Alucard69
Kraken
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2024
- Posts
- 4,570
- Reputation
- 5,470
Genuinely best eye area if not morphed, only blue eyes could improve tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Looks retarded
Way too low pfh-pfl ratio
Cope morelol hes wearing excessive makeup to fraud
Idk not in my opinionLooks retarded
Way too low pfh-pfl ratio
He's half ethnic, but prolly still does maybe, softmaxxing brows/lashes is such a good looksmax tbh.lol hes wearing excessive makeup to fraud
Idk bro it looks pretty retardedCope more
In my opinion it doesn't look retarded, low averageness, but to me still ideal.Idk bro it looks pretty retarded
I guess he can blame his fingoloid genes for that
If it was legit, it'd literally be one of the best, atleast in my opinionNot even top 1 million
He's half finn so basically a gookit gets too a point where its too much
his pfl is way too high proportional to fucking everything makes him look uncanny and shit
he looks gook aswell
Yeah i thought about it, does he morph his PFL or what?Saw him on tiktok before he wiped most of his videos & it's all fraud.
its a filter im pretty sureYeah i thought about it, does he morph his eyes or what?
Yeah it's frauded apparently, but wearing makeup/mascara and or upturning lashes can be a good looksmax tbhits a filter im pretty sure
plus he is wearing makeup to fraud higher perceived pfl
same way that nigga bass does it
Angle fraud + filter + makeupIf it was legit, it'd literally be one of the best, atleast in my opinion
He's half finn so basically a gook
Yeah i thought about it, does he morph his PFL or what?
It gets to a point where ur frauding too much tho..Yeah it's frauded apparently, but wearing makeup/mascara and or upturning lashes can be a good looksmax tbh
Sure it canIt gets to a point where ur frauding too much tho..
It's frauded apparently with filters and whatnot, but he's a fingoloid. Compact eyes are ideal anyway imo, and upper eyelid exposure to the point of eyelashes showingching chong bing bong
more of a good thing doesn't make it better, this is too compact and looks like a korean with a birth defect.It's frauded apparently with filters and whatnot, but he's a fingoloid. Compact eyes are ideal anyway imo, and upper eyelid exposure to the point of eyelashes showing
Genuinely best eye area if not morphed, only blue eyes could improve tbh
Nah, lashes and brows make it less autisticmore of a good thing doesn't make it better, this is too compact and looks like a korean with a birth defect.
even my eyes look less asian and I pass as native in kazakhstan.
Not squinting, but bunch of fillers and stuff like that yeah, it's fraudedIt's fake lol, probably filters and squinting like he's about to take the biggest dump in his life
anime characters are inspired by japanese people, who are genetically indistinguishable from korean farmers.
Yeah, but it doesn't look gooky, just vertically narrow eyes. Lots of characters are drawn with more narrow eyes, to create a more mysterious and alluring appearance. Asians have low PFL, monolids and no lashes etc..anime characters are inspired by japanese people, who are genetically indistinguishable from korean farmers.
Gigafrauded, but not squinting reallyNot Frauding right, just squinting and stare at the camera like a retard
Asians have low PFL, monolids and no lashes etc..
Authors | Year | Number | Population | PFW (mm) | PFH (mm) | PFI (ç) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | F | M | F | M | F | ||||
Park et al.17 | 1990 | M-1,078,F-1,073 | Koreans | 29.7 | 28.4 | - | - | 9.5 | 10.6 |
Cho et al.21 | 1993 | M- 750,F -750 | Asians | 34.2 | 33.4 | 8.06 | 8.03 | - | - |
Farkas et al.16 | 1994 | M-52,F-51 | North American white | 31.2 | 30.7 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 2.1 | 4.1 |
Barretto et al.19 | 1999 | T-61 | Black (American) | 32.34 | 31.46 | 9.84 | 10.56 | - | - |
Barretto et al19 | 1999 | T-65 | White (American) | 29.51 | 29.4 | 10.25 | 10.65 | - | - |
Bozkir et al.15 | 2003 | M-228,F-272 | Turkish | 32.6 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.4 | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Egyptians | 31.5 | 30.8 | - | - | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Indians | 30.2 | 31.3 | - | - | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Iranian | 37.2 | 24.4 | - | - | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Japanese | 30.7 | 29.2 | - | - | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Singaporean Chinese | 29.4 | 28.4 | - | - | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Turkish | 30.6 | 29.8 | - | - | - | - |
Farkas et al.8 | 2005 | M-30,F-30 | Vietnamese | 29.1 | 29.2 | - | - | - | - |
Kunjur et al.1 | 2005 | M-13,F-13 | Chinese | 28.8 | 26.8 | 9.5 | 10.6 | 3 | 4 |
Kunjur et al.1 | 2005 | M-13,F-13 | Indians | 30.3 | 28.2 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 2.7 | 1.2 |
Kunjur et al.1 | 2005 | M-13,F-13 | Whites | 27.6 | 26.5 | 10.2 | 9.8 | 2.7 | 5.7 |
Park et al.3 | 2008 | M-234,F-264 | Asians | 27 | 26.8 | 8 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 8.8 |
Takahagi et al.12 | 2008 | T-114 | Japanese | 25.21 | 24.99 | 9.23 | 9.1 | 6.62 | 7.8 |
Takahagi et al.12 | 2008 | T-107 | Nikkei’s | 24.87 | 23.63 | 6.86 | 8.84 | 7.13 | 6.11 |
Ngeow et al.11 | 2009 | M-50,F-50 | Malays | 29.5 | 28.7 | 10.2 | 10 | - | - |
Ngeow et al.10 | 2009 | M-50,F-50 | Malaysian Indians | 30.7 | 29.6 | 10.1 | 10.5 | - | - |
Price et al.9 | 2009 | M-33,F-56 | Africans (American) | 27.5 | 27 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 3.9 | 6 |
Price et al.9 | 2009 | M-33,F-56 | Whites (American) | 26.7 | 27.2 | 9.4 | 10.3 | 3.6 | 5.8 |
Oladipo et al.13 | 2010 | M-500,F-500 | Ijaws(Nigeria) | 38.1 | 36 | - | - | - | - |
Preechawai14 | 2011 | M-51,F-50 | Thais | 30.4 | 27.3 | 9.5 | 9.5 | - | - |
Our study | | | South Indians | 31.08 | 29.90 | 11.30 | 11.58 | 5.05 | 6.10 |
Middle easterners bumping numbers up, east asians on this have lower than europeans, japenese have giga low at 25Table 3
Compilation of palpebral fissure parameters of various population.
M: male; F: female; T: total; PFW: palpebral fissure width; PFH: palpebral fissure height; PFI: palpebral fissure inclination.
Authors Year Number Population PFW (mm) PFH (mm) PFI (ç) M F M F M F Park et al.17 1990 M-1,078,F-1,073 Koreans 29.7 28.4 - - 9.5 10.6 Cho et al.21 1993 M- 750,F -750 Asians 34.2 33.4 8.06 8.03 - - Farkas et al.16 1994 M-52,F-51 North American white 31.2 30.7 10.4 11.1 2.1 4.1 Barretto et al.19 1999 T-61 Black (American) 32.34 31.46 9.84 10.56 - - Barretto et al19 1999 T-65 White (American) 29.51 29.4 10.25 10.65 - - Bozkir et al.15 2003 M-228,F-272 Turkish 32.6 31 10.3 10.4 - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Egyptians 31.5 30.8 - - - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Indians 30.2 31.3 - - - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Iranian 37.2 24.4 - - - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Japanese 30.7 29.2 - - - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Singaporean Chinese 29.4 28.4 - - - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Turkish 30.6 29.8 - - - - Farkas et al.8 2005 M-30,F-30 Vietnamese 29.1 29.2 - - - - Kunjur et al.1 2005 M-13,F-13 Chinese 28.8 26.8 9.5 10.6 3 4 Kunjur et al.1 2005 M-13,F-13 Indians 30.3 28.2 10.5 10.7 2.7 1.2 Kunjur et al.1 2005 M-13,F-13 Whites 27.6 26.5 10.2 9.8 2.7 5.7 Park et al.3 2008 M-234,F-264 Asians 27 26.8 8 8.2 7.9 8.8 Takahagi et al.12 2008 T-114 Japanese 25.21 24.99 9.23 9.1 6.62 7.8 Takahagi et al.12 2008 T-107 Nikkei’s 24.87 23.63 6.86 8.84 7.13 6.11 Ngeow et al.11 2009 M-50,F-50 Malays 29.5 28.7 10.2 10 - - Ngeow et al.10 2009 M-50,F-50 Malaysian Indians 30.7 29.6 10.1 10.5 - - Price et al.9 2009 M-33,F-56 Africans (American) 27.5 27 9.8 9.5 3.9 6 Price et al.9 2009 M-33,F-56 Whites (American) 26.7 27.2 9.4 10.3 3.6 5.8 Oladipo et al.13 2010 M-500,F-500 Ijaws(Nigeria) 38.1 36 - - - - Preechawai14 2011 M-51,F-50 Thais 30.4 27.3 9.5 9.5 - - Our study South Indians 31.08 29.90 11.30 11.58 5.05 6.10
most asians don't have particularly narrow eyes compared to europeans.
japanese are in it twice, they were measured 30.7 and 25.21.Middle easterners bumping numbers up, east asians on this have lower than europeans, japenese have giga low at 25
Ok you are right probably, but 'asians' is too broad of a term. Also yeah asian bizygo widths are huge, which effectively makes their FW to PFL higher, and it's all about relativity anyway tbh. Monolids also decrease perceived PFL further (lack of eyelashes and upper eyelid not extending with that).japanese are in it twice, they were measured 30.7 and 25.21.
europeans are also in it several times, so are africans, and also the highest measurement among these studies at 34.2 was in asians.
their eyes look small because their cheekbones protrude sideways rather than forwards like they do in europeans, which makes their heads rather wide looking, and that makes the eyes look narrower.