western media talking about how this was even possible?

That kind of ascendancy is scary and I'm envious ngl. I wish a Muslim country could have this level of growth. The only ones I ever did and changed their skyline's overnight in a short span of time are cucked ones like UAE relying on tourism.

Yeah I'm aware this communist retards don't like the Muslims in their country. That's a separate issue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411 and Bomber517
I'm not worshiping them. But I will give credit where credit is due. They have managed to develop their economy and modernize their infrastructure without relying or giving In to West's cultural social and economic hegemony.

They have the death grip over some of these upcoming technologies. Recently overtoook he US when it comes to peer-reviewed research. They went from 3% into early 2000s to 40 + now overtaking the US. You won't ever hear in Western media talking about how this was even possible?

That kind of ascendancy is scary and I'm envious ngl. I wish a Muslim country could have this level of growth. The only ones I ever did and changed their skyline's overnight in a short span of time are cucked ones like UAE relying on tourism.

Yeah I'm aware this communist retards don't like the Muslims in their country. That's a separate issue.
Over for Westoids. China is a next superpower. They already developed hypersonic missiles which America is still falling behind and losing arms race.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
those countries you named are oilmaxxed,before oil they were nothing unless im wrong and you can feel free to correct me cause im no expert on the middle east
Yes, almost all of them were oil rich. However, many of the secular poor countries are also oil rich, being Iraq one of the biggest superpowers of the world in that regard.

Iran is also extremely oil rich but they are sanctioned to oblivion.

My entire point is that the entire issue stems from disobeying the words of Allah, since if we did not divide and betray ourselves we would be able to overcome any sanctions, and be stronger than any other nation in the world just like it happened during the first centuries of Islam. Allah says (Interpretation of the meaning): “And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah, and be not divided among yourselves

Allah also says (interpretation of the meaning): “And obey Allah and His Messenger, and do not dispute (with one another) lest you lose courage and your strength departs, and be patient. Surely, Allah is with those who are As-Saabiroon (the patient)”

Thawban reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Soon the nations will be summoned to you just like one is invited to a feast.” It was said, “Will we be few in that day?” The Prophet said, “No, rather you will be many in that day, but you will be scum like such flowing down a torrent. Allah will remove your esteem from the chests of your enemies, and Allah will insert feebleness in your own hearts.”

Al-Nu’man ibn Bashir reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The parable of the believers in their affection, mercy, and compassion for each other is that of a body. When any limb aches, the whole body reacts with sleeplessness and fever.”

Jubayr ibn Mut’im reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “He is not one of us who calls to tribalism. He is not one of us who fights for the sake of tribalism. He is not one of us who dies following the way of tribalism.”

It was narrated that Jundab bin 'Abdullah said: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Whoever fights for a cause that is not clear, advocating tribalism, getting angry for the sake of tribalism, then he has died a death of Jahiliyyah (Ignorance).'"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skinnycel_ and ryuken
First, we need to start from the obvious premise that @yeeyeeslayer is not a muslim, as it is evident by his stances like this particular one or his clear support for Israel (Go ahead, say now "B-b-b i dont support them dude, trust me bro, look at this old comment)
Im the biggest sympathiser with the plight of the Palestinians, ive said on many occasions that what Israel is doing in Gaza is wrong and collective punishment, and that there was no need to kill 60k. Ive condemned the fact that Israels attempt to displace the Palestinians in the West Bank and take their homes and how it's wrong and that there should be a two state solution were both jews and Palestinians live in peace. A blindly pro Israel person wouldn't say any of this.

but all I said was that Hamas are terrorists and committed atrocities and raped and killed on Oct 7.

Condemning Hamas doesn't make me pro Israel it just makes you a decent person, theyre the main ones who caused the loss of life in this war after all, even if Israels approach is wrong if oct 7 didn't happen we wouldn't be here and they have to respond somehow.

Also Im fair to Israel in that despite the bad that it does, I recognise the admirable aspects of Israel that we should try to emulate. For example, technological innovation in cybersecurity, AI and biotech. , highest number of startups in the world, agricultural advancements. many Nobel prizes etc.

That's all Ive said in regards to Israel and I don't think Im wrong anywhere here
 
Im the biggest sympathiser with the plight of the Palestinians, ive said on many occasions that what Israel is doing in Gaza is wrong and collective punishment, and that there was no need to kill 60k. Ive condemned the fact that Israels attempt to displace the Palestinians in the West Bank and take their homes and how it's wrong and that there should be a two state solution were both jews and Palestinians live in peace. A blindly pro Israel person wouldn't say any of this.

but all I said was that Hamas are terrorists and committed atrocities and raped and killed on Oct 7.

Condemning Hamas doesn't make me pro Israel it just makes you a decent person, theyre the main ones who caused the loss of life in this war after all, even if Israels approach is wrong if oct 7 didn't happen we wouldn't be here and they have to respond somehow.

Also Im fair to Israel in that despite the bad that it does, I recognise the admirable aspects of Israel that we should try to emulate. For example, technological innovation in cybersecurity, AI and biotech. , highest number of startups in the world, agricultural advancements. many Nobel prizes etc.

That's all Ive said in regards to Israel and I don't think Im wrong anywhere here
Stop playing your empty double games. No one believes you, double faced dumbass. You are probably an alt account of someone like The Grinch, because your way of being is exactly the same. Constantly passive agressive and switching sides. You suck their dick constantly, repeat their talking points like the human shield BS and then after a few threads when no one is reading you and it has no relevance, you say stuff "Muh i was just joking dude, it was sarcasm bro"

Everyone knows exactly from what foot you are limping. I recommend everyone to just look on the searcher for Israel and @yeeyeslayer

For God's sake, you literally have comments saying you "wish Israel and America destroy Iran" and "As a matter of fact if I woke up and heard that Palestine is now free and Israel is destroyed it would be the saddest day of my life"

You are the best definition of this meme, plant
GSPpbrRW8AA1s72


And why you ALWAYS SKIP THE FACT THAT ISRAEL STARTED THE VIOLENCE WAY BEFORE OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR??? WHY DON'T YOU SPEAK ABOUT THIS??? WHY DON'T YOU MENTION THIS ARTICLE BEFORE OCTOBER???
Screenshot 20241117 201130 Chrome
GBUitSvW4AASDxQ large
GD8wvnYWIAAUWmv large


OH YEAH, BECAUSE YOU ARE A PLANT AND YOUR ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE IS TO SUPPORT THIS
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: yeeyeeslayer, ryuken and Zone7411
Yes, almost all of them were oil rich. However, many of the secular poor countries are also oil rich, being Iraq one of the biggest superpowers of the world in that regard.

Iran is also extremely oil rich but they are sanctioned to oblivion.

My entire point is that the entire issue stems from disobeying the words of Allah, since if we did not divide and betray ourselves we would be able to overcome any sanctions, and be stronger than any other nation in the world just like it happened during the first centuries of Islam. Allah says (Interpretation of the meaning): “And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah, and be not divided among yourselves

Allah also says (interpretation of the meaning): “And obey Allah and His Messenger, and do not dispute (with one another) lest you lose courage and your strength departs, and be patient. Surely, Allah is with those who are As-Saabiroon (the patient)”

Thawban reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Soon the nations will be summoned to you just like one is invited to a feast.” It was said, “Will we be few in that day?” The Prophet said, “No, rather you will be many in that day, but you will be scum like such flowing down a torrent. Allah will remove your esteem from the chests of your enemies, and Allah will insert feebleness in your own hearts.”

Al-Nu’man ibn Bashir reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The parable of the believers in their affection, mercy, and compassion for each other is that of a body. When any limb aches, the whole body reacts with sleeplessness and fever.”

Jubayr ibn Mut’im reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “He is not one of us who calls to tribalism. He is not one of us who fights for the sake of tribalism. He is not one of us who dies following the way of tribalism.”

It was narrated that Jundab bin 'Abdullah said: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Whoever fights for a cause that is not clear, advocating tribalism, getting angry for the sake of tribalism, then he has died a death of Jahiliyyah (Ignorance).'"
well yeah thats definetly true,if we were united again we wouldnt need to modernmaxx and we wouldnt have to give a shit about other powerful nations worldwide or their trash morality
 
Stop playing your empty double games. No one believes you, double faced dumbass. You are probably an alt account of someone like The Grinch, because your way of being is exactly the same. Constantly passive agressive and switching sides.
Ill admit ive been immature in the past an said some insensitive shit to be edgy but I stopped saying fucked up shit in jest
You suck their dick constantly, repeat their talking points like the human shield BS and then after a few threads when no one is reading you and it has no relevance, you say stuff "Muh i was just joking dude, it was sarcasm bro"
the human shields thing is true, they have tunnels under civilian infrastructure such that it intentionally puts civilians in harms way

and I even remember hearing a video about a Hamas leader which said on video that this is their form of jihad to make these sacrifices in their civilian population (I cant remember where it is now) while they become rich in Qatar and steal billions from the Palestinian population
Everyone knows exactly from what foot you are limping. I recommend everyone to just look on the searcher for Israel and @yeeyeslayer

For God's sake, you literally have comments saying you "wish Israel and America destroy Iran"
I said that in response to an atheist Iranian saying he hopes Israel destroys Iraq not because I really meant it
and "As a matter of fact if I woke up and heard that Palestine is now free and Israel is destroyed it would be the saddest day of my life"
I ask allah to forgive me,

again ive been immature and ive said edgy shit I don't deny it but why don't you highlight the good I say for example here :
Screenshot 2024 11 17 at 192249


in response to an OP which said this :

Screenshot 2024 11 17 at 192304

You are the best definition of this meme, plant
View attachment 3301377

And why you ALWAYS SKIP THE FACT THAT ISRAEL STARTED THE VIOLENCE WAY BEFORE OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR??? WHY DON'T YOU SPEAK ABOUT THIS??? WHY DON'T YOU MENTION THIS ARTICLE BEFORE OCTOBER???
View attachment 3301393View attachment 3301397View attachment 3301399

OH YEAH, BECAUSE YOU ARE A PLANT AND YOUR ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE IS TO SUPPORT THIS

I never denied that Israel kills civilians and takes their homes and tried to displace them bro can you not read I said it's bad.

" Ive condemned the fact that Israels attempt to displace the Palestinians in the West Bank and take their homes and how it's wrong and that there should be a two state solution "

difference between me and you is that im not blindly anti semetic and that I criticise the Palestinian side where criticism is due and don't turn a blind eye to any terrorism that might come out of their groups.
 
Last edited:
those countries you named are oilmaxxed,before oil they were nothing unless im wrong and you can feel free to correct me cause im no expert on the middle east
no you're right
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skinnycel_

Similar threads

Deleted member 11406
Replies
24
Views
4K
riju77
R

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top