illusion
Forefront of the Anti-Rotter Movement
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
- Posts
- 970
- Reputation
- 3,512
Height is an important feature however it is not a main feature (only the face is) therefore height is counted as a halo. It amplifies what’s already there.
Generally an MTN is considered to be a mediocre/somewhat above average guy and height, being a halo, will amplify their attractiveness, as they are already perceived as “handsome” to a degree (although not significant and it is possible to be MTN and not be viewed as handsome although rare and depends on features.)
However being anything below MTN is where you’re viewed as bad looking/below average. Height in these ratings will not act as a halo but as a pedestal for your bad looks. It’s like going on a big stage for everyone to see how unideal your ratios are. You will almost always be seen as a lanklet (tall people are rarely noticeably jacked, most “tall jacked guys” are sub 6’0 and lying about their height.)
This information comes out of what I’ve seen and experienced first hand. Height will not save you if you are already below average even a little. Stop coping with your manletism, no matter how mad this gets your napoleonic syndrome, I promise you your oneitis will view you as equally as invisible if you were tall. Fix your face before trying to blame something you have no control over to try and shift the blame off of yourself for being unattractive.
@cryptt @Jgns @islaymtbs I hope this answers your question.
Inb4 some iqlet comments a photo of a tall LTN dating a model as if 1 case beats reality jfl. It won’t, you aren’t rich, famous, or with good connections. Also models don’t count because they’re mentalcels almost 100% of the time and controlled by the agency they’re signed to. DNR.
Generally an MTN is considered to be a mediocre/somewhat above average guy and height, being a halo, will amplify their attractiveness, as they are already perceived as “handsome” to a degree (although not significant and it is possible to be MTN and not be viewed as handsome although rare and depends on features.)
However being anything below MTN is where you’re viewed as bad looking/below average. Height in these ratings will not act as a halo but as a pedestal for your bad looks. It’s like going on a big stage for everyone to see how unideal your ratios are. You will almost always be seen as a lanklet (tall people are rarely noticeably jacked, most “tall jacked guys” are sub 6’0 and lying about their height.)
This information comes out of what I’ve seen and experienced first hand. Height will not save you if you are already below average even a little. Stop coping with your manletism, no matter how mad this gets your napoleonic syndrome, I promise you your oneitis will view you as equally as invisible if you were tall. Fix your face before trying to blame something you have no control over to try and shift the blame off of yourself for being unattractive.
@cryptt @Jgns @islaymtbs I hope this answers your question.
Inb4 some iqlet comments a photo of a tall LTN dating a model as if 1 case beats reality jfl. It won’t, you aren’t rich, famous, or with good connections. Also models don’t count because they’re mentalcels almost 100% of the time and controlled by the agency they’re signed to. DNR.
Last edited:
