“Beauty is subjective”

9cel

9cel

Pump and dump=law
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Posts
1,111
Reputation
1,290
just look at how fucking braindead the people are that are saying this shit
IMG 5814

“short is the beauty standard in england”
Funny GIF



anyway being tanned or being pale is not the “beauty standard” they are personal subjective preferences, with a prerequisite of having good facial bones and foward grown maxilla, that is the middle ground between these “beauty standards” being tanned or pale in different countries will do no shit if ur a sub5 with a recessed infra orbitals, people like this are genuinely braindead
 
  • +1
Reactions: micropp, WeiWei, Madridista and 4 others
just look at how fucking braindead the people are that are saying this shitView attachment 2986019
“short is the beauty standard in england”
Funny GIF



anyway being tanned or being pale is not the “beauty standard” they are personal subjective preferences, with a prerequisite of having good facial bones and foward grown maxilla, that is the middle ground between these “beauty standards” being tanned or pale in different countries will do no shit if ur a sub5 with a recessed infra orbitals, people like this are genuinely braindead
hate these copers so much
 
I am so confused when she is talking about the height part
 
beauty is subjective after ltb. beauty is objective after ltn
 
beauty is unmeasurable, means it can not be objective
retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
Beauty is not subjective, however people absolutely do have preferences. For example some women like good looking jocks, but others might like good looking emos, or good looking guys with long hair, or good looking gamers, good looking twinks, good looking guys with blonde hair, etc.


In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
Beauty is not subjective, however people absolutely do have preferences. For example some women like good looking jocks, but others might like good looking emos, or good looking guys with long hair, or good looking gamers, good looking twinks, good looking guys with blonde hair, etc.


In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults
beauty is objective, attraction is subjective, not sure why this needs to be said so much. in some places the females have overinflated high standards while women in my country will get fucked by any guy, it reminds me when my oneitis got a bf wasnt a htn+ or even a normie it was this ugly mess ntfag
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
just look at how fucking braindead the people are that are saying this shitView attachment 2986019
“short is the beauty standard in england”
Funny GIF



anyway being tanned or being pale is not the “beauty standard” they are personal subjective preferences, with a prerequisite of having good facial bones and foward grown maxilla, that is the middle ground between these “beauty standards” being tanned or pale in different countries will do no shit if ur a sub5 with a recessed infra orbitals, people like this are genuinely braindead
Precision is subjective, which is why after HTN looks becomes very subjective.

There's a general preference for tall men, but exactly how tall is subjective. Some women want 6'0, other want 6'5
Women want low bodyfat, high muscle mass. But exact amount is subjective. Some women want Chris Hemsworth peak roids, others want Tom Hiddleston or Jude Law at his likely natty peak.

Racial preferences vary wildly. I've met women that are only attracted to black guys, only attracted to white guys, and only attracted to asian guys.

Good skin and Hair is universally attractive.

Exactly how important different features are vary wildly. Some girls are just a fan of tall guys, others of buff guys, others of facemaxed guys, and they'll rate men with those qualities differetly than other women. If you're in the top 1% of height, face, or muscle mass, you're some girls niche.

Facial shape is mostly objective, but not entirely. For both men and women, different people have a different preferences on nose shape (adapted for different climates).

You can't have signs of mutation or low health, or physical weakness.
 
1718640253864
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 6ft4 and future slavic chad
The pale and tan skin that they like
IMG 3111
IMG 3110
 

Similar threads

Xangsane
Replies
201
Views
2K
Lawarcel
Lawarcel
Xangsane
Replies
144
Views
968
Xangsane
Xangsane
9cel
Replies
13
Views
647
Deleted member 68446
D
D
Replies
3
Views
258
mrdouchebag
mrdouchebag

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top