Sloppyseconds
Onlysloppy2nds4u
- Joined
- May 24, 2020
- Posts
- 58
- Reputation
- 400
Chaos cucks order
“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain” was the first thing I thought of when I wrote the title. (When I mean "kind", I don't mean "nice guy" but rather a state of neutrality). Previously in my megathread, I talked about being cucked by this ultra low-inhib asian guy in glasses who posted himself dressed in a maid outfit, where being a “negging asshole” actually worked in his favour and led to my virgin oneitis gravitating towards him. When I was still talking to her, she often told me about this guy harassing and talking down on her. And when she finally cut me out, she did a 180 and started hanging out with this dude regularly.
looksmax.org
Even though they were just “friends”, he kept making sexually objectifying comments towards her on a college Discord server. Yet none of the admins did anything and even shipped them together. The part that still baffles me to this day is that the admins were all women, yet they did nothing to shut down such behaviour from him (no he was the furthest thing from chad). I thought those shitlib feminists were supposed to be pros at this kind of stuff. It’s almost like the admins saw such an example as what they want out of a relationship. The collective irrationality of those people pushed me to the point where I felt like having a stroke.
“That asian guy just mogged you and she was just upgrading”. Firstly no, unironically I mog that guy because at least I don’t have a face that is as flat as a clothing iron, nor do I have a Jay Leno chin. Using the same logic, Tom Brady’s ex-wife must’ve also “upgraded” too with that random jiu-jitsu instructor. If he mogged me I wouldn’t even be writing all this since it’d be water. “That guy just had more rizz than you”. No, fuck you. All that guy did was neg her by continuously addressing her as “roach” for over a year and somehow she fell into it. If that is “rizz” then I take pride in having no “rizz”. My theory was that there was an element of tokenism at play here. Perhaps the female admins needed a token “edgy neurodivergent ethnic 4chan femboy” to make their server look as “inclusive” as possible. That guy did go against every typical asian stereotype, so it must’ve made the admins see him as some “exotic beast” that must be preserved. But if you’re just another native normie with a “treat others how you want to be treated” modus operandi, you’re seen as too "boring" and every “mistake” you make will be magnified. When you’re the only reasonable person in a circle of fatherless lunatics, you become the “freak”. I suppose that’s their own version of “morality” after pushing my “empathy” to its utmost limits to "understand" them.
Your first impression dictates your expressive freedom
I’ve noticed that people are extremely good at detecting change, no matter if they’re a genius or a subhuman retard. Between something that moves and something inert, I think it’s quite obvious what will catch your attention more. That asian guy already acted ultra low-inhib and edgy from day 1, perhaps making it easier for them to accept such behaviour and eventually get conditioned to it. Perhaps they thought “he’s fucked in the head, he probs doesn’t know any better”. It's somewhat similar to how underperforming students or “special needs” kids are given preferential treatment. They then have a “we don’t need to worry about those people” attitude towards the well above-average students because those students “know better”.
In my high school friend group, there’s this one guy who was jestermaxxed and every person there agreed that the guy was a self-centred asshat. If you were to injure yourself in front of them, instead of trying to help you, he’d be the type of guy to laugh in your face about it and turn it into a meme. Yet no one there actually confronted them about it. They’ll just be like “John is just being John”. Why are they excusing his behaviour? Because that’s the way he’s been since day 1. “It’s just in his nature”. “He doesn’t know better. But you should and therefore shouldn’t ever act like him”. “B-but maybe you just got mogged again”. Unironically I mogged that guy too, but mogging someone doesn’t automatically grant you chad treatment unless you’re literally chad level. Guys in the normie range all think they have chances of out-competing one another.
All things equal while keeping in mind that women are tempted by dark-triad behaviour, my key theory as to why the female admins tolerated that asian guy’s behaviour is this:
It’s like socializing is a movie or sitcom and we all have “roles” that we've subconsciously assigned to one another to play and stick to. If we ain’t our usual selves, we get accused of stepping out of line and not playing our “role” properly. But it seems to me that the “asshole” role has the most expressive freedom. You don’t even need to be a “nice guy” nowadays for it to be cucked. Just being a reasonable person is enough for it to be cucked since it leads to people in your social circle seeing you as the group “therapist”, or the one who “knows better”. When you try to join in their shit-talking, they’ll start to think what has become of you.
I remember being confronted by one of my friends for being an “asshole”, even though what I did was join in with their shit-talking, saying the exact type of shit they did back at them. Besides I don’t think what I flung at them would’ve been any worse than them posting “hope you die of cancer” on my Facebook profile during my birthdays and thinking it’s “peak comedy”. It's like they metaphorically nailed me on a cross and had to “die” for their "sins".
Despite all this bullshit I still see kindness itself in a vacuum as something commendable. But it’s just not something I see as sustainable from a pragmatic basis. Kindness inevitably makes you vulnerable to being taken advantage of or that’ll place you in a disadvantaged position. I’m not saying that to be “kind” only to reap benefits, but rather as an exuberance of being, something you don’t even think of consciously, not exhibiting needless cruelty to people who never wronged you. It should be as easy as inaction itself. However, if it’s with a bunch of people that you only plan to associate with short-term, then I suppose it makes sense to go down the dark-triad route just to avoid being cucked.
Aside from having to cater to the ideals of others, there’s no easy countermeasure to such bullshit and cognitive dissonance other than having the willingness to walk away when things aren’t going your way. There’s inevitably going to be disparities in the understanding of cause and effect exhibited between individuals whether it’s due to low sentience, intelligence or just straight-up psychopathy. Most people do not “keep score” and think that time itself absolves everything they’ve done. These are not “bugs” but an ineradicable, albeit flawed “feature” of humans. Also happy new year, I’d be surprised if I could write at least one thread every month for the entirety of the year.
TL;DR:
Tags: @TiktokUser @Darkeningstar @bloomercel @autistic_tendencies @Clown Show @Chadeep @h111 @ihearvoices @Spookybah @narcomogs @Lawarcel @Gaia262 @incel194012940
“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain” was the first thing I thought of when I wrote the title. (When I mean "kind", I don't mean "nice guy" but rather a state of neutrality). Previously in my megathread, I talked about being cucked by this ultra low-inhib asian guy in glasses who posted himself dressed in a maid outfit, where being a “negging asshole” actually worked in his favour and led to my virgin oneitis gravitating towards him. When I was still talking to her, she often told me about this guy harassing and talking down on her. And when she finally cut me out, she did a 180 and started hanging out with this dude regularly.
How I fully embraced the blackpill (MEGATHREAD + COMPILATION)
Intro Shoutout to @emeraldglass for prompting me to write this thread after he broke my profile’s hymen to ask why I basically never posted this whole time since 2020. Although he seems to have gone MIA ever since. Looks like I got pumped n dumped and @greycel got his sloppy seconds. I made...
looksmax.org
Even though they were just “friends”, he kept making sexually objectifying comments towards her on a college Discord server. Yet none of the admins did anything and even shipped them together. The part that still baffles me to this day is that the admins were all women, yet they did nothing to shut down such behaviour from him (no he was the furthest thing from chad). I thought those shitlib feminists were supposed to be pros at this kind of stuff. It’s almost like the admins saw such an example as what they want out of a relationship. The collective irrationality of those people pushed me to the point where I felt like having a stroke.
“That asian guy just mogged you and she was just upgrading”. Firstly no, unironically I mog that guy because at least I don’t have a face that is as flat as a clothing iron, nor do I have a Jay Leno chin. Using the same logic, Tom Brady’s ex-wife must’ve also “upgraded” too with that random jiu-jitsu instructor. If he mogged me I wouldn’t even be writing all this since it’d be water. “That guy just had more rizz than you”. No, fuck you. All that guy did was neg her by continuously addressing her as “roach” for over a year and somehow she fell into it. If that is “rizz” then I take pride in having no “rizz”. My theory was that there was an element of tokenism at play here. Perhaps the female admins needed a token “edgy neurodivergent ethnic 4chan femboy” to make their server look as “inclusive” as possible. That guy did go against every typical asian stereotype, so it must’ve made the admins see him as some “exotic beast” that must be preserved. But if you’re just another native normie with a “treat others how you want to be treated” modus operandi, you’re seen as too "boring" and every “mistake” you make will be magnified. When you’re the only reasonable person in a circle of fatherless lunatics, you become the “freak”. I suppose that’s their own version of “morality” after pushing my “empathy” to its utmost limits to "understand" them.
Your first impression dictates your expressive freedom
I’ve noticed that people are extremely good at detecting change, no matter if they’re a genius or a subhuman retard. Between something that moves and something inert, I think it’s quite obvious what will catch your attention more. That asian guy already acted ultra low-inhib and edgy from day 1, perhaps making it easier for them to accept such behaviour and eventually get conditioned to it. Perhaps they thought “he’s fucked in the head, he probs doesn’t know any better”. It's somewhat similar to how underperforming students or “special needs” kids are given preferential treatment. They then have a “we don’t need to worry about those people” attitude towards the well above-average students because those students “know better”.
In my high school friend group, there’s this one guy who was jestermaxxed and every person there agreed that the guy was a self-centred asshat. If you were to injure yourself in front of them, instead of trying to help you, he’d be the type of guy to laugh in your face about it and turn it into a meme. Yet no one there actually confronted them about it. They’ll just be like “John is just being John”. Why are they excusing his behaviour? Because that’s the way he’s been since day 1. “It’s just in his nature”. “He doesn’t know better. But you should and therefore shouldn’t ever act like him”. “B-but maybe you just got mogged again”. Unironically I mogged that guy too, but mogging someone doesn’t automatically grant you chad treatment unless you’re literally chad level. Guys in the normie range all think they have chances of out-competing one another.
All things equal while keeping in mind that women are tempted by dark-triad behaviour, my key theory as to why the female admins tolerated that asian guy’s behaviour is this:
| I noticed that an "asshole" is far more likely to get away with being an "asshole" if the first impression they leave is of an "asshole". Every “mistake” they make will just be accepted as being the average Tuesday for them. Hence hardly anyone will make a fuss about it. But a person who is an “asshole” from day 1 has seemingly infinite room to “improve” as a person. Any personality changes they undergo can only be “positive” and is seen as them “making an effort”. If you try to call out the “asshole”, people around you might tell you, “At least he’s trying to be a better person unlike you! It takes a lot of self-awareness to make changes in ourselves!”. After all, we all love “redemption” stories. But a “kind” person (not to be confused with “nice guy”) can’t get away with being an "asshole" if their first impression is being “kind”. A person who acts “righteous” from day 1 basically has no more room to “improve” and can only “descend” from then onwards. Every “mistake” they make will be amplified, making them seem like a bigger “asshole” than the person who’s always an "asshole". There’s no more room for “redemption” for them. They don’t really ever notice their "kindness", only their “descent” and that they've "fallen off". They’ll have all the moral burdens placed onto their shoulders. It’s like you then become the “Jesus” and the scapegoat for the “sins” of your social circle. That’s why you “never appear too perfect” otherwise you might end up cucking yourself. In the 4B movement, the husbands/bfs of women who stuck with them through thick and thin often fall under this category. Those guys are probably the biggest “casualties” of such movement. |
It’s like socializing is a movie or sitcom and we all have “roles” that we've subconsciously assigned to one another to play and stick to. If we ain’t our usual selves, we get accused of stepping out of line and not playing our “role” properly. But it seems to me that the “asshole” role has the most expressive freedom. You don’t even need to be a “nice guy” nowadays for it to be cucked. Just being a reasonable person is enough for it to be cucked since it leads to people in your social circle seeing you as the group “therapist”, or the one who “knows better”. When you try to join in their shit-talking, they’ll start to think what has become of you.
I remember being confronted by one of my friends for being an “asshole”, even though what I did was join in with their shit-talking, saying the exact type of shit they did back at them. Besides I don’t think what I flung at them would’ve been any worse than them posting “hope you die of cancer” on my Facebook profile during my birthdays and thinking it’s “peak comedy”. It's like they metaphorically nailed me on a cross and had to “die” for their "sins".
Despite all this bullshit I still see kindness itself in a vacuum as something commendable. But it’s just not something I see as sustainable from a pragmatic basis. Kindness inevitably makes you vulnerable to being taken advantage of or that’ll place you in a disadvantaged position. I’m not saying that to be “kind” only to reap benefits, but rather as an exuberance of being, something you don’t even think of consciously, not exhibiting needless cruelty to people who never wronged you. It should be as easy as inaction itself. However, if it’s with a bunch of people that you only plan to associate with short-term, then I suppose it makes sense to go down the dark-triad route just to avoid being cucked.
Aside from having to cater to the ideals of others, there’s no easy countermeasure to such bullshit and cognitive dissonance other than having the willingness to walk away when things aren’t going your way. There’s inevitably going to be disparities in the understanding of cause and effect exhibited between individuals whether it’s due to low sentience, intelligence or just straight-up psychopathy. Most people do not “keep score” and think that time itself absolves everything they’ve done. These are not “bugs” but an ineradicable, albeit flawed “feature” of humans. Also happy new year, I’d be surprised if I could write at least one thread every month for the entirety of the year.
TL;DR:
Talked about getting cucked by an asian femboy who might’ve actually been successful in negging my virgin oneitis through Discord. The guy acted dismissively and often made sexually objectifying remarks towards her. Even though the admins were all women, they did nothing about it, even though I had the impression that these shitlib feminists were supposed to be pros at cancelling people. Perhaps the female admins needed a token “edgy neurodivergent ethnic 4chan femboy” to make their server look as “inclusive” as possible.
I theorized that an asshole is far more likely to get away with being an asshole if the first impression they leave is of an asshole. Such first impression makes it seem like there is infinite room for them to “improve” as a person, and any personality changes they undergo can only be “positive”. But a “kind” guy can’t get away with being an asshole if their first impression is a “kind” guy. A person who acts “righteous” from day 1 basically has no more room to “improve” and can only “descend” from then onwards. Every “mistake” they make will be amplified, making them seem like a bigger “asshole” than the person who’s always an asshole.
Aside from having to cater to the ideals of others, there’s no easy countermeasure to such bullshit and cognitive dissonance other than having the willingness to walk away when things aren’t going your way. Continuously cultivating an abundance mentality is the only way to take this in your stride. These are not bugs but a feature of human psychology.
I theorized that an asshole is far more likely to get away with being an asshole if the first impression they leave is of an asshole. Such first impression makes it seem like there is infinite room for them to “improve” as a person, and any personality changes they undergo can only be “positive”. But a “kind” guy can’t get away with being an asshole if their first impression is a “kind” guy. A person who acts “righteous” from day 1 basically has no more room to “improve” and can only “descend” from then onwards. Every “mistake” they make will be amplified, making them seem like a bigger “asshole” than the person who’s always an asshole.
Aside from having to cater to the ideals of others, there’s no easy countermeasure to such bullshit and cognitive dissonance other than having the willingness to walk away when things aren’t going your way. Continuously cultivating an abundance mentality is the only way to take this in your stride. These are not bugs but a feature of human psychology.
Tags: @TiktokUser @Darkeningstar @bloomercel @autistic_tendencies @Clown Show @Chadeep @h111 @ihearvoices @Spookybah @narcomogs @Lawarcel @Gaia262 @incel194012940
Last edited:
